Accessible Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter September 11, 2021

Testing of mechanical butt joints in composite structures

Gurkan Altan
From the journal Materials Testing

Abstract

As the main contribution of the present study, an I-shaped joining element, which allows the plates used in large composite structures to be joined butt-to-butt, has been improved in terms of load capabilities. It is desirable that the joining zones of composite plates not be visible according to the design of composite structures and the requirements for the desired use in particular. In other words, it is not desirable to create any surfaces that would cause protrusions in the joining zones. The only joining technique that fulfils this condition is the butt joint. Generally, butt joints are performed by bonding. With this technique, it is possible to make a more durable mechanical butt joint using an I-shaped joining element. In this way, instead of bonding butt joints, stronger non-bonding or bonding mechanical butt joints can also be achieved. In this study, the geometric changes in the shape of an I-shaped joining element used in mechanical butt joints and the changes in load-carrying capabilities have been studied experimentally and numerically. Experiments were carried out with tensile, three-point bending and four-point bending tests. The experimental specimens and I-shaped joining elements were cut using a water jet machine. Abaqus finite element analysis software was used for numerical analysis. The numerical data obtained in the study were found to be consistent with the experimental data. The load-carrying capabilities of the joining elements of different geometric shapes were studied numerically and experimentally, and it was found that the ideal element was the joining element with a 60° angle.


Gurkan ALTAN Akdeniz University Faculty of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering Department 07058 Antalya, Turkey

Funding statement: The author would like to thank the TUBITAK, Turkey, for providing financial support for this study under Project No: 110M250.

References

1 V. Kradinov, E. Madenci, D. R. Ambur: Bolted lap joints of laminates with varying thickness and metallic inserts, Composite Structures 68 (2005), pp. 75-85 DOI:10.1016/j.compstruct.2004.03.002 Search in Google Scholar

2 P. P. Camanho, M. A. Lambert: A design methodology for mechanically fastened joints in laminated composite materials, Composite Science of Technology 66 (2006), pp. 3004-3020 DOI:10.1016/j.compscitech.2006.02.017 Search in Google Scholar

3 A. J. Kinlocha, G. K. A. Kodokianab: The design of double-overlap joints using thermoplasticfibre composites, The Journal of Adhesion 37 (1992), No. 1, pp. 33-45 DOI:10.1080/00218469208031247 Search in Google Scholar

4 K. S. Kim, Y. M. Yi, G. R. Cho, C. G. Kim: Failure prediction and strength improvement of uni-directional composite single lap bonded joints, Composite Structures 82 (2008), pp. 513-520 DOI:10.1016/j.compstruct.2007.02.005 Search in Google Scholar

5 E. A. Diler, C. Ozes, G. Neser: Effect of T-joint geometry on the performance of a GRP/PVC sandwich system subjected to tension, Journal of Reinforced Plastics Composites 28 (2009), pp. 49-58 DOI:10.1177/0731684407081378 Search in Google Scholar

6 G. Altan, M. Topcu: An investigation on damage loads of mechanical butt joints in composite structures, Journal of Reinforced Plastics Composites Composite 34 (2015), No.10, pp. 839-853 DOI:10.1177/0731684415583165 Search in Google Scholar

7 T. H. Kim, J. H. Kweon, J. H. Choi: An experimental study on the effect of overlap length on the failure of composite-to-aluminum single-lap bonded joints, Journal of Reinforced Plastics Composites 27 (2008), pp. 1071-1081 DOI:10.1177/0731684407087074 Search in Google Scholar

8 L. Zhao, T. Qin, R. A. Shenoi, J. Zhang: Strength prediction of composite p joints under tensile load, Journal of Composite Materials 44 (2010), pp. 2759-2778 DOI:10.1177/0021998310369593 Search in Google Scholar

9 J. W. Nader, H. J. Dagher, R. Lopez-Anido: Size effects on the bending strength of fiber-reinforced polymer matrix composites, Journal of Reinforced Plastics Composites 30 (2011), pp. 309-316 DOI:10.1177/0731684410396598 Search in Google Scholar

10 M. Dawood, E. Taylor, S. Rizkala: Two-way bending behaviour of 3-D GFRP sandwich panels with through-thickness fiber insertions, Composite Structures 92 (2010), pp. 950-963 DOI:10.1016/j.compstruct.2009.09.040 Search in Google Scholar

11 S. B. Basturk, M. Tanoglu: Development and mechanical behaviour of FML/Aluminium foam sandwiches, Applied Composite Materials 20 (2013), pp. 789-802 DOI:10.1007/s10443-012-9306-3 Search in Google Scholar

12 S. D. Malingam, K. Subramaniam, N. L. Feng, S. H. S. MD Fadzullah, S. Subramonian: Mechanical properties of plain woven kenaf/ glass fiber reinforced polypropylene hybrid composites, Materials Testing 61 (2019), No. 11, pp. 1095-1100 DOI:10.3139/120.111426 Search in Google Scholar

13 S. M. Radhakrishnan, B. Dyer, M. Kashtalyan, A. R. Akisanya, I. Guz, C. Wilkinson: Analysis of bolted flanged panel joint for GRP sectional tanks, Applied Composite Materials 21 (2014), pp. 247-261 DOI:10.1007/s10443-014-9385-4 Search in Google Scholar

14 H. Aydin, S. Temiz: Experimental and numerical strength analysis of double lap joints subjected to tensile loads, Materials Testing 56 (2014), No.2, pp. 160-168 DOI:10.3139/120.110521 Search in Google Scholar

15 M. Shishesaz, M. Hosseini: Effects of joint geometry and material on stress distribution, strength and failure of bonded composite joints: an overview, The Journal of Adhesion 96 (2018), No.12, pp. 1053-1121 DOI:10.1080/00218464.2018.1554483 Search in Google Scholar

16 A. Ulker, S. Saye, V. Ceyhun: Welding parameters and joint strength optimization during friction stir welding of high-density polyethylene (HDPE) using the Taguchi method, Materials Testing 58 (2016), No.5, pp. 423-432 DOI:10.3139/120.110874 Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2021-09-11
Published in Print: 2021-09-30

© 2021 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston, Germany