Abstract
The central thesis of this paper is that fake news and related phenomena serve as defeaters for knowledge transmission via journalistic channels. This explains how they pose a threat to democracy; and it points the way to determining how to address this threat. Democracy is both intrinsically and instrumentally good provided the electorate has knowledge (however partial and distributed) of the common good and the means of achieving it. Since journalism provides such knowledge, those who value democracy have a reason to protect it. Hostile agents, however, can undermine both the effectiveness of democratic decision-making and faith in democracy itself, by deliberately promulgating fake news and hyper-partisan views; moreover, these effects can come about unintentionally on social media. I conclude that we may need to change, not just the way we process information online, but also the informational environment in which we operate.
Acknowledgements
Thanks to Elizabeth Edenberg, Don Fallis, Michael Hannon, David Lanius, Ioannis Votsis, two anonymous referees for this journal, and audiences at MANCEPT 2018 and the 2019 NCH/KIT workshop, Improving Public Debate and Political Decision-Making.
References
Adler, J. (2017). ‘Epistemological Problems of Testimony’, in E. Zalta (ed.). The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2017 ed.). URL=https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2017/entries/testimony-episprob/Search in Google Scholar
Ball, B. (2014). ‘Speech Acts: Natural or Normative Kinds?’, Mind and Language 29 (3): 336–350.10.1111/mila.12054Search in Google Scholar
Cairncross, F. (2019). The Cairncross Review: A Sustainable Future for Journalism. Available online at https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/the-cairncross-review-a-sustainable-future-for-journalismSearch in Google Scholar
Coady, C.A.J. (1992). Testimony: A Philosophical Study (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Search in Google Scholar
Collins, D., et al. (2018). Disinformation and ‘Fake News’: Interim Report (London: House of Commons). Available online at https://www.parliament.uk/business/committees/committees-a-z/commons-select/digital-culture-media-and-sport-committee/publications/Search in Google Scholar
Collins, D., et al. (2019). Disinformation and ‘Fake News’: Final Report (London: House of Commons). Available online at https://www.parliament.uk/business/committees/committees-a-z/commons-select/digital-culture-media-and-sport-committee/publications/Search in Google Scholar
Curtis, A. (2016). Hypernormalization (London: British Broadcasting Corporation) Retrieved 11 Oct. 2018 from https://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/p04b183c/adam-curtis-hypernormalisationSearch in Google Scholar
Dennett, D. (2017). From Bacteria to Bach and Back: The Evolution of Minds (UK: Allen Lane).Search in Google Scholar
Dryzek, J.S. and List, C. (2003). ‘Social Choice Theory and Deliberative Democracy: A Reconciliation’, British Journal of Political Science 33 (1): 1–28.10.1017/S0007123403000012Search in Google Scholar
Fallis, D. and Mathiesen, K. (manuscript). ‘Fake News Is Counterfeit News’.Search in Google Scholar
Fricker, E. (1995). ‘Critical Notice: Telling and Trusting: Reductionism and Anti-Reductionism in the Epistemology of Testimony’, Mind 104 (414): 393–411.10.1093/mind/104.414.393Search in Google Scholar
Goldman, A. (1976). ‘Discrimination and Perceptual Knowledge’, The Journal of Philosophy 73 (20): 771–791.10.1515/9783110843828.174Search in Google Scholar
Goldman, A. (1986). Epistemology and Cognition (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Search in Google Scholar
Greco, J. (2012). ‘Recent Work on Testimonial Knowledge’, American Philosophical Quarterly 49 (1): 15–28.Search in Google Scholar
Greenwald, G. (2014). No Place to Hide (London: Penguin).Search in Google Scholar
Habgood-Coote, J. (2018). ‘Stop Talking About Fake News!’, Inquiry Published online first at https://doi.org/10.1080/0020174X.2018.150836310.1080/0020174X.2018.1508363Search in Google Scholar
Harrison, R. (2005). ‘Democracy’, in The Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy Taylor and Francis, Retrieved 8 Oct. 2018, from https://www.rep.routledge.com/articles/thematic/democracy/v-2.doi:10.4324/9780415249126-S017-210.4324/9780415249126-S017-2Search in Google Scholar
Hawthorne, J. and Stanley, J. (2008). ‘Knowledge and Action’, The Journal of Philosophy 105 (10): 571–590.10.5840/jphil20081051022Search in Google Scholar
Hume, D. (1748). ‘Of Miracles’, in E. Steinberg (ed.). An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding (Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company), 1977.Search in Google Scholar
Ichikawa, J.J. and Steup, M. (2018). ‘The Analysis of Knowledge’, in E. Zalta (ed.). The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2018). URL=https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2018/entries/knowledge-analysis/Search in Google Scholar
Jaster, R. and Lanius, D. (2018). ‘What is Fake News?’, Versus 2 (127): 207–227.Search in Google Scholar
Javid, S. and White, J. (2019). Online Harms White Paper. Available online at https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/online-harms-white-paperSearch in Google Scholar
Lackey, J. (2008). Learning from Words: Testimony as a Source of Knowledge (Oxford: OUP).10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199219162.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Mathiesen, K. (2019). ‘Fake News and the Limits of Freedom of Speech’, in C. Fox and J. Saunders (eds.). Media Ethics, Free Speech, and the Requirements of Democracy (Abingdon: Routledge).Search in Google Scholar
Michaelian, K. (2010). ‘In Defence of Gullibility: The Epistemology of Testimony and the Psychology of Deception Detection’, Synthese 176 (3): 399–427.10.1007/s11229-009-9573-1Search in Google Scholar
Mill, J. (1820). ‘Essay on Government’, Repr. in J. Mill (ed.). Political Writings (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 1992.Search in Google Scholar
Mill, J.S. (1859). On Liberty in Utilitarianism/On Liberty/Considerations on Representative Government (London: Dent), 1910.Search in Google Scholar
Millikan, R. (1984). Language, Thought, and Other Biological Categories (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).Search in Google Scholar
Mukerji, N. (2018). ‘What is Fake News?’, Ergo 5 (35): 923–946. Available online at http://dx.doi.org/10.3998/ergo.12405314.0005.03510.3998/ergo.12405314.0005.035Search in Google Scholar
Pepp, J., Michaelson, E., and Sterken, R.K. (forthcoming). ‘What’s New about Fake News?’, Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy.Search in Google Scholar
Pollock, J.L. (1989). Contemporary Theories of Knowledge (New York: Rowman and Littlefield).Search in Google Scholar
Pomerantsev, P. (2011). ‘Putin’s Rasputin’, London Review of Books 33 (20): 3–6. Available online at: https://www.lrb.co.uk/v33/n20/peter-pomerantsev/putins-rasputinSearch in Google Scholar
Reid, T. (1764). ‘Inquiry into the Human Mind on the Principles of Common Sense’, Extracts in R.E. Beanblossom and K. Lehrer (eds.). Thomas Reid’s Inquiry and Essays (Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing) Company), 1983.10.1037/11974-000Search in Google Scholar
Rini, R. (2017). ‘Fake News and Partisan Epistemology’, Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 27 2: E43–64. Supp10.1353/ken.2017.0025Search in Google Scholar
Rusbridger, A. (2018). Breaking News: The Remaking of Journalism and Why it Matters Now (Edinburgh: Canongate).Search in Google Scholar
Schumpeter, J.A. (1943). Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy:Fifth edition. (London: Routledge), 2003.Search in Google Scholar
Shaw, T. (2018). ‘Edward Snowden Reconsidered’, in The New York Review of Books published 13 Sept. 2018 retrieved 10 Oct. from https://www.nybooks.com/daily/2018/09/13/edward-snowden-reconsidered/Search in Google Scholar
Stowell, J. (2018). ‘What Is Hybrid Warfare?’, Global Security Review Published 1 Aug. 2018 Retrieved 10 Oct. 2018, from https://globalsecurityreview.com/hybrid-and-non-linear-warfare-systematically-erases-the-divide-between-war-peace/Search in Google Scholar
Williamson, T. (2000). Knowledge and its Limits (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Search in Google Scholar
Williamson, T. (2018). Doing Philosophy: From Common Curiosity to Logical Reasoning (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Search in Google Scholar
© 2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
