Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter February 3, 2018

Natural Kinds, Causal Profile and Multiple Constitution

Max Kistler
From the journal Metaphysica

Abstract

The identity of a natural kind can be construed in terms of its causal profile. This conception is more appropriate to science than two alternatives. The identity of a natural kind is not determined by one causal role because one natural kind can have many causal roles and several functions and because some functions are shared by different kinds. Furthermore, the microstructuralist thesis is wrong: The identity of certain natural kinds is not determined by their microstructure. It is true that if A and B have the same microstructural composition then a sample of a chemical substance A is of the same chemical substance as a sample of B. However, the reverse does not hold. It is not the case that if a sample of a chemical substance A is of the same chemical substance as a sample of B then A and B have the same microstructural composition. This is because a macroscopic NK can be “multiconstituted” by different microstructures.

Acknowledgments

Research for this paper has benefited from funding by ANR (grant ANR-12-BSH3-0009). Thank my auditors at Lille and Newark, and in particular A. Barberousse, for their critical remarks.

A French version of this paper has been published in Lato Sensu.

M. Kistler, « Espèces naturelles, profil causal et constitution multiple », Lato sensu, Vol. 3, No 1 (2016), p. 17–30.

References

Abbott, B. 1997. “A Note on the Nature of “Water”.” Mind 106 (422):311–319.10.1093/mind/106.422.311Search in Google Scholar

Ahn, W.-K., C. Kalish, S.A. Gelman, D.L. Medin, C. Luhmann, S. Atran, J.D. Coley, and P. Shafto 2001. “Why Essences are Essential in the Psychology of Concepts.” Cognition 82 (1):59–69.10.1016/S0010-0277(01)00145-7Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Aizawa, K. 2007. “The Biochemistry of Memory Consolidation: A Model System for the Philosophy of Mind.” Synthese 155 (1):65–98.10.1007/s11229-005-2566-9Search in Google Scholar

Aizawa, K. 2018. “Multiple Realization, Autonomy, and Integration.” In Explanation and Integration in Mind and Brain Science, edited by D. Kaplan, 215–235. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780199685509.003.0010Search in Google Scholar

Aizawa, K., and C. Gillett 2009. “The (Multiple) Realization of Psychological and Other Properties in the Sciences.” Mind and Language 24:181–208.10.1111/j.1468-0017.2008.01359.xSearch in Google Scholar

Aizawa, K., and C. Gillett 2011. “The Autonomy of Psychology in the Age of Neuroscience.” In Causality in the Sciences, edited by P.M. Illari, F. Russo and J. Williamson, 202–223. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199574131.003.0010Search in Google Scholar

Anandhi, D. 2014. Introduction to Biochemistry and Metabolism. Noida (India): Dorling Kindersley.Search in Google Scholar

Armstrong, D.M. 1997. A World of States of Affairs. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511583308Search in Google Scholar

Armstrong, D.M. 2004. Truth and Truthmakers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511487552Search in Google Scholar

Barberousse, A., and P. Ludwig 2008. “Models as Fictions.” In Fictions in Science. Philosophical Essays in Modeling and Idealizations, edited by M. Suarez, 56–73. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Bickle, J. 2003. Philosophy and Neuroscience: A Ruthlessly Reductive Account. Dordrecht: Kluwer.10.1007/978-94-010-0237-0Search in Google Scholar

Bird, A. 2007. Nature’s Metaphysics. Laws and Properties. Oxford: Clarendon Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199227013.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Bird, A. 2015. “The Metaphysics of Natural Kinds.” Synthese doi:10.1007/s11229-015-0833-y.Search in Google Scholar

Boyd, R. 1991. “Realism, Anti-Foundationalism and the Enthusiasm for Natural Kinds.” Philosophical Studies 61:127–148.10.1007/BF00385837Search in Google Scholar

Buller, A.R., and C.A. Townsend 2013. “Intrinsic Evolutionary Constraints on Protease Structure, Enzyme Acylation, and the Identity of the Catalytic Triad.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 110 (8):E653–61.10.1073/pnas.1221050110Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Callender, C. 2011. “Philosophy of Science and Metaphysics.” In Continuum Companion to the Philosophy of Science, edited by S. French and J. Saatsi, 33–54. London: Continuum.Search in Google Scholar

Chakravartty, A. 2007. A Metaphysics for Scientific Realism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511487354Search in Google Scholar

Chaplin, M. 2016. Water Structure and Science. http://www1.lsbu.ac.uk/water/Search in Google Scholar

Churchland, P.M. 1979. Scientific Realism and the Plasticity of Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511625435Search in Google Scholar

Churchland, P.S. 1986. Neurophilosophy: Toward a Unified Science of the Mind-Brain. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Traduit par M. Siksou. 1999. Neurophilosophie: l’esprit-cerveau. 1999. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Search in Google Scholar

De Jong, W.W., J.A. Leunissen, and C.E.M. Voorter 1993. “Evolution of the Alpha-Crystallin/Small Heat-Shock Protein Family.” Molecular Biology and Evolution 10 (1):103–126.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Dumsday, T. 2013. “Using Natural-Kind Essentialism to Defend Dispositionalism.” Erkenntnis 78:869–880.10.1007/s10670-012-9361-zSearch in Google Scholar

Fodor, J.A. 1974. “Special Sciences, or the Disunity of Science as a Working Hypothesis.” Synthese 28:97–115.10.1007/BF00485230Search in Google Scholar

Gelman, S. 2003. The Essential Child: Origins of Essentialism in Everyday Thought. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195154061.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Gillett, C. 2003. “The Metaphysics of Realization, Multiple Realizability, and the Special Sciences.” Journal of Philosophy 100:591–603.Search in Google Scholar

Goodwin, W. 2011. “Structure, Function, and Protein Taxonomy.” Biology and Philosophy 26:533–545.10.1007/s10539-011-9252-8Search in Google Scholar

Hempel, C.G. 1965. Empiricist Criteria of Cognitive Significance. Aspects of Scientific Explanation, 101–122. New York: Free Press.Search in Google Scholar

Hendry, R.F. 2006. “Elements, Compounds and Other Chemical Kinds.” Philosophy of Science 73:864–875.10.1086/518745Search in Google Scholar

Huisman, T.H.J., M.F.H. Carver, and G.D. Efremov 1996. A Syllabus of Human Hemoglobin Variants. Augusta, GA: The Sickle Cell Anemia Foundation.Search in Google Scholar

Jackson, F. 1998. From Metaphysics to Ethics. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Search in Google Scholar

Kim, J. 1998. Mind in a Physical World. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/4629.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Kistler, M. 2002. “The Causal Criterion of Reality and the Necessity of Laws of Nature.” Metaphysica 3:57–86.Search in Google Scholar

Kistler, M. 2004. “Matérialisme et réduction de l’esprit.” In Les matérialismes (et leurs détracteurs), edited by J. Dubessy, G. Lecointre and M. Silberstein, 309–339. Paris: Syllepse. Repr. in Silberstein, Marc (ed.). 2013. Matériaux philosophiques et pour un matérialisme contemporain: Sciences, ontologie, épistémologie. Paris: Editions Matériologiques. 919–954.Search in Google Scholar

Kistler, M. 2007. “La réduction, l’émergence, l’unité de la science et les niveaux de réalité.” Matière Première 2:67–97. Repr. in Silberstein, Marc (ed.). 2013. Matériaux philosophiques et pour un matérialisme contemporain: Sciences, ontologie, épistémologie. Paris: Editions Matériologiques. 179–212.Search in Google Scholar

Kistler, M. 2012. “Powerful Properties and the Causal Basis of Dispositions.” In Properties, Powers and Structures. Issues in the Metaphysics of Realism, edited by A. Bird, B. Ellis and H. Sankey, 119–137. New York and Oxford: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Kistler, M. 2016. L’esprit matériel : réduction et émergence. Paris: Ithaque.Search in Google Scholar

Knobe, J., and S. Nichols 2008. Experimental Philosophy. New York: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Ladyman, J., and D. Ross 2007. Every Thing Must Go. Metaphysics Naturalized. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199276196.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Lowe, E.J. 2001. The Possibility of Metaphysics. Oxford: Clarendon Press.10.1093/0199244995.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Manafu, A. 2014. “A Novel Approach to Emergence in Chemistry.” In Philosophy of Chemistry. Growth of a New Discipline, edited by E. Scerri and L. McIntyre. Dordrecht: Springer.10.1007/978-94-017-9364-3_4Search in Google Scholar

Maudlin, T. 2007. The Metaphysics Within Physics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199218219.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Mellor, D.H. 1991. Properties and Predicates, Matters of Metaphysics, 170–182. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Mellor, D.H. 2012. “Nature’s Joints: A Realistic Defense of Natural Properties.” Ratio (New Series) 25:387–404.10.1002/9781118627747.ch2Search in Google Scholar

Mill, J.S. 1843. A System of Logic, Ratiocinative and Inductive. 2002. Reprise de l’édition de 1891. Honolulu (Hawaii): University Press of the Pacific.Search in Google Scholar

Mills, E. 2014. “Mellor on the Sparseness of Natural Properties.” Ratio (New Series) 27:350–355.10.1111/rati.12040Search in Google Scholar

Morris, C., and H. Lecar 1981. “Voltage Oscillations in the Barnacle Giant Muscle Fiber.” Biophysical Journal 35:193–213.10.1016/S0006-3495(81)84782-0Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Motonori, O., Y. Isogai, and K. Nishikawa 1997. “Structural Requirement of Highly-Conserved Residues in Globins.” FEBS Letters 415 (2):129–133.10.1016/S0014-5793(97)01110-1Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Okasha, S. 2002. “Darwinian Metaphysics: Species and the Question of Essentialism.” Synthese 131:191–213.10.1023/A:1015731831011Search in Google Scholar

Prior, E.W., R. Pargetter, and F. Jackson 1982. “Three Theses about Dispositions.” American Philosophical Quarterly 19:251–257.Search in Google Scholar

Quine, W.V.O. 1939a. “A Logistical Approach to the Ontological Problem.” Repris In The Ways of Paradox and Other Essays, Revised edition, edited by W.V.O. Quine 1976, 197–202. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Quine, W.V.O. 1939b. “Designation and Existence.” Journal of Philosophy 36:701–709.10.2307/2017667Search in Google Scholar

Quine, W.V.O. 1948. “On What There Is.” Repris In From A Logical Point of View, Second edition, edited by W.V.O. Quine 1953. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1980.Search in Google Scholar

Saibil, H. 2013. “Chaperone Machines for Protein Folding, Unfolding and Disaggregation.” Nature Reviews. Molecular Cell Biology. 14 (10):630–642.10.1038/nrm3658Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Setoh, P., D. Wu, R. Baillargeon, and R. Gelman 2013. “Young Infants Have Biological Expectations about Animals.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Science USA 110:15937–15942.10.1073/pnas.1314075110Search in Google Scholar

Shapiro, L.A. 2004. The Mind Incarnate. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Shoemaker, S. 1980. “Causality and Properties.” In Identity, Cause and Mind, 206–233. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984. Repr. in Mellor, David Hugh, Oliver, Alex (ed.). 1997. Properties. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 228–254.Search in Google Scholar

Slater, M.H. 2015. “Natural Kindness.” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 66 (2):375–411.10.1093/bjps/axt033Search in Google Scholar

Sousa, P., S. Atran, and D. Medin 2002. “Essentialism and Folkbiology: Evidence from Brazil.” Journal of Cognition and Culture 2:195–223.10.1163/15685370260225099Search in Google Scholar

Strawson, P.F. 1959. Individuals. London: Methuen.Search in Google Scholar

Tahko, T. 2015. “Natural Kind Essentialism Revisited.” Mind 124 (495):795–822.10.1093/mind/fzv027Search in Google Scholar

Tobin, E. 2010. “Microstructuralism and Macromolecules: The Case of Moonlighting Proteins.” Foundations of Chemistry 12:41–54.10.1007/s10698-009-9078-5Search in Google Scholar

Tobin, E. 2013. “Are Natural Kinds and Natural Properties Distinct?” In Metaphysics and Science, edited by S. Mumford and M. Tugby, 164–182. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199674527.003.0008Search in Google Scholar

Tompa, P., C. Szasz, and L. Buday 2005. “Structural Disorder Throws New Light on Moonlighting.” Trends in Biochemical Sciences 30:484–489.10.1016/j.tibs.2005.07.008Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Van Holde, K.E., and I. Miller Karen 1995. “Hemocyanins.” Advances in Protein Chemistry 47:1–81.10.1016/S0065-3233(08)60545-8Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Vorms, M. 2011. “Formats of Representation in Scientific Theorizing.” In Models, Simulations, and Representations, edited by P. Humphreys and C. Imbert. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2018-2-3
Published in Print: 2018-3-26

© 2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Scroll Up Arrow