Abstract
The best arguments for a nation-state’s right to exclude unwanted outsiders actually condemn nation-level regimes of restriction. Two argumentative steps lead to this conclusion. The first points out that the best arguments for exclusion generalize: if they show that nation-states have the right to exclude, they perform the same service for a great many towns, cities, subnational states, and provinces. The second step constructs a dilemma. The right to exclude is important enough to justify the suffering of would-be immigrants, or it is not. If it is, the right to exclude is very important indeed–would-be immigrants often suffer grievously. But nation-level regimes would then be a serious moral problem: they would deprive a great many municipalities of a right that matters a great deal. Turning to the dilemma’s second horn, if the right to exclude is not important enough to justify the suffering of would-be immigrants, nation-level regimes are straightforwardly immoral. Either way, we arrive at this paper’s central thesis: the best arguments for a nation-states right to exclude actually condemn nation-level regimes of exclusion.
References
Abizadeh, A. (2008). ‘Democratic Legitimacy and Border Coercion: No Right to Unilaterally Control Your Own Borders’, Political Theory 36 (1): 37–65.10.1177/0090591707310090Search in Google Scholar
Abizadeh, A. (2010). ‘Democratic Theory and Border Coercion: Reply to Miller’, Political Theory 38 (1): 121–130.10.1177/0090591709348192Search in Google Scholar
Blake, M. (2013). ‘Immigration, Jurisdiction, and Exclusion’, Philosophy and Public Affairs 41 (2): 103–130.10.1111/papa.12012Search in Google Scholar
Carens, J. (1992). ‘Migration and Morality’, in R. Goodin and B. Barry (eds.). Free Movement: Ethical Issues in the Transnational Migration of People and Money (New York: University of Pennsylvania Press), pp. 25–47.Search in Google Scholar
Exdell, J. (2009). ‘Immigration, Nationalism, and Human Rights’, Metaphilosophy 40: 131–146.10.1002/9781444328288.ch13Search in Google Scholar
Grey, C. (2013). ‘Review of Ryan Pevnick Immigration and the Constraints of Justice’, University of Toronto Law Journal 63 (3): 516–526.10.3138/utlj.080112-02RSearch in Google Scholar
Hidalgo, J. (2014). ‘Immigration Restrictions and the Right to Avoid Unwanted Obligations’, Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy 8 (2).10.26556/jesp.v8i2.162Search in Google Scholar
Hudson, J. (2011). ‘Review of Ryan Pevnick Immigration and the Constraints of Justice,’ Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews: http://ndpr.nd.edu/news/immigration-and-the-constraints-of-justice-between-open-borders-and-absolute-sovereignty/.Search in Google Scholar
Miller, D. (1995). On Nationality (New York: Oxford University Press).Search in Google Scholar
Miller, D. (2005). ‘The Case for Limits’, in A. Cohen and C. Wellman (eds.). Contemporary Debates in Applied Ethics (Wiley-Blackwell), pp. 193–206.Search in Google Scholar
Miller, D. (2010). ‘Why Immigration Controls are Not Coercive: A Reply to Arash Abizadeh’, Political Theory 38 (1): 111–120.10.1177/0090591709348194Search in Google Scholar
Miller, D. (2013). ‘Border Regimes and Human Rights’, Law and Ethics of Human Rights 7 (1): 1–23.10.1515/lehr-2013-0001Search in Google Scholar
Miller, D. (2016). Strangers in Our Midst (Cambridge: Harvard University Press).10.4159/9780674969827Search in Google Scholar
Pevnick, R. (2009). ‘Social Trust and the Ethics of Immigration Policy’, The Journal of Political Philosophy 17 (2): 147–167.10.1111/j.1467-9760.2007.00296.xSearch in Google Scholar
Pevnick, R. (2011). Immigration and the Constraints of Justice (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).10.1017/CBO9780511975134Search in Google Scholar
Philpott, D. (2016). ‘Sovereignty’, in E. Zalta (ed.). The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2016/entries/sovereignty/.Search in Google Scholar
Sandelind, C. (2013). ‘Territorial Rights and Open Borders’, Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 18 (5): 487–507.10.1080/13698230.2013.864796Search in Google Scholar
Wellman, C. (2008). ‘Immigration and Freedom of Association’, Ethics 119: 109–141.10.1086/592311Search in Google Scholar
Wellman, C. (2015). ‘Immigration’, in E. Zalta (ed.). The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2015/entries/immigration/.Search in Google Scholar
Wellman, C. (2016). ‘Freedom of Movement and the Rights to Enter an Exit’, in S. Fine and L. Ypi (eds.). Migration in Political Theory: The Ethics of Movement and Membership (NY: Oxford University Press), pp. 80–104.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199676606.003.0005Search in Google Scholar
Whelan, F. (1998). ‘Citizenship and Freedom of Movement: An Open Admissions Policy?’, in M. Gibney (ed.). Open Borders? Closed Societies? the Ethical and Political Issues (London: Greenwood Press), pp. 3–39.Search in Google Scholar
© 2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
