Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter February 16, 2018

Molnar on Truthmakers for Negative Truths

  • Nils Kürbis EMAIL logo
From the journal Metaphysica

Abstract

Molnar argues that the problem of truthmakers for negative truths arises because we tend to accept four metaphysical principles that entail that all negative truths have positive truthmakers. This conclusion, however, already follows from only three of Molnar´s metaphysical principles. One purpose of this note is to set the record straight. I provide an alternative reading of two of Molnar´s principles on which they are all needed to derive the desired conclusion. Furthermore, according to Molnar, the four principles may be inconsistent. By themselves, however, they are not. The other purpose of this note is to propose some plausible further principles that, when added to the four metaphysical theses, entail a contradiction.

References

Armstrong, D. 1997. A World Of States Of Affairs. Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511583308Search in Google Scholar

Armstrong, D. 2004. Truth and Truth-Makers. Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511487552Search in Google Scholar

Cameron, R. 2018. “Truthmakers.” In The Oxford Handbook of Truth, edited by Glanzberg M.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199557929.013.13Search in Google Scholar

Cheyne, C., and Pigden C.. 2006. “Negative Truths from Positive Facts.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 84 (2): 249–265.10.1080/00048400600759092Search in Google Scholar

Hochberg, H. 1969. “Negation and Generality.” Noûs 3 (3): 325–343.10.2307/2214554Search in Google Scholar

Kukso, B. 2006. “The Reality of Absences.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 84 (1): 21–37.10.1080/00048400600571679Search in Google Scholar

Molnar, G. 2000. “Truthmakers for Negative Truths.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 78 (1): 72–86.10.1080/00048400012349361Search in Google Scholar

Mumford, S. 2007. “Negative Truth and Falsehood.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society CVII: 45–71.10.1111/j.1467-9264.2007.00211.xSearch in Google Scholar

Russell, B. 1919. “On Propositions: What They are and How they Mean.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volumes 2: 1–43.10.1093/aristoteliansupp/2.1.1Search in Google Scholar

Veber, M. 2008. “How to Derive a ‘not´ from an ‘is´: A Defense of the Incompatibility View of Negative Truths.” Metaphysica 9: 79–91.10.1007/s12133-008-0024-0Search in Google Scholar

Waechter, J. 2017. “Positive Truthmakers for Negative Truths: A Solution to Molnar´s Problem.” Philosophical Studies 174 (3): 579–592.10.1007/s11098-016-0697-0Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2018-02-16
Published in Print: 2018-08-28

© 2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 27.2.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/mp-2018-0014/html
Scroll to top button