Accessible Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter September 9, 2016

Vikings or Normans? The Radicalism of Naturalized Metaphysics

Don Ross
From the journal Metaphysica

Abstract

The paper investigates the extent to which naturalized metaphysics, as proposed and characterized by Ladyman and Ross (2007. Every Thing Must Go: Metaphysics Naturalized. Oxford: Oxford University Press) among others, suggests a radical break with the conceptual space of pre-naturalized metaphysics. The investigation compares Ladyman and Ross’s methodology for metaphysics with that recently advocated by Steven French (2014. The Structure of the World: Metaphysics and Representation. Oxford: Oxford University Press). The comparison promises to be revealing because French shares Ladyman and Ross’s commitment to build a new metaphysics on the basis of a particular thesis developed in the philosophy of science literature, ontic structural realism (OSR). Thus differences between Ladyman and Ross’s and French’s approaches to metaphysics can be exhibited cleanly, without having to be pried apart from different respective views about the ontology implied by scientific theory and practice.

Acknowledgement

I thank Steven French and James Ladyman for helpful comments on an earlier draft.

References

Batterman, R. 2002. The Devil in the Details. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Bird, A. 2007. Nature’s Metaphysics: Laws and Properties. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Brown, R., and J. Ladyman. 2009: “Physicalism, Supervenience and the Fundamental Level.” Philosophical Quarterly 59:20–38.Search in Google Scholar

Chakravartty, A. 2007. A Metaphysics for Scientific Realism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Dennett, D. 1991. “Real Patterns.” Journal of Philosophy 88:27–51.Search in Google Scholar

Dupré, J. 1993. The Disorder of Things. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Fine, A. 1984. “The Natural Ontological Attitude.” In Scientific Realism, edited by J. Leplin, 83–107. Berkeley: University of California Press.Search in Google Scholar

Fine, A. 1986. The Shaky Game. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar

French, S. 2014. The Structure of the World: Metaphysics and Representation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

French, S., and K. McKenzie. 2012. “Thinking Outside the (Tool)Box: Towards a More Productive Engagement Between Metaphysics and Philosophy of Physics.” European Journal of Analytic Philosophy 8:42–59.Search in Google Scholar

Ladyman, J., and K. Robertson. 2013. “Landauer Defended: A Reply to Norton.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 44:263–261.Search in Google Scholar

Ladyman, J., and D. Ross. 2007. Every Thing Must Go: Metaphysics Naturalized. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Ladyman, J., and D. Ross. 2013. “The World in the Data.” In Scientific Metaphysics, edited by D. Ross, J. Ladyman and H. Kincaid, 108–50. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Lakoff, G. 1987. Women, Fire and Dangerous Things. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar

Lakoff, G., and M. Johnson. 1980. Metaphors We Live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar

Lange, M. 2009. Laws and Lawmakers: Science, Metaphysics and the Laws of Nature. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Maudlin, T. 2007. The Metaphysics within Physics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Pearl, J. 2009. Causality, 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

van Fraassen, B. 2002. The Empirical Stance. New Haven: Yale University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Woodward, J. 2003. Making Things Happen. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Zahar, E. 2007. Why Science Needs Metaphysics: A Plea for Structural Realism. Chicago: Open Court.Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2016-9-9
Published in Print: 2016-9-1

©2016 by De Gruyter