Skip to content
BY 4.0 license Open Access Published by De Gruyter December 20, 2019

Topological insulator overlayer to enhance the sensitivity and detection limit of surface plasmon resonance sensor

  • Jiaqi Zhu , Yuxuan Ke , Jianfeng Dai , Qi You , Leiming Wu , Jianqing Li , Jun Guo , Yuanjiang Xiang ORCID logo and Xiaoyu Dai EMAIL logo
From the journal Nanophotonics

Abstract

Surface plasmon resonance (SPR) sensors have been applied in a wide range of applications for real-time and label-free detection. In this article, by covering the topological insulators nanosheets on the surface of the noble metal (Au), the sensitivity of the SPR sensor is greatly enhanced because of the strong interaction of light with Au–bismuth selenide (Bi2Se3) heterostructure. It is shown that the sensitivity of proposed SPR sensors depends on the concentration of Bi2Se3 solution or the thickness of the coated Bi2Se3 film. The optimised sensitivity (2929.1 nm/RIU) and figure of merit (33.45 RIU−1) have been obtained after three times drop-casting, and the enhancement sensitivity of proposed sensors is up to 51.97% compared to the traditional Au–SPR sensors. Meanwhile, the reflection spectrum is simulated by using the method of effective refractive index, and the reason for the increase of sensitivity is analysed theoretically. For researching the application of modified SPR sensor, heavy metal detection is employed to detect in the last part. Our proposed SPR sensors have potential applications in heavy metal detections and biosensing.

1 Introduction

Surface plasmon polariton (SPP) is an electron densification wave propagating along the interface of the dielectric medium and the metal, which was first noticed in 1902 by Wood [1]. Surface plasmon polaritons are generally stimulated by the incident light through prism coupler in the Otto geometry or Kretschmann configuration [2], [3], and the phenomenon of surface plasmon resonance (SPR) occurs [4] when the wave vector of SPP matches well with the evanescent wave vector of the incident light. Surface plasmon wave is very sensitive to the changes in the refractive index (RI) of the surrounding environment, so even a tiny change occurring in sensing medium (such as the interaction of biological macromolecules) will arouse the great changes of resonance, such as wavelength, angle, phase, or intensity [5], [6], [7]. With these features, a series of sensors have been designed in biological analysis, chemistry, gas detection, and so on [8], [9], [10], [11]. The means of optical sensing are becoming more diversified, playing an important role in the application field [12], [13], [14], [15], [16]. In some recent literatures, the enhancement sensitivity for SPR sensors based on two-dimensional (2D) materials draws great attention. For example, Wang et al. [17] proposed a wavelength modulation SPR sensor with large sensitivity of 2459.3 nm/RIU based on tungsten disulphide, and Xiong et al. [18] proposed an SPR sensor based on graphene oxide sheets overlayer (2715.1 nm/RIU), and so on. However, it is still not clear how to achieve higher sensitivity in experiments and design the multichannel SPR systems.

With the preparation and development of a series of new materials, such as phosphorene, antimonene, black phosphorus (BP), and so on, they are more widely used in improving the performance of traditional optical devices [19], [20], [21], [22], [23], [24], [25], [26]. The topological insulator is also a typical kind of new material and bulk insulator with a chiral Dirac cone on its surface, which is a new state of quantum matter with internal insulation but the electric conduction for the interface. Since the theory was predicted by Zhang et al. [27], bismuth selenide (Bi2Se3) has attracted much attention. Bi2Se3 has excellent performance in thermoelectric and electronic band structure due to morphology and size, which can be modulated by varying reaction conditions [28], [29], [30], [31], unlike thin vertical thickness of the classic 2D material such as graphene, BP, and so on [32], [33]. Besides, with the larger surface-to-volume ratios than bulk materials, Bi2Se3 nanostructures can improve the surface effect further and offer additional advantages to forward-looking applications and basic researches. Nowadays, because of its unique performance, Bi2Se3 has shown great potential applications in biomedicine, photoacoustic imaging, and high-performance electronic and optoelectronic devices [34], [35], [36], [37], [38]. Moreover, Bi2Se3 topological insulator has the advantages of simple fabrication and low cost, and it is easy to achieve saturable absorption because of the unique significant gap. In this article, we prepared 2D Bi2Se3 nanosheets by solution growth route, which is an effective method to prepare high-quality and controllable 2D Bi2Se3 nanosheets [39], [40], [41].

In this research, we have experimentally demonstrated that Bi2Se3 can improve the sensitivity of SPR sensors. First, by sensing different RI mixed solutions of deionised water and ethylene glycol, we illustrate that the proposed sensor can effectively improve bulk RI sensitivities. Besides, we have discussed the performance of the proposed SPR sensor and analysed the reasons for the increased sensitivity. Finally, by detecting the small concentration of Pb2+ heavy metal ions, we demonstrate that the sensor can sensitively monitor molecular activities in the sensing surface. In this section, we use the units of ppb to express the concentration of Pb2+ solutions, as 1 ppb=10−9 g/ml.

2 Experimental section

2.1 Materials and reagents

Bismuth (III) acetate [Bi(CH3CO2)3, ≥99.99% trace metals basis], hydroxylamine solution (NH2OH, 50% weight in H2O, 99.999%), sodium selenite (Na2SeO3, ≥99%), polyvinylpyrrolidone [PVP, molecular weight (MW)≈58,000] were bought from Sigma-Aldrich (Shanghai, China). Ethylenediamine (≥99.5%), ethylene glycol (EG), and glacial acetic acid (≥99.99%) were acquired from Aladdin (Shanghai, China). Chitosan (MW=50,000 and degree of deacetylation ≥95%) was purchased from Macklin (Shanghai, China). The standard solution (1000 ppm and 1 mol/L HNO3) of Pb2+ was purchased from Ruiqi (Shanghai, China).

2.2 Preparation of chemical reagents

The classic preparation method of 2D Bi2Se3 is solution-based synthesis; we first dissolve 0.3 mmol Bi(CH3CO2)3 and 0.4 g PVP in 10 ml EG and then add 0.45 mmol Na2SeO3 and 1 ml glacial acetic acid in the above solution and keep stirring until a clear solution disappeared. The clear solution should be further heated to 170°C, and then 1 ml NH2OH and EG are rapidly injected in it, finally quickly turning black, which indicates that the required Bi2Se3 nanosheets are well prepared. In the experiment, different RI-sensing medium was acquired by mixing the EG solution and deionised water and measured using the Abbe refractometer. The chitosan solution was a mixture of 0.4 g chitosan and 1% acetic acid (50 ml), and the different concentration of heavy metal (Pb2+) was obtained by diluting with deionised water.

2.3 Optical characterisation instrument

The Raman spectroscopy measurements were performed by using a Raman system (WITec Alpha300 R, Ulm, Baden-Württemberg, Germany). The Raman scattering signal excited by a continuous wave laser of 532 nm was collected by the 100× objective lens with the spot size of ~1 μm. The crystal structure of the prepared Bi2Se3 material was measured by X-ray diffraction (XRD) using Cu Kα radiation (λ=1.541Å) (XRD, D8 ADVANCE, Bruker, Camarillo, CA, USA). The atomic force microscopy (AFM) (Bruker, Dimension Icon, Santa Barbara, CA, USA). with the ScanAsyst mode under ambient conditions was carried out to determine the surface topography of Bi2Se3. The morphology of as-prepared Bi2Se3 was detected by field emission scanning electron microscopy (SEM, Supra 55 Sapphire, Carl ZEISS, Baden-Württemberg, Germany).

2.4 The schematic of the SPR chip

Figure 1A exhibits the detail of the SPR chip, where the chip consists of 50 nm Au film and 3 nm Cr on the BK7 glass. Bi2Se3–Au heterostructure was prepared by using drop-casting technology, which is prepared by the method of magnetron sputtering. The thickness of Bi2Se3 film on the Au surface can be controlled by the times of drop-casting. Bi2Se3–Au heterostructure is attached to the top of the prism with matching liquid, and the peristaltic pump is used to transfer and recover liquid. A more detailed experimental optical circuit device for sensing detection is shown in Figure S1.

Figure 1: The schematic diagram of the SPR sensor.(A) Three-dimensional structure model of designed sensor chip based on Bi2Se3. (B) Crystal structure of Bi2Se3.
Figure 1:

The schematic diagram of the SPR sensor.

(A) Three-dimensional structure model of designed sensor chip based on Bi2Se3. (B) Crystal structure of Bi2Se3.

3 Theory and experiment

As the primitive cell of Bi2Se3 is shown in Figure 1B, hexagonal monatomic crystal planes alternate with each other and stack in ABC order along the z axis. Every repeating unit is an ordered sequence of Se–Bi–Se–Bi–Se and forms quintuple layers (QLs), and atomic planes are covalently bonded within a QL; nevertheless, the adjacent QLs are linked together by weak van der Waals interaction [42], [43], [44]. This is why some literature prepared Bi2Se3 by solution growth route. As the typical Raman spectrum of the as-prepared nanosheet is described in Figure 2A, the four prominent Raman peaks were located at ~37, ~71, ~130, and ~175 cm−1, corresponding to E1g, A1g1,Eg2, and A1g2 modes, respectively, which is in accord with some theoretical demonstration that the crystal is in α phase [45], [46]. The relative motion of the various atoms for these observations is plotted in the inset in Figure 2A. It is worth noting that A1g and Eg modes are out-of-plane and in-plane vibration modes, belonging to the Raman active phonon. Here we can quite clearly see that the intensity of the low frequency is relatively weak, possibly ascribed to the high Rayleigh background [47], [48]. The crystal structure of Bi2Se3 is verified by the XRD as displayed in Figure 2B, and the diffraction peaks of rhombohedral Bi2Se3 structure (space group: R–3m) can be indexed, which highly maintains consistency of the literature dates (JCPDS no. 33-0214) [49], [50], [51].

Figure 2: Characterisation of the Bi2Se3 overlayer.(A) Raman spectrum of the deposited Bi2Se3 overlayer. Inset: schematic diagram of Raman active modes. (B) X-ray diffraction (XRD) pattern of Bi2Se3 nanosheets. (C–E) Three-dimensional atomic force microscopy images correspond to zero, three, and four times drop-casting. (F) Line scanning height profile of Bi2Se3 overlayer for three and four times drop-casting. (G) The root-mean-square roughness of Bi2Se3 overlayer corresponds to three and four times drop-casting.
Figure 2:

Characterisation of the Bi2Se3 overlayer.

(A) Raman spectrum of the deposited Bi2Se3 overlayer. Inset: schematic diagram of Raman active modes. (B) X-ray diffraction (XRD) pattern of Bi2Se3 nanosheets. (C–E) Three-dimensional atomic force microscopy images correspond to zero, three, and four times drop-casting. (F) Line scanning height profile of Bi2Se3 overlayer for three and four times drop-casting. (G) The root-mean-square roughness of Bi2Se3 overlayer corresponds to three and four times drop-casting.

For a more intuitive description of the Au–Bi2Se3 heterostructure, we draw the 3D AFM images as an understanding. Figure 2C is the Au film without Bi2Se3 overlayer. The Bi2Se3 nanosheets are casually distributed in the surface of the Au film and have a higher concentration and dense distribution with increasing drop-casting, as shown in Figure 2D and E. The height profile in Figure 2F indicates that the thickness of Bi2Se3 overlayers satisfies the normal distribution. The average thicknesses are 256 and 345.738 nm. Meanwhile, the root-mean-square roughnesses (Rq) are 15.6 and 19.4 nm, which manifests that Bi2Se3 nanosheets have good dispersiveness. In order to obtain the representative topographical profiles corresponding to the AFM images of Bi2Se3 nanosheets, we provided the SEM images. As shown in Figure S2, the thicknesses of Bi2Se3 nanosheets on the Au surface are increased by repeated drop-casting, (240.8 and 281.6 nm corresponding to three and four times drop-casting). The average thickness may be larger than SEM characterisations because of the wide range of measurement for AFM and the aggregation of nanosheets when abundant materials distribute on the surface [17], [18].

Figure 3A–E are the reflectance spectra varying with the resonance wavelength for different RI of sensing medium, the reflectance broadened, and the SPR dips risen with the growing of drop-casting times, due to the large loss of Bi2Se3. When the RI of sensing medium changes within a certain range, the resonance wavelength changes linearly with the RI of the medium. Therefore, the resonance wavelength is determined by measuring the curve of the reflectivity changing with the wavelength, and the refractive of the medium can be obtained by using the linear relation between the resonance wavelength and the refractivity. And we can clearly see that the linearly dependent coefficients (R2) were 0.98129, 0.98464, 0.9983, 0.9979, and 0.98544 under the condition of zero to four drop-casting times of Bi2Se3 nanosheet, respectively. These experimental data exhibited a good linear relationship between the changes of RI of sensing medium and wavelength shifts of SPR resonance, which indicates that the RI of sensing medium changes can be obtained from resonance wavelength shift. On the other hand, the slope of the line can represent the sensitivity of the sensor. Therefore, the sensitivities for different coating times of Bi2Se3 nanosheet suspension are 1927.4, 2140.9, 2303.4, 2929.1, and 2333 nm/RIU for zero to four times drop-casting, respectively.

Figure 3: The experimental measurements of the reflectance spectrum.(A–E) The reflectance spectrum of resonance wavelength experimentally changes with the variation of RI 1.3334 to 1.3605 and different drop-casting times of Bi2Se3 nanosheets corresponding to zero to four times. (F) Variation of the FWHM and FOM with the increase of drop-casting times for the proposed sensor based on Bi2Se3 at the environment of ns=1.333.
Figure 3:

The experimental measurements of the reflectance spectrum.

(A–E) The reflectance spectrum of resonance wavelength experimentally changes with the variation of RI 1.3334 to 1.3605 and different drop-casting times of Bi2Se3 nanosheets corresponding to zero to four times. (F) Variation of the FWHM and FOM with the increase of drop-casting times for the proposed sensor based on Bi2Se3 at the environment of ns=1.333.

To describe the performance of the designed SPR sensor based on Bi2Se3, we define the performance of the sensor by calculating several common parameters, such as sensitivity and FWHM (full width at half maximum), which is referred to the full width of the spectral band when the maximum height of the absorption spectral band height is half and is used to represent energy resolution, DA (detection accuracy), and FOM (the figure of merit), where Sλn, DA=1/FWHM and FOM=S·DA, respectively [52]. It illustrates that the overall trend FWHM (Figure 3F) shows growth with the increasing number of drop-casting; due to the large loss of increasing Bi2Se3 layer, the varying tendency of FOM (Figure 3D) is increasing first and then decreasing, and a large FOM of 33.45 RIU−1 can be obtained with three times drop-casting. But beyond that, the stability and repeatability investigations were measured in Figure S3, which showed good stability and durability.

In the simulation process of physical modelling, the approach of Fresnel equations and the transfer matrix method are employed to acquire the reflectance spectrum, which is the formula for incident wavelength (λin). According to Figure 2C–E, the AFM image is detailed enough to see that the Bi2Se3 covering layer is a porous structure on the surface of the Au film; the different RI-sensing medium will be filled with hollowness. Therefore, the Bi2Se3 overlayer and sensing medium are considered as a hybrid structure, and the hybrid dielectric neff is described as neff=nBi2Se3×fBi2Se3+ns×fs, whereas the nBi2Se3 and ns are the RIs, respectively. fBi2Se3 and fs are the relevant occupation ratios in volume and added together make 1 [17], [18], [53], [54], [55]. In the simulation process, the thickness of the hybrid structure is fixed (d2=5 nm), whereas fBi2Se3 is changing; the RIs of Au and Bi2Se3 can refer to the relevant literature [56], [57]. Figure 4A is the excitation of SPPs based on Au, and the lowest reflectance intensity can be observed at 74°. Then, we choose a different value of fBi2Se3 (0, 0.1, 0.2, 0.5, 1) as shown in Figure 4E–F. The resonance wavelengths are constantly generated red shifts with the increasing RI-sensing medium. Meanwhile, the sensitivity first increases and then decreases for different occupation ratios in the volume of Bi2Se3 overlayer, which matches the experimental data.

Figure 4: Theoretical simulation of the SPR curve.(A) Theoretical three-dimensional plot and map of reflection spectra for the traditional SPR sensor based on Au. (B–F) The theoretically calculated reflectance curve for different occupation ratios in the volume of Bi2Se3 overlayer of 0, 0.1, 0.2, 0.5, and 1, the incident angle set 74°.
Figure 4:

Theoretical simulation of the SPR curve.

(A) Theoretical three-dimensional plot and map of reflection spectra for the traditional SPR sensor based on Au. (B–F) The theoretically calculated reflectance curve for different occupation ratios in the volume of Bi2Se3 overlayer of 0, 0.1, 0.2, 0.5, and 1, the incident angle set 74°.

To further explain the reason of red shift and enhancement sensitivity, Figure 5A is the typical electric field for the excitation of the SPP mode based on Au, which is the strongest at the Au-sensing medium interface and decreases exponentially away from the interface. The field intensity changed obviously when the RI-sensing mediums are gradually increasing. It is because a slight change of the RI-sensing medium near the interface can alter the characteristics of the related surface wave, which means it is sensitive to the variation of the RI-sensing medium. The electric field is defined as |Ex|2/|E0|2, while Ex and E0 are the electric field amplitude and the incident light, respectively. As Figure 3B and C show, the resonance wavelengths become broader with the growth of drop-casting times, which is due to the introduced Bi2Se3 overlayer and additional loss, so the field intensity decreases with the increase of fBi2Se3. However, the field strength continues to increase in the region of the Bi2Se3 layer, and fBi2Se3=0.5 (as shown in Figure 5C) grows faster than fBi2Se3=0.1 (as shown in Figure 5B), corresponding to the sensitivity of the experimental data. The effect of the thickness of hybrid structure d2 is discussed in Figure 5D, and the resonance wavelengths become broader with the increasing d2.

Figure 5: Simulation of the electric field.(A–C) The amplitude distribution of the electric field (|Ex|2/|E0|2) for different occupation ratios in the volume of Bi2Se3 overlayer of 0, 0.1, and 0.5. (D) The changing resonance wavelength with the varying thickness of the hybrid structure and ns=1.3334.
Figure 5:

Simulation of the electric field.

(A–C) The amplitude distribution of the electric field (|Ex|2/|E0|2) for different occupation ratios in the volume of Bi2Se3 overlayer of 0, 0.1, and 0.5. (D) The changing resonance wavelength with the varying thickness of the hybrid structure and ns=1.3334.

To further describe the performance of the designed SPR sensor based on Bi2Se3 nanosheets, we apply it to the sensing experiment of heavy metal detection (Pb2+, changing from 0 to 1 ppb with a step of 0.25 ppb). Traditional sensor based on gold film did not have the ability to detect the heavy metal, and the common method of detecting the heavy metal was realised by adding chitosan on the surface of the gold film. We experimentally measured the changes of resonance wavelength for conventional SPR sensor based on Au+chitosan and proposed sensor based on Au+chitosan+Bi2Se3 with different concentrations of Pb2+ solution, and the wavelength shifts in conventional SPR sensor (Figure 6A) are significantly less than the proposed sensor based on Au+chitosan+Bi2Se3 (Figure 6B). For a more intuitive expression, we compared the performant of the three types of SPR sensors in Figure 6C: the pink line is the SPR sensors without chitosan, the yellow line is the SPR sensors with chitosan, and the purple line is the SPR sensors with chitosan+Bi2Se3. Figure 6D shows the wavelength shifts for different SPR sensors in detecting 0 to 1 ppb Pb2+ solution. The wavelength shifts of the proposed sensor based on Au+chitosan+Bi2Se3 have been enhanced by 51.07% compared with the SPR sensors with chitosan, which indicates that the proposed Bi2Se3 nanosheets could improve the sensitivity and detect a lower concentration of heavy metal.

Figure 6: Comparison of different structures applied to the detection of lead ions.(A, B) Reflection spectra of SPR sensor without Bi2Se3 coating and proposed SPR sensor based on Bi2Se3 overlayer for different concentrations of Pb2+. (C) The corresponding line graph of resonance wavelength. (D) The wavelength shifts for different SPR sensors in detecting heavy metal.
Figure 6:

Comparison of different structures applied to the detection of lead ions.

(A, B) Reflection spectra of SPR sensor without Bi2Se3 coating and proposed SPR sensor based on Bi2Se3 overlayer for different concentrations of Pb2+. (C) The corresponding line graph of resonance wavelength. (D) The wavelength shifts for different SPR sensors in detecting heavy metal.

In the final section, we have listed some literature about SPR sensors based on different 2D materials. According to the sensing target, materials, and data acquisition method, we sorted out Table 1 to compare the performance. The SPR sensor based on the Bi2Se3 overlayer has larger sensitivity and FOM, which will make a great contribution to the practical application of the sensor.

Table 1:

Comparison of the latest literature of the enhancing methods for SPR-sensing performance.

Plasmonic interfaceDetection range (RI)Sensitivity (nm/RIU)Enhanced foldFOMTheoretical/experimentalReferents
Au+WS21.333–1.3602459.31.26615.23Experimental[17]
Au+MoS21.333–1.3602793.51.35724.58Experimental[53]
Au+(GO)1.333–1.3602715.11.20219.53Experimental[18]
Au+MoSe21.333–1.3602524.81.36316.2Experimental[55]
Au+Bi2Se31.333–1.3602929.11.5233.45ExperimentalThis work

4 Conclusion

In summary, we have designed an SPR sensor based on Bi2Se3 nanosheets in this article, and a higher sensitivity (up to 2929.1 nm/RIU) and FOM (33.45 RIU−1) can be acquired through experimentally measuring RI sensing. The enhancements of sensitivity and FOM are 51.97% and 67.35% compared to the traditional SPR based on gold film without Bi2Se3 nanosheets. We have employed the method of effective RI to explain why the sensitivity increases first and then decreases with increasing times of drop-casting. The proposed SPR sensor based on Bi2Se3 has a linearly dependent coefficient of 99.79% in detecting the RI of sensing medium ranging from 1.3334 to 1.3605, more than the Bi2Se3 overlayer can protect the metal from oxidation. In the final section, we apply the proposed SPR sensor to lead ions detection, and the lower concentration of lead ions can be detected. Compared with the traditional heavy metal detection sensors based on Au–chitosan, the enhancement of wavelength shift (51.07%) was obtained. We convinced that the optimisation of SPR sensors with the Bi2Se3 nanosheet overlayer will have widespread applications in heavy metal detection and biosensing.

5 Supplementary material

The supplementary information can be found with the online version of the article: Experimental device for the SPR technique; Characterisation of SEM; The stability and repeatability of the SPR sensor based on the Bi2Se3 overlayer.

Award Identifier / Grant number: 61875133

Award Identifier / Grant number: 11874269

Award Identifier / Grant number: 11704259

Funding statement: This work was partially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant nos. 61875133, 11874269, and 11704259, Funder Id: http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100001809), the Science and Technology Project of Shenzhen (grant nos. JCYJ20180305125036005, JCYJ20180508152903 208, and JCYJ20180305124842330), the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (grant no. 2019M653027, Funder Id: http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100002858), and the Science and Technology Development Fund, Macau SAR (file no. 002/2016/AFJ).

  1. Competing interest:The authors declare no competing financial interest.

References

[1] Wood RW. On a remarkable case of uneven distribution of light in a diffraction grating spectrum. Philos Mag 1902;4:396–402.10.1080/14786440209462857Search in Google Scholar

[2] Otto A. Excitation of nonradiative surface plasma waves in silver by the method of frustrated total reflection. Z Angew Math Phys 1968;216:398–410.10.1007/BF01391532Search in Google Scholar

[3] Kretschmann E, Raether H. Radiative decay of nonradiative surface plasmons excited by light. Z Naturforsch A 1968;23:2135–6.10.1515/zna-1968-1247Search in Google Scholar

[4] Homola J, Yee SS, Gauglitz G. Surface plasmon resonance sensors: review. Sens Actuators B 1999;54:3–15.10.1016/S0925-4005(98)00321-9Search in Google Scholar

[5] Homola J, Present and future of surface plasmon resonance biosensors. Anal Bioanal Chem 2003;377:528–39.10.1007/s00216-003-2101-0Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[6] Kobori A, Horie S, Suda H, Sait I, Nakatani K. The SPR sensor detecting cytosine–cytosine mismatches. J Am Chem Soc 2004;126:557–62.10.1021/ja037947wSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[7] Sheridan AK, Harris RD, Bartlett PN, Wilkinson JS. Phase interrogation of an integrated optical SPR sensor. Sens Actuators B 2004;97:114–21.10.1016/j.snb.2003.08.005Search in Google Scholar

[8] Xue T, Liang W, Li Y, et al. Ultrasensitive detection of miRNA with an antimonene-based surface plasmon resonance sensor. Nat Commun 2019;10:28.10.1038/s41467-018-07947-8Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[9] Liu J, Jiang X, Zhang R, et al. MXene-enabled electrochemical microfluidic biosensor: applications toward multicomponent continuous monitoring in whole blood. Adv Funct Mater 2019;29:1807326.10.1002/adfm.201807326Search in Google Scholar

[10] Wang T, Qi D, Yang H, et al. Tactile chemomechanical transduction based on an elastic microstructured array to enhance the sensitivity of portable biosensors. Adv Mater 2019;31:1803883.10.1002/adma.201803883Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[11] Wang T, Guo YL, Wan PB, Zhang H, Chen XD, Sun XM. Flexible transparent electronic gas sensors. Small 2016;12:3748–56.10.1002/smll.201601049Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[12] Yang S, Liu Y, Chen W, et al. High sensitivity and good selectivity of ultralong MoO3 nanobelts for trimethylamine gas. Sens Actuators B 2016;226:478–85.10.1016/j.snb.2015.12.005Search in Google Scholar

[13] Liu ZH, Wei Y, Zhang Y, et al. Twin-core fiber SPR sensor. Opt Lett 2015;40:2826–9.10.1364/OL.40.002826Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[14] Paul AK, Sarkar AK, Rahman ABS, Khaleque A. Twin core photonic crystal fiber plasmonic refractive index sensor. IEEE Sens J 2018;18:5761–9.10.1109/JSEN.2018.2841035Search in Google Scholar

[15] Yang Z, Xia L, Li SY, Qi RL, Chen X, Li W. Highly sensitive refractive index detection based on compact HSC–SPR structure in a microfluidic chip. Sensor Actuat A Phys 2019;297:111558.10.1016/j.sna.2019.111558Search in Google Scholar

[16] Zhang Y, Lin B, Tjin SC, et al. Refractive index sensing based on higher-order mode reflection of a microfiber Bragg grating. Opt Express 2010;18:26345–50.10.1364/OE.18.026345Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[17] Wang H, Zhang H, Dong J, et al. Sensitivity-enhanced surface plasmon resonance sensor utilizing a tungsten disulfide (WS2) nanosheets overlayer. Photonics Res 2018;6:485–91.10.1364/PRJ.6.000485Search in Google Scholar

[18] Xiong X, Chen Y, Wang H, et al. Plasmonic interface modified with graphene oxide sheets overlayer for sensitivity enhancement. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 2018;10:34916–23.10.1021/acsami.8b11424Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[19] Zheng J, Tang X, Yang Z, et al. Few-layer phosphorene-decorated microfiber for all-optical thresholding and optical modulation. Adv Opt Mater 2017;5:1700026.10.1002/adom.201700026Search in Google Scholar

[20] Wang Y, Huang W, Wang C, et al. An all-optical, actively Q-switched fiber laser by an antimonene-based optical modulator. Laser Photonics Rev 2019;13:1800313.10.1002/lpor.201800313Search in Google Scholar

[21] Zhou Y, Zhang M, Guo Z, et al. Recent advances in black phosphorus–based photonics, electronics, sensors and energy devices. Mater Horiz 2017;4:997–1019.10.1039/C7MH00543ASearch in Google Scholar

[22] Hsieh D, Xia Y, Qian D, et al. A tunable topological insulator in the spin helical Dirac transport regime. Nature 2009;460:1101−5.10.1038/nature08234Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[23] Zhang Y, Lim C, Dai Z, et al. Photonics and optoelectronics using nano-structured hybrid perovskite media and their optical cavities. Phys Rep 2019;795:1–51.10.1016/j.physrep.2019.01.005Search in Google Scholar

[24] Song J, Yuan J, Xia F, et al. Large-scale production of bismuth chalcogenide and graphene heterostructure and its application for flexible broadband photodetector. Adv Electronic Mater 2016;2:1600077.10.1002/aelm.201600077Search in Google Scholar

[25] Ren Z, Su Y, Chen S, et al. Enhanced response of bulk heterojunction polymer photodetectors upon incorporating CsPbBr3 quantum dots. Appl Phys Lett 2018;113:253301.10.1063/1.5050253Search in Google Scholar

[26] Tang J, Maurice J, Fossard F, et al. Natural occurrence of the diamond hexagonal structure in silicon nanowires grown by a plasma-assisted vapour–liquid–solid method. Nanoscale 2017;9:8113–8.10.1039/C7NR01299CSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[27] Zhang H, Liu C, Qi X, Dai X, Fang Z, Zhang S. Topological insulators in Bi2Se3, Bi2Te3 and Sb2Te3 with a single Dirac cone on the surface. Nat Phys 2009;5:438–42.10.1038/nphys1270Search in Google Scholar

[28] Zhang Y, Hu L, Zhu T, Xie J, Zhao X. High yield Bi2Te3 single crystal nanosheets with uniform morphology via solvothermal synthesis. Cryst Growth Des 2013;13:645–51.10.1021/cg3013156Search in Google Scholar

[29] Jiang Y, Zhu Y, Cheng G. Synthesis of Bi2Se3 nanosheets by microwave heating using an ionic liquid. Cryst Growth Des 2006;6:2174–6.10.1021/cg060219aSearch in Google Scholar

[30] Soni A, Zhao Y, Yu L, Aik M, Dresselhaus M, Xiong Q. Enhanced thermoelectric properties of solution grown Bi2Te3–xSes nanoplatelet composites. Nano Lett 2012;12:1203–9.10.1021/nl2034859Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[31] Min Y, Moon G, Kim B, et al. Quick controlled synthesis of ultrathin Bi2Se3 nanodiscs and nanosheets. J Am Chem Soc 2012:134:2872–5.10.1021/ja209991zSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[32] Geim A, Novoselov K. The rise of graphene. Nat Mater 2007;6:183–91.10.1142/9789814287005_0002Search in Google Scholar

[33] Xu Y, Wang Z, Guo Z, et al. Solvothermal synthesis and ultrafast photonics of black phosphorus quantum dots. Adv Opt Mater 2016;4:1223–9.10.1002/adom.201600214Search in Google Scholar

[34] Yuan J, Ma W, Zhang L, et al. Infrared nano imaging reveals the surface metallic plasmons in topological insulator. ACS Photonics 2017;4:3055–62.10.1021/acsphotonics.7b00568Search in Google Scholar

[35] Aguilar R, Stier A, Liu W, et al. Terahertz response and colossal Kerr rotation from the surface states of the topological insulator Bi2Se3. Phys Rev Lett 2012;108:087403.10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.087403Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[36] Politano A, Viti L, Vitiello M. Optoelectronic devices, plasmonics, and photonics with topological insulators. Apl Mater 2017;5:035504.10.1063/1.4977782Search in Google Scholar

[37] Autore M, Di Pietro P, Gaspare A, et al. Terahertz plasmonic excitations in Bi2Se3 topological insulator. J Phys Condens Matter 2017;29:183002.10.1088/1361-648X/aa63acSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[38] Liu M, Cai Z, Hu S, et al. Dissipative rogue waves induced by long-range chaotic multi-pulse interactions in a fiber laser with a topological insulator-deposited microfiber photonic device. Opt Lett 2015;40:4767–70.10.1364/OL.40.004767Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[39] Wu X, Tan C, Wang Q, et al. Solution growth of two-dimensional Bi2Se3 nanosheets for two-color all-optical switching. Materials 2017;10:1332.10.3390/ma10111332Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[40] Zhuang A, Zhao Y, Liu X, et al. Controlling the lateral and vertical dimensions of Bi2Se3 nanoplates via seeded growth. Nano Res 2014;8:246–56.10.1007/s12274-014-0657-ySearch in Google Scholar

[41] Yuan J, Zhao M, Yu W, et al. Raman spectroscopy of two-dimensional Bi(2)TexSe3-x platelets produced by solvothermal method. Materials 2015;8:5007–17.10.3390/ma8085007Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[42] Ambrosi A, Sofer Z, Luxa J, Pumera M. Exfoliation of layered topological insulators Bi2Se3 and Bi2Te3 via electrochemistry. ACS Nano 2016;10:11442–8.10.1021/acsnano.6b07096Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[43] Chen Y, Analytis J, Chu J, et al. Experimental realization of a three-dimensional topological insulator, Bi2Te3. Science 2009;325:178−81.10.1126/science.1173034Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[44] Qi X, Zhang S. Topological insulators and superconductors. Rev Mod Phys 2011;83:1057−1110.10.1103/RevModPhys.83.1057Search in Google Scholar

[45] Zhang J, Peng Z, Soni A, et al. Raman spectroscopy of few-quintuple layer topological insulator Bi2Se3 nanoplatelets. Nano Lett 2011;11:2407–14.10.1021/nl200773nSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[46] Shahil K, Hossain M, Goyal V, Balandin A. Micro-Raman spectroscopy of mechanically exfoliated few-quintuple layers of Bi2Te3, Bi2Se3, and Sb2Te3 materials. J Appl Phys 2012;111:054305.10.1063/1.3690913Search in Google Scholar

[47] Dang W, Peng H, Li H, Wang P, Liu Z. Epitaxial heterostructures of ultrathin topological insulator nanoplate and graphene. Nano Lett 2010;10:2870–6.10.1021/nl100938eSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[48] Dun C, Hewitt C, Huang H, et al. Layered Bi2Se3 nanoplate/polyvinylidene fluoride composite based n-type thermoelectric fabrics. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 2015;7:7054–9.10.1021/acsami.5b00514Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[49] Kong D, Dang W, Cha JJ, et al. Few-layer nanoplates of Bi2Se3 and Bi2Te3 with highly tunable chemical potential. Nano Lett. 2010;10:2245–50.10.1021/nl101260jSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[50] Steinberg H, Gardner DR, Lee YS, Jarillo-Herrero P. Surface state transport and ambipolar electric field effect in Bi2Se3 nanodevices. Nano Lett 2010;10:5032–6.10.1021/nl1032183Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[51] Hong SS, Kundhikanjana W, Cha JJ, et al. Ultrathin topological insulator Bi2Se3 nanoribbons exfoliated by atomic force microscopy. Nano Lett 2010;10:3118–22.10.1021/nl101884hSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[52] Xu Y, Bai P, Zhou X, et al. Optical refractive index sensors with plasmonic and photonic structures: promising and inconvenient truth. Adv Mater 2019;7:1801433.10.1002/adom.201801433Search in Google Scholar

[53] Chen Y, Hu S, Wang H, et al. MoS2 nanosheets modified surface plasmon resonance sensors for sensitivity enhancement. Adv Opt Mater 2019;7:1909479.Search in Google Scholar

[54] Zhang H, Chen Y, Wang H, et al. Titanium dioxide nanoparticle modified plasmonic interface for enhanced refractometric and biomolecular sensing. Opt Express 2018;26:33226–7.10.1364/OE.26.033226Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[55] Luo Y, Hu S, Wang H, et al. Sensitivity-enhanced surface plasmon sensor modified with MoSe2 overlayer. Opt Express 2018;26:34250–8.10.1364/OE.26.034250Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[56] Etchegoin P, Le E, Meyer M. An analytic model for the optical properties of gold. J Chem Phys 2006;125:164705.10.1063/1.2360270Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[57] Yang S, Yang L, Zheng Y, et al. Structure-dependent optical properties of self-organized Bi2Se3 nanostructures: from nanocrystals to nanoflakes. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 2017;9:29295–301.10.1021/acsami.7b08834Search in Google Scholar PubMed


Supplementary Material

The online version of this article offers supplementary material (https://doi.org/10.1515/nanoph-2019-0439).


Received: 2019-10-23
Revised: 2019-11-28
Accepted: 2019-11-28
Published Online: 2019-12-20

© 2019 Xiaoyu Dai et al., published by De Gruyter, Berlin/Boston

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Downloaded on 29.3.2023 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/nanoph-2019-0439/html
Scroll Up Arrow