Skip to content
Accessible Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter November 7, 2019

Deliberating about Climate Change: The Case for ‘Thinking and Nudging’

Dominic Lenzi ORCID logo


Proponents of deliberative democracy believe deliberation provides the best chance of finding effective and legitimate climate policies. However, in many societies there is substantial evidence of biased cognition and polarisation about climate change. Further, many appear unable to distinguish reliable scientific information from false claims or misinformation. While deliberation significantly reduces polarisation about climate change, and can even increase the provision of reliable beliefs, these benefits are difficult to scale up, and are slow to affect whole societies. In response, I propose a combined strategy of ‘thinking and nudging’. While deliberative theorists tend to view nudging askance, combining deliberation with nudges promises to be a timelier and more effective response to climate change than deliberation alone. I outline several proposals to improve societal deliberative capacity while reducing climate risks, including media reform, strategic communication and framing of debates, incentivising pro-climate behaviour change, and better education about science.


I would like to thank Andrew Alexandra, Martin Kowarsch, Clare Heyward, Christian Flachsland and Sebastian Levi for comments on an earlier version of this paper. I also thank my anonymous reviewers for their thoughtful suggestions. Remaining errors are my own.


Ackerman, B. and Fishkin, J. (2004). Deliberation Day (New Haven: Yale University Press).Search in Google Scholar

Anderson, E. (2011). ‘Democracy, Public Policy, and Lay Assessments of Scientific Testimony’, Episteme 8 (2): 144–164.Search in Google Scholar

Beeson, M. (2010). ‘The Coming of Environmental Authoritarianism’, Environmental Politics 19 (2): 276–294.Search in Google Scholar

Bolsen, T., Druckman, J.N., and Lomax Cook, F. (2015). ‘Citizens’, Scientists’, and Policy Advisors’ Beliefs about Global Warming’, The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 658 (1): 271–295.Search in Google Scholar

Boykoff, M.T. and Boykoff, J.M. (2004). ‘Balance as Bias: Global Warming and the US Prestige Press’, Global Environmental Change 14 (2): 125–136.Search in Google Scholar

Braman, D., Kahan, D.M., and Grimmelmann, J. (2005). ‘Modeling Facts, Culture, and Cognition in the Gun Debate’, Social Justice Research 18 (3): 283–304.Search in Google Scholar

Brennan, J. (2016). Against Democracy (New Jersey: Princeton University Press).Search in Google Scholar

Buchanan, A. (2004). ‘Political Liberalism and Social Epistemology’, Philosophy & Public Affairs 32 (2): 95–130.Search in Google Scholar

Christiano, T. (2012). ‘Rational Deliberation among Experts and Citizens’, in J. Parkinson and J. Mansbridge (eds.). Deliberative Systems: Deliberative Democracy at the Large Scale (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press), pp. 27–51.Search in Google Scholar

Coady, C.A.J. (1992). Testimony: A Philosophical Study (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Search in Google Scholar

Coady, D. and Corry, R. (2013). The Climate Change Debate: An Epistemic and Ethical Enquiry (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan).Search in Google Scholar

Dewey, J. (1996). The Collected Works of John Dewey (Charlottesville, VA: InteLex Corporation).Search in Google Scholar

Douglas, H.E. (2009). Science, Policy, and the Value-Free Ideal (Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press).Search in Google Scholar

Douglas, H.E. (2015). ‘Politics and Science: Untangling Values, Ideologies, and Reasons’, The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 658 (1): 296–306.Search in Google Scholar

Dryzek, J. (1999). ‘Transnational Democracy’, Journal of Political Philosophy 7 (1): 30–51.Search in Google Scholar

Dryzek, J. (2000). Deliberative Democracy and Beyond: Liberals, Critics, Contestations (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Search in Google Scholar

Dryzek, J. (2005). ‘Handle with Care: The Deadly Hermeneutics of Deliberative Instrumentation’, Acta Politica 40 (2): 197–211.Search in Google Scholar

Dryzek, J. (2009). ‘Democratization as Deliberative Capacity Building’, Comparative Political Studies 42 (11): 1379–1402.Search in Google Scholar

Dryzek, J.S. (1987). Rational Ecology: Environment and Political Ecology (New York: Blackwell).Search in Google Scholar

Dunlap, R.E. (2013). ‘Climate Change Skepticism and Denial: An Introduction’, American Behavioral Scientist 57 (6): 691–698.Search in Google Scholar

Dunlap, R.E. and McCright, A.M. (2011). ‘Organized Climate Change Denial’, in J.S. Dryzek, R.B. Norgaard, and D. Schlosberg (eds.). The Oxford Handbook of Climate Change and Society (Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press).Search in Google Scholar

Fiorino, D.J. (2018). Can Democracy Handle Climate Change? (Cambridge, UK: Polity Press).Search in Google Scholar

Fishkin, J.S. (1991). Democracy and Deliberation: New Directions for Democratic Reform (New Haven: Yale University Press).Search in Google Scholar

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. (2013). Food Wastage Footprint. Impacts on Natural Resources - Summary Report (Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations).Search in Google Scholar

Gallup Inc. 2013. ‘Americans’ Concerns about Global Warming on the Rise’. . (accessed on January 26, 2018).Search in Google Scholar

Goodin, R.E. (2003). Reflective Democracy (Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press).Search in Google Scholar

Griffin, M. (2011). ‘Developing Deliberative Minds - Piaget, Vygotsky and the Deliberative Democratic Citizen’, Journal of Public Deliberation 7 (1): 1–28.Search in Google Scholar

Gutmann, A. and Thompson, D.F. (1996). Democracy and Disagreement (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Search in Google Scholar

Hamilton, L.C. (2011). ‘Education, Politics, and Opinions about Climate Change: Evidence for Interaction Effects’, Climatic Change 104 (2): 231–242.Search in Google Scholar

Hobson, K. and Niemeyer, S. (2011). ‘Public Responses to Climate Change: The Role of Deliberation in Building Capacity for Adaptive Action’, Global Environmental Change 21 (3): 957–971.Search in Google Scholar

Hobson, K. and Niemeyer, S. (2013). ‘“What Sceptics Believe”: The Effects of Information and Deliberation on Climate Change Skepticism’, Public Understanding of Science 22 (4): 396–412.Search in Google Scholar

Hulme, M. (2009). Why We Disagree about Climate Change. Understanding Controversy, Inaction and Opportunity (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press).Search in Google Scholar

IPCC. 2018. Global Warming of 1.5°C. An IPCC Special Report on the Impacts of Global Warming of 1.5°C above Pre-Industrial Levels and Related Global Greenhouse Gas Emission Pathways, in the Context of Strengthening the Global Response to the Threat of Climate Change, Sustainable Development, and Efforts to Eradicate Poverty. Edited by V. Masson-Delmotte, P. Zhai, H.O. Pörtner, D. Roberts, J. Skea, P.R. Shukla, A. Pirani, et al. (Geneva, Switzerland: World Meteorological Organization).Search in Google Scholar

Jacques, P.J., Dunlap, R.E., and Freeman, M. (2008). ‘The Organisation of Denial: Conservative Think Tanks and Environmental Scepticism’, Environmental Politics 17 (3): 349–385.Search in Google Scholar

Jasanoff, S. (2007). ‘Technologies of Humility’, Nature 450: 33.Search in Google Scholar

John, P., Smith, G., and Stoker, G. (2009). ‘Nudge Nudge, Think Think: Two Strategies for Changing Civic Behaviour’, The Political Quarterly 80 (3): 361–370.Search in Google Scholar

Kahan, D.M., Jenkins-Smith, H., and Braman, D. (2011). ‘Cultural Cognition of Scientific Consensus’, Journal of Risk Research 14 (2): 147–174.Search in Google Scholar

Kahan, D.M., Jenkins-Smith, H., Braman, D., and Gastil, J. (2006). ‘Fear of Democracy: A Cultural Evaluation of Sunstein on Risk’, Harvard Law Review 119 (4): 1071–1109.Search in Google Scholar

Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, Fast and Slow (New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux).Search in Google Scholar

Kasser, T. (2009). ‘Shifting Values in Response to Climate Change’, in R. Engelman, M. Renner, and J. Sawin (eds.). 2009 State of the World: into a Warming World (New York: W. W. Norton & Company), pp. 122–125.Search in Google Scholar

Keller, S. (2015). ‘Empathising with Scepticism about Climate Change’, in J. Moss (ed.). Climate Change and Justice (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press), pp. 219–235.Search in Google Scholar

Kowarsch, M. (2016). A Pragmatist Orientation for the Social Sciences in Climate Policy Vol. 323 (Springer).Search in Google Scholar

Lamb, M. and Lane, M. (2016). ‘Aristotle on the Ethics of Communicating Climate Change’, in C. Heyward and D. Roser (eds.). Climate Justice in a Non-Ideal World (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 229–254.Search in Google Scholar

Leiserowitz, A., Maibach, E., Roser-Renouf, C., Feinberg, G., and Rosental, S. 2014. Climate Change in the American Mind: April 2014. New Haven, CT: Yale Project on Climate Change Communication: Yale University and George Mason University.Search in Google Scholar

McCright, A.M. and Dunlap, R.E. (2011). ‘‘The Politicization of Climate Change and Polarization in the American Public’s Views of Global Warming, 2001–2010ʹ’, The Sociological Quarterly 52 (2): 155–194.Search in Google Scholar

Mendelberg, T. (2002). ‘The Deliberative Citizen: Theory and Evidence’, Political Decision Making, Deliberation and Participation 6: 151–193.Search in Google Scholar

Neblo, M.A. (2015). Deliberative Democracy between Theory and Practice (Cambridge, UK; New York, USA: Cambridge University Press).Search in Google Scholar

Neblo, M.A., Minozzi, W., Esterling, K.M., Green, J., Kingzette, J., and Lazer, D.M.J. (2017). ‘The Need for a Translational Science of Democracy’, Science 355 (6328): 914–915.Search in Google Scholar

Niemeyer, S. (2013). ‘Democracy and Climate Change: What Can Deliberative Democracy Contribute?’, Australian Journal of Politics and History 59 (3): 429–448.Search in Google Scholar

Niemeyer, S. (2014). ‘A Defence of (deliberative) Democracy in the Anthropocene’, Ethical Perspectives 21 (1): 15–45.Search in Google Scholar

Offe, C. (1997). ‘Micro-Aspects of Democratic Theory: What Makes for the Deliberative Competence of Citizens?’, in A. Hadenius (ed.). Democracy’s Victory and Crisis (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 81–104.Search in Google Scholar

Offe, C. and Preuss, U.K. (1991). ‘Democratic Institutions and Moral Resources’, in D. Held (ed.). Political Theory Today (Cambridge, UK: Polity Press).Search in Google Scholar

Oreskes, N. and Conway, E.M. (2010). Merchants of Doubt: How a Handful of Scientists Obscured the Truth on Issues from Tobacco Smoke to Global Warming (New York: Bloomsbury Press).Search in Google Scholar

Parkinson, J. and Mansbridge, J. eds. (2012). Deliberative Systems (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press).Search in Google Scholar

Pidgeon, N., Poortinga, W., Steentjes, K., Corner, A., Mays, C., Poumadère, M., Tvinnereim, E., et al. 2016. European Perceptions of Climate Change (EPCC): Six Recommendations for Public Engagement. Project Report (Oxford: Climate Outreach).Search in Google Scholar

Popp, A., Lotze-Campen, H., and Bodirsky, B.L. (2010). ‘Food Consumption, Diet Shifts and Associated Non-Co2 Greenhouse Gases from Agricultural Production’, Global Environmental Change 20 (3): 451–462.Search in Google Scholar

Romsdahl, R., Blue, G., and Kirilenko, A. (2018). ‘Action on Climate Change Requires Deliberative Framing at Local Governance Level’, Climatic Change 149 (3): 277–287.Search in Google Scholar

Rosenberg, S.W. (2007). ‘Rethinking Democratic Deliberation: The Limits and Potential of Citizen Participation’, Polity 39 (3): 335–360.Search in Google Scholar

Shahar, D.C. (2015). ‘Rejecting Eco-Authoritarianism, Again’, Environmental Values 24 (3): 345–366.Search in Google Scholar

Shearman, D. and Smith, J.W. (2007). The Climate Change Challenge and the Failure of Democracy (Westport, CT: Praeger).Search in Google Scholar

Stechow, C., McCollum, D., Riahi, K., Minx, J.C., Kriegler, E., van Vuuren, D.P., Jewell, J., et al. (2015). ‘Integrating Global Climate Change Mitigation Goals with Other Sustainability Objectives: A Synthesis’, Annual Review of Environment and Resources 40 (1): 363–394.Search in Google Scholar

Tetlock, P.E. (2005). Expert Political Judgement: How Good Is It? How Can We Know? (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).Search in Google Scholar

Thaler, R.H. and Sunstein, C.R. (2008). Nudge: Improving Decisions about Health, Wealth, and Happiness (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press).Search in Google Scholar

Thompson, D.F. (2008). ‘Deliberative Democratic Theory and Empirical Political Science’, Annual Review of Political Science 11: 497–520.Search in Google Scholar

Weber, E.U. and Stern, P.C. (2011). ‘Public Understanding of Climate Change in the United States’, American Psychologist 66 (4): 315–328.Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2019-11-07
Published in Print: 2019-11-18

© 2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston