This article examines Risse and Wollner’s discussion and rejection of several strategies a) in favour of developed countries subsidising their producers, and b) against the relocation of firms operating on their territory. It argues that their critical review of these strategies remains incomplete and therefore not decisive. It starts by bringing into relief two blind spots in their moral assessment of subsidies. The first concerns the imperfect nature of the general duties of global justice they focus on; the second concerns their understanding of the relation between these duties and duties of social justice. While addressing these two difficulties, it presents another possible strategy in support of subsidies, which Risse and Wollner fail to examine: the ‘equal citizenship’ strategy. This strategy is mobilised again in an assessment of Risse and Wollner’s treatment of relocations. In this context, some doubts are raised about the remedy Risse and Wollner prescribe to overcome both social injustices and exploitative relocations ― namely, the domestic redistribution by governments of the gains of international trade. It is argued that such a redistribution is both insufficient to combat social exclusion and threatened by the very practice of trade liberalisation that Risse and Wollner seek to defend.
I would like to thank the guest editors of this special issue and the two anonymous referees for extremely helpful comments. I would also like to thank François Blais, Patrick Turmel and students in my autumn 2020 graduate seminar on ethics and international relations for enlightening and thought-provoking discussion.
Catão, L. A. V., and M. Obstfeld, eds. 2019. Meeting Globalization’s Challenges: Policies to Make Trade Work for All. Princeton: Princeton University Press.10.1515/9780691198866Search in Google Scholar
Fraser, N. 2008. “Scales of Justice.” In Reimagining Political Space in a Globalizing World. New York: Columbia University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Fraser, N. 2011. “Social Exclusion, Global Poverty, and Scales of (In)justice: Rethinking Law and Poverty in a Globalizing World.” Stellenbosch Law Review 22 (3): 452–62.Search in Google Scholar
Fraser, N. 2019. The Old is Dying and the New Cannot Be Born. London: Verso.Search in Google Scholar
Hassoun, N. 2008. “Free Trade, Poverty, and the Environment.” Public Affairs Quarterly 22 (4): 353–80.Search in Google Scholar
International Labour Organization (ILO). https://www.ilo.org/global/topics/decent-work/lang--en/index.htm (accessed June 5, 2021).Search in Google Scholar
Mauger, G. 2012. “Mondialisation, altermondialisme, démondialisation.” [“Globalisation, Alterglobalisation, Deglobalisation”]. Savoir/Agir 1 (19): 89–92, https://doi.org/10.3917/sava.019.0089.Search in Google Scholar
Ronzoni, M. 2016. “Global Labour Injustice: A Critical Overview.” In Global Justice and International Labour Rights, edited by Y. Dahan, H. Lerner, and F. Milman-Sivan, 27–52. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781316104354.002Search in Google Scholar
Sandel, M. 2020. The Tyranny of Merit. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Search in Google Scholar
© 2021 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston