Abstract
According to the Democratic Stability Argument, since currently existing democratic states are overwhelmingly likely to play a leading role in the establishment of a just cosmopolitan order, should one ever be established, there are moral reasons to take measures that are necessary to preserve the adequate functioning of these states. If large-scale immigration can undermine their adequate functioning, then immigration restrictions are justified even from a cosmopolitan perspective, under non-ideal conditions. This paper argues that this argument may not succeed in justifying immigration restrictions under current conditions. Properly understood, the problem involves the competing claims of current poor admission-seekers and of the global poorest at some point in the future, i. e. the earliest feasible date of the establishment of the cosmopolitan order. The paper invokes normative arguments suggesting that the claims of the poorest in the distant future do not have lexical priority as a matter of principle. It also argues that available empirical estimates imply that the claims of admission-seekers in the present and near future potentially outcompete the claims of the poorest in the distant future. These considerations point towards a specification of the Democratic Stability Argument rather than to its complete rejection.
References
Blake, M. (2001). ‘Distributive Justice, State Coercion, and Autonomy’, Philosophy & Public Affairs 30: 257–296.10.1111/j.1088-4963.2001.00257.xSearch in Google Scholar
Blake, M. (2013). ‘Immigration, Jurisdiction, and Exclusion’, Philosophy and Public Affairs 41 (2): 103–13010.1111/papa.12012Search in Google Scholar
Broome, J. (1994). ‘Discounting the Future’, Philosophy & Public Affairs 23 (2): 128–156.10.1111/j.1088-4963.1994.tb00008.xSearch in Google Scholar
Broome, J. (2008). ‘The Ethics of Climate Change’, Scientific American 298 (6): 96–102.10.1038/scientificamerican0608-96Search in Google Scholar
Caney, S. (2006). ‘Cosmopolitan Justice and Institutional Design: An Egalitarian Liberal Conception of Global Governance’, Social Theory and Practice 32 (4): 725–756.10.5840/soctheorpract200632437Search in Google Scholar
Caney, S. (2001). ‘Cosmopolitan Justice and Equalizing Opportunities’, Metaphilosophy 32: 113–134.10.4324/9781315254210-8Search in Google Scholar
Carens, J. (2013). The Ethics of Immigration (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Search in Google Scholar
Christiano, T. (2008). ‘Immigration, Political Community, and Cosmopolitanism’, San Diego Law Review 45: 933–961.Search in Google Scholar
Cowen, T. and Parfit, D. (1992). ‘Against the Social Discount Rate’, in Laslett, P. and Fishkin, J.S. (eds.), Justice Between Age Groups and Generations (New Haven: Yale University Press), pp. 144–161.Search in Google Scholar
Funke, M., Schularick, M. and Trebesch, C. (2015). ‘Going to Extremes: Politics after Financial Crises, 1870-2014’, London, Centre for Economic Policy Research. http://www.cepr.org/active/publications/discussion_papers/dp.php?dpno=10884 (accessed on September 8, 2016).Search in Google Scholar
Goodin, R. (1988). ‘What Is so Special about Our Fellow Countrymen’? Ethics 98 (4): 663–686.10.1017/CBO9780511625053.017Search in Google Scholar
Keohane, R.O. (2005). After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).Search in Google Scholar
Laegaard, S. (2010). ‘What is the Right to Exclude Immigrants?,’ Res Publica 16 (3): 245–262.10.1007/s11158-010-9122-2Search in Google Scholar
Miller, D. (2007). National Responsibility and Global Justice (Oxford: Oxford University Press).10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199235056.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Miller, D. (2009). ‘Democracy’s Domain’, Philosophy and Public Affairs 37 (3): 201–228.10.1111/j.1088-4963.2009.01158.xSearch in Google Scholar
Moellendorf, D. (2006). ‘Equality of Opportunity Globalized’? The Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 19 (02): 301–318.10.1017/S0841820900004124Search in Google Scholar
Oberman, K. (2011). ‘Immigration, Global Poverty, and the Right to Stay’, Political Studies 59 (2): 253–268.10.1111/j.1467-9248.2011.00889.xSearch in Google Scholar
Oberman, K. (2016). ‘Immigration as a Human Right’, in Fine, S. and Ypi, L. (eds.), Migration in Political Theory: The Ethics of Movement and Membership (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Search in Google Scholar
Pogge, T. (1992). ‘Cosmopolitanism and Sovereignty’, Ethics 103 (1): 48–7510.1086/293470Search in Google Scholar
Rawls, J. (1971). A Theory of Justice (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).10.4159/9780674042605Search in Google Scholar
Rodrik, D. (2011). The Globalization Paradox: Democracy and the Future of the World Economy (New York: Norton).10.1355/ae28-3kSearch in Google Scholar
Rodrik, D. (2014). ‘The Past, Present, and Future of Economic Growth’, Challenge 57 (3): 5–39.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198723455.003.0002Search in Google Scholar
Scanlon, T. (1998). What We Owe to Each Other (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Search in Google Scholar
Scanlon, T. (2003). ‘The Diversity of Objections to Inequality’, in Scanlon, T. (ed.), The Difficulty of Tolerance (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 212–218.10.1017/CBO9780511615153Search in Google Scholar
Scanlon, T. (2013). ‘Equality of Opportunity: A Normative Anatomy’, Annual Uehiro Lectures.Search in Google Scholar
Schelling, T. C. (1995). ‘Intergenerational Discounting’, Energy Policy 23 (4): 395–401.10.1016/0301-4215(95)90164-3Search in Google Scholar
Simmons, B.A. (1998). ‘Compliance with International Agreements’, Annual Review of Political Science 1: 75, 77, 83–85.10.1146/annurev.polisci.1.1.75Search in Google Scholar
Singer, P. (1972). ‘Famine, Affluence and Morality’, Philosophy and Public Affairs 229–243, September 8, 2016.Search in Google Scholar
United Nations, http://esa.un.org/unpd/wpp/Publications/Files/Key_Findings_WPP_2015.pdfSearch in Google Scholar
Valentini, L. (2011). ‘On the Duty to Withhold Global Aid Now to Save More Lives in the Future’, Ethics and Global Politics 4 (2): 125–134.10.3402/egp.v4i2.7220Search in Google Scholar
Vallentyne, P. (2000). ‘Equality, Efficiency, and the Priority of the Worse-off’, Economics and Philosophy 16 (01): 1–19.10.1017/S0266267100000110Search in Google Scholar
Voorhoeve, A. (2014). ‘How Should We Aggregate Competing Claims’? Ethics 125: 64–87.10.1086/677022Search in Google Scholar
Wellman, C. (2008). ‘Immigration and Freedom of Association’, Ethics 119 (1): 109–141.10.1086/592311Search in Google Scholar
World Bank, http://povertydata.worldbank.org/poverty/home/Search in Google Scholar
©2016 by De Gruyter
