Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter March 22, 2017

Towards a Naturalistic Philosophy

José Ignacio Galparsoro
From the journal Metaphysica

Abstract

This paper is an invitation to reflect on the advisability of analysing philosophy from a naturalistic perspective. That is, from a perspective that considers philosophy as if it was one more cultural object, which can be studied using the tools that we have available to us today and that are provided by disciplines such as evolutionary psychology or anthropology oriented by a distinctly cognitivist approach. A central concept in the analysis is that of “intuitive ontology” – closely linked to intuitive (or folk-) philosophy or the spontaneous, naïve (natural) way of thinking that is associated with common sense – which is a result of the evolutionary process and a source of metaphysical prejudices such as dualism. A metaphilosophical reflection, such as that proposed here, identifies the “natural” character of a transcendent metaphysics that is still too close to intuitive philosophy, and the interest of constituting a naturalistic philosophy that is fully conscious of its “unnatural” or “counterintuitive” character.

References

Astuti, R. 2001. “Are We All Natural Dualist? A Cognitive Developmental Approach”. The Malinowski Memorial Lecture, 2000 [online]. London: LSE Research Online. http://eprints.Ise.ac.uk/archive/00000471. Available online: November 2005.Search in Google Scholar

Atran, S. 1998. “Folk Biology and the Anthropology of Science: Cognitive Universals and Cultural Particulars.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21:547–609.10.1017/S0140525X98001277Search in Google Scholar

Ayala, F.J. 1987. “The Biological Roots of Morality.” Biology & Philosophy 2 (3):235–252.10.1007/BF00128831Search in Google Scholar

Bloom, P. 2004. Descartes’ Baby. How the Science of Child Development Explains What Makes Us Human. New York: Basic Books.Search in Google Scholar

Bloom, P. 2007. “Religion Is Natural.” Developmental Science 10 (1):147–151.10.1111/j.1467-7687.2007.00577.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

Bloom, P. 2009. “Religion Belief as an Evolutionary Accident.” In The Believing Primate, edited by M.J. Murray and J. Schloss, 118–127. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199557028.003.0006Search in Google Scholar

Bloom, P. 2012. “Religion, Morality, Evolution.” Annual Review of Psychology 63:179–199.10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100334Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Bloom, P. 2013. Just Babies: The Origins of Good and Evil. New York: Crown.Search in Google Scholar

Bloom, P., and D. Skolnick Weisberg. 2007. “Childhood Origins of Adult Resistance to Science.” Science 316:996–997.10.1126/science.1133398Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Boyer, P. 1994. The Naturalness of Religious Ideas. A Cognitive Theory of Religion. Berkeley/Los Angeles: University of California Press.10.1525/9780520911628Search in Google Scholar

Boyer, P. 1998. “Cognitive Tracks of Cultural Inheritance: How Evolved Intuitive Ontology Governs Cultural Transmission.” American Anthropologist 100 (4):876–889.10.1525/aa.1998.100.4.876Search in Google Scholar

Boyer, P. 1999. “Human Cognition and Cultural Evolution.” In Anthropological Theory Today, edited by H.L. Moore, 206–233. Cambridge: Polity Press.Search in Google Scholar

Boyer, P. 2000. “Natural Epistemology of Evolved Metaphysics? Developmental Evidence for Early-Developmental Evidence for Early-Developed, Intuitive, Category-Specific, Incomplete, and Stubborn Metaphysical Presumptions.” Philosophical Psychology 13:277–297.10.1080/09515080050128123Search in Google Scholar

Boyer, P. 2001. Religion Explained. the Evolutionary Origins of Religious Thought. New York: Basic Books.Search in Google Scholar

Boyer, P. 2003. “Religious Thought and Behaviour as By-Products of Brain Function.” Trends in Cognitive Sciences 7 (3):119–124.10.1016/S1364-6613(03)00031-7Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Boyer, P. 2008. “Religion: Bound to Believe?” Nature 445:1038–1039.10.1038/4551038aSearch in Google Scholar

Boyer, P., and C. Barrett. 2005. “Domain Specificity and Intuitive Ontology.” In The Handbook of Evolutionary Psychology, edited by D.M. Buss, 96–118. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons.10.1002/9780470939376.ch3Search in Google Scholar

Carruthers, P., S. Stich, and M. Siegal. 2002. The Cognitive Basis of Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511613517Search in Google Scholar

De Cruz, H., and J. De Smedt. 2007. “The Role of Intuitive Ontologies in Scientific Understanding — The Case of the Human Evolution.” Biology and Philosophy 22:351–368.10.1007/s10539-006-9036-8Search in Google Scholar

Dennett, D.C. 2003. Freedom Evolves. New York: Penguin.Search in Google Scholar

Dennett, D.C. 2006. Breaking the Spell. Religion as a Natural Phenomenon. New York: Penguin.Search in Google Scholar

Galparsoro, J.I. 1995. “La volonté de puissance chez Nietzsche. Tentative d’une explication naturaliste du monde.” Les études Philosophiques 4: 457–480.Search in Google Scholar

Gell, A. 1998. Art and Agency. Anthropological Theory. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Search in Google Scholar

Gelman, S.A. 2003. The Essential Child: Origins of Essentialism in Everyday Thought. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195154061.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Gelman, S.A., and L.A. Hirschfeld. 1999. “How Biological Is Essentialism?” In Folkbiology, edited by D.L. Medin and S. Atran, 403–446. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Girotto, V., T. Pievani, and G. Vallortigara. 2008. Nati per Credere. Perché Il Nostro Cervello Sembra Predisposto a Fraintendere La Teoria Di Darwin? Torino: Codice Editori.Search in Google Scholar

Goldman, A.I. 1991. Liaisons: Philosophy Meets the Cognitive and Social Sciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Goldman, A.I. 2015. “Naturalizing Metaphysics with the Help of Cognitive Science.” In Oxford Studies in Metaphysics, Volume 9, edited by K. Bennett and D.W. Zimmerman, 171–216. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198729242.003.0008Search in Google Scholar

Hauser, M.D. 2006. Moral Minds: How Nature Designed Our Universal Sense of Right and Wrong. New York: Harper Collins.Search in Google Scholar

Joyce, R. 2006. The Evolution of Morality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/2880.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Lévi-Strauss, C. 1955. Tristes Tropiques. Paris: Plon.Search in Google Scholar

Mithen, S. 1996. The Prehistory of the Mind. A Search for the Origins of Art, Religion and Science. Thames and Hudson: London.Search in Google Scholar

Nietzsche, F. 1967-sq. Werke, Kritische Gesamtausgabe. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter (Hrsg.: Giorgio Colli & Mazzino Montinari).Search in Google Scholar

Pinker, S. 2002. The Blank Slate. the Modern Denial of Human Nature. New York: Penguin.Search in Google Scholar

Ridley, M. 1996. The Origins of Virtue. Human Instincts and the Evolution of Cooperation. New York: Penguin Books.Search in Google Scholar

Sperber, D. 1996. Explaining Culture. A Naturalistic Approach. Oxford: Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

Sperber, D. 1999. “Voir autrement la culture”. In Des Idées qui viennent, edited by Roger-Paul Droit and Dan Sperber, 91–105. Paris: Odile Jacob.Search in Google Scholar

Tooby, J., and L. Cosmides. 1992. “The Psychological Foundations of Culture.” In The Adapted Mind: Evolutionary Psychology and the Generation of Culture, edited by J.H. Barkow, L. Cosmides and J. Tooby, 19–136. New York: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Tort, P. 2008. L’effet Darwin. Sélection naturelle et naissance de la civilisation. Paris: Éditions du Seuil.Search in Google Scholar

Wellman, H.M. 1990. The Child’s Theory of Mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Wolpert, L. 1992. The Unnatural Nature of Science. London: Faber and Faber.Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2017-3-22
Published in Print: 2017-9-26

© 2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Scroll Up Arrow