Abstract
Electro-optic modulators provide a key function in optical transceivers and increasingly in photonic programmable application-specific integrated circuits (ASICs) for machine learning and signal processing. However, both foundry-ready silicon-based modulators and conventional material-based devices utilizing lithium-niobate fall short in simultaneously providing high chip packaging density and fast speed. Current-driven ITO-based modulators have the potential to achieve both enabled by efficient light–matter interactions. Here, we introduce micrometer-compact Mach–Zehnder interferometer (MZI)-based modulators capable of exceeding 100 GHz switching rates. Integrating ITO-thin films atop a photonic waveguide, one can achieve an efficient
1 Introduction
Electro-optical modulators (EOMs) tune the light intensity or phase at certain wavelength. The Mach–Zehnder based optical modulator change the light intensity or phase by having the electro-optical effect on the active arms to shift the transmission spectral, results in an amplitude modulation or phase modulation signal. Currently for high-speed data transmission in integrated silicon photonics suffers from large footprint, high insertion loss, high energy consumption, low extinction ratio due to weak electro-refractivity. For example, a current available foundry doped silicon based Mach–Zehnder interferometer (MZI) modulator (MZM), while being reasonably fast (f 3 dB ∼ 27 GHz), require a large footprint of 0.74 mm2 [1]. Using an electronic processor die as a footprint-guide (1 cm2 = 100 mm2), the number of photonic integrated circuit (PIC) components on-chip is severely limited to about 100–1000 components as compared to electronic counterparts. The MZI insertion loss <3 dB, extinction ratio >15 dB and V π L = 90 V mm [2]. With looming technological advances such as the internet-of-things [3], network-edge computing [3, 4], neuromorphic computing [5, 6], chip-scale light detection and ranging (LiDAR) [7]; the need for increasingly efficient and miniaturized EOMs is relentless.
For example, the photonic processors scale differently than electronics; by (a) multiplexing options and (b) synergistic complexity scaling reductions to algorithms. The algorithm-to-hardware mapping, we can look at performing complex convolutions optically as much simpler dot-product multiplications in the Fourier domain. While this is known in signal processing, the required overhead-heavy Fourier transportation (FT) is performed effortlessly (passively) by an optical lens (either in free space or on a PIC). Mathematical operations scale with a nominal dimensionality factor N, reflecting the runtime complexity (under brute-force, that is, meaning without parallelization strategies). Tensor operations and convolutions, for example, scale with N3 and N4, respectively, assuming a squared matrix of size N. Why is this relevant for modulators? Because the performance (typically stated in throughput per second per power, i.e., TOPS/W = TOP/J) of an accelerator is a direct function of the speed of each modulator and the number of modulators on the application specific integrated circuit (ASIC) PIC. Hence, being fast and compact becomes critically crucial for next-generation photonic ASICs.
To address these relevant information processing trends using reconfigurable photonic circuits and hence modulators, several EOM devices schemes have been proposed to enhance Si-based devices’ performance only to reveal inadequate improvements beyond the basic and selectively doped junctions [8]. In this view, alternative electro-optic materials for active modulation are sought, offering higher index tunability, seamless integration on the Si platform, ease of relevant processing, and fast modulation in a compact form factor. A plethora of materials have been investigated for this purpose in recent years ranging from the traditional III–V materials [9], polymers [10], ferroelectric materials [11] to more exotic 2-dimensional materials, including graphene [12], transition metal dichalcogenides [13], etc. In this regard, a class of materials that have received growing interest is transparent conducting oxides (TCOs). TCOs usually feature a fairly wide-bandgap with degenerate doping levels to facilitate electrical conduction while remaining transparent in the widely utilized telecom C-band.
Indium tin oxide (ITO) is the most widely used TCO material in industry and research alike; it offers current-based modulation in an electrical capacitive arrangement based on similar carrier dispersion dynamics as Si. Compared to other materials, integrating ITO in chip-scale modulation schemes presents the following advantages: (i) availability of at least 3–4 orders of magnitude higher carrier density compared to silicon; (ii) dramatic effect of change in carrier concentration on its optical index, which arises from the small permittivity of the material, i.e.,
Pioneering works in ITO-based absorption modulation influenced interest in its efficacy as a phase modulator stemming from the well-known Kramers–Kronig (K–K) relations [18]. Recently, we identified that phase tuning efficacy surpasses that of absorption tuning for ITO in associated performance metrics [19]. Indeed, ITO is an exciting alternative for highly performing phase modulation as such has been manifested by our recent works supporting half-wave voltage and active device length products,
Figure of merit comparison for different type Mach–Zehnder interferometric modulators.
Material | Mechanism | Length (µm) | ER (dB) | IL (dB) | Speed (GHz) |
|
Energy consumption (fJ/bit) | Ref. |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LN | Pockels effect | 20,000 | 30 | 0.4 | 45 | 2800 | 0.37 | [25] |
Si | Plasma dispersion effect | 15,000 | 3.8 | 10 | 10 | 3300 | 138,000 | [26] |
Polymer | Pockels effect | 1000 | 10 | 6 | 12.5 | 500 | 0.7 | [27] |
ITO | Plasma dispersion effect | 1.4 | 8 | 6.7 | 1.1 | 95 | 2100 | [15] |
ITO | Plasma dispersion effect | 4.7 | 3* | 2.9* | 100* | 108 | 380* | This work |
-
Numbers with ‘*’ its calculated value.
On the other hand, traveling wave-based schemes such as MZIs are single-pass arrangements that can deliver the full broadband optical response the chosen optical mode offers depending on the arms’ imbalance. Furthermore, the entire MZI area can be reduced to only the active device footprint plus the spacing for another MZI arm and Y-couplers without any conceivable effect to hinder the device’s performance. This can, de facto, be achieved in a minuscule footprint owing to lithographic advancement in recent years paired with cutting-edge fabrication facilities.
Recapitulating the efforts to minimize the real estate on the chip, plasmonics can serve as a reasonable alternative approach to traditional photonic packaging. Plasmonics effectively squeezes the light in the optical mode to enhance light–matter interaction (LMI) with the active modulation material realizing ultrashort devices with improved modulation metrics. Such enhancements in active performance do inherently accompany additional loss in the form of IL due to the high modal mismatch when coupling back and forth from the underlying Si waveguide. These losses can be partially mitigated by employing modal transitional architecture within the coupling regions in the vicinity of the active device, for example, tapered waveguide sections for plasmonic slot designs. We have shown that the enhanced LMI alleviates the high loss per unit length encountered in plasmonic, and the performance benefits outweigh the initial surcharge of IL if the latter is managed to retain at a tolerable limit [17, 24]. The high real index tuning in ITO accompanies a considerable modulating loss directly resulting from the imaginary part of the index via K–K relations, and this effect is even stronger in the plasmonic mode-based setups as the confinement can reach at least one order of magnitude more than the photonic case.
Simple integration of an ITO-based modulator in one arm of an MZI thus limits attainable extinction and refrains from a linear operation, inducing substantial chirp accrual in the process. We had mitigated this issue by imposing some static loss in the form of a passive metallic contact on the other unmodulated arm of the MZI in our previous works with a view to minimizing the loss imbalance in both arms [15, 19, 20]. The static passive metallic method balances the output by introducing loss on the passive arm, increasing IL. One alternative approach is to design the input Y-junction to deliver more power to the active arm to minimize the imbalance resulting upon active switching, decrease IL, and reduce the number of required fabrication steps. What’s more, this asymmetric Y-junction design can also be used to achieve low IL by delivering less power to the active arm. Whether to provide more power to the active arm to minimize the imbalance or deliver less power to increase the imbalance but decrease the IL depends on the applications. (Details in Supporting Information (SI))
In this work, we propose an ITO-plasmon-based asymmetric MZI modulator to solve the aforementioned problems. The numerical simulation results show the modulator affords the advantages of low bias voltage and compact device size, low IL, adequate ER, low electrical resistance leading to multi-GHz operational speeds, etc. Our design strategy, which can be applied to other material frameworks, enables unitary ER/IL without sacrificing footprint (<5 µm phase shifter, and 2 × 10−4 mm2). Additionally, the crafted material properties and appropriately tuned thicknesses lead to superior electrostatic performance, aiding unprecedented switching speed (up to 100 GHz) and one order of magnitude lower low energy consumption (380 fJ/bit) with respect to state of the art (Table 1). Such performance heralds a new device makes it a strong candidate to become the fundamental building block of the next-generation photonic platform with immediate applications in neuromorphic computing [28] and programmable photonic circuits [29].

ITO-based plasmonic MZI modulator on Si photonic platform. (a) Footprint comparison between ITO MZI modulator and traditional MZI modulator. The ITO-based plasmonic MZI modulator with input and output grating couplers is 1 mm long and 165 µm in width, including the contact pads. The size of ITO-based plasmonic MZI is 33 µm in length and 6 µm in width. The distance between the grating coupler and the device is longer than 500 µm to facilitate measurement. (b) Perspective view of the Mach–Zehnder structure with the active biasing contacts. The power splitting ratio for the active arm is X, and the splitting ratio for the passive arm is 100-X. (c) Electric field distribution by performing FEM at 1550 nm under +3.5 V in the cross-sectional structure for a z cutline along the central region of the Si waveguide (width: 500 nm; height: 220 nm). (d) Composition layers of ITO MZI modulator.

Tailored material and design parameters of the phase shifter. (a) Dispersive spectrum of 10 nm ITO thin film measured by ellipsometry. (b) Resistance and speed of ITO MZI modulator with a gating oxide thickness of 10 nm, 15 nm, and 20 nm. (c) Refractive indices and extinction coefficients of 10 nm in thick and 4.7 µm in length ITO thin film for various dielectric thicknesses under different voltages at 1550 nm. (d) Effective mode index differences change with dielectric thickness under varied voltages at 1550 nm. (e) Confinement factor Γ varies with dielectric thickness and voltages at 1550 nm.
2 Results and discussion
Modulators are inherently optimization-sensitive devices. There is no single best design as many parameters are cross- and inter-dependent (Figure 3a). For example, thick gating oxide can reduce the capacitance and result in higher speed; however, it undermines the confinement factor, which leads to weak modulation depth. As such, we bound ourselves by a set of performance requirements. While these are arbitrarily chosen, they are informed by the rationale above for next-generation modulators with an option for ASPICs and defined as follows: ER > 3 dB, IL < 3 dB, (i.e., ER/IL > 1), 3 dB > 100 GHz, footprint >10−3 mm2, and energy consumption ∼300 fJ/bit. The following discussions revolve around this goal.

Relations between variables and performances. (a) Flow chart of Mach–Zehnder modulator analysis. Variables are dielectric thickness (gating oxide thickness), material properties, device length, and splitting ratio. The performances are ER, IL, transmission, and speed. (b) Transmission of ON state, 0 bias state, and OFF state oscillate within the device with a dielectric thickness of 15 nm under voltage of +3.5 V, 0 V, and −3.5 V when splitting ratio is 41:59. Propagating loss is caused by absorption, while the design loss is caused by insufficient phase shift. (c) Transmission, corresponding ER, and IL varies with device length. ER = 3 dB and IL = 2.9 dB when device length is 4.7 μm (d) Fabrication tolerance of device length and splitting ratio for the proposed device.
First, we introduce the scheme of the phase shifter and carefully analyze material properties under different voltages. Thus, the phase shift and electrical performance, such as system resistance, capacitance, and speed, are obtained for devices with different lengths and gating oxide thickness. As discussed above, gating oxide thickness is critical for speed and modulation depth. However, different secondly, we discuss the above-introduced asymmetric splitting ratio of the front-end Y-junction of the MZI as a secondary application wised optimization strategy to reach an optimized point in terms of trade-offs between ER and IL within the constraints of small phase shifts.
A 5 nm thin film of
The modulation mechanism in ITO is free-carrier dispersion-based accumulation/depletion. The optical properties can be controlled by well-timed adjusted deposition techniques to concurrently limit off-state optical losses and keep on-state away from epsilon-near-zero higher losses (Figure 2a) [16]. The Drude oscillator is used to describe the free-carrier absorption, while the Tauc–Lorentz equations are used to describe the effects of electronic transitions in the short wavelength [30]. In this work, refractive indexes are calculated from carrier concentration using Drude model. The refractive index of the unbiased ITO film is obtained from the reported carrier concentration, 2.07 × 1020 cm−3 [31]. The depleted or accumulated carriers and corresponding refractive indexes in the active ITO region upon capacitive operation under the bias using Thomas–Fermi screening model [32]. The real part of refractive index the decreases for increasing positive voltages corresponding to a blue shift in wavelength. In contrast, the imaginary part increases towards a more metallic characteristic (Figure 2c). Assuming a fixed, CMOS compatible voltage of ±3.5 V, carrier dynamic charge accumulation
To optimize the modulation performance of the proposed phase shifter, compensate for losses, and tune the design parameters, we study the effective mode index variation by performing eigenmode simulation using FEM analysis. The variation of the effective refractive

The performance map of asymmetric plasmonic mode ITO-based MZI modulator with 15 nm
The electrical properties of the phase shifter device are calculated from reported ITO resistivity of
Footprint has a strong impact on RC delay. Even if a larger overlap area of the two plates would considerably reduce the voltage to be applied or eventually improve modulation depth, providing π-shift for the same voltage applied, it would significantly compromise device speed. In contrast, thicker oxide, which can improve speed performance (lowering capacitance), would reduce trade-offs in terms of optical losses.
Here we distinguish amongst, propagating loss, defined by
Additionally, we verified the theoretical impact of fabrication tolerances on the phase shifter performance; with a ±4% tolerance in device footprint and over ±12% tolerance in splitting ratio (splitting ratio of ±8% is the current foundry tolerance), we can still achieve an ER/IL = 0.8, demonstrating reasonably achievable robustness, certainly given foundry precision (Figure 3d). To be noticed, the robustness is at the expense of unity decreasing or increasing of the ER and IL. The details about the ER and IL will be discussed in the following context.
Considering the constraints, we select a 15 nm gating oxide which allows altering the ITO carrier concentration from
The performance map can be used to find the design with the desired performance (in this work, we randomly pick ER > 3 dB and IL < 3 dB). The related equations are in SI. Here, transmission difference is defined as the difference between the maximum transmission and minimal transmission, and it is discussed with ER and IL since it is straightforward and facilitates the analysis. The transmission difference of plasmonic mode oscillates with the device length because of periodical initial phase change caused by the various device length (Figure 4a). The envelope of the transmission difference with a splitting ratio of 50:50 in Figure 4b is dominated by the modulation depth and propagating loss. Both increase with device length. The envelop rises in the short length region because modulation depth increases with the device length and mainly affects the shape of the envelope. Then it decreases in the long length region because the loss of the device on the active arm increases with device length faster than the modulation depth and changes the direction of the envelope. If the propagating loss of the device on the active arm is negligible, ER reaches the largest value with a splitting ratio of 50:50 and with a specific initial phase. The initial phase can be controlled by controlling particular device lengths or using asymmetric MZI arms (SI). However, the propagating loss of the plasmonic mode device on the active arm is not negligible. And a high splitting ratio X > 50 compensates for the propagating loss but also increases the IL and reduces the output transmission. The sweet spot is usually below the splitting ratio that gives the maximal ER. The maximum ER represented by using the triangle symbol in Figure 4c is 53 dB which is achieved by the splitting ratio of 91:9. The ER looks promising because the amplitude difference of pass-through light from two arms is below 10−5 when the device is operating in an OFF state (destructive interference). However, compared with the device we proposed (length of 4.7 µm, speed of 108 GHz, 3 dB ER, 2.9 dB IL, and 25%ΔT), the device with 53 dB ER has a longer length of 9.1 µm, lower speed of 71 GHz, higher IL of 10 dB, and lower ΔT of 10%. High ER can be achieved by compensating the device loss (including propagating loss and design loss) using a high splitting ratio (X > 50) (Figure 4d). And the splitting ratio of maximum ER design increase with device length because of increasing device loss. IL changed periodically with device length because initial phase changes and varied with splitting ratio because of increasing device loss (Figure 4e).
For applications with limited phase shift but requires high ER, high IL is expected as a trade-off (SI). The same concept also applies to the minimal IL device design. Based on the desired performance requirement and the non-negligible propagating loss of the device, a low splitting ratio of 41:59 is used for the design. The modulation depth is reduced, but transmitted power is enhanced. This design perfectly balances the trade-off between the ER and IL and meets the requirements. The ER & IL map in Figure 4f shows more design options with different device length but under the same operation voltage. The designs are distributed in a certain order. And the border marked using red solid line is mainly determined by the maximum phase change. Here we have a phase shift of about 0.33π. If the phase change increases, the border will move towards the shown direction.
3 Conclusions
In this paper, we explored material properties and the design of the modulator to reach an optimized point in terms of trade-offs between ER and IL within the constraints of small phase shifts. A 4.7 µm-long ITO-plasmon-based asymmetric MZI modulator with a phase shift of 0.33π, ER of 3 dB, IL of 2.9 dB, speed of 108 GHz under the bias of ±3.5 V. The device length is carefully chosen considering high transmission difference, high ER, and low IL. Asymmetric MZI modulator (41:59) gives rise to 0.4 dB lower IL compared to the symmetric MZI modulator. Trading off modulation depth, an increased oxide thickness can reduce the device’s capacitance, thus increasing the RC-limited device bandwidth. Additionally, we provide a design protocol to achieve tailored metrics such as modulation depth, speed, and losses that extend the active material of choice to engineer modulators with specific functionality-based performance [33].
Funding source: Air Force Office of Scientific Research http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000181
Award Identifier / Grant number: FA9550-21-1-0425
-
Author contributions: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.
-
Research funding: H.D. is supported by the AFOSR Award (FA9550-21-1-0425)
-
Conflict of interest statement: The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding this article.
References
[1] “APSUNY Process Development Kit Full-Build Component Library Documentation,”, Analog Photonics, vol. 29, Apr. 2021.Search in Google Scholar
[2] H. Huang, L. Tao, F. Liu, et al.., “Chemical-sensitive graphene modulator with a memory effect for internet-of-things applications,” Microsyst. Nanoeng., vol. 2, no. September 2015, pp. 1–9, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1038/micronano.2016.18.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[3] T. Kondo, H. Watanabe, and T. Ohigashi, “Development of the edge computing platform based on functional modulation architecture,” Compsac, vol. 2, pp. 284–285, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1109/COMPSAC.2017.108.Search in Google Scholar
[4] W. Li, N. Zhang, Q. Liu, W. Feng, R. Ning, and S. Lin, “Scalable modulation based computation offloading in vehicular edge computing system,” IEEE Veh. Technol. Conf., vol. 2020-Novem, pp. 20–24, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1109/VTC2020-Fall49728.2020.9348752.Search in Google Scholar
[5] J. K. George, A. Mehrabian, R. Amin, et al.., “Neuromorphic photonics with electro-absorption modulators,” Opt. Express, vol. 27, no. 4, p. 5181, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1364/oe.27.005181.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[6] R. Amin, J. K. George, S. Sun, et al., “ITO-based electro-absorption modulator for photonic neural activation function,” APL Mater., vol. 7, p. 81112, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5109039.Search in Google Scholar
[7] J. Park, B. G. Jeong, S. I. Kim, et al.., “All-solid-state spatial light modulator with independent phase and amplitude control for three-dimensional LiDAR applications,” Nat. Nanotechnol., vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 69–76, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41565-020-00787-y.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[8] Q. Li, C. P. Ho, S. Takagi, and M. Takenaka, “Optical phase modulators based on reverse-biased III-v/si hybrid metal-oxide-semiconductor capacitors,” IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett., vol. 32, no. 6, pp. 345–348, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1109/LPT.2020.2973174.Search in Google Scholar
[9] G. W. Lu, J. Hong, F. Qiu, et al.., “High-temperature-resistant silicon-polymer hybrid modulator operating at up to 200 Gbit s−1 for energy-efficient datacentres and harsh-environment applications,” Nat. Commun., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 1–9, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-18005-7.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[10] M. Li, J. Ling, Y. He, U. A. Javid, S. Xue, and Q. Lin, “Lithium niobate photonic-crystal electro-optic modulator,” Nat. Commun., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 1–8, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-17950-7.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[11] Z. Cheng, X. Zhu, M. Galili, et al.., “Double-layer graphene on photonic crystal waveguide electro-absorption modulator with 12 GHz bandwidth,” Nanophotonics, vol. 9, no. 8, pp. 2377–2385, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1515/nanoph-2019-0381.Search in Google Scholar
[12] Z. Fan, Z. Geng, W. Fang, et al.., “Characteristics of transition metal dichalcogenides in optical pumped modulator of terahertz wave,” AIP Adv., vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 1–9, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5141511.Search in Google Scholar
[13] R. Amin, C. Suer, Z. Ma, et al.., “Active material, optical mode and cavity impact on nanoscale electro-optic modulation performance,” Nanophotonics, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 455–472, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1515/nanoph-2017-0072.Search in Google Scholar
[14] R. Amin, M. H. Tahersima, Z. Ma, et al., “Low-loss tunable 1D ITO-slot photonic crystal nanobeam cavity,” J. Opt., vol. 20, no. 5, p. 054003, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1088/2040-8986/aab8bf.Search in Google Scholar
[15] R. Amin, R. Maiti, Y. Gui, et al.., “Heterogeneously integrated ITO plasmonic Mach–Zehnder interferometric modulator on SOI,” Sci. Rep., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 1–12, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-80381-3.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[16] Y. Gui, M. Miscuglio, Z. Ma, et al.., “Towards integrated metatronics: a holistic approach on precise optical and electrical properties of indium tin oxide,” Sci. Rep., vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 1–10, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-47631-5.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[17] V. J. Sorger, N. D. Lanzillotti-Kimura, R. M. Ma, and X. Zhang, “Ultra-compact silicon nanophotonic modulator with broadband response,” Nanophotonics, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 17–22, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1515/nanoph-2012-0009.Search in Google Scholar
[18] R. Amin, R. Maiti, J. B. Khurgin, and V. J. Sorger, “Performance analysis of integrated electro-optic phase modulators based on emerging materials,” IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quant. Electron., vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 1–11, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTQE.2020.3041835.Search in Google Scholar
[19] R. Amin, R. Maiti, J. K. George, et al.., “A lateral MOS-capacitor-enabled ITO Mach-Zehnder modulator for beam steering,” J. Lightwave Technol., vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 282–290, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1109/JLT.2019.2956719.Search in Google Scholar
[20] R. Amin, R. Maiti, C. Carfano, et al.., “0.52 V mm ITO-based Mach-Zehnder modulator in silicon photonics,” APL Photonics, vol. 3, no. 12, pp. 0–11, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5052635.Search in Google Scholar
[21] R. Amin, R. Maiti, Y. Gui, et al.., “Sub-wavelength GHz-fast broadband ITO Mach–Zehnder modulator on silicon photonics,” Optica, vol. 7, no. 4, p. 333, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1364/optica.389437.Search in Google Scholar
[22] M. H. Tahersima, Z. Ma, Y. Gui, et al.., “Coupling-enhanced dual ITO layer electro-absorption modulator in silicon photonics,” Nanophotonics, vol. 8, no. 9, pp. 1559–1566, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1515/nanoph-2019-0153.Search in Google Scholar
[23] E. Li, Q. Gao, R. T. Chen, and A. X. Wang, “Ultracompact silicon-conductive oxide nanocavity modulator with 0.02 lambda-cubic active volume,” Nano Lett., vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 1075–1081, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.7b04588.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[24] M. A. Swillam, A. O. Zaki, K. Kirah, and L. A. Shahada, “On chip optical modulator using epsilon-near-zero hybrid plasmonic platform,” Sci. Rep., pp. 1–9, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-42675-z.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[25] C. Wang, M. Zhang, X. Chen, et al.., “Integrated lithium niobate electro-optic modulators operating at CMOS-compatible voltages,” Nature, vol. 562, no. 7725, pp. 101–104, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0551-y.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[26] A. Liu, R. Jones, L. Liao, et al.., “A high-speed silicon optical modulator based on a metal – oxide – semiconductor capacitor,” Nature, vol. 427, pp. 615–618, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature02279.1.Search in Google Scholar
[27] S. Koeber, R. Palmer, M. Lauermann, et al.., “Femtojoule electro-optic modulation using a silicon-organic hybrid device,” Light Sci. Appl., vol. 4, p. 2, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1038/lsa.2015.28.Search in Google Scholar
[28] N. C. Harris, G. R. Steinbrecher, M. Prabhu, et al.., “Quantum transport simulations in a programmable nanophotonic processor,” Nat. Photonics, vol. 11, no. 7, pp. 447–452, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1038/nphoton.2017.95.Search in Google Scholar
[29] M. Dong, G. Clark, A. J. Leenheer, et al.., High-speed Programmable Photonic Circuits in a Cryogenically Compatible, Visible-NIR 200 mm CMOS Architecture, 2021, [Online]. Available at: http://arxiv.org/abs/2105.12531.10.1038/s41566-021-00903-xSearch in Google Scholar
[30] H. Fujiwara and R. W. Collins, Spectroscopic Ellipsometry for Photovoltaics Volume 1: Fundamental Principles and Solar Cell Characterization, vol. 2, 2018, [Online]. Available at: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-319-95138-6.10.1007/978-3-319-75377-5Search in Google Scholar
[31] Z. Ma, Z. Li, K. Liu, C. Ye, and V. J. Sorger, “Indium-tin-oxide for high-performance electro-optic modulation,” Nanophotonics, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 198–213, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1515/nanoph-2015-0006.Search in Google Scholar
[32] J. Parra, I. Olivares, J. L. Frieiro, et al.., “Transparent conducting oxides for optoelectronics and biosensing applications,” Int. Conf. Transparent Opt. Netw., vol. 2018-July, no. 1, pp. 1–4, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICTON.2018.8473979.Search in Google Scholar
[33] E. Heidari, H. Dalir, F. Mokhtari Koushyar, et al.., “Integrated ultra-high-performance graphene optical modulator,” Nanophotonics, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1515/nanoph-2021-0797.Search in Google Scholar
Supplementary Material
The online version of this article offers supplementary material (https://doi.org/10.1515/nanoph-2021-0796).
© 2022 Yaliang Gui et al., published by De Gruyter, Berlin/Boston
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.