Abstract
The World Trade Organisation (WTO), and the international trade regime within which it operates, is regularly evaluated in terms of distributive outcomes or opportunities. A less-established concern is the extent to which the institutional structure of the trade regime enables agents to exert control over the economic forces to which they’re subject. This oversight is surprising, as trade negotiations amongst states have profound impacts upon what options remain open to those states and their citizens in regulating their economies. This article contributes to filling this lacuna in the literature. Following on from recent neo-republican work on global and international justice, it argues that a major problem with the WTO is that it fails to effectively mitigate the domination of some states by others within its negotiations. Such domination prevails despite the employment of negative consensus as a decision-making procedure.
References
Ahlstrom-Vij, K. (2012). ‘‘Review of Frank Lovett,’A General Theory of Domination and Justice”’, Philosophical Quarterly 62 (246): 190–192.10.1111/j.1467-9213.2011.00003.xSearch in Google Scholar
Arnold, S. and Harris, J.R. (2017). ‘What Is Arbitrary Power?’, Journal of Political Power 10 (1): 55–70.10.1080/2158379X.2017.1287473Search in Google Scholar
Bachvarova, M. (2013). ‘Non-Domination’s Role in the Theorizing of Global Justice’, Journal of Global Ethics 9 (2): 173–185.10.1080/17449626.2013.818434Search in Google Scholar
Bagwell, K. and Staiger, R.W. (2004). The Economics of the World Trading System (Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press).Search in Google Scholar
Baldwin, R.E. (2012). ‘The Case for a Multilateral Trade Organization’, in M. Daunton, A. Narlikar and R.M. Stern (eds.). The Oxford Handbook on the World Trade Organization (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 29–39.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199586103.013.0002Search in Google Scholar
Blustein, P. (2009). Misadventures of the Most Favored Nations (New York: Public Affairs).Search in Google Scholar
Bohman, J. (2015). ‘Domination, Global Harms, and the Priority of Injustice: Expanding Transnational Republicanism’, in B. Bucknix, J. Trejo-Mathys and T. Waligore (eds.). Domination and Global Political Justice: Conceptual, Historical, and Institutional Perspectives (New York: Routledge), pp. 83–99.Search in Google Scholar
Brandi, C. (2017). ‘The Trade Regime Complex and Megaregionals – An Exploration from the Perspective of International Domination’, Global Justice: Theory Practice Rhetoric 10 (1): 24–42.10.21248/gjn.10.1.109Search in Google Scholar
Brock, G. (2009). Global Justice: A Cosmopolitan Account (Oxford: Oxford University Press).10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199230938.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Brown, A.G. and Stern, R.M. (2012). ‘Fairness in the WTO Trading System’, in M. Daunton, A. Narlikar and R.M. Stern (eds.). The Oxford Handbook on the World Trade Organization (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 677–696.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199586103.013.0031Search in Google Scholar
Cavallero, E. (2010). ‘Coercion, Inequality and the International Property Regime’, Journal of Political Philosophy 18 (1): 16–31.10.1111/j.1467-9760.2009.00343.xSearch in Google Scholar
Chang, H.-J. (2002). Kicking Away the Ladder: Development Strategy in Historical Perspective (London: Anthem Press).Search in Google Scholar
Chayes, A. and Chayes, A.H. (1995). The New Sovereignty: Compliance with International Regulatory Agreements (Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press).10.4159/9780674029453Search in Google Scholar
Christensen, J. (2018). Trade Justice (Oxford: Oxford University Press).10.1093/oso/9780198810353.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Christiano, T. (2015). ‘Legitimacy and the International Trade Regime’, San Diego Law Review 52 (5): 981–1012.Search in Google Scholar
Clark, S. (2007). Living without Domination: The Possibility of an Anarchist Utopia (Burlington, Vermont: Ashgate Publishing Company).Search in Google Scholar
Collier, P. (2008). The Bottom Billion: Why the Poorest Countries are Failing and What Can Be Done about It (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Search in Google Scholar
Drake, W.J. and Nicolaidis, K. (1992). ‘Ideas, Interests, and institutionalization:“Trade in Services” and the Uruguay Round’, International Organization 46 (1): 37–100.10.4324/9781315085463-1Search in Google Scholar
Eagleton-Pierce, M. (2013). Symbolic Power in the World Trade Organization (Oxford: Oxford University Press).10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199662647.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Filling, J. (2017). ‘What’s Wrong with Republican Liberty?’ the Future of Republicanism: Liberal, Critical, Radical? University of York, July 26th, 2017.Search in Google Scholar
Finger, J.M., Reincke, U., and Castro, A. (1999). Market Access Bargaining in the Uruguay Round: Rigid or Relaxed Reciprocity? (Washington, DC: World Bank Publications).10.1596/1813-9450-2258Search in Google Scholar
Gädeke, D. (2016). ‘The Domination of States: Towards an Inclusive Republican Law of Peoples’, Global Justice: Theory Practice Rhetoric 9 (1): 1–27.10.21248/gjn.9.1.99Search in Google Scholar
Gordon, U. (2007a). ‘Anarchism Reloaded’, Journal of Political Ideologies 12 (1): 29–48.10.2307/j.ctt18fsb5d.6Search in Google Scholar
Gordon, U. (2007b). Anarchy Alive! Anti-Authoritarian Politics from Practice to Theory (London: Pluto Press).Search in Google Scholar
Gourevitch, A. (2013). ‘Labor Republicanism and the Transformation of Work’, Political Theory 41 (4): 591–617.10.1177/0090591713485370Search in Google Scholar
Guzman, A.T. (1998). ‘Why LDCs Sign Treaties that Hurt Them: Explaining the Popularity of Bilateral Investment Treaties’, Virginia Journal of International Law 38 (4): 639–688.Search in Google Scholar
Hoekman, B.M. and Mavroidis, P.C. (2015). World Trade Organization (WTO) Law, Economics, and Politics: Second Edition (New York: Routledge).10.4324/9781315742212Search in Google Scholar
Hopewell, K. (2016). Breaking the WTO: How Emerging Powers Disrupted the Neoliberal Project (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press).Search in Google Scholar
James, A. (2012). Fairness in Practice: A Social Contract for A Global Economy (Oxford: Oxford University Press).10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199846153.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Jones, K. (2009). ‘Green Room Politics and the WTO’s Crisis of Representation’, Progress in Development Studies 9 (4): 349–357.10.1177/146499340900900408Search in Google Scholar
Julius, A.J. (2014). ‘Practice Independence’, Canadian Journal of Philosophy 44 (2): 239–254.10.1080/00455091.2014.942142Search in Google Scholar
Kelsey, J. (2008). Serving Whose Interests? the Political Economy of Trade in Services Agreements (New York, NY: Routledge-Cavendish).Search in Google Scholar
Khor, M. (2000). ‘How the South Is Getting a Raw Deal at the WTO’, in S. Anderson (eds.). Views from the South: The Effects of Globalization and the WTO on Third World Countries (Chicago, IL: Food First Books), pp. 7–53.Search in Google Scholar
Krueger, A.O. (1998). The WTO as an International Organization (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press).Search in Google Scholar
Krugman, P. (1997). ‘What Should Trade Negotiators Negotiate About?’, Journal of Economic Literature 35 (1): 113–120.Search in Google Scholar
Laborde, C. and Ronzoni, M. (2016). ‘What Is a Free State? Republican Internationalism and Globalisation’, Political Studies 64 (2): 279–296.10.1111/1467-9248.12190Search in Google Scholar
Lovett, F. (2009). ‘Domination and Distributive Justice’, The Journal of Politics 71 (3): 817–830.10.1017/S0022381609090732Search in Google Scholar
Lovett, F. (2010). A General Theory of Domination and Justice (Oxford: Oxford University Press).10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199579419.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Lovett, F. (2012). ‘What Counts as Arbitrary Power?’, Journal of Political Power 5 (1): 137–152.10.1080/2158379X.2012.660026Search in Google Scholar
Lovett, F. (2016). ‘Should Republicans Be Cosmopolitans?’, Global Justice: Theory Practice Rhetoric 9 (1): 28–46.10.21248/gjn.9.1.100Search in Google Scholar
Lovett, F. and Pettit, P. (2009). ‘Neorepublicanism: A Normative and Institutional Research Program’, Annual Review of Political Science 12: 11–29.10.1146/annurev.polisci.12.040907.120952Search in Google Scholar
Macdonald, T. (2015). ‘Antipower, Agency, and the Republican Case for Global Institutional Pluralism’, in B. Buckinx, J. Trejo-Mathys and T. Waligore (eds.). Domination and Global Political Justice: Conceptual, Historical, and Institutional Perspectives (New York: Routledge), pp. 291–312.Search in Google Scholar
Martí, J.L. (2010). ‘A Global Republic to Prevent Global Domination’, Diacritica 24 (2): 31–72.Search in Google Scholar
Maynor, J. (2015). ‘Should Republican Liberty as Non-Domination Be Outsourced?’, in B. Buckinx, J. Trejo-Mathys and T. Waligore (eds.). Domination and Global Political Justice: Conceptual, Historical, and Institutional Perspectives (New York: Routledge), pp. 227–250.Search in Google Scholar
Miller, R.W. (2010). Globalizing Justice: The Ethics of Poverty and Power (Oxford: Oxford University Press).10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199581986.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Moellendorf, D. (2005). ‘The World Trade Organization and Egalitarian Justice’, Metaphilosophy 36 (1–2): 145–162.10.1111/j.1467-9973.2005.00360.xSearch in Google Scholar
Nail, T. (2013). ‘Zapatismo and the Global Origins of Occupy’, Journal for Cultural and Religious Theory 12 (3): 20–35.Search in Google Scholar
Narlikar, A. (2005). The World Trade Organization: A Very Short Introduction (Oxford: Oxford University Press).10.1093/actrade/9780192806086.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Narlikar, A. (2012). ‘Collective Agency, Systemic Consequences: Bargaining Coalitions in the WTO.’, in M. Daunton, A. Narlikar and R.M. Stern (eds.). The Oxford Handbook on the World Trade Organization (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 184–209.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199586103.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Pettit, P. (1996). ‘Freedom as Antipower’, Ethics 106 (3): 576–604.10.4135/9781446215272.n18Search in Google Scholar
Pettit, P. (1997). Republicanism: A Theory of Freedom and Government (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Search in Google Scholar
Pettit, P. (2008). ‘Republican Freedom: Three Axioms, Four Theorems’, in C. Laborde and J. Maynor (eds.). Republicanism and Political Theory (Oxford: Blackwell Publishing), pp. 102–130.Search in Google Scholar
Pettit, P. (2010). ‘A Republican Law of Peoples’, European Journal of Political Theory 9 (1): 70–94.10.1177/1474885109349406Search in Google Scholar
Pettit, P. (2012). On the People’s Terms: A Republican Theory and Model of Democracy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).10.1017/CBO9781139017428Search in Google Scholar
Pettit, P. (2014). Just Freedom: A Moral Compass for A Complex World (New York: W.W. Norton & Company).Search in Google Scholar
Pettit, P. (2015). ‘The Republican Law of Peoples: A Restatement’, in B. Buckinx, J. Trejo-Mathys and T. Waligore (eds.). Domination and Global Political Justice: Conceptual, Historical, and Institutional Perspectives (New York: Routledge), pp. 49–82.Search in Google Scholar
Pettit, P. (2016). ‘The Globalized Republican Ideal’, Global Justice: Theory Practice Rhetoric 9 (1): 47–68.10.21248/gjn.9.1.101Search in Google Scholar
Pogge, T.W. (2008). World Poverty and Human Rights: Second Edition (Cambridge, UK: Polity Press).Search in Google Scholar
Risse, M. (2017). ‘Realizing Justice in Trade: Multilateralism and Mega-Regionalism’, Global Justice: Theory Practice Rhetoric 10 (1): 1–23.Search in Google Scholar
Shaffer, G. (2015). ‘How the World Trade Organization Shapes Regulatory Governance’, Regulation & Governance 9 (1): 1–15.10.1111/rego.12057Search in Google Scholar
Steinberg, R.H. (2002). ‘In the Shadow of Law or Power? Consensus-Based Bargaining and Outcomes in the GATT/WTO’, International Organization 56 (2): 339–374.10.1162/002081802320005504Search in Google Scholar
Suttle, O. (2017). Distributive Justice and World Trade Law: A Political Theory of International Trade Regulation (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).10.1017/9781108235235Search in Google Scholar
Taylor, R.S. (forthcoming). ‘Donation without Domination: Private Charity and Republican Liberty’, The Journal of Political Philosophy.Search in Google Scholar
Thompson, M.J. (2013). ‘Reconstructing Republican Freedom: A Critique of the Neo-Republican Concept of Freedom as Non-Domination’, Philosophy & Social Criticism 39 (3): 277–298.10.1177/0191453712473081Search in Google Scholar
Thompson, M.J. (2018). ‘The Two Faces of Domination in Republican Political Theory’, European Journal of Political Theory 17 (1): 44–64.10.1177/1474885115580352Search in Google Scholar
Vrousalis, N. (2013). ‘Exploitation, Vulnerability, and Social Domination’, Philosophy & Public Affairs 41 (2): 131–157.10.1111/papa.12013Search in Google Scholar
Vrousalis, N. (2016a). ‘Exploitation as Domination: A Response to Arneson’, The Southern Journal of Philosophy 54 (4): 527–538.10.1111/sjp.12199Search in Google Scholar
Vrousalis, N. (2016b). ‘Imperialism, Globalization and Resistance’, Global Justice: Theory Practice Rhetoric 9 (1): 69–92.10.21248/gjn.9.1.102Search in Google Scholar
Wade, R.H. (2003). ‘‘What Strategies are Viable for Developing Countries Today? the World Trade Organization and the Shrinking of ‘Development Space”’, Review of International Political Economy 10 (4): 621–644.10.1080/09692290310001601902Search in Google Scholar
Wilkinson, R. (2000). Multilateralism and the World Trade Organisation: The Architecture and Extension of International Trade Regulation (London: Routledge).Search in Google Scholar
Wilkinson, R. (2006). The WTO: Crisis and the Governance of Global Trade (Oxon, OX: Routledge).Search in Google Scholar
Wilkinson, R. (2014). What’s Wrong with the WTO and How to Fix It (Cambridge: Polity Press).Search in Google Scholar
Wolf, M. (2004). Why Globalization Works (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press).Search in Google Scholar
WorldBank. (2016). ’World Bank Open Data’ https://data.worldbank.org/ (accessed on September 14th, 2018).Search in Google Scholar
WTO. (1994a). Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organization (Gevena: GATT).Search in Google Scholar
WTO. (1994b). General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade 1994 (Geneva: GATT).Search in Google Scholar
WTO. (2013). ’USTR Froman Warns Poor Countries Would Be the Biggest Losers if Bali Fails’ https://www.wto.org/english/news_e/news13_e/pfor_01oct13_e.htm (accessed on September 13th, 2018).Search in Google Scholar
WTO. (2018a). ’Sub-Committee on Least-Developed Countries’ https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/devel_e/dev_sub_committee_ldc_e.htm (accessed September 13th, 2018).Search in Google Scholar
WTO. (2018b). ’Regional Trade Agreements’ https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/region_e/region_e.htm#rules_ita (accessed on June 11th, 2018).Search in Google Scholar
WTO. (2018c). ’What Is the WTO? Overview’ https://www.wto.org/english/thewto_e/whatis_e/wto_dg_stat_e.htm (accessed May 18th, 2018).Search in Google Scholar
© 2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston