Abstract
Does the politicization of international authority help to reduce democratic deficits beyond the state? In this paper I argue that politicization provides a useful springboard for remedying democratic deficits at the EU and global level. Despite this promise, there are a range of concerns that inhibit a direct relationship between politicization and increased democratic legitimacy. The paper unpacks what politicization is and how it might relate to democratic legitimacy. It then argues that problems surrounding representation – in particular the constructivist view of representation – complicates this relationship. Significantly the notion of mobilization generates suspicions of democratic representational legitimacy. In response, the paper details a framework for assessing the democratic legitimacy of representative claims under conditions of politicization that responds to the aforementioned concerns. This framework is briefly applied to the cases of TTIP and TPP to show its merits.
References
Abizadeh, A. (2012). ‘On the Demos and Its Kin: Nationalism, Democracy, and the Boundary Problem’, American Political Science Review 106 (4): 867–882.10.1017/S0003055412000421Search in Google Scholar
Kuyper, J. W. (2016). ‘Systemic representation: democracy, deliberation, and nonelectoral representatives’, American Political Science Review 110 (2): 308–324.10.1017/S0003055416000095Search in Google Scholar
Bohman, J. (1998). ‘The Coming Age of Deliberative Democracy’, Journal of Political Philosophy 6 (4): 400–425.10.1111/1467-9760.00061Search in Google Scholar
Braithwaite, J. and Drahos, P. (2000). Global Business Regulation (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).10.1017/9780521780339Search in Google Scholar
Cabrera, L. (2004). Political Theory of Global Justice: A Cosmopolitan Case for the World State (Abingdon: Routledge).10.4324/9780203335192Search in Google Scholar
Chambers, S. (2004). ‘Behind Closed Doors: Publicity, Secrecy, and the Quality of Deliberation’, Journal of Political Philosophy 12 (4): 389–410.10.1111/j.1467-9760.2004.00206.xSearch in Google Scholar
Cho, C.H., Martens, M.L., Kim, H., and Rodrigue, M. (2011). ‘Astroturfing Global Warming: It Isn't Always Greener on the Other Side of the Fence’, Journal of Business Ethics 104 (4): 571–587.10.1007/s10551-011-0950-6Search in Google Scholar
De Ville, F. and Siles-Brügge, G. (2016). ‘Why TTIP Is a Game-Changer and Its Critics Have a Point’, Journal of European Public Policy 24 (10): 1491–1505.10.1080/13501763.2016.1254273Search in Google Scholar
de Wilde, P. (2013). ‘Representative claims analysis: theory meets method’, Journal of European Public Policy 20 (2): 278–294.10.1080/13501763.2013.746128Search in Google Scholar
de Wilde, P. and Zürn, M. (2012). ‘Can the Politicization of European Integration Be Reversed?’, JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 50 (s1): 137–153.10.1111/j.1468-5965.2011.02232.xSearch in Google Scholar
Disch, L. (2011). ‘Toward a Mobilization Conception of Democratic Representation’, American Political Science Review 105 (1): 100–114.10.4324/9781315681696-6Search in Google Scholar
Dryzek, J.S. (2000). Deliberative Democracy and Beyond: Liberals, Critics, Contestations (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Search in Google Scholar
Dryzek, J.S. (2009). ‘Democratization as Deliberative Capacity Building’, Comparative Political Studies 42 (11): 1379–1402.10.1177/0010414009332129Search in Google Scholar
Eliasson, L.J. and García-Duran, P. (2017). ‘Why TTIP Is an Unprecedented Geopolitical Game-Changer, but Not a Polanyian Moment’, Journal of European Public Policy 24 (10): 1522–1533.10.1080/13501763.2016.1254275Search in Google Scholar
Erman, E. (2016). ‘Global Political Legitimacy beyond Justice and Democracy?’, International Theory 8 (1): 29–62.10.1017/S1752971915000196Search in Google Scholar
Flinders, M. and Buller, J. (2006). ‘Depoliticisation: Principles, Tactics and Tools’, British Politics 1 (3): 293–318.10.1057/palgrave.bp.4200016Search in Google Scholar
Fraser, N. (1990). ‘Rethinking the Public Sphere: A Contribution to the Critique of Actually Existing Democracy’, Social Text 25/26: 56–80.10.2307/466240Search in Google Scholar
Gheyle, N. (2016). ‘Adding Fuel to the Flames. How TTIP Reinvigorated the Politicization of Trade’, paper presented at the GIFTA workshop, Brussels, Belgium.Search in Google Scholar
Habermas, J. (1996). Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy (Cambridge: MIT Press).10.7551/mitpress/1564.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Hale, T., Held, D., and Young, K. (2013). Gridlock: Why Global Cooperation Is Failing When We Need It Most (Cambridge: Polity).Search in Google Scholar
Hay, C. (2007). Why We Hate Politics (Cambridge: Polity).Search in Google Scholar
Held, D. (1995). Democracy and the Global Order: From the Modern State to Cosmopolitan Governance (Stanford: Stanford University Press).Search in Google Scholar
Hooghe, L. and Marks, G. (2009). ‘A Postfunctionalist Theory of European Integration: From Permissive Consensus to Constraining Dissensus’, British Journal of Political Science 39 (1): 1–23.10.1017/S0007123408000409Search in Google Scholar
Hooghe, L. and Marks, G. (2015). ‘Delegation and Pooling in International Organizations’, Review of International Organizations 10 (3): 305–328.10.1007/s11558-014-9194-4Search in Google Scholar
Johnson, T. (2013). ‘Institutional Design and Bureaucrats' Impact on Political Control’, The Journal of Politics 75 (1): 183–197.10.1017/S0022381612000953Search in Google Scholar
Mansbridge, J., Bohman, J., Chambers, S., Christiano, T., Fung, A., Parkinson, J., and Warren, M.E. (2012). ‘A Systemic Approach to Deliberative Democracy’, in J. Parkinson and J. Mansbridge (eds.). Deliberative Systems: Deliberative Democracy at the Large Scale (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 1–26.10.1017/CBO9781139178914Search in Google Scholar
Moore, A. (2017). Critical Elitism: Deliberation, Democracy, and the Problem of Expertise (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).10.1017/9781108159906Search in Google Scholar
Näsström, S. (2015). ‘Democratic Representation Beyond Election’, Constellations 22 (1): 1–12.10.1111/1467-8675.12123Search in Google Scholar
Pepermans, Y. and Maeseele, P. (2016). ‘The Politicization of Climate Change: Problem or Solution?’, Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change 7 (4): 478–485.10.1002/wcc.405Search in Google Scholar
Pitkin, H. (1967). The Concept of Representation (Berkeley: University of CaliforniaPress).10.1525/9780520340503Search in Google Scholar
Rehfeld, A. (2006). ‘Towards a General Theory of Political Representation’, Journal of Politics 68 (1): 1–21.10.1111/j.1468-2508.2006.00365.xSearch in Google Scholar
Saward, M. (2006). ‘The Representative Claim’, Contemporary Political Theory 5 (3): 297–318.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199579389.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Saward, M. (2009). ‘Authorisation and Authenticity: Representation and the Unelected’, Journal of Political Philosophy 17 (1): 1–22.10.1111/j.1467-9760.2008.00309.xSearch in Google Scholar
Schmitter, P.C. (1969). ‘Three Neo-Functionalist Hypotheses about International Integration’, International Organization 23 (1): 161–166.10.1017/S0020818300025601Search in Google Scholar
Stein, J. (2017). ‘Paul Ryan Used to Love TPP. Then Came Donald Trump’ http://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2017/1/23/14359196/paul-ryan-trump-tpp (accessed on May 5, 2018).Search in Google Scholar
Urbinati, N. (2006). Representative Democracy: Principles and Genealogy (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).10.7208/chicago/9780226842806.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Wiener, A. (2017). ‘A Theory of Contestation—A Concise Summary of Its Argument and Concepts’, Polity 49 (1): 109–125.10.1086/690100Search in Google Scholar
Zürn, M. (2014). ‘The Politicization of World Politics and Its Effects: Eight Propositions’, European Political Science Review 6 (1): 47–71.10.1017/S1755773912000276Search in Google Scholar
Zürn, M., Binder, M., and Ecker-Ehrhardt, M. (2012). ‘International Authority and Its Politicization’, International Theory 4 (1): 69–106.10.1017/S1752971912000012Search in Google Scholar
© 2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
