Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter Mouton July 8, 2015

Hybrid practices meet nation-state language policies: Transcarpathia in the twentieth century and today

István Csernicskó and Petteri Laihonen
From the journal Multilingua

Abstract

From the early twentieth century to the present day, Transcarpathia has belonged to several states: the Austrian-Hungarian Monarchy, Czechoslovakia, the Hungarian Kingdom, the Soviet Union, and finally to Ukraine. The status of what counts as a minority and a majority language has changed each time the state affiliation has been changed. Based on the long term research by Csernicskó, and on the one-month fieldwork carried out by Laihonen in 2012, our goal is to provide an autonomous critical account and discourse analysis of the linguistic situation in Transcarpathia. We draw examples especially from the linguistic landscape, which documents the hybrid practices difficult to catch with other means. Different nation states have aimed to evaluate certain languages over others. However, Transcarpathia has been too far away from different national centers and it has therefore remained a periphery. In the everyday life of Transcarpathians, ironies around language repertoires, standardization and heteroglossia come into the fore, especially in the current context. Such unexpected linguistic practices or “pre-nationalist” and “non-purist” ideologies offer a change to see how certain categories, such as language, have remained in their hybrid forms and are still clearly “in the making”.

Funding statement: Funding: The research was supported by the Academy of Finland grant 137718 for Laihonen.

Acknowledgments

Both authors contributed equally. We thank István Lanstyák for his comments and Bridget Goodman for polishing our content and language. We express our gratitude to the reviewers and editors of Multilingua. Any errors remain our own responsibility.

References

Application of the charter in Ukraine, 2nd Monitoring Cycle. 2014. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.Search in Google Scholar

Berecz, Ágoston. 2013. The politics of early language teaching: Hungarian in the primary schools of the late Dual Monarchy. Budapest: Pasts Inc.Search in Google Scholar

Beregszászi, Anikó. 1995–1996. Language planning issues of Hungarian place names in Subcarpathia . Acta Linguistica Hungarica43(3–4). 18.Search in Google Scholar

Besters-Dilger, Juliane (ed.). 2009. Language policy and language situation in Ukraine: Analysis and recommendations. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Search in Google Scholar

Blommaert, Jan.2010. The sociolinguistics of globalization. New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511845307Search in Google Scholar

Blommaert, Jan.2013. Complexity, accent, and conviviality: Concluding comments . Applied Linguistics34(5). 613622.Search in Google Scholar

Bowring, Bill.2014. The Russian language in Ukraine: Complicit in Genocide, or Victim of State-building? In LaraRyazanova-Clarke (ed.), The Russian Language Outside the Nation, 5680. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.10.1515/9780748668465-005Search in Google Scholar

Braun, László, IstvánCsernicskó & JózsefMolnár. 2010. Magyar anyanyelvű csigányok/romák Kárpátálján. (Hungarian-speaking Gypsies/Roma in Transcarpathia.) Ungvár: PoliPrint.Search in Google Scholar

Butt, Judy.2002. Transcarpathia: Peripheral region at the ‘centre of Europe’ . Regional & Federal Studies12(2). 155177.10.1080/714004744Search in Google Scholar

Csernicskó, István. 2005. Hungarian in Ukraine. In Fenyvesi, Anna (ed.) Hungarian language contact outside Hungary: Studies on Hungarian as a minority language, 89131. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/impact.20.11cseSearch in Google Scholar

Csernicskó, István. 2011. The linguistic aspects of the Ukrainian educational policy . ESUKA – JEFUL2–1. 7591.10.12697/jeful.2011.2.1.05Search in Google Scholar

Csernicskó, István. 2013. Államok, Nyelvek, Államnyelvek: Nyelvpolitika a mai Kárpátalja területén (1867–2010). (States, languages, state languages: Language policy in the territory of current Subcarpathia.) Budapest: Gondolat.Search in Google Scholar

Fishman, Joshua & OfeliaGarcia (eds.). 2010–2011. Handbook of language and ethnic identity. 2nd edn., vols. 1 & 2. New York: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Fedinec, Csilla.1999. Fejezetek a kárpátaljai magyar közoktatás történetéből (1938–1991). (Chapters from the history of Hungarian public education in Transcarpathia (1938–1991).) Budapest: Nemzetközi Hungarológiai Központ.Search in Google Scholar

Guzinec, Yurii & MariaMoca (eds.). 2011. Єдина родина. Матеріали про національно-культурні товариства Закарпаття. (One family. Facts on ethno-cultural organizations in Transcarpathia.) Uzhhorod: Lira.Search in Google Scholar

Heller, Monica.2011. Paths to post-nationalism: A critical ethnography of language and identity. New York: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Nyelv és tudomány [portal]Hamis kutyák Dél-Szlovákiában? [‘Hamis’ dogs in Southern Slovakia]. Nyelv és tudomány [portal]. 2012. http://www.nyest.hu/hirek/hamis-kutyak-del-szlovakiaban (accessed 2 June 2014).Search in Google Scholar

Introducing Transcarpathia. Lonely planet2014. www.lonelyplanet.com/ukraine/transcarpathia (accessed 2 June 2014).Search in Google Scholar

Jóźwiak, Ignacy. 2013. Negotiating the territory in a Transcarpathian urban-type settlement. In MarijaBeham & MarkusWakounig (eds.), Transgressing boundaries – Humanities in flux, 215228. Vienna: LIT Verlag.Search in Google Scholar

Kamuszella, Tomasz.2012. The politics of language and nationalism in modern Central Europe. Basingstoke: Palgrave.Search in Google Scholar

Kloss, Heinz.1967. Types of multilingual communities: A discussion of ten variables. In StanleyLieberson (ed.), Explorations in sociolinguistics, 717. Bloomington: Indiana University.Search in Google Scholar

Kushko, Nadiya.2007. Literary standards of the Rusyn language: The historical context and contemporary situation . Slavic and East European Journal51(1). 111132.Search in Google Scholar

Kuzio, Taras.2005. The Rusyn question in Ukraine: Sorting out fact from fiction . Canadian Review of Studies in Nationalism, XXXII. 115.Search in Google Scholar

Lanstyák, István1995. A magyar nyelv központjai. [The centers of the Hungarian language] . Magyar Tudomány102(10). 11701183.Search in Google Scholar

Magocsi, Paul.1995. A new Slavic language is born . East European Politics and Societies9(3). 534537.10.1177/0888325495009003008Search in Google Scholar

Magocsi, Paul.2005. Jews in Transcarpathia: A brief historical outline. Uzhhorod: Vyd-vo V. Padiaka.Search in Google Scholar

May, Stephen.2012. Language and Minority Rights: Ethnicity, Nationalism and the Politics of Language. 2nd edn. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Moore, Robert E., SariPietikäinen & JanBlommaert.2010. Counting the losses: numbers as the language of endangerment . Sociolinguistic Studies4(1). 126.10.1558/sols.v4i1.1Search in Google Scholar

Pavlenko, Aneta.2008. Multilingualism in Post-Soviet countries: Language revival, language removal, and sociolinguistic theory . International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism11(3–4). 275314.Search in Google Scholar

Pavlenko, Aneta.2009. Language conflict in Post-Soviet linguistic landscapes . Journal of Slavic Linguistics17(1–2). 247274.10.1353/jsl.0.0025Search in Google Scholar

Pavlenko, Aneta.2011. Language rights versus speakers’ rights: on the applicability of Western language rights approaches in Eastern European contexts . Language Policy10(1). 3758.10.1007/s10993-011-9194-7Search in Google Scholar

Pavlenko, Aneta.2013. Multilingualism in Post-Soviet successor states . Language and Linguistics Compass7(4). 262271.10.1111/lnc3.12024Search in Google Scholar

Pennycook, Alistair.2010. Language as a local practice. New York: Routledge.10.4324/9780203846223Search in Google Scholar

Pennycook, Alistair.2012. Language and mobility: Unexpected places. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.10.21832/9781847697653Search in Google Scholar

Pietikäinen, Sari.2013. Heteroglossic authenticity in Sami heritage tourism. In SariPietikäinen, & HelenKelly-Holmes (eds.), Multilingualism and the periphery, 7794. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199945177.003.0005Search in Google Scholar

Pietikäinen, Sari & HelenKelly-Holmes (eds.). 2013. Multilingualism and the periphery. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199945177.003.0001Search in Google Scholar

Pujolar, Joan.2013. Tourism and Gender in Linguistic Minority Communities. In SariPietikäinen & HelenKelly-Holmes (eds.), Multilingualism and the periphery, 5576. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199945177.003.0004Search in Google Scholar

Rusinko, Elana.1996. Between Russia and Hungary: Foundations of literature and national identity in Subcarpathian Rus’ . Slavonic & East European Review74(3). 421444.Search in Google Scholar

Shohamy, Elana.2006. Language policy: Hidden agendas and new approaches. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203387962Search in Google Scholar

Taranenko, Oleksandr.2007. Ukrainian and Russian in contact: Attraction and estrangement . International Journal of the Sociology of Language183. 119140.10.1515/IJSL.2007.007Search in Google Scholar

Trier, Tom.1999. Inter-ethnic relations in Transcarpathian Ukraine. ECMI Report # 4. Uzhhorod: European Centre for Minority Issues.Search in Google Scholar

Vdovenko, Vitalii (ed.). 2007. Закарпатська область (1:250 000). Політико-адміністративна карта. Офіційне видання. [Transcarpathian Region (1:250 000). Political and Administrative Map. Official Publication] Київ: Державна Служба Геодезії, Картографії та Кадастру, Державне Науково-Виробниче Підприємство «КАРТОГРАФІЯ».Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2015-7-8
Published in Print: 2016-1-1

©2016 by De Gruyter Mouton