Abstract
Proponents of deliberative democracy believe deliberation provides the best chance of finding effective and legitimate climate policies. However, in many societies there is substantial evidence of biased cognition and polarisation about climate change. Further, many appear unable to distinguish reliable scientific information from false claims or misinformation. While deliberation significantly reduces polarisation about climate change, and can even increase the provision of reliable beliefs, these benefits are difficult to scale up, and are slow to affect whole societies. In response, I propose a combined strategy of ‘thinking and nudging’. While deliberative theorists tend to view nudging askance, combining deliberation with nudges promises to be a timelier and more effective response to climate change than deliberation alone. I outline several proposals to improve societal deliberative capacity while reducing climate risks, including media reform, strategic communication and framing of debates, incentivising pro-climate behaviour change, and better education about science.
Acknowledgements
I would like to thank Andrew Alexandra, Martin Kowarsch, Clare Heyward, Christian Flachsland and Sebastian Levi for comments on an earlier version of this paper. I also thank my anonymous reviewers for their thoughtful suggestions. Remaining errors are my own.
References
Ackerman, B. and Fishkin, J. (2004). Deliberation Day (New Haven: Yale University Press).Search in Google Scholar
Anderson, E. (2011). ‘Democracy, Public Policy, and Lay Assessments of Scientific Testimony’, Episteme 8 (2): 144–164.10.3366/epi.2011.0013Search in Google Scholar
Beeson, M. (2010). ‘The Coming of Environmental Authoritarianism’, Environmental Politics 19 (2): 276–294.10.1080/09644010903576918Search in Google Scholar
Bolsen, T., Druckman, J.N., and Lomax Cook, F. (2015). ‘Citizens’, Scientists’, and Policy Advisors’ Beliefs about Global Warming’, The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 658 (1): 271–295.10.1177/0002716214558393Search in Google Scholar
Boykoff, M.T. and Boykoff, J.M. (2004). ‘Balance as Bias: Global Warming and the US Prestige Press’, Global Environmental Change 14 (2): 125–136.10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2003.10.001Search in Google Scholar
Braman, D., Kahan, D.M., and Grimmelmann, J. (2005). ‘Modeling Facts, Culture, and Cognition in the Gun Debate’, Social Justice Research 18 (3): 283–304.10.1007/s11211-005-6826-0Search in Google Scholar
Brennan, J. (2016). Against Democracy (New Jersey: Princeton University Press).10.1515/9781400888399Search in Google Scholar
Buchanan, A. (2004). ‘Political Liberalism and Social Epistemology’, Philosophy & Public Affairs 32 (2): 95–130.10.1111/j.1088-4963.2004.00008.xSearch in Google Scholar
Christiano, T. (2012). ‘Rational Deliberation among Experts and Citizens’, in J. Parkinson and J. Mansbridge (eds.). Deliberative Systems: Deliberative Democracy at the Large Scale (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press), pp. 27–51.10.1017/CBO9781139178914.003Search in Google Scholar
Coady, C.A.J. (1992). Testimony: A Philosophical Study (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Search in Google Scholar
Coady, D. and Corry, R. (2013). The Climate Change Debate: An Epistemic and Ethical Enquiry (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan).10.1057/9781137326287Search in Google Scholar
Dewey, J. (1996). The Collected Works of John Dewey (Charlottesville, VA: InteLex Corporation).Search in Google Scholar
Douglas, H.E. (2009). Science, Policy, and the Value-Free Ideal (Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press).10.2307/j.ctt6wrc78Search in Google Scholar
Douglas, H.E. (2015). ‘Politics and Science: Untangling Values, Ideologies, and Reasons’, The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 658 (1): 296–306.10.1177/0002716214557237Search in Google Scholar
Dryzek, J. (1999). ‘Transnational Democracy’, Journal of Political Philosophy 7 (1): 30–51.10.1111/1467-9760.00064Search in Google Scholar
Dryzek, J. (2000). Deliberative Democracy and Beyond: Liberals, Critics, Contestations (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Search in Google Scholar
Dryzek, J. (2005). ‘Handle with Care: The Deadly Hermeneutics of Deliberative Instrumentation’, Acta Politica 40 (2): 197–211.10.1057/palgrave.ap.5500099Search in Google Scholar
Dryzek, J. (2009). ‘Democratization as Deliberative Capacity Building’, Comparative Political Studies 42 (11): 1379–1402.10.1177/0010414009332129Search in Google Scholar
Dryzek, J.S. (1987). Rational Ecology: Environment and Political Ecology (New York: Blackwell).Search in Google Scholar
Dunlap, R.E. (2013). ‘Climate Change Skepticism and Denial: An Introduction’, American Behavioral Scientist 57 (6): 691–698.10.1177/0002764213477097Search in Google Scholar
Dunlap, R.E. and McCright, A.M. (2011). ‘Organized Climate Change Denial’, in J.S. Dryzek, R.B. Norgaard, and D. Schlosberg (eds.). The Oxford Handbook of Climate Change and Society (Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press).Search in Google Scholar
Fiorino, D.J. (2018). Can Democracy Handle Climate Change? (Cambridge, UK: Polity Press).Search in Google Scholar
Fishkin, J.S. (1991). Democracy and Deliberation: New Directions for Democratic Reform (New Haven: Yale University Press).Search in Google Scholar
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. (2013). Food Wastage Footprint. Impacts on Natural Resources - Summary Report (Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations).Search in Google Scholar
Gallup Inc. 2013. ‘Americans’ Concerns about Global Warming on the Rise’. Gallup.com. http://www.gallup.com/poll/161645/americans-concerns-global-warming-rise.aspx. (accessed on January 26, 2018).Search in Google Scholar
Goodin, R.E. (2003). Reflective Democracy (Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press).10.1093/0199256179.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Griffin, M. (2011). ‘Developing Deliberative Minds - Piaget, Vygotsky and the Deliberative Democratic Citizen’, Journal of Public Deliberation 7 (1): 1–28.10.16997/jdd.113Search in Google Scholar
Gutmann, A. and Thompson, D.F. (1996). Democracy and Disagreement (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Search in Google Scholar
Hamilton, L.C. (2011). ‘Education, Politics, and Opinions about Climate Change: Evidence for Interaction Effects’, Climatic Change 104 (2): 231–242.10.1007/s10584-010-9957-8Search in Google Scholar
Hobson, K. and Niemeyer, S. (2011). ‘Public Responses to Climate Change: The Role of Deliberation in Building Capacity for Adaptive Action’, Global Environmental Change 21 (3): 957–971.10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.05.001Search in Google Scholar
Hobson, K. and Niemeyer, S. (2013). ‘“What Sceptics Believe”: The Effects of Information and Deliberation on Climate Change Skepticism’, Public Understanding of Science 22 (4): 396–412.10.1177/0963662511430459Search in Google Scholar
Hulme, M. (2009). Why We Disagree about Climate Change. Understanding Controversy, Inaction and Opportunity (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press).10.1017/CBO9780511841200Search in Google Scholar
IPCC. 2018. Global Warming of 1.5°C. An IPCC Special Report on the Impacts of Global Warming of 1.5°C above Pre-Industrial Levels and Related Global Greenhouse Gas Emission Pathways, in the Context of Strengthening the Global Response to the Threat of Climate Change, Sustainable Development, and Efforts to Eradicate Poverty. Edited by V. Masson-Delmotte, P. Zhai, H.O. Pörtner, D. Roberts, J. Skea, P.R. Shukla, A. Pirani, et al. (Geneva, Switzerland: World Meteorological Organization).Search in Google Scholar
Jacques, P.J., Dunlap, R.E., and Freeman, M. (2008). ‘The Organisation of Denial: Conservative Think Tanks and Environmental Scepticism’, Environmental Politics 17 (3): 349–385.10.1080/09644010802055576Search in Google Scholar
Jasanoff, S. (2007). ‘Technologies of Humility’, Nature 450: 33.10.4324/9781315572888-3Search in Google Scholar
John, P., Smith, G., and Stoker, G. (2009). ‘Nudge Nudge, Think Think: Two Strategies for Changing Civic Behaviour’, The Political Quarterly 80 (3): 361–370.10.1111/j.1467-923X.2009.02001.xSearch in Google Scholar
Kahan, D.M., Jenkins-Smith, H., and Braman, D. (2011). ‘Cultural Cognition of Scientific Consensus’, Journal of Risk Research 14 (2): 147–174.10.1080/13669877.2010.511246Search in Google Scholar
Kahan, D.M., Jenkins-Smith, H., Braman, D., and Gastil, J. (2006). ‘Fear of Democracy: A Cultural Evaluation of Sunstein on Risk’, Harvard Law Review 119 (4): 1071–1109.Search in Google Scholar
Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, Fast and Slow (New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux).Search in Google Scholar
Kasser, T. (2009). ‘Shifting Values in Response to Climate Change’, in R. Engelman, M. Renner, and J. Sawin (eds.). 2009 State of the World: into a Warming World (New York: W. W. Norton & Company), pp. 122–125.Search in Google Scholar
Keller, S. (2015). ‘Empathising with Scepticism about Climate Change’, in J. Moss (ed.). Climate Change and Justice (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press), pp. 219–235.10.1017/CBO9781316145340.013Search in Google Scholar
Kowarsch, M. (2016). A Pragmatist Orientation for the Social Sciences in Climate Policy Vol. 323 (Springer).10.1007/978-3-319-43281-6Search in Google Scholar
Lamb, M. and Lane, M. (2016). ‘Aristotle on the Ethics of Communicating Climate Change’, in C. Heyward and D. Roser (eds.). Climate Justice in a Non-Ideal World (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 229–254.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198744047.003.0012Search in Google Scholar
Leiserowitz, A., Maibach, E., Roser-Renouf, C., Feinberg, G., and Rosental, S. 2014. Climate Change in the American Mind: April 2014. New Haven, CT: Yale Project on Climate Change Communication: Yale University and George Mason University.10.2139/ssrn.2292599Search in Google Scholar
McCright, A.M. and Dunlap, R.E. (2011). ‘‘The Politicization of Climate Change and Polarization in the American Public’s Views of Global Warming, 2001–2010ʹ’, The Sociological Quarterly 52 (2): 155–194.10.1111/j.1533-8525.2011.01198.xSearch in Google Scholar
Mendelberg, T. (2002). ‘The Deliberative Citizen: Theory and Evidence’, Political Decision Making, Deliberation and Participation 6: 151–193.Search in Google Scholar
Neblo, M.A. (2015). Deliberative Democracy between Theory and Practice (Cambridge, UK; New York, USA: Cambridge University Press).10.1017/CBO9781139226592Search in Google Scholar
Neblo, M.A., Minozzi, W., Esterling, K.M., Green, J., Kingzette, J., and Lazer, D.M.J. (2017). ‘The Need for a Translational Science of Democracy’, Science 355 (6328): 914–915.10.1126/science.aal3900Search in Google Scholar
Niemeyer, S. (2013). ‘Democracy and Climate Change: What Can Deliberative Democracy Contribute?’, Australian Journal of Politics and History 59 (3): 429–448.10.1111/ajph.12025Search in Google Scholar
Niemeyer, S. (2014). ‘A Defence of (deliberative) Democracy in the Anthropocene’, Ethical Perspectives 21 (1): 15–45.Search in Google Scholar
Offe, C. (1997). ‘Micro-Aspects of Democratic Theory: What Makes for the Deliberative Competence of Citizens?’, in A. Hadenius (ed.). Democracy’s Victory and Crisis (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 81–104.10.1017/CBO9780511558832.005Search in Google Scholar
Offe, C. and Preuss, U.K. (1991). ‘Democratic Institutions and Moral Resources’, in D. Held (ed.). Political Theory Today (Cambridge, UK: Polity Press).Search in Google Scholar
Oreskes, N. and Conway, E.M. (2010). Merchants of Doubt: How a Handful of Scientists Obscured the Truth on Issues from Tobacco Smoke to Global Warming (New York: Bloomsbury Press).Search in Google Scholar
Parkinson, J. and Mansbridge, J. eds. (2012). Deliberative Systems (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press).10.1017/CBO9781139178914Search in Google Scholar
Pidgeon, N., Poortinga, W., Steentjes, K., Corner, A., Mays, C., Poumadère, M., Tvinnereim, E., et al. 2016. European Perceptions of Climate Change (EPCC): Six Recommendations for Public Engagement. Project Report (Oxford: Climate Outreach).Search in Google Scholar
Popp, A., Lotze-Campen, H., and Bodirsky, B.L. (2010). ‘Food Consumption, Diet Shifts and Associated Non-Co2 Greenhouse Gases from Agricultural Production’, Global Environmental Change 20 (3): 451–462.10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.02.001Search in Google Scholar
Romsdahl, R., Blue, G., and Kirilenko, A. (2018). ‘Action on Climate Change Requires Deliberative Framing at Local Governance Level’, Climatic Change 149 (3): 277–287.10.1007/s10584-018-2240-0Search in Google Scholar
Rosenberg, S.W. (2007). ‘Rethinking Democratic Deliberation: The Limits and Potential of Citizen Participation’, Polity 39 (3): 335–360.10.1057/palgrave.polity.2300073Search in Google Scholar
Shahar, D.C. (2015). ‘Rejecting Eco-Authoritarianism, Again’, Environmental Values 24 (3): 345–366.10.3197/096327114X13947900181996Search in Google Scholar
Shearman, D. and Smith, J.W. (2007). The Climate Change Challenge and the Failure of Democracy (Westport, CT: Praeger).Search in Google Scholar
Stechow, C., McCollum, D., Riahi, K., Minx, J.C., Kriegler, E., van Vuuren, D.P., Jewell, J., et al. (2015). ‘Integrating Global Climate Change Mitigation Goals with Other Sustainability Objectives: A Synthesis’, Annual Review of Environment and Resources 40 (1): 363–394.10.1146/annurev-environ-021113-095626Search in Google Scholar
Tetlock, P.E. (2005). Expert Political Judgement: How Good Is It? How Can We Know? (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).Search in Google Scholar
Thaler, R.H. and Sunstein, C.R. (2008). Nudge: Improving Decisions about Health, Wealth, and Happiness (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press).Search in Google Scholar
Thompson, D.F. (2008). ‘Deliberative Democratic Theory and Empirical Political Science’, Annual Review of Political Science 11: 497–520.10.1146/annurev.polisci.11.081306.070555Search in Google Scholar
Weber, E.U. and Stern, P.C. (2011). ‘Public Understanding of Climate Change in the United States’, American Psychologist 66 (4): 315–328.10.1037/a0023253Search in Google Scholar
© 2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
