Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter June 30, 2021

Hybrid Taguchi-Lévy flight distribution optimization algorithm for solving real-world design optimization problems

  • Mustafa Yıldız

    Mustafa Yıldız received his Bachelors degree in Mechanical Engineering from KSU, Turkey, in 2019. He is a Msc student in the Department of Mechanical engineering, Bursa Uludağ University. He has been working as an FEA engineer at Isringhausen-Aunde Teknik, Bursa Turkey. His research interests are the finite element analysis, shape and topology optimization of vehicle seat components.

    , Natee Panagant

    Natee Panagant received his B.Eng. in Mechanical Engineering from Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand, M.Eng. and Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering from Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand. Currently, he is a Lecturer at the Department of Mechanical Engineering, Khon Kaen University. His research interests include multidisciplinary design optimization, evolutionary computation and finite element analysis.

    , Nantiwat Pholdee

    Dr. Nantiwat Pholdee received his B.Eng. and Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering from Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand, in 2008 and 2013, respectively. Currently, he is a Lecturer at the Department of Mechanical Engineering, Khon Kaen University. His research interests include multidisciplinary design optimization, evolutionary computation, aircraft finite-element analysis, robot path planning optimization, and flight dynamics and control.

    , Sujin Bureerat

    Dr.Sujin Bureerat received his BEng degree in Mechanical Engineering from Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand, in 1992, and his PhD degree in Engineering from Manchester University, Manchester, UK, in 2001. Currently, he is a Professor in the Department of Mechanical Engineering, Khon Kaen University. His research interests include multidisciplinary design optimization, evolutionary computation, aircraft design, finite-element analysis, agricultural machinery, mechanism synthesis, and mechanical vibration.

    , Sadiq M. Sait

    Dr. Sadiq M. Sait received his Bachelor’s degree in Electronics Engineering from Bangalore University, India, in 1981, and his Master’s and Ph.D. degrees in Electrical Engineering from the King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals (KFUPM), Dhahran, in 1983 and 1987, respectively. He is currently a Professor of Computer Engineering and Director of the Center for Communications and IT Research, KFUPM, Dhahran, Saudi Arabia. He is a Senior Member of the IEEE. In 1981, he received the Best Electronic Engineer Award from the Indian Institute of Electrical Engineers, Bengaluru.

    and Ali Rıza Yıldız

    Dr. Ali Rıza Yıldız is a Professor in the Department of Automotive Engineering, Bursa Uludağ University, Bursa, Turkey. His research interests are the finite element analysis of automobile components, lightweight design, composite materials, vehicle design, vehicle crashworthiness, shape and topology optimization of vehicle components, meta-heuristic optimization techniques, and sheet metal forming. He has been serving as an Associate Editor for the Journal of Expert Systems, Wiley.

    EMAIL logo
From the journal Materials Testing

Abstract

The Lévy flight distribution optimization algorithm is a recently developed meta-heuristic. In this study, the Lévy flight distribution optimization algorithm and the Taguchi method are hybridized to solve the shape optimization problem, which is the final step in developing optimum structural components. The new method is termed the hybrid Lévy flight distribution and Taguchi (HLFD-T) algorithm. Geometric dimensions are used as design variables in the optimization, and the problem is aimed at mass minimization. The constraint in the problem is the maximum stress value. The well-known Kriging meta-modeling approach and a specifically developed hybrid approach have been coupled in this paper to find the component’s optimal geometry. The results show that the proposed hybrid algorithm (HLFD-T) has more robust features than the ant lion algorithm, the whale algorithm, and the Lévy flight distribution optimization algorithm for obtaining an optimal component geometry.


Prof. Dr. Ali Rıza Yıldız Department of Automotive Engineering Uludağ University Görükle, Bursa, Turkey

About the authors

Mustafa Yıldız

Mustafa Yıldız received his Bachelors degree in Mechanical Engineering from KSU, Turkey, in 2019. He is a Msc student in the Department of Mechanical engineering, Bursa Uludağ University. He has been working as an FEA engineer at Isringhausen-Aunde Teknik, Bursa Turkey. His research interests are the finite element analysis, shape and topology optimization of vehicle seat components.

Natee Panagant

Natee Panagant received his B.Eng. in Mechanical Engineering from Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand, M.Eng. and Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering from Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand. Currently, he is a Lecturer at the Department of Mechanical Engineering, Khon Kaen University. His research interests include multidisciplinary design optimization, evolutionary computation and finite element analysis.

Dr. Nantiwat Pholdee

Dr. Nantiwat Pholdee received his B.Eng. and Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering from Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand, in 2008 and 2013, respectively. Currently, he is a Lecturer at the Department of Mechanical Engineering, Khon Kaen University. His research interests include multidisciplinary design optimization, evolutionary computation, aircraft finite-element analysis, robot path planning optimization, and flight dynamics and control.

Dr. Sujin Bureerat

Dr.Sujin Bureerat received his BEng degree in Mechanical Engineering from Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand, in 1992, and his PhD degree in Engineering from Manchester University, Manchester, UK, in 2001. Currently, he is a Professor in the Department of Mechanical Engineering, Khon Kaen University. His research interests include multidisciplinary design optimization, evolutionary computation, aircraft design, finite-element analysis, agricultural machinery, mechanism synthesis, and mechanical vibration.

Dr. Sadiq M. Sait

Dr. Sadiq M. Sait received his Bachelor’s degree in Electronics Engineering from Bangalore University, India, in 1981, and his Master’s and Ph.D. degrees in Electrical Engineering from the King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals (KFUPM), Dhahran, in 1983 and 1987, respectively. He is currently a Professor of Computer Engineering and Director of the Center for Communications and IT Research, KFUPM, Dhahran, Saudi Arabia. He is a Senior Member of the IEEE. In 1981, he received the Best Electronic Engineer Award from the Indian Institute of Electrical Engineers, Bengaluru.

Prof. Dr. Ali Rıza Yıldız

Dr. Ali Rıza Yıldız is a Professor in the Department of Automotive Engineering, Bursa Uludağ University, Bursa, Turkey. His research interests are the finite element analysis of automobile components, lightweight design, composite materials, vehicle design, vehicle crashworthiness, shape and topology optimization of vehicle components, meta-heuristic optimization techniques, and sheet metal forming. He has been serving as an Associate Editor for the Journal of Expert Systems, Wiley.

Acknowledgment

The authors gratefully acknowledge the support of Bursa Uludağ University, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, and King Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals.

References

1 E. H. Houssein, M. R. Saad, F. A. Hashim, H. Shaban, M. Hassaballah: Lévy flight distribution: A new metaheuristic algorithm for solving engineering optimization problems, Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence 94 (2020), No. 103731 DOI:10.1016/j.engappai.2020.1037310.1016/j.engappai.2020.10373Search in Google Scholar

2 M. Magdziarz, W. Szczotka: Quenched trap model for Lévy flights. Communication Nonlinear Science Numerical Simuation 30 (2016), No. 1-3, pp. 5-14 DOI:10.1016/j.cnsns.2015.05.02710.1016/j.cnsns.2015.05.027Search in Google Scholar

3 P. Champasak, N.Panagant, N. Pholdee, S. Bureerat, A. R. Yildiz: Self-adaptive many-objective meta-heuristic based on decomposition for many-objective conceptual design of a fixed wing unmanned aerial vehicle, Aerospace Science and Technology 100 (2020), pp. 1-11 DOI:10.1016/j.ast.2020.10578310.1016/j.ast.2020.105783Search in Google Scholar

4 F. A. Hashim, E. H. Houssein, M. S. Mabrouk, W. Al-Atabany, S. Mirjalili: Henry gas solubility optimization: A novel physics-based algorithm, Future Generation Computer Systems 101 (2019), pp. 646-667 DOI:10.1016/j.future.2019.07.01510.1016/j.future.2019.07.015Search in Google Scholar

5 A. Faramarzi, M. Heidarinejad, B. Stephens, S. Mirjalili: Equilibrium optimizer: A novel optimization algorithm, Knowledge-Based Systems 191 (2020), No. 105190 DOI:10.1016/j.knosys.2019.10519010.1016/j.knosys.2019.105190Search in Google Scholar

6 P. Champasak, N. Panagant, N. Pholdee, S. Bureerat, A. R. Yildiz: Self-adaptive many-objective meta-heuristic based on decomposition for many-objective conceptual design of a fixed wing unmanned aerial vehicle, Aerospace Science and Technology 100 (2020), pp. 1-11 DOI:10.1016/j.ast.2020.10578310.1016/j.ast.2020.105783Search in Google Scholar

7 A. R. Yildiz, M. U. Erdaş: A new Hybrid Taguchi-salp swarm optimization algorithm for the robust design of real-world engineering problems, Materials Testing 63 (2021), pp.157-162 DOI:10.1515/mt-2020-002210.1515/mt-2020-0022Search in Google Scholar

8 A. R. Yildiz: Designing of optimum vehicle components using new generation optimization methods, Journal of Polytechnic 20 (2017), No. 2, pp. 319-323 DOI:10.2339/2017.20.2 325-3310.2339/2017.20.2Search in Google Scholar

9 B. S. Yildiz, AR. Yildiz, S. Bureerat, N. Pholdee, Sadiq M. Sait, V. Patel: The Henry gas solubility optimization algorithm for optimum structural design of automobile brake components, Materials Testing 62 (2020), No. 3, pp. 261-264 DOI:10.3139/120.11147910.3139/120.111479Search in Google Scholar

10 Z. Meng, G. Li, X. Wang, S. M. Sait, A. R. Yildiz: A comparative study of metaheuristic algorithms for reliability-based design optimization problems, Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering 28 (2021), pp.1853-1869 DOI:10.1007/s11831-020-09443-z10.1007/s11831-020-09443-zSearch in Google Scholar

11 B. S. Yıldız: The spotted hyena optimization algorithm for weight-reduction of automobile brake components, Materials Testing 62 (2020), No. 4, pp. 383-388 DOI:10.3139/120.11149510.3139/120.111495Search in Google Scholar

12 B. S. Yıldız, A. R. Yildiz, E. I. Albak, H. Abderazek, Sadiq M. Sait, S. Bureerat: Butterfly optimization algorithm for optimum shape design of automobile suspension components, Materials Testing 62 (2020), No. 4, pp. 365-370, DOI:10.3139/120.11149210.3139/120.111492Search in Google Scholar

13 B. S. Yıldız: Optimal design of automobile structures using moth-flame optimization algorithm and response surface methodology, Materials Testing 62 (2020), No. 4, pp. 371-377 DOI:10.3139/120.11149410.3139/120.111494Search in Google Scholar

14 H. Özkaya, M. Yildiz, A. R. Yildiz, S. Bureerat, B. S. Yildiz, Sadiq M. Sait: The equilibrium optimizationalgorithm and the response surface based metamodel for optimal structural design of vehicle components, Materials Testing 62 (2020), pp. 492-496 DOI:10.3139/120.11150910.3139/120.111509Search in Google Scholar

15 N. Panagant, N. Pholdee, S. Bureerat, A. R. Yildiz, S. M. Sait: Seagull optimization algorithm for solving real-world design optimization problems, Materials Testing 62 (2020), pp. 640-644 DOI:10.3139/120.11152910.3139/120.111529Search in Google Scholar

16 B. S. Yildiz: The mine blast algorithm for the structural optimization of electrical vehicle components, Materials Testing 62 (2020), No. 5, pp. 497-501 DOI:10.3139/120.11151110.3139/120.111511Search in Google Scholar

17 E. Kurtuluş, A. R. Yildiz, S. Bureerat, Sadiq M. Sait: A novel hybrid Harris hawkssimulated annealing algorithm and RBF-based metamodel for design optimization of highway guardrails, Materials Testing 62 (2020), No. 3, pp. 251-260 DOI:10.3139/120.11147810.3139/120.111478Search in Google Scholar

18 A. Karaduman, B. S. Yıldız, A. R. Yıldız: Experimental and numerical fatigue-based design optimisation of clutch diaphragm spring in the automotive industry, International Journal of Vehicle Design 80 (2020), No. 2-4, pp. 330-345 DOI:10.1504/IJVD.2019.10987510.1504/IJVD.2019.109875Search in Google Scholar

19 T. Kunakote, S. Bureerat: Multi-objective topology optimization using evolutionary algorithms, Engineering Optimization 43 (2011), No. 5, pp. 541-557 DOI:10.1080/0305215X.2010.50293510.1080/0305215X.2010.502935Search in Google Scholar

20 F. Hamza, H. Abderazek, S. Lakhdar, D. Ferhat, A. R. Yildiz: Optimum design of cam-roller follower mechanism using a new evolutionary algorithm, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 99 (2018), No. 5-8, pp. 1261-1282 DOI:10.1007/s00170-018-2543-310.1007/s00170-018-2543-3Search in Google Scholar

21 A. Baykasoglu: Design optimization with chaos embedded great deluge algorithm, Applied Soft Computing 12 (2012), pp. 1055-1567 DOI:10.1016/j.asoc.2011.11.01810.1016/j.asoc.2011.11.018Search in Google Scholar

22 B. S Yildiz, N. Pholdee, S. Bureerat, A. R. Yildiz, S. M. Sait: Robust design of a robot gripper mechanism using new hybrid grasshopper optimization algorithm, Expert Systems 38 (3) 2021, e12666 DOI:10.1111/exsy.1266610.1111/exsy.12666Search in Google Scholar

23 B. Aslan, A. R. Yildiz: Optimum design of automobile components using lattice structures for additive manufacturing, Materials Testing 52 (2020), pp. 633-639 DOI:10.3139/120.11152710.3139/120.111527Search in Google Scholar

24 H. Abderazek, A. R. Yildiz, S. Mirjalili: Comparison of recent optimization algorithms for design optimization of a cam-follower mechanism, Knowledge-Based Systems 105 (2020), No. 105237 DOI:10.1016/j.knosys.2019.10523710.1016/j.knosys.2019.105237Search in Google Scholar

25 H. Abderazek, A. R. Yildiz, S. M. Sait: Optimal design of planetary gear train for automotive transmissions using advanced meta-heuristics, International Journal of Vehicle Design 80 (2019), No. 2-4, pp. 121-136 DOI:10.1504/IJVD.2019.10986210.1504/IJVD.2019.109862Search in Google Scholar

26 H. Abderazek, A. R. Yildiz, S. M. Sait: Mechanical engineering design optimisation using novel adaptive differential evolution algorithm, International Journal of Vehicle Design, 80 (2019), No. 2-4, pp. 285-329 DOI:10.1504/IJVD.2019.10987310.1504/IJVD.2019.109873Search in Google Scholar

27 N. Panagan, N. Pholdee; K. Wansasueb, S. Bureerat, A. R. Yildiz; S. M. Sait: Comparison of recent algorithms for many-objective optimisation of an automotive floor-frame, International Journal of Vehicle Design, 80 (2019), No. 2-4, pp. 176-208 DOI:10.1504/IJVD.2019.10986310.1504/IJVD.2019.109863Search in Google Scholar

28 R. Sarangkum, K. Wansasueb, N. Panagant, N. Pholdee; S. Bureerat, A. R. Yildiz; S. M. Sait: Automated design of aircraft fuselage stiffeners using multiobjective evolutionary optimisation, International Journal of Vehicle Design, 80 (2019), No. 2-4, pp. 162-175 DOI:10.1504/IJVD.2019.10986410.1504/IJVD.2019.109864Search in Google Scholar

29 C. M. Aye, N. Pholdee, A. R. Yildiz, S. Bureerat, S. M. Sait: Multi-surrogate-assisted metaheuristics for crashworthiness optimisation, International Journal of Vehicle Design 80 (2019), No. 2-4, pp. 223-240 DOI:10.1504/IJVD.2019.10986610.1504/IJVD.2019.109866Search in Google Scholar

30 A. R. Yildiz: Comparison of evolutionary based optimization algorithms for structural design optimization, Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence 26 (2013), No. 1, pp. 327-333 DOI:10.1016/j.engappai.2012.05.01410.1016/j.engappai.2012.05.014Search in Google Scholar

31 A. R. Yildiz, K. Saitou: Topology Synthesis of Multi-Component Structural Assemblies in Continuum Domains, Transactions of ASME, Journal of Mechanical Design 133 (2011), No.1, No. 011008-9 DOI:10.1115/1.400303810.1115/1.4003038Search in Google Scholar

32 B. S. Yildiz: A comparative investigation of eight recent population-based optimisation algorithms for mechanical and structural design problems, International Journal of Vehicle Design 73 (2017), No. 1-3, pp. 208-218 DOI:10.1504/IJVD.2017.08260310.1504/IJVD.2017.082603Search in Google Scholar

33 E. Demirci, A. R. Yıldız: An experimental and numerical investigation of the effects of geometry and spot welds on the crashworthiness of vehicle thin-walled structures, Materials Testing 60 (2018), No. 6, pp. 553-561 DOI:10.3139/120.11118710.3139/120.111187Search in Google Scholar

34 E. Demirci, A. R. Yıldız: An investigation of the crash performance of magnesium, aluminum and advanced high strength steels and different cross-sections for vehicle thin-walled energy absorbers, Materials Testing 60 (2018), pp. 661-668 DOI:10.3139/120.11120110.3139/120.111201Search in Google Scholar

35 T. Guler, A. Demirci, A. R. Yıldız, U. Yavuz: Lightweight design of an automobile hinge component using glass fiber polyamide composites, Materials Testing 60 (2018), No. 3, pp. 306-310 DOI:10.3139/120.11115210.3139/120.111152Search in Google Scholar

36 A. R. Yildiz: A new hybrid particle swarm optimization approach for structural design optimization in automotive industry, Journal of Automobile Engineering 226 (2012), No. 10, pp. 1340-1351 DOI:10.1177/095440701244363610.1177/0954407012443636Search in Google Scholar

37 B. S. Yildiz: Natural frequency optimization of vehicle components using the interior search algorithm, Materials Testing 59 (2017), No. 5, pp. 456-458 DOI:10.3139/120.11101810.3139/120.111018Search in Google Scholar

38 M. Mitić, N. Vuković, M. Petrović, Z. Miljković: Chaotic fruit fly optimization algorithm, Knowledge-Based Systems 89 (2015), pp. 446-458 DOI:10.1016/j.knosys.2015.08.01010.1016/j.knosys.2015.08.010Search in Google Scholar

39 E. Demirci, A. R. Yıldız: A new hybrid approach for reliability-based design optimization of structural components, Materials Testing 61 (2019), pp. 111-119 DOI:10.3139/120.11129110.3139/120.111291Search in Google Scholar

40 A. R. Yildiz: A novel hybrid whale nelder mead algorithm for optimization of design and manufacturing problems, International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 105 (2019), pp. 5091-5104 DOI:10.1007/s00170-019-04532-110.1007/s00170-019-04532-1Search in Google Scholar

41 G. G. Tejani, N. Pholdee, S. Bureerat, D. Prayogo, A. H. Gandomi: Structural optimization using multi-objective modified adaptive symbiotic organisms search, Expert Systems with Applications 125 (2019), pp. 425-441 DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2019.01.06810.1016/j.eswa.2019.01.068Search in Google Scholar

42 N. Panagant, S. Bureerat: Truss topology, shape and sizing optimization by fully stressed design based on hybrid grey wolf optimization and adaptive differential evolution, Engineering Optimization 50 (2018), No. 10, pp. 1645-1661 DOI: 10.1080/0305215X.2017.141740010.1080/0305215X.2017.1417400Search in Google Scholar

43 S. Bureerat, N. Pholdee: Inverse problem based differential evolution for efficient structural health monitoring of trusses, Applied Soft Computing 66 (2018), pp. 462-472 DOI:10.1016/j.asoc.2018.02.04610.1016/j.asoc.2018.02.046Search in Google Scholar

44 A. R. Yildiz, F. Öztürk: Hybrid Taguchi-Harmony search approach for shape optimization, Recent Advances in Harmony Search Algorithm, Studies in Computational Intelligence 270 (2010), pp. 89-98 DOI:10.1007/978-3-642-04317-8_810.1007/978-3-642-04317-8_8Search in Google Scholar

45 S. Arora, S. Singh: Butterfly optimization algorithm: A novel approach for global optimization, Soft Computing 23 (2019), pp. 715-734 DOI:10.1007/s00500-018-3102-4 A.10.1007/s00500-018-3102-4ASearch in Google Scholar

46 A. Kaveh, M. Khayatazad: A new meta-heuristic method: ray optimization, Computers and Structures 112 (2012), pp. 283-294 DOI:10.1016/j.compstruc.2012.09.00310.1016/j.compstruc.2012.09.003Search in Google Scholar

47 B. S Yildiz, V. Patel, N. Pholdee, S. M. Sait, S. Bureerat, A. R. Yildiz: Conceptual comparison of the ecogeography-based algorithm, equilibrium algorithm, marine predators algorithm and slime mold algorithm for optimal product design, Materials Testing 63 (2021) 4, pp. 336-340 DOI:10.1515/mt-2020-004910.1515/mt-2020-0049Search in Google Scholar

48 B. S. Yildiz, N. Pholdee, S. Bureerat, S. M. Sait, A. R. Yildiz: Sine-cosine optimization algorithm for the conceptual design of automobile components, Materials Testing 62 (2020), pp. 744-748 DOI:10.3139/120.11154110.3139/120.111541Search in Google Scholar

49 H. Abderazek, F. Hamza, A. R. Yildiz, S. M. Sait: Comparative investigation of the moth-flame algorithm and whale optimization algorithm for optimal spur gear design, Materials Testing 63 (2021) 3, pp. 266-271 DOI:10.1515/mt-2020-003910.1515/mt-2020-0039Search in Google Scholar

50 S. Gupta, K. Deep: Improved sine cosine algorithm with crossover scheme for global optimization, Knowledge-Based Systems 165 (2019), pp. 374-406 DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2018.12.00810.1016/j.knosys.2018.12.008Search in Google Scholar

51 B. S Yildiz, N. Pholdee, S. Bureerat, A. R. Yildiz, S. M. Sait: Comparision of the political optimization algorithm, the Archimedes optimization algorithm and the Levy flight algorithm for design optimization in industry, Materials Testing 63 (2021) 4, pp. 356-359 DOI 10.1515/mt-2020-00510.1515/mt-2020-005Search in Google Scholar

52 S. I. Song, G. J. Park: Multidisciplinary optimization of an automotive door with a tailored blank, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part D: Journal of Automobile Engineering 220 (2006), No. 2, pp. 151-163 DOI:10.1243/095440706X7277210.1243/095440706X72772Search in Google Scholar

53 B. S. Yildiz: Robust design of electric vehicle components using a new hybrid salp swarm algorithm and radial basis function-based approach, International Journal of Vehicle Design 83 (2020), No. 1, pp. 38-53 DOI:10.1504/IJVD.2020.11477910.1504/IJVD.2020.114779Search in Google Scholar

54 S. Gupta, K. Deep: An opposition-based chaotic grey wolf optimizer for global optimisation tasks, Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Artificial Intelligence 31 (2019), pp. 751-779 DOI:10.1080/0952813X.2018.155471210.1080/0952813X.2018.1554712Search in Google Scholar

55 B. S. Yildiz: Slime mould algorithm and kriging surrogate model-based approach for enhanced crashworthiness of electric vehicles, International Journal of Vehicle Design 83 (2020), No. 1, pp. 54-68 DOI:10.1504/IJVD.2020.11478610.1504/IJVD.2020.114786Search in Google Scholar

56 B. Crawford, R. Soto, E. Monfroy, W. Palma, C. Castro, F. Paredes: Parameter tuning of a choice-function based hyperheuristic using particle swarm optimization, Expert Systems with Applications 40 (2013), pp. 1690-1695 DOI:10.1016/j.eswa.2012.09.013 S. Zhang, Z. Ren, C. Li, J. Xuan:A perturbation adaptive pursuit strategy based hyper-heuristic for multi-objective optimization problems. Swarm and Evolutionary Computation, 54 (2020), No. 100647 DOI:10.1016/j.swevo.2020.10064710.1016/j.eswa.2012.09.013Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2021-06-30
Published in Print: 2021-06-30

© 2021 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston, Germany

Downloaded on 28.5.2023 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/mt-2020-0091/html
Scroll to top button