Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter November 11, 2014

Women’s Rights in Islamic Shari’a: Between Interpretation, Culture and Politics

  • Dina Mansour EMAIL logo


This article analyses existing biases – whether due to misinterpretation, culture or politics – in the application of women’s rights under Islamic Shari’a law. The paper argues that though in its inception, one purpose of Islamic law may have aimed at elevating the status of women in pre-Islamic Arabia, biases in interpreting such teachings have failed to free women from discrimination and have even added “divinity” to their persistent subjugation. By examining two case studies – Saudi Arabia and Egypt – the article shows that interpretative biases that differ in application from one country to the other further subject women to the selective application of rights. Dictated by norms, culture and tradition rather than a unified Islamic law, the paper shows how culture and politics have contributed to such biases under the pre-text of Islamic dictate. As such, it proposes a re-examination of “personal status” laws across the region in light of international human rights norms.


I am particularly grateful to Cameron Thibos of the European University Institute (EUI), whose comments and edits greatly improved this paper. I am also grateful to Sebastian Ille of the Lebanese American University (LAU) for his helpful comments and to Lana Baydas for her support in the initial phase of this article.


al-Hibri, A. Y. 2001. “Muslim Women’s Rights in the Global Village: Challenges and Opportunities.” Journal of Law and Religion15:3766.10.2307/1051514Search in Google Scholar

Ali, S. S. 2000. Gender and Human Rights in Islam and International Law: Equal before Allah, Unequal Before Man?The Hague; Boston, MA: Kluwer Law International.10.1163/9789004479951Search in Google Scholar

Ambah, F. S. 2008. “Saudi Women See a Brighter Road on Rights.” Washington Post Foreign Service 31 Jan. 2008. Web: Accessed August 7, 2011.Search in Google Scholar

Baderin, M. A. 2003. International Human Rights and Islamic Law. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Bernard-Maugiron, N.2010. Personal Status Laws in Egypt – Promotion of Women’s Rights: FAQ. Cairo: German Technical Cooperation Office [GTZ]. GTZ Reports. Web: Accessed June 3, 2011.Search in Google Scholar

Bielefeldt, H. 2000. “‘Western’ Versus ‘Islamic’ Human Rights Conceptions? A Critique of Cultural Essentialism in the Discussion on Human Rights.” Political Theory28(1):90121.10.1177/0090591700028001005Search in Google Scholar

Brandt, M., and J. A.Kaplan. 1996. “The Tension Between Women’s Rights and Religious Rights: Reservations to CEDAW by Egypt, Bangladesh and Tunisia.” Journal of Law and Religion12(1):10542.10.2307/1051612Search in Google Scholar

Cairo Institute for Human Rights Studies. 2010. Annual Human Rights Report in Arab Region: Bastion of Impunity. Cairo, Egypt: CIHRS. Web: Accessed February 5, 2012.Search in Google Scholar

Cline, A. 2014. “Religion as Opium of the People.” Agnosticism/Atheism. 30 July 2014. Web. Accessed June 30, 2011.Search in Google Scholar

Coleman, I. 2011. “Are the Mideast Revolutions Bad for Women’s Rights?” Washington Post 20 Feb. 2011. Web. Accessed July 12, 2012.Search in Google Scholar

Constitution of Saudi Arabia. 1992. “Saudia Arabia: Basic Law [Saudi Arabia], 1 March 1992.” Accessed February 1, 2009.Search in Google Scholar

Constitution of the Arab Republic of Egypt. January 18, 2014. Available at: Accessed July 12, 2014.Search in Google Scholar

Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women” (CEDAW). 1979. Country Reservations: Declarations, Reservations and Objections to CEDAW. Web: Accessed February 3, 2009.Search in Google Scholar

Dalacoura, K. 1998. Islam, Liberalism and Human Rights: Implications for International Relations. London; New York: I B Tauris.10.5040/9780755609895Search in Google Scholar

ENP Country Progress Report 2009–Egypt.2010. 12 May 2010. Web: Accessed June 1, 2012.Search in Google Scholar

Essential Background: Overview of Human Rights Issues in Saudi Arabia – Country Summary.” January 2008. Web: Accessed February 16, 2009.Search in Google Scholar

Hawley, C. 2000. “Divorce Law Fails to Prompt Deluge.” BBC News 28 Aug. 2000. Web. Accessed July 21, 2011.Search in Google Scholar

Human Rights in Saudi Arabia: A Deafening Silence – Human Rights Watch Backgrounder.” 12 Apr. 2001. Web: Accessed June 5, 2012.Search in Google Scholar

Jansen, J. J. G. 1985. “The Creed of Sadat’s Assassins. the Contents of ‘the Forgotten Duty’ Analysed.” Weltislams Die Welt Des Islams25(1/4):130.10.1163/157006085X00017Search in Google Scholar

MacFarquhar, N. 2011. “Saudis Arrest Woman Leading Right-to-Drive Campaign.” NYTimes 23 May 2011. Web. Accessed August 5, 2011.Search in Google Scholar

Mayer, A. E. 1987. “Law and Religion in the Muslim Middle East.” The American Journal of Comparative Law35(1):12784. JSTOR. 3 July 2011. Web: in Google Scholar

Mayer, A. E. 2000. “A ‘Benign’ Apartheid: How Gender Apartheid Has Been Rationalized.” UCLA Journal of International Law & Foreign Affairs5:237338.Search in Google Scholar

Mayer, A. E. 2002. “Islam, Human Rights, and Gender: Traditions and Politics.” the Cornelia Goethe Center of the University of Frankfurt: N.p., 2002. Open WorldCat. Web. Accessed May 23, 2011.Search in Google Scholar

Mayer, A. E. 2007a. Islam and Human Rights: Tradition and Politics. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Search in Google Scholar

Mayer, A. E. 2007b. “The Islam and Human Rights Nexus: Shifting Dimensions.” Muslim World Journal of Human Rights4(1):n. pag.10.2202/1554-4419.1115Search in Google Scholar

Moussa, J. 2005. “The Reform of Shari’a-Derived Divorce Legislation in Egypt: International Standards and the Cultural Debate.” Human Rights Law Commentary1 n. pag. Available at Accessed May 27, 2011.Search in Google Scholar

Naʻīm, ʻAbd Allāh Aḥmad al-. 2000. “Islam and Human Rights: Beyond the Universality Debate.” Proceedings of the American Society of International Law94:95103.Search in Google Scholar

Naʻīm, ʻAbd Allāh Aḥmad al. 2003. “The Synergy and Interdependence of Human Rights, Religion and Secularism.” In Human Rights and Responsibilities in the World Religions Human Rights and Responsibilities in the World Religions, edited by Joseph Runzo, Nancy M. Martin, and Arvind Sharma, 27–49. ISBN 1851683097. Available at Accessed April 19, 2011.Search in Google Scholar

Peters, J., and A.Wolper. 1995. Women’s Rights, Human Rights: International Feminist Perspectives. New York: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Pilkington, E. 2008. “The Women That Time Forgot.” The Guardian 7 June 2008. Web. Accessed February 1, 2011.Search in Google Scholar

S Arabia Eases Laws on Solo Women.BBC 22 Jan. 2008. Accessed February 2, 2009.Search in Google Scholar

Said, A. A. 1979. “Precept and Practice of Human Rights in Islam.” Univhumarigh Universal Human Rights1(1):6379.10.2307/761831Search in Google Scholar

Saudi Women Face Systematic Discrimination – UN Report.2008. Agence France-Presse 1 Feb. 2008. Web:—-UN-report. Accessed August 5, 2011.Search in Google Scholar

Tibi, B. 1994. “Islamic Law/Shari’a, Human Rights. Universal Morality and International Relations.” Human Rights Quarterly162:27799.Search in Google Scholar

UN Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination Against Women: Combined Initial and Second Periodic Reports of States Parties, Saudi Arabia.” 29 Mar. 2007. CEDAW/C/SAU/2. Web. Accessed February 13, 2009.Search in Google Scholar

UN Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women. 2008. Concluding Observations of the Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women: Saudi Arabia, ¶ 21, 1 February 2008, CEDAW/C/SAU/CO/2. Web: Accessed April 12, 2009.Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2014-11-11
Published in Print: 2014-1-1

©2014 by De Gruyter

Downloaded on 24.9.2023 from
Scroll to top button