Accessible Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter October 4, 2016

Freedom of Movement and Emigration Pressures: A Defence of Immigration Fees

Oliviero Angeli

Abstract

The article addresses the prospective responsibility of states to protect citizens from emigration pressures. After establishing the moral weight of the interest in staying, the article proceeds to explain why the interest to stay is comparatively more resistant to restrictions than the interest in exercising freedom of movement across borders. On this basis, the argument is then advanced that immigration fees can be charged on (well-off) immigrants as a means to protect economically vulnerable residents in recipient countries from emigration pressures. The argument that I will advance is in at least one sense non-consequentialist: it accounts for the need for immigration fees without relying on (problematic) assumptions about the consequences of immigration. Furthermore, the argument is also realistic in so far as it accepts that states have the right to restrict immigration.

Acknowledgments

This article has benefited from numerous comments and suggestions provided among others by Chris Armstrong, Frank Dietrich, Bob Goodin, Christine Strähle, Lea Ypi and the three anonymous reviewers

References

Angeli, O. (2015). Cosmopolitanism, Self-Determination and Territory (London: Palgrave).Search in Google Scholar

Becker, G. S. (2011). ‘The Challenge of Immigration: A Radical Solution’, Institute of Economic Affairs Monographs Occasional Paper, 145.Search in Google Scholar

Bell, D. A. and de-Shalit, A. (2011). The Spirit of Cities. Why Identity of a City Matters in a Global Age (Oxford: Princeton University Press).Search in Google Scholar

Borjas, G. (2003) ‘The Labor Demand Curve Is Downward Sloping: Reexamining the Impact of Immigration on the Labor Market’. Quarterly Journal of Economics 118 (4): 1335–1374.Search in Google Scholar

Bradley, M. (2013), Refugee Repatriation – Justice, Responsibility and Redress (Cambridge University Press).Search in Google Scholar

Carens, J. (1992). ‘Migration and Morality: A Liberal Egalitarian Perspective’, in B. Barry and R. E. Goodin (eds.), Free Movement: Ethical Issues in the Transnational Migration of People and of Money (University Park, PA: The Pennsylvania University Press), pp. 25–47.Search in Google Scholar

Carens, J. (2013). The Ethics of Immigration (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Search in Google Scholar

Carling, J. (2002). ‘Migration in the Age of Involuntary Immobility: Theoretical Reflections and Cape Verdean Experiences’, Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 28 (1): 5–42.Search in Google Scholar

Castles, S. (2007). ‘Twenty-First-Century Migration as a Challenge to Sociology’, Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 33 (3): 351–371.Search in Google Scholar

Castles, S. and Miller, M. (1993). The Age of Migration (London: Macmillan).Search in Google Scholar

Colson, E. (1971). The Social Consequences of Resettlement: The Impact of the Kariba Resettlement upon the Gwembe Tonga (Manchester: University of Manchester Press).Search in Google Scholar

Glanville, L. (2013). Sovereignty and the Responsibility to Protect: A New History (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).Search in Google Scholar

Goodin, R. E. (1986). Protecting the Vulnerable: A Re-analysis of Our Social Responsibilities (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).Search in Google Scholar

Heyd, D. (2012). ‘Global Responsibility and Distributive Justice’, Ethical Perspectives 10: 677–702.Search in Google Scholar

Hobbes, T. (1985/1651). Leviathan (Harmondsworth: Penguin).Search in Google Scholar

Hume, D. (1994). Political Essays (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Search in Google Scholar

Lee, E. S. (1966). ‘A Theory of Migration’, Demography 3 (1): 47–57.Search in Google Scholar

Lewellen, T.C. (2002). The Anthropology of Globalization: Cultural Anthropology Enters the 21st Century (Westport, CT: Bergin and Garvey).Search in Google Scholar

Malmberg, G. (1997). ‘Time and Space in International Migration’, in T. Hammar et al. (eds.), International Migration, Immobility and Development. Multidisciplinary Perspectives (Oxford: Berg), pp. 187–217.Search in Google Scholar

Miller, D. (2007). National Responsibility and Global Justice (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Search in Google Scholar

Moore, M. (2015). A Political Theory of Territory (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Search in Google Scholar

Nozick, R. (1969). ‘Coercion’, in S. Morgenbesser, P. Suppes and M. White (eds.) Philosophy, Science, and Method (New York: St Martin’s Press), pp. 440–472.Search in Google Scholar

Oberman, K. (2011). ‘Immigration, Global Poverty and the Right to Stay’, Political Studies 59 (2): 253–268Search in Google Scholar

Oberman, K. (2013). ‘Can Brain Drain Justify Immigration Restrictions?’, Ethics 123 (3): 427–455Search in Google Scholar

Penz, P. (2006). ‘Displacement by Development and Moral Responsibility: A Theoretical Treatment’, in F. Crepeau et al. (eds.) Forced Migration and Global Processes (Lanham: Lexington Books), pp. 63–91.Search in Google Scholar

Raz, J. (1986). The Morality of Freedom (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Search in Google Scholar

Shacknove, A. E. (1985). ‘Who Is a Refugee?’, Ethics 95 (2): 274–284.Search in Google Scholar

Stilz, A. (2013). ‘Occupancy Rights and the Wrong of Removal’, Philosophy and Public Affairs 41 (4): 324–356.Search in Google Scholar

Young, I. M. (2006). ‘Responsibility and Global Justice: A Social Connection Model’, Social Philosophy and Policy 23 (1): 102–130.Search in Google Scholar

Ypi, L. (2008). ‘Justice in Migration: A Closed Borders Utopia?’, Journal of Political Philosophy 16 (4): 391–418.Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2016-10-4
Published in Print: 2016-11-1

©2016 by De Gruyter