Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter August 16, 2017

Hyper-Russellian Skepticism

Giuliano Torrengo
From the journal Metaphysica

Abstract

The hyper-Russellian skeptic is someone who thinks that only one of all your experiences was, is, and will ever be conscious. Which one? The very one you are having now. Before you were always a zombie, and you will be a zombie for ever after. In the present literature on the metaphysics of passage of time, there is disagreement on whether our feeling that time passes — the “dynamic flavor” of our ordinary experience — provides support to the A-theory, that is, the thesis that the passage of time is an objective feature of reality. Lately, several philosophers have argued against this idea. In this paper I want to push this line of reasoning further by exploiting the hyper-Russellian scenario against the A-theory of time.

Acknowledgements

For useful comments, thanks to an anonymous referee and to the people at the Center for Philosophy of Time for useful comments. Thanks to the project 2015-0746 (15-5-3007000-601) of Fondazione Cariplo and Regione Lombardia, and project 15-6-3007000-2021 of Università degli Studi di Milano for financial supports.

Bibliography

Almäng, J. 2014. “Tense as Feature of Perceptual Content.” Journal of Philosophy 7:361–378.10.5840/jphil2014111725Search in Google Scholar

Bourne, C. 2002. “When Am I? A Tense Time for Some Tense Theorists?” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 80:359–371.10.1080/713659472Search in Google Scholar

Braddon-Mitchell, D. 2004. “How Do We Know It Is Now Now?” Analysis 64:199–203.10.1093/analys/64.3.199Search in Google Scholar

Cameron, R. 2015. The Moving Spotlight. an Essay on Time and Ontology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198713296.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Correia, F., and S. Rosenkranz. 2013. “Living on the Brink, or Welcome Back, Growing Block!” In Oxford Studies in Metaphysics, eds K. Bennett and D.W. Zimmerman, Vol. 8, 333–350. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199682904.003.0009Search in Google Scholar

Deasy, D. 2015. “The Moving Spotlight Theory.” Philosophical Studies 172:2073–2089.10.1007/s11098-014-0398-5Search in Google Scholar

Deng, N. 2013. “On Explaining Why Time Seems to Pass.” Southern Journal of Philosophy 51 (3):367–382.10.1111/sjp.12033Search in Google Scholar

Dummett, M. 1969. “The Reality of the Past.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 69:139–158.10.1093/aristotelian/69.1.239Search in Google Scholar

Fine, K. 2005. “Tense and Reality”, in Id. Modality and Tense. Philosophical Papers, 261–320. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/0199278709.003.0009Search in Google Scholar

Forbes, G.A. 2015. “The Growing Block’s past Problems.” Philosophical Studies 173: 699–709.10.1007/s11098-015-0514-1Search in Google Scholar

Forrest, P. 2004. “The Real but Dead Past: A Reply to Braddon-Mitchell.” Analysis 64:358–362.10.1093/analys/64.4.358Search in Google Scholar

Forrest, P. 2006. “General Facts, Physical Necessity, and the Metaphysics of Time.” Oxford Studies in Metaphysics 2:137–154.Search in Google Scholar

Heathwood, C. 2005. “The Real Price of the Dead Past: A Reply to Forrest and to Braddon-Mitchell.” Analysis 65:249–251.10.1093/analys/65.3.249Search in Google Scholar

Hoerl, C. 2014. “Do We (Seem To) Perceive Passage?” Philosophical Explorations 17:188–202.10.1080/13869795.2013.852615Search in Google Scholar

Leininger, L. 2015. “Presentism and the Myth of Passage.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 93 (4):724–739.10.1080/00048402.2015.1007463Search in Google Scholar

Lipman, M., forthcoming, “A Passage Theory of Time.” Oxford Studies in Metaphysics 11.10.1093/oso/9780198828198.003.0003Search in Google Scholar

Merricks, T. 2006. “Goodbye Growing Block.” In Oxford Studies in Metaphysics, edited by K. Bennett and D.W. Zimmerman, Vol. 2, 103–110. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Paul, L.A. 2010. “Temporal Experience.” Journal of Philosophy 107 (7):333–359.10.5840/jphil2010107727Search in Google Scholar

Phillips, I. 2014. “Experience of and in Time.” Philosophy Compass 9 (2):131–144.10.1111/phc3.12107Search in Google Scholar

Price, H. 2011. “The Flow of Time.” In The Oxford Handbook of the Philosophy of Time, edited by C. Callender, 276–311. Oxford: OUP.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199298204.003.0010Search in Google Scholar

Prosser, S. 2013. “Passage and Perception.” Noûs 47 (1):69–84.10.1111/j.1468-0068.2010.00816.xSearch in Google Scholar

Russell, B. 1921. Analysis of Mind. London: G. Allen and Unwin.Search in Google Scholar

Russell, J.S. 2015. “Temporary Safety Hazards.” NoûS (online first).10.1111/nous.12104Search in Google Scholar

Russell, J.S. 2017. “Temporary Safety Hazards.” Noûs 51 (1):152–174.10.1111/nous.12104Search in Google Scholar

Skow, B. 2009. “Relativity and the Moving Spotlight.” The Journal of Philosophy 106:666–678.10.5840/jphil20091061224Search in Google Scholar

Skow, B. 2011. “Experience and the Passage of Time.” Philosophical Perspectives 25 (Metaphysics):359–387.10.1111/j.1520-8583.2011.00220.xSearch in Google Scholar

Skow, B. 2015. Objective Becoming. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198713272.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Sider, T. 2011. Writing the Book of the World. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199697908.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Sullivan, M. 2012. “The Minimal A-Theory.” Philosophical Studies 158:149–174.10.1007/s11098-012-9888-5Search in Google Scholar

Torrengo, G. 2017a. “Feeling the Passing of Time.” The Journal of Philosophy 114:4.10.5840/jphil2017114415Search in Google Scholar

Torrengo, G. 2017b. “The Myth of Presentism’s Intuitive Appeal.” Phenomenology and Mind 12:50–55.Search in Google Scholar

Torrengo, G. 2017c. “Perspectival Tenses and Dynamic Tenses.” Erkenntnis (online first: http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10670-017-9928-9).10.1007/s10670-017-9928-9Search in Google Scholar

Traynor, M. 2014. “Phenomenal Experience and the Metaphysics of Persistence.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 114:381–388.10.1111/j.1467-9264.2014.00380.xSearch in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2017-8-16
Published in Print: 2018-3-26

© 2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Scroll Up Arrow