Accessible Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter November 30, 2021

Failure analysis of simple overlap bonding joints and numerical investigation of the adhered tip geometry effect on the joint strength

İsmail Saraç
From the journal Materials Testing

Abstract

This study was carried out in two stages. In the first step, a numerical study was performed to verify the previous experimental study. In accordance with the previous experimental study data, single lap joints models were created using the ANSYS finite element analysis program. Then, nonlinear stress and failure analyses were performed by applying the failure loads obtained in the experimental study. The maximum stress theory was used to find finite element failure loads of the single lap joints models. As a result of the finite element analysis, an approximate 80 % agreement was found between experimental and numerical results. In the second step of the study, in order to increase the bond strength, different overlap end geometry models were produced and peel and shear stresses in the adhesive layer were compared according to the reference model. As a result of the analyses, significant strength increases were calculated according to the reference model. The strength increase in model 3 and model 5 was found to be 80 % and 67 %, respectively, relative to the reference model.


Assistant Prof. Dr. İsmail Saraç Department of Mechanical Engineering Aksaray University, Aksaray/Turkey

References

1 Ş. Temiz, A. Özel, M. D. Aydın: The effect of adherend thickness on the failure of adhesively bonded single lap joints, Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology 19 (2005), No. 8, pp. 705-718 DOI:10.1163/156856105489049910.1163/1568561054890499Search in Google Scholar

2 A. Şahin: Investigation of shear strength of composite metal foam materials with single bonded adhesive joints, MSc. Thesis, Institute of Natural and Applied Sciences of Trakya University, Edirne, Turkey (2011)Search in Google Scholar

3 F. Ascione, L. Feo, M. Lamberti, R. Penna: Experimental and numerical evaluation of the axial stiffness of the web to-flange adhesive connections in composite I-beams, Composite Structures 176 (2017), pp. 702-714 DOI:10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.05.07110.1016/j.compstruct.2017.05.071Search in Google Scholar

4 F. Ascione, M. Lamberti, G. Razaqpur, S. Spadea: Strength and stiffness of adhesively bonded GFRP beam-column moment resisting connections, Composite Structures 160 (2017), pp. 1248-1287 DOI:10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.11.02110.1016/j.compstruct.2016.11.021Search in Google Scholar

5 P. T. Cheuk, L. Tong, C. H. Wang, A. Baker, P. Chalkley: Fatigue crack growth in adhesively bonded composite-metal double-lap joints, Composite Structures 57 (2002), pp. 109-115 DOI:10.1016/S0263-8223(02)00074-010.1016/S0263-8223(02)00074-0Search in Google Scholar

6 H. Hadavinia, A. J. Kinloch, M. S. G. Little, A. C. Taylor: The prediction of crackgrowth in bonded joints under cyclic-fatigue loading I – Experimental studies, International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives 23 (2003), pp. 449-461 DOI:10.1016/S0143-7496(03)00074-510.1016/S0143-7496(03)00074-5Search in Google Scholar

7 M. M. Abdel Wahab, I. A. Ashcroft, A. D. Crocombe, P. A. Smith: Finite element prediction of fatigue crack propagation lifetime in composite bonded joints, Composites: Part A 35 (2004), pp. 213-222 DOI:10.1016/j.compositesa.2003.10.00210.1016/j.compositesa.2003.10.002Search in Google Scholar

8 G. Kelly: Quasi-static strength and fatigue life of hybrid (bonded/bolted) composite single-lap joints, Composite Structures 72 (2006), No. 1, pp. 119-129 DOI:10.1016/j.compstruct.2004.11.00210.1016/j.compstruct.2004.11.002Search in Google Scholar

9 H. Adin, Ş. Temiz: Experimental and numerical strength analysis of double lap joints subjected to tensile loads, Materials Testing 56 (2014), No. 2, pp. 160-168 DOI:10.3139/120.11052110.3139/120.110521Search in Google Scholar

10 İ.Y. Sülü, Ş. Temiz: Failure analysis of an adhesively joined composite pipe system under internal pressure, Materials Testing 60 (2018), No. 10, pp. 997 − 1003 DOI:10.3139/120.11124110.3139/120.111241Search in Google Scholar

11 A. G. Solana, A. D. Crocombe, I. A. Ashcroft: Fatigue life and backface strain predictions in adhesively bonded joints, International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives 30 (2010), No. 1, pp. 36-42 DOI:10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2009.08.00110.1016/j.ijadhadh.2009.08.001Search in Google Scholar

12 S. Akpınar: The effect of adherend thickness and width on fracture behavior in adhesively bonded double cantilever beam joints, European Mechanical Science 3 (2019), No. 3, pp. 83 − 87 DOI:10.26701/ems.56677310.26701/ems.566773Search in Google Scholar

13 M. D. Aydın: Experimental and theoretical investigation of mechanical properties of adhesively bonded single lap joint, PhD Thesis, Atatürk University Institute of Science and Technology, Erzurum, Turkey (2003)Search in Google Scholar

14 B. Duncan, G. Dean: Measurement and models for design with modern adhesives, International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives 23 (2003), No. 2, pp. 141-149 DOI:10.1016/S0143-7496(03)00006-X10.1016/S0143-7496(03)00006-XSearch in Google Scholar

15 M. Y. Solmaz: Mechanical analysis and design of adhesive bonded joints, PhD Thesis, Fırat University Institute of Science and Technology, Elazığ, Turkey (2008)Search in Google Scholar

16 A. Çalık: Effect of adherend shape on stress concentration reduction of adhesively bonded single lap joint, Engineering Review 36 (2016), No. 1, pp. 29-34 DOI:hrcak.srce.hr/151838Search in Google Scholar

17 A. Pinto, N. Ribeiro, R. Campilho, I. R. Mendes: Effect of adherend recessing on the tensile strength of single lap joints, The Journal of Adhesion 90 (2014), No. 8, pp. 649-666 DOI:10.1080/00218464.2013.76613210.1080/00218464.2013.766132Search in Google Scholar

18 L. Kırkayak: The effects of adhesive geometry on the stress distribution in bonded joints, Pamukkale University Journal of Engineering Sciences 25 (2019), No. 1, pp. 27-33 DOI:10.5505/pajes.2018.5428910.5505/pajes.2018.54289Search in Google Scholar

19 İ. Saraç, H. Adin,Ş. Temiz: Experimental determination of the mechanical properties of adhesive joints bonded epoxy adhesive included Al2O3 nanoparticle, European Journal of Technique 6 (2016), No. 2, pp. 104-112Search in Google Scholar

20 N. N.: ANSYS – The general purpose finite element software, Swanson Analysis Systems, Inc., Houston, Texas, USA (2020)Search in Google Scholar

21 L. Malag L. Kukielka: Hybrid method to determinate the states of deformation and stress in material during the tensile test, Procedures of Applied Mathematics and Mechanics 7 (2007), No. 1, pp. 2090025-2090026 DOI:10.1002/pamm.20070109910.1002/pamm.200701099Search in Google Scholar

22 P. G. Kossakowski, W. Wcislik: Numerical simulation of material damage for structural steels S235JR and S355J2G3, Advances in Computational Design 3 (2018), No. 2, pp. 133-146 DOI:10.12989/acd.2018.3.2.13310.12989/acd.2018.3.2.133Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2021-11-30

© 2021 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston