The basic divide in the metaphysics of time is between those who defend a dynamic view and those who defend a static view. Whereas the former hold that time does truly pass, the latter take the passage of time to be some sort of illusion. Recently, however, an alternative minority view developed, according to which passage is identical either with the succession of times in the four-dimensional manifold or with the temporally ordered sequence of events located at these. I want to argue that something is wrong with the identity theory of passage. If passage and time qua part of the manifold are identical, then talk of passage should be translatable into talk about time qua part of the manifold (and vice versa). I show that this is not always possible.
For their valuable comments, I would like to thank Florian Fischer, Tim Hesse, Florian Risch and, especially, Laurenz Hudetz, Manfred Stöckler and Wanja Thielmann. This paper would have looked very different without their help.
Chalmers, D. 1996. The Conscious Mind: In Search of a Fundamental Theory. New York: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Dyke, H. 2008. Metaphysics and the Representational Fallacy. New York: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar
Frege, G. 1892. “Über Sinn Und Bedeutung.” Zeitschrift Für Philosophie Und Philosophische Kritik, N.F100:25–50. Reprinted in: Frege, G; Textor, M. (ed.), Funktion – Begriff – Bedeutung. Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, Göttingen.Search in Google Scholar
Friedman, M. 1983. Foundations of Space-Time Theories. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Le Poidevin, R. 1998. “The Past, Present and Future of the Debate about Tense.” In Questions of Time and Tense, edited by R.Le Poidevin. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Oaklander, N. 2012. “A-, B- and R-Theories of Time: A Debate.” In The Future of the Philosophy of Time, edited by A.Bardon. New York: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar
Savitt, S. 2002. “On Absolute Becoming and the Myth of Passage.” In Time, Reality and Experience, edited by C.Callender. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Savitt, S. 2013. “Being and Becoming in Modern Physics.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2014 Edition), edited by E. N.Zalta forthcoming. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2014/entries/spacetime-bebecome/Search in Google Scholar
Sklar, L. 1974. Space, Time, and Spacetime. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Search in Google Scholar
©2014 by De Gruyter