Abstract
Many libertarians ground their theory of justice in a non-aggression principle (NAP). The NAP is often the basis for the libertarian condemnation of state action – that it is necessarily aggressive and therefore unjust. This approach is often criticised insofar as it defines aggression, in part, as the violation of legitimate property rights, and is therefore parasitical upon a prior – and unjustified – theory of property. While it is true that libertarians who defend the NAP sometimes fail to give a satisfactory account of its relationship to libertarian property rights, such an account is in fact available. A commitment to property rights and to non-aggression can both be grounded in a commitment to non-interference. Such a principle, then, brings together the NAP and the theory of property it is parasitical upon, thus saving the unity and austerity of the overall approach.
Acknowledgements
I am thankful to two anonymous reviewers whose comments have greatly improved the structure and substance of this paper.
References
Arneson, R.J. (1992). ‘Property Rights in Persons’, Social Philosophy & Policy 9: 201–230.10.1017/S0265052500003654Search in Google Scholar
Attas, D. (2006). ‘Fragmenting Property’, Law and Philosophy 25: 119–149.10.1007/s10982-005-8758-0Search in Google Scholar
Attas, D. (2008). ‘Lockean Justifications of Intellectual Property’, in A. Gosseries, A. Strowel and A. Marciano (eds.). Intellectual Property and Theories of Justice (Houdsmills: Palgrave Macmillan): 29–56.10.1007/978-0-230-58239-2_2Search in Google Scholar
Bamford v. Turnley. (1862). 122 ER 25 Vol. 122.Search in Google Scholar
Barnett, R.E. (1986). ‘A Consent Theory of Contract’, Columbia Law Review 86: 269–321.10.2307/1122705Search in Google Scholar
Blackstone, W. (1893/1753). Commentaries on the Laws of England in Four Books, Vol. 1 (Philadelphia: J. B. Lippincott).Search in Google Scholar
Brennan, J. (2017). ‘Elinor Ostrom, Governing the Commons’, in J.T. Levy (ed.). The Oxford Handbook of Classics in Political Theory (Oxford: Oxford University Press). DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198717133.013.61.Search in Google Scholar
Cardozo, B.N. (1928). The Paradoxes of Legal Science (New York: Columbia University Press).Search in Google Scholar
Christmas, B. (2016). ‘The Possibility of Thick Libertarianism’, Libertarian Papers 8: 1–21.Search in Google Scholar
Cohen, G.A. (1995). Self-Ownership, Freedom, and Equality (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).10.1017/CBO9780511521270Search in Google Scholar
Cwik, B. (2016). ‘Property Rights in Non-Rival Goods’, The Journal of Political Philosophy 24: 470–86.10.1111/jopp.12090Search in Google Scholar
De Jasay, A. (1997). Against Politics: On Government, Anarchy, and Order (London: Routledge).Search in Google Scholar
Fressola, A. (1981). ‘Liberty and Property: Reflections on the Right of Appropriation in the State of Nature’, American Philosophical Quarterly 18: 316–322.Search in Google Scholar
Fried, B. (2004). ‘Left-Libertarianism: A Review Essay’, Philosophy & Public Affairs 32: 66–99.10.4324/9781315236322-17Search in Google Scholar
Gillis, W. (2009). ‘From Whence Do Property Titles Arise?’, Human Iterations blog, November 13. Reprinted in G. Chartier & C .W. Johnson (eds.). Markets Not Capitalism: Individualist Anarchism Against Bosses, Inequality, Corporate Power, and Structural Poverty (New York: Minor Compositions, 2011).Search in Google Scholar
Grotius, H. (1916/1608). Mare Liberum, trans. R. V. D. Magoffin (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Search in Google Scholar
Grotius, H. (1925/1625). De Jure Belli Ac Pacis Libri Tres, Vol. 2, trans. F. W. Kelsey (Oxford: Clarendon Press).Search in Google Scholar
Harris, J.W. (1986). ‘Ownership of Land in English Law’, in N. MacCormick and P. Birks (eds.). The Legal Mind: Essays for Tony Honoré (Oxford: Clarendon Press).Search in Google Scholar
Holcombe, R.G. (2005). ‘Common Property in Anarcho-Capitalism’, Journal of Libertarian Studies 19: 3–29.Search in Google Scholar
Honoré, A.M. (1961). ‘Ownership’, in A. Guest (ed.). Oxford Essays in Jurisprudence (London: Oxford University Press).Search in Google Scholar
Ingram, A. (1994). A Political Theory of Rights (New York: Oxford University Press).10.1093/0198279639.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Johnson, C.W. (2008). ‘Liberty, Equality, Solidarity: Toward a Dialectical Anarchism’, in R.T. Long and T.R. Machan (eds.). Anarchism/Minarchism: Is Government Part of a Free Country? (Aldershot: Ashgate).Search in Google Scholar
Kant, I. (1991/1779). The Metaphysics of Morals, trans. M. J. Gregor (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).10.1017/CBO9780511809620.008Search in Google Scholar
Kinsella, N.S. (2008). Against Intellectual Property (Auburn: Ludwig von Mises Institute).Search in Google Scholar
Lewis, J. (1888). Law of Eminent Domain (Chicago: Callaghan & Co).Search in Google Scholar
Lippert-Rasmussen, K. (2008). ‘Against Self-Ownership: There are No Fact-Insensitive Ownership Rights over One’s Body’, Philosophy & Public Affairs 36: 86–118.10.1111/j.1088-4963.2008.00125.xSearch in Google Scholar
Locke, J. (1689/1988). Two Treatises of Government (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).10.1017/CBO9780511810268Search in Google Scholar
Long, R.T. (1995). ‘The Libertarian Case Against Intellectual Property Rights’, Formulations 3: 1.Search in Google Scholar
Long, R.T. (1996). ‘In Defense of Public Space’, Formulations 3: 3.Search in Google Scholar
Long, R.T. (1998). ‘A Plea for Public Property’, Formulations 5: 3.Search in Google Scholar
Long, R.T. (2006). ‘Land-Locked: A Critique of Carson on Property Rights’, Journal of Libertarian Studies 20: 87–95.Search in Google Scholar
Long, R.T. (2008). ‘Market Anarchism and Constitutionalism’, in R.T. Long and T.R. Machan (eds.). Anarchism/Minarchism: Is Government Part of a Free Country? (Aldershot: Ashgate).Search in Google Scholar
Long, R.T. (2012a). ‘Self-Ownership and External Property’, Bleeding Heart Libertarians blog, April 25, http://bleedingheartlibertarians.com/2012/04/self-ownership-and external-property/ (accessed on October 24, 2014).Search in Google Scholar
Long, R.T. (2012b). ‘Eudaimonist Libertarianism’, Bleeding Heart Libertarians blog, February 4, http://bleedingheartlibertarians.com/2012/02/eudaimonist- libertarianism/ (accessed on May 26, 2016).Search in Google Scholar
Long, R.T. (2014). ‘Why Libertarians Believe There Is Only One Right’, Center for a Stateless Society, April 7, https://c4ss.org/content/25648 (accessed on February 8, 2017).Search in Google Scholar
Machan, T.R. (2008). ‘Reconciling Anarchism and Minarchism’, in R.T. Long and T.R. Machan (eds.). Anarchism/Minarchism: Is Government Part of a Free Country? (Aldershot: Ashgate).Search in Google Scholar
Mack, E. (1990). ‘Self-Ownership and the Right of Property’, The Monist 79: 519–543.10.5840/monist19907343Search in Google Scholar
Mack, E. (1995). ‘The Self-Ownership Proviso: A New and Improved Lockean Proviso’, Social Philosophy and Policy 12: 186–218.10.1017/S0265052500004611Search in Google Scholar
Mack, E. (2002). ‘Self-Ownership, Marxism, and Egalitarianism Part II: Challenges to the Self Ownership Thesis’, Politics, Philosophy and Economics 1: 237–276.10.1177/1470594X02001002004Search in Google Scholar
Mack, E. (2006). ‘Non-Absolute Rights and Libertarian Taxation’, Social Philosophy and Policy 23: 109–141.10.1017/S0265052506060195Search in Google Scholar
Mack, E. (2011). ‘Nozickian Arguments for the More-Than-Minimal State’, in R.M. Bader and J. Meadwocroft (eds.). The Cambridge Companion to Nozick’s Anarchy, State, and Utopia (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).10.1017/CCOL9780521769082Search in Google Scholar
Mack, E. (2015). ‘Elbow Room for Rights’, in D. Sobel, P. Vallentyne and S. Wall (eds.). Oxford Studies in Political Philosophy, Vol. 1 (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Search in Google Scholar
McKean, M. and Ostrom, E. (1995). ‘Common Property Regimes in the Forest: Just a Relic from the Past?’, Unasylva 46: 3–15.Search in Google Scholar
Narveson, J. (2001/1988). The Libertarian Idea (Peterborough: Broadview Press).Search in Google Scholar
Nozick, R. (1971). ‘On the Randian Argument’, The Personalist 52: 282–304.Search in Google Scholar
Nozick, R. (1974). Anarchy, State, and Utopia (New York: Basic Books).Search in Google Scholar
Nozick, R. (1977). ‘On Austrian Methodology’, Synthese 36: 353–392.10.1007/BF00486025Search in Google Scholar
Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).10.1017/CBO9780511807763Search in Google Scholar
Palmer, T.G. (1990). ‘Are Patents and Copyrights Morally Justified? The Philosophy of Property Rights and Ideal Objects’, Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy 13: 817–865.Search in Google Scholar
Penner, J.E. (1995). ‘Review of Reinterpreting Property by Margaret Jane Radin’, Social and Legal Studies 4: 426–428.10.1177/096466399500400312Search in Google Scholar
Penner, J.E. (1996). ‘The “Bundle of Rights” Picture of Property’, UCLA Law Review 43: 711–820.Search in Google Scholar
Penner, J.E. (1997). The Idea of Property in Law (Oxford: Clarendon Press).Search in Google Scholar
Pennington, M. (2013). ‘Elinor Ostrom and the Robust Political Economy of Common-Pool Resources’, Journal of Institutional Economics 9: 449–498.10.1017/S1744137413000258Search in Google Scholar
Radin, M.J. (1993). Reinterpreting Property (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press).10.7208/chicago/9780226702292.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Rand, A. (1957). Atlas Shrugged (London: Random House).Search in Google Scholar
Rand, A. (1964). The Virtue of Selfishness: A New Concept of Egoism (New York: Signet).Search in Google Scholar
Risse, M. (2012). On Global Justice (Princeton: Princeton University Press).Search in Google Scholar
Rose, C.M. (1986). ‘The Comedy of the Commons: Commerce, Custom, and Inherently Public Property’, University of Chicago Law Review 53: 711–781.10.4324/9780429303227-9Search in Google Scholar
Rothbard, M.N. (1974/2000). For A New Liberty: The Libertarian Manifesto, 2nd ed. (Auburn: Ludwig von Mises Institute).Search in Google Scholar
Rothbard, M.N. (1997/1982). ‘Law, Property Rights, and Air Pollution’, Cato Journal 2: 55–99. Reprinted in his The Logic of Action vol. 2: Application and Criticism from the Austrian School (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar).Search in Google Scholar
Rothbard, M.N. (1998). The Ethics of Liberty (New York: New York University Press).Search in Google Scholar
Schmidtz, D. (2010). ‘Property and Justice’, Social Philosophy & Policy 27: 79–100.10.1017/S0265052509990045Search in Google Scholar
Schmidtz, D. (2011). ‘Property’, in G. Klosko (ed.). The Oxford Handbook of the History of Political Philosophy (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Search in Google Scholar
Schroeder, J.L. (1994). ‘Chix Nix Bundle-O-Stix: A Feminist Critique of the Disaggregation of Property’, Michigan Law Review 93: 239–319.10.2307/1289929Search in Google Scholar
Simmons, J.A. (2001). Justification and Legitimacy: Essays on Rights and Obligations (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).10.1017/CBO9780511625152Search in Google Scholar
Sobel, D. (2012). ‘Backing Away from Libertarian Self-Ownership’, Ethics 123: 32–60.10.1086/667863Search in Google Scholar
Sobel, D. (2013). ‘Self-Ownership and the Conflation Problem’, in M. Timmons (ed.). Oxford Studies in Normative Ethics, Vol. 3 (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Search in Google Scholar
Sobel, D. (2016). ‘The Point of Self-Ownership’, in D. Schmidtz and C. Pavel (eds.). The Oxford Handbook of Freedom (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Search in Google Scholar
Steiner, H. (1977). ‘The Structure of a Set of Compossible Rights’, The Journal of Philosophy 74: 767–775.10.2307/2025928Search in Google Scholar
Steiner, H. (1994). An Essay on Rights (Oxford: Blackwell).Search in Google Scholar
Steiner, H. (2013). ‘Directed Duties and Inalienable Rights’, Ethics 123: 230–244.10.1086/668708Search in Google Scholar
Stilz, A. (2009). Liberal Loyalty: Freedom, Obligation, and the State (Princeton: Princeton University Press).10.1515/9781400830701Search in Google Scholar
Thomson, J.J. (1990). The Realm of Rights (Cambridge: Harvard University Press).Search in Google Scholar
Van Dun, F. (2009). ‘Freedom and Property: Where They Conflict’, in J.G. Hülsmann and N.S. Kinsella (eds.). Property, Freedom, and Society: Essays in Honor of Hans-Hermann Hoppe (Auburn: Ludwig von Mises Institute).Search in Google Scholar
Waldron, J. (1988). The Right to Private Property (New York: Oxford University Press).Search in Google Scholar
Wheeler, S.C.III. (1980). ‘Natural Property Rights as Body Rights’, Noûs 14: 171–193.10.2307/2214859Search in Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L. (1958). Philosophical Investigations, trans. G. E. M. Anscombe (Oxford: Blackwell).Search in Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L. (1982). Last Writings on the Philosophy of Psychology, Vol. 1: Preliminary Studies for Part 2 of Philosophical Investigations, ed. G. H. von Wright & H. Nyman, trans. C. G. Luckhardt & M. A. E. Aue (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).Search in Google Scholar
Zwolinski, M. (2013). ‘Six Reasons Libertarians Should Reject the Non-Aggression Principle’, Libertarianism.org, April 8, http://www.libertarianism.org/blog/six- reasons libertarians-should-reject-non-aggression-principle (accessed on May 26, 2016).Search in Google Scholar
Zwolinski, M. (2016). ‘The Libertarian Nonaggression Principle’, Social Philosophy & Policy 32: 62–90.10.1017/S026505251600011XSearch in Google Scholar
© 2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
