We establish a simple quantitative criterium for the search of new dielectric materials with high values of refractive index in the visible range. It is demonstrated, that for light frequencies below the bandgap, the latter is determined by the dimensionless parameter η calculated as the ratio of the sum of the widths of conduction and valence bands and the bandgap. Small values of this parameter, which can be achieved in materials with almost flat bands, lead to dramatic increase of the refractive index. We illustrate this rule with a particular example of rhenium dichalcogenides, for which we perform ab initio calculations of the band structure and optical susceptibility and predict the values of the refractive index in a wide frequency range around 1 eV together with comparatively low losses. Our findings open new perspectives in search for the new high-index/low-loss materials for all-dielectric nanophotonics.
All-dielectric photonics ,  is arguably the most rapidly evolving field of modern nano-optics. The basic component in all-dielectric photonics, a dielectric nanoantenna, supports optical Mie resonances , with properties that can be flexibly controlled by the geometry of a nanoantenna. In particular, the variation of its shape allows changing the nature of the lowest energy optical resonance from electric dipole to magnetic dipole , , the functionality inaccessible in plasmonic devices. With the current stage of technology, the fabrication of specifically designed arrays of resonant antennae with finely controlled shape and lattice geometry became a routine task, which paved the way toward unprecedented control over linear , ,  and nonlinear ,  light manipulation.
The key factor defining the functionality of resonant all-dielectric nanostructures, besides their shape, is the value of the refractive index of the material forming resonant nanoantennas. Indeed, the quality factor of the fundamental Mie resonance scales is , and the ratio of the nanoantenna size to the resonant wavelength is . Thus, the increase in the refractive index would allow for both more sharp and more deep subwavelength resonances in all-dielectric nanostructures, provided that the extinction coefficient, related to the imaginary part of the refractive index, is kept small.
While virtually purely real refractive indices can be easily achieved in the wide frequency range from terahertz to mid-IR, in the near-IR and visible ranges, the values of refractive index are currently limited by a value of approximately 5. Around a characteristic photon energy of 1 eV, standard high-index reference materials are crystalline silicon , gallium arsenide , and germanium . It is clear that the broadband large refractive index in this frequency range is provided by strong interband polarization. However, the questions of what are the other parameters which can contribute to high values of the off-resonant refractive index, are there any fundamental upper limit for this quantity, and whether it can be substantially increased with respect to the values characterizing current high-index materials remain unexplored to our knowledge.
In this work, we show the sum of the widths of the conduction and valence bands to the bandgap.
We start from considering a simplified model of interband polarization in bulk material and show that the condition of the weak dependence of the bandgap on the wave vector in the whole Brillouin zone (BZ) (the extreme case being a material with flat bands) results in a high value of optical susceptibility close to the absorption edge.
We start from the simplest expression for the susceptibility tensor given by the Kubo formula
Let us consider the simplest case of a cubic unit cell, for which , where D is the lattice period. We limit ourselves to the case of single conduction and valence bands separated by the bandgap , assuming that and putting . We then can rewrite the expression for the susceptibility as:
At the first sight, it seems that the recipe for the large value of susceptibility is straightforward: if the material has , then tuning the frequency slightly below , we can achieve arbitrary large susceptibility with vanishing losses. Unfortunately, this would not work so directly because conduction and valence band dispersions and matrix elements P are directly related to each other. This can be easily seen if we use perturbation theory. As a very rough approximation, we can assume that the dispersion in the whole BZ is parabolic and isotropic (which of course is not the case in real materials) and write
If we set and go from summation to the integration over the BZ, we can derive simple analytical expression for susceptibility:
Fortunately, one can find representatives of this class of the materials, the example being bulk ReSe2 . This layered material belonging to the rhenium dichalcogenide family has been gaining recently increasing attention, mainly owing to its pronounced in-plane anisotropy and suppressed interlayer van der Waals coupling . To check the results of our qualitative analysis, in the next section, we provide the data of ab initio modeling of the linear optical response of bulk ReSe2.
All ab initio calculations were performed using QUANTUM ESPRESSO package . The analysis of the optical response was performed in three steps.
In the first step, we determined the equilibrium positions of the ions in the lattice by full self-consistent geometry optimization within density functional theory (DFT). The top and side views of the resulting structure are presented in Figure 1. The obtained lattice parameters and their comparison to experimental XRD data are given in Supplementary.
In the second step, we employed two different DFT approaches (LDA and GGA) to calculate the three-dimensional (3D) band structure.
In the third step, we calculated the diagonal components of the unit cell polarizability tensor via time-dependent DFT (TDDFT) (see details in Supplementary).
Most of the previous calculations of the band structure of the considered materials focused only on the dispersion along the special sets of directions, example being the 2D projection into the layers plane , . In the other cases, highly symmetric paths were chosen in the 3D BZ connecting 3D special points, without exploring the structure of the whole BZ ,  and thus missing the true band edges, which are crucially important for the determination of the optical response. The possible drawbacks of this approach were analyzed in detail in the recent work , wherein the necessity of the calculation of the band energies everywhere within the BZ and determination of the constant energy surfaces was stressed. In the present paper, we used the k-path, developed in the study by Gunasekara et al. , and calculated the band structure using the following path: –CBM–CBM′–Z– –VBM–VBM′–Z– , where CBM is the conduction band minimum (LUMO), VBM is the valence band maximum (HOMO), and CBM′ and VBM′ are the intersection points of the boundary surface of the BZ and the straight lines connecting and CBM or VBM points, respectively. The paths from CBM′ or VBM′ points to the Z point run along the surface of the BZ containing the Z point. To find the k-points corresponding to the VBM and CBM, we used the different grids in BZ–6 × 6 × 6 and 7 × 7 × 7. The calculated values of the direct and indirect bandgap are presented in Table 1 and compared with the previously reported data , .
|Type/Material||LDA/GGA||LDA /GGA ||GGA + GW |
|Direct (Z) ReSe2||1.0714/1.0909||0.97/1.00||1.38|
|Direct ( ) ReSe2||1.3262/1.3421||–||–|
|Direct (Z) ReSe2||1.1908/1.2147||–||1.60|
|Direct ( ) ReSe2||1.6809/1.7441||–||1.88|
CBM, conduction band minimum; VBM, valence band maximum.
The grid 6 × 6 × 6 was used to define the VBM point for ReSe2 and CBM point for ReS2, and the grid 7 × 7 × 7 was used to define the CBM point for ReSe2 and VBM point for ReS2. This choice was dictated by the reasons of grid parity and symmetry of the BZ. All energies are given in electron volt.
The obtained band structures of ReSe2 and ReS2 are presented in Figure 2. It can be seen that the energy of the lowest conduction and the highest valence bands depend only weakly on the wavevector, and the bands are close to the flat ones.
In order to get the the optical response, we employ the TDDFT approach, calculating the diagonal terms of the unit cell polarizability . The average dielectric susceptibility was found as the ratio of the polarization and the unit cell volume V, . The dielectric permittivity was then found as . The spectra of the dielectric permittivities are shown in Figure 3.
It can be seen that for both ReSe2 and ReS2, the absorption sharply increases only when the photon frequency approaches the bandgap in point, 1.32 and 1.7 eV, respectively. Furthermore, we observe strong biaxial anisotropy for both crystals, stemming both from the layered structure of the material and reduced in-plane symmetry of the rhenium dichalcogenides . Noteworthily, large refractive index contrast and strong uniaxial anisotropy have been recently experimentally measured in bulk transition metal dichalcogenides , ,  and hexagonal boron nitride . The pronounced biaxial anisotropy may be used for the the observation of the Dyakonov surface waves  in the rhenium dichalcogenide waveguides.
One can see that the real parts of the in-plane components of the permittivity of ReSe2 exceed 25 in the broad frequency range, which should correspond to the high refractive index. Since for biaxial crystals, the refractive index depends on the light propagation direction, we limit ourselves to the case when light travels along one of the three principal axes. In this case, the refractive index for each of the two polarizations is just a square root of the corresponding permittivity. The spectra of the refractive index components are shown in Figure 4. One sees that in the broad wavelength range, the refractive index exceeds 5, which is substantially larger than the index of the modern state-of-the-art high-index materials such as c-Si , GaP , and Ge . The refractive index of ReS2 is smaller than that of ReSe2, but is still quite large. It should be noted that the imaginary part of the refractive index in this wavelength range is negligibly small.
In our analysis, we have not accounted for the excitonic contribution to the dielectric permittivity, which can be substantial and would lead to the additional absorption losses at the frequencies slightly below the bandgap. Nevertheless, since the range of the large refractive index covers more than 0.5 eV below the bandgap, it should be possible to detune from the exciton absorption lines to probe the lossless large refractive index.
We established a simple quantitative criterium for the search of high-refractive-index dielectric materials, expressed in terms of the single dimensionless parameter calculated as the ratio of the sum of the widths of conduction and valence bands and the bandgap. With the use of it, we found that ReSe2 is low-loss material, possessing a record high refractive index in a wide frequency range around 1 eV. Our conclusion is supported by the results of the DFT simulation of the optical response. Since currently there exist vast material databases containing the data on their band structures, the proposed criterion can be used for the automated search of the perspective candidates for the novel high-index materials for all-dielectric photonics.
Funding source: Russian Science Foundation
Award Identifier / Grant number: 20-12-00224
Funding source: Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation10.13039/501100003443
Award Identifier / Grant number: 14.Y26.31.0015
Funding source: Icelandic research fund
Award Identifier / Grant number: 163082-051
Author contribution: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.
Research funding: The authors acknowledge the support from the mega-grant No. 14.Y26.31.0015 of the http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100003443, “Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation.” I.A.S. acknowledges the support from the Icelandic research fund, grant No. 163082-051.
Conflict of interest statement: The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding this article.
 A. I. Kuznetsov, A. E. Miroshnichenko, M. L. Brongersma, Y. S. Kivshar, and B. Luk’yanchuk, “Optically resonant dielectric nanostructures,” Science, vol. 354, no. 6314, p. aag2472, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aag2472. Search in Google Scholar
 A. B. Evlyukhin, S. M. Novikov, U. Zywietz, et al., “Demonstration of magnetic dipole resonances of dielectric nanospheres in the visible region,” Nano Lett., vol. 12, no. 7, pp. 3749–3755, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1021/nl301594s. Search in Google Scholar
 M. Decker, I. Staude, M. Falkner, et al., “High-efficiency dielectric huygens’ surfaces,” Adv. Opt. Mater., vol. 3, no. 6, pp. 813–820, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1002/adom.201400584. Search in Google Scholar
 A. Arbabi, Y. Horie, M. Bagheri, and A. Faraon, “Dielectric metasurfaces for complete control of phase and polarization with subwavelength spatial resolution and high transmission,” Nat. Nanotechnol., vol. 10, no. 11, pp. 937–943, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2015.186. Search in Google Scholar
 M. R. Shcherbakov, P. P. Vabishchevich, A. S. Shorokhov, et al., “Ultrafast all-optical switching with magnetic resonances in nonlinear dielectric nanostructures,” Nano Lett., vol. 15, no. 10, pp. 6985–6990, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b02989. Search in Google Scholar
 C. Schlickriede, S. S. Kruk, L. Wang, B. Sain, Y. Kivshar, and T. Zentgraf, “Nonlinear imaging with all-dielectric metasurfaces,” Nano Lett., vol. 20, no. 6, pp. 4370–4376, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.0c01105. Search in Google Scholar
 S. M. Gunasekera, D. Wolverson, L. S. Hart, and M. Mucha-Kruczynski, “Electronic band structure of rhenium dichalcogenides,” J. Electron. Mater., vol. 47, pp. 4314–4320, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11664-018-6239-0. Search in Google Scholar
 H. Zhao, J. Wu, H. Zhong, et al., “Interlayer interactions in anisotropic atomically thin rhenium diselenide,” Nano Res., vol. 8, no. 11, pp. 3651–3661, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12274-015-0865-0. Search in Google Scholar
 P. Giannozzi, S. Baroni, N. Bonini, et al., “Quantum espresso: A modular and open-source software project for quantum simulations of materials,” J. Phys. Condens. Matter, vol. 21, no. 39, p. 395502, 2009, https://doi.org/10.1088/0953-8984/21/39/395502. Search in Google Scholar
 K. Dileep, R. Sahu, S. Sarkar, S. C. Peter, and R. Datta, “Layer specific optical band gap measurement at nanoscale in mos2 and res2 van der waals compounds by high resolution electron energy loss spectroscopy,” J. Appl. Phys., vol. 119, no. 11, p. 114309, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4944431. Search in Google Scholar
 W. Wen, Y. Zhu, X. Liu, et al., “Anisotropic spectroscopy and electrical properties of 2d res2(1–x)se2x alloys with distorted 1t structure,” Small, vol. 13, no. 12, p. 1603788, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.201603788. Search in Google Scholar
 J. P. Echeverry and I. C. Gerber, “Theoretical investigations of the anisotropic optical properties of distorted 1tres2 and rese2 monolayers, bilayers, and in the bulk limit,” Phys. Rev. B, vol. 97, p. 075123, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.97.075123. Search in Google Scholar
 A. Arora, J. Noky, M. Drüppel, et al., “Highly anisotropic in-plane excitons in atomically thin and bulklike 1t’-rese2,” Nano Lett., vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 3202–3207, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.7b00765. Search in Google Scholar
 H. Tian, J. Tice, R. Fei, et al., “Low-symmetry two-dimensional materials for electronic and photonic applications,” Nano Today, vol. 11, no. 6, pp. 763–777, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nantod.2016.10.003. Search in Google Scholar
 R. Verre, D. G. Baranov, B. Munkhbat, J. Cuadra, M. Käll, and T. Shegai, “Transition metal dichalcogenide nanodisks as high-index dielectric mie nanoresonators,” Nat. Nanotechnol., vol. 14, no. 7, pp. 679–683, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41565-019-0442-x. Search in Google Scholar
 S. Busschaert, R. Reimann, M. Cavigelli, R. Khelifa, A. Jain, and L. Novotny, “Tmdc resonators for second harmonic signal enhancement,” arXiv:2001.08959v3 preprint, 2020. https://arxiv.org/pdf/2001.08959.pdf. Search in Google Scholar
 G. A. Ermolaev, D. V. Grudinin, Y. V. Stebunov, et al., “Giant optical anisotropy in transition metal dichalcogenides for next-generation photonics,” arXiv:2006.00884 preprint, 2020. https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/2006/2006.00884.pdf. Search in Google Scholar
 A. Segura, L. Artús, R. Cuscó, T. Taniguchi, G. Cassabois, and B. Gil, “Natural optical anisotropy of h-bn: highest giant birefringence in a bulk crystal through the mid-infrared to ultraviolet range,” Phys. Rev. Mater., vol. 2, p. 024001, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevmaterials.2.024001. Search in Google Scholar
 M. I. D’yakonov, “New type of electromagnetic wave propagating at an interface,” Sov. Phys. JETP, vol. 67, no. 4, pp. 714–716, 1988. Search in Google Scholar
 S. Adachi, “Optical dispersion relations for gap, gaas, gasb, inp, inas, insb, alxga1-xas, and in1-xgaxasyp1-y,” J. Appl. Phys., vol. 66, no. 12, pp. 6030–6040, 1989, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.343580. Search in Google Scholar
 G. E. JellisonJr, “Optical functions of gaas, gap, and ge determined by two-channel polarization modulation ellipsometry,” Opt. Mater., vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 151–160, 1992, https://doi.org/10.1016/0925-3467(92)90022-f. Search in Google Scholar
The online version of this article offers supplementary material (https://doi.org/10.1515/nanoph-2020-0416).
© 2020 Anton A. Shubnic et al., published by De Gruyter, Berlin/Boston
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.