Abstract
We investigate symmetry-selective surface-mode excitation in a general periodically time-modulated double-layer system, where the modulation of the two layers has a constant phase difference. By deriving a semi-analytic transfer matrix formalism of a Drude-dispersive double-layer structure with periodic time-modulation, we calculate the scattering amplitudes and the corresponding transmission coefficient. Our results show that the phase-difference between the modulation of the two sheets plays an essential role in significantly enhancing and selectively exciting either the even or odd surface mode with high efficiency. We verify our calculations with full-wave time-domain simulations, showing that efficient switching between the surface-wave excitation of the two distinct modal channels can be achieved, even under illumination from a single off-resonant Gaussian pulse, by controlling the phase difference between the two modulations. Our results pave the way towards ultrafast, symmetry-selective mode excitation and switching via temporal modulation.
1 Introduction
Confining and manipulating light at the nanoscale constitutes a decade-long scientific and technological challenge, with applications ranging from sensing and spectroscopy to imaging, communications, the optical probing of quantum materials and quantum optics. One fast-growing family of electromagnetic resonances capable of confining light to subwavelength volumes is represented by surface waves (SWs), travelling-wave excitations propagating along the interface between different materials, while decaying exponentially away from it. The first type of SWs exploited in nanophotonics is the surface plasmon polariton, which originates from the coupling between an impinging electromagnetic field and oscillations of an electron plasma [1]. More recently, a plethora of new polaritonic materials and excitations have been discovered, often featuring exotic dispersion relations, such as hyperbolic [2], ghost [3] and shear [4] phonon polaritons in anisotropic media.
On the other hand, the combined rise of ultra-thin, highly tunable layered materials and polaritonics has drawn significant attention to the opportunities stemming from leveraging the strong light-matter interactions enabled by these resonances, and the resulting nonlinearities, to achieve temporal control of light [5, 6] and matter [7]. This mechanism has led to a surge of interest in time-varying electromagnetic systems, which hold the promise to endow the fields of photonics, metamaterials and condensed matter physics with an additional degree of freedom for tailoring wave-matter interactions. Light–matter dynamics in time-modulated systems have been demonstrated to host a wealth of exotic wave phenomena, including parametric amplification [8, 9], negative refraction [10], time-refraction [11] and frequency shifting [12–14], photon acceleration [15] and the engineering of synthetic frequency dimensions [16]. In addition, a rising number of theoretical proposals have been studied, such as synthetic motion [17, 18], temporal topological edge states [19], nonreciprocity [20, 21] and space–time metamaterials [22–24], temporal aiming [25] and antireflection coatings [26], nonlocality [27], Floquet topology [28–31] and chirally selective amplification [32], among many others [33]. Furthermore, several research papers have demonstrated that tunable surfaces, such as 2D materials, passive and active impedance sheets, can achieve reconfigurable surface guided/leaky modes [34], frequency conversion [35], tunable Drude dispersion, and even gain [36, 37], which provide additional design flexibility to the proposed system.
One particular avenue that was recently proposed in this context is the one of dynamical Wood anomalies [38]: resonant, efficient SW-excitation schemes that form the analogue of spatial grating couplers to excite SWs from the far-field, by exploiting a periodic temporal modulation in the electromagnetic response of a spatially homogeneous surface, which may be realized via nonlinearities in a polaritonic medium such as graphene [39, 40]. In this work, we extend the concept of dynamical wood anomalies by introducing a second Floquet sheet, whose periodic time-modulation differs from the first one by a constant phase delay. While the additional sheet introduces a second surface mode with opposite symmetry, the time-grating can only couple radiation efficiently to one specific mode for a given interlayer gap, due to symmetry mismatch. This is due to the temporal symmetry of the system: crucially, this symmetry cannot be broken in a single-sheet structure. However, by tuning the constant modulation phase between the two Floquet sheets, this symmetry is broken and waves impinging from the far-field can be made to selectively couple to surface modes with a specific spatial symmetry, with high efficiency. We provide semi-analytical transfer matrix solutions to carry out the scattering problem, and verify our theoretical findings via both frequency domain and time-domain full-wave numerical simulations, concluding with numerical experiments where we selectively excite even or odd modes with a single pulse, by solely changing the interlayer phase. By interweaving periodic time-modulations with near-field wave interactions, our results introduce new opportunities stemming from ultrafast, dynamical switching to control the coupling to different surface mode channels on a time-modulated surface, or metasurface, paving the way for new directions in the context of dynamical Wood anomalies and polaritonic Floquet-surfaces.
2 Principle
We begin by considering two temporally modulated sheets that divide the space into three regions, with dielectric constants ɛ
1, ɛ
2, and ɛ
3. The schematic configuration of the proposed structure is depicted in Figure 1a. The current density
where γ is a phenomenological dissipation rate,

Schematics of the phased double-Floquet-sheet structure.
(a) Schematic of a double-layer system with an interlayer spacing d along the z-axis. The temporal modulation of both sheets enters the system via the Drude weight W D. The dielectric sub-domains are characterized by dielectric constants ɛ 1, ɛ 2, and ɛ 3. (b, c) Symmetry of the x-component of the electric fields (for the n = −1 harmonic channel, E x,−1), for the anti-symmetric (b) and symmetric (c) surface modes.
We start by considering a TM polarized wave
where
To determine the amplitudes, we enforce the continuity of the in-plane electric fields E
jx
and discontinuity of the magnetic fields H
jy
by the surface current
Thus, in frequency space, applying the boundary conditions at the two current sheets, leaves us with a 2n × 2n transfer matrix M for the double Floquet sheet (DFS) system,
where
With the reduced transfer matrix in Eq. (6), the approximate solutions of the transmitted amplitudes with and without time-modulation can then be obtained. Assuming that the incoming wave is incident from the top (see Figure 1a) upon the double-Floquet-sheet (DFS) with transmission coefficient denoted by T, it can be shown that the transmission coefficient for the fundamental harmonic is determined in terms of the elements of
In addition, the dispersion relation of the surface waves in the unmodulated structure can also be obtained when the matrix
3 Double Floquet sheets
In order to clearly show the mechanism of temporal Wood anomalies on our DFS, we first solve the dispersion relation for the unmodulated structure at a fixed interlayer distance
![Figure 2:
The dynamical SWs excitation mechanism.
(a) Dispersion relation of surface modes at a double-sheet system, calculated using the matrix M. The black double arrows indicate the excitation mechanism with time-gratings at the modulation frequency
Ω
̃
$\tilde {{\Omega}}$
. (b) Transmittance spectra for two temporal sheets with and without modulation
α
=
0.15
a
n
d
0
$\left(\alpha =0.15\;\mathrm{a}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{d}\;0\right)$
at fixed in-plane wavevector
k
̃
x
=
0.75
${\tilde {k}}_{x}=0.75$
[white vertical dashed line in (a)]. Here we used
d
̃
=
2
$\tilde {d}=2$
, ɛ
1 = ɛ
2 = ɛ
3 = 1,
Ω
̃
≈
0.6
$\tilde {{\Omega}}\approx 0.6$
, and
γ
̃
≈
0.01
$\tilde {\gamma }\approx 0.01$
. Solid line: Mode-matching result. Dots: Numerical result from COMSOL. (c, d) Electric field
E
̃
x
,
−
1
$\left({\tilde {E}}_{x,-1}\right)$
distributions of the symmetric and anti-symmetric surface modes under time-modulation of its Drude weight with modulation frequency
Ω
̃
≈
0.6
$\tilde {{\Omega}}\approx 0.6$
. Symmetric (even) mode at frequency
ω
̃
0
+
≈
1.176
${\tilde {\omega }}_{0+}\approx 1.176$
and anti-symmetric (odd) mode at frequency
ω
̃
0
−
≈
1.056
${\tilde {\omega }}_{0-}\approx 1.056$
are shown.](/document/doi/10.1515/nanoph-2022-0253/asset/graphic/j_nanoph-2022-0253_fig_002.jpg)
The dynamical SWs excitation mechanism.
(a) Dispersion relation of surface modes at a double-sheet system, calculated using the matrix M. The black double arrows indicate the excitation mechanism with time-gratings at the modulation frequency
To characterize the two SW modes, we have simulated the DFS system in the x-z plane with FEM-based software COMSOL 5.6. With time modulation, Figure 2c and d shows the x component of the electric fields in the n = −1 harmonic channel, i.e.,
4 Phased double Floquet sheets
Conventionally, SW excitation can be optimised for either the symmetric or antisymmetric mode by tuning the distance between the sheets, which however necessarily makes the other mode darker. A temporal Wood anomaly can overcome this limitation when a constant phase shift is introduced between the two time-gratings, enabling dynamic switching between coupling to the two modes. In our scenario, Figure 3a shows the transmittance spectra for the fundamental harmonic of the fields scattered off the DFS structure when the two Floquet sheets are modulated in phase, as a contour plot in terms of frequency

The surface modes excitation of the DFS system with phase modulation.
(a) Transmittance spectra of the DFS structure without phase modulation as a function of incident frequency
For the scenario where the two time-gratings differ by a constant relative phase Δϕ, in Figure 3b we show the transmittance spectrum
The switching capability of our DFS system is best exploited if just the phase shift can be leveraged to selectively excite a specific mode given the same input wave. In order to investigate this avenue, we design three time-domain numerical simulations with Gaussian pulses of different carrier frequencies [see Supplementary 1 for details on simulation settings]. Figure 4 shows a snapshot of the in-plane components of the electric field

The snapshots of surface excitations at t ≈ 186.
Temporal simulations of phased dynamical wood anomalies predicted in Figure 3a and b on-resonance pulses with carrier frequencies
To achieve symmetry-selection at the same incident angle and frequencies, we design a Gaussian pulse whose bandwidth covers the two resonance frequencies [pink curve in Figure S3]. The off-resonance carrier frequency is chosen in the middle of the two resonance frequencies, i.e.,
We envision possible implementations of a DFS device in high-quality graphene, either via all-optical modulation or electrical bias. All-optical modulation refers to the capability of graphene to undergo ultrafast modulations of its graphene carrier density under infrared pumping [41, 42]. In addition, electrical bias refers to the ultrafast response of graphene to incident electrostatic fields, which has been previously used to realize graphene modulations [43]. In order to match our parameters with realistic values, experimentally achieved for carrier modulation speeds and graphene plasmon lifetimes, we choose to work in a lower frequency regime, where the SW dispersions are closer to the light line, as detailed in Figure S4 of the Supplementary Material. In Figure 5, we demonstrate the reflection spectrum for incoming terahertz waves with in-plane wavevector k x = 8.87 rad/mm impinging on the DFS device as d ≈ 0.17 mm. Given a realistic modulation frequency f m ≈ 0.16 THz, the two in-coupled photon frequencies are f 0,− = 0.515 THz and f 0,+ = 0.57 THz, corresponding to odd and even surface modes. Here we assume a modulation amplitude α = 0.15, and demonstrate the effect of three different loss rates γ = 0.3, 0.6 and 1.2 THz. Clearly, the onset of losses plays a role both in the coupling to the two eigenmodes, but also in the selectivity achievable, due to the loss of orthogonality between the two eigenmodes with opposite parity. Furthermore, due to its lower frequency, the lifetime of the antisymmetric mode is more affected by the loss, so that the corresponding excitation signal becomes hardly distinguishable for loss rates above 1 THz, a common problem of acoustic plasmons in graphene. However, for reasonably high-quality samples, it is possible to excite preferentially one of the two SW modes, while suppressing the other one by simply tuning the phase difference Δϕ between two graphene layers by π radians. Thus, although both reflection signals originating from the SW coupling drop as the loss rate increases, symmetry-selective coupling can still be achieved under a reasonable loss rate.
![Figure 5:
Numerical calculations of the reflection spectrum of phased double-Floquet-graphene layers at d ≈ 0.17 mm for different values of loss rates
γ
Δ
ϕ
=
e
v
F
2
/
m
E
F
${\gamma }_{{\Delta}\phi }=e{v}_{\mathrm{F}}^{2}/\left(m{E}_{\mathrm{F}}\right)$
from 0.3 THz (blue), 0.6 THz (green), to 1.2 THz (red) based on a conservative electron mobility m = 100 × 103, 50 × 103,
25
×
1
0
3
c
m
2
/
V
⋅
s
$25{\times}1{0}^{3}\mathrm{c}{\mathrm{m}}^{2}/\left(V\cdot s\right)$
[44]. Solid and dashed lines correspond to Δϕ ≈ 0 and Δϕ ≈ π, corresponding to the preferential even and odd mode excitations respectively. The parameters are E
F,0 = 0.3 eV,
W
D
,
0
=
e
2
E
F
,
0
/
π
ℏ
2
=
0.035
T
H
z
${W}_{\mathrm{D},\mathrm{0}}={e}^{2}{E}_{\mathrm{F},\mathrm{0}}/\left(\pi {\hslash }^{2}\right)=0.035\mathrm{T}\mathrm{H}\mathrm{z}$
, f
m = Ω/2π
≈
0.16
T
H
z
$\approx 0.16\mathrm{T}\mathrm{H}\mathrm{z}$
, andv
F = 9.5 × 107 cm/s [38], which correspond to the fermi level, Drude weight, modulation frequency, and fermi velocity of the charge carriers, respectively.](/document/doi/10.1515/nanoph-2022-0253/asset/graphic/j_nanoph-2022-0253_fig_005.jpg)
Numerical calculations of the reflection spectrum of phased double-Floquet-graphene layers at d ≈ 0.17 mm for different values of loss rates
Finally, the blending of Floquet engineering with near-field surface interactions presents further opportunities for experimental implementations at radio-frequencies, for instance by incorporating variable capacitors into spoof-plasmon metasurfaces, or by introducing lumped elements that can be sequentially added into/removed from the system via voltage-controlled switches, with commercial switching displaying response times below 4 ns, in a similar fashion to what was realized in Refs [13, 24]. Hence, the effective impedance of these systems can be modulated at around GHz speeds, and desired surface modes can be tailored by adequately structuring the metasurface.
5 Concluding remarks
To conclude, we have investigated double time-modulated Floquet sheets to selectively excite symmetric and anti-symmetric SW modes at flat interfaces. By means of a general, efficient transfer-matrix model, we showed how symmetry-selective temporal Wood anomalies, capable of enhancing and efficiently switching between the excitation of even and odd surface modes, can be engineered by introducing a constant phase difference between the temporal modulation of the two conductive layers, simultaneously suppressing the undesired mode. Furthermore, we used time-domain Gaussian pulses impinging on the DFS in transient FEM simulations to demonstrate how the same impinging signal can be efficiently coupled to either symmetric or anti-symmetric mode by controlling the relative modulation phase. In practice, implementations are viable either within the THz range, where the switching effect can be realized by either all-optical or electrical pumping, or at microwaves, by exploiting active metasurfaces supporting designer SWs, such as spoof plasmons.
By forging a link between Floquet physics and near-field photonic interactions, our results open a new avenue for ultrafast and fully reconfigurable optoelectronic switching, with further opportunities stretching from the engineering of geometric phases via more complex dynamical phase difference and modulation schemes with additional layers, to further applications of these concepts for the design of broadband active absorbers and amplifying devices.
Funding source: Simon Society of Fellows
Award Identifier / Grant number: 855344, EG
Funding source: Ministry of science of technology, Taiwan
Award Identifier / Grant number: MOST 110-2218-E−007-055-MBK
Award Identifier / Grant number: MOST 110-2221-E−007-051-MY3
Award Identifier / Grant number: MOST 111-2923-E−007-007-MY2
Award Identifier / Grant number: MOST 111-2218-E-007-014-MBK
-
Author contributions: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.
-
Research funding: This work was supported by grants from the Ministry of Science and Technology (MOST 110-2221-E-007-051-MY3, MOST 110-2218-E-007-055-MBK, MOST 111-2923-E-007-007-MY2, MOST 111-2218-E-007-014-MBK), the Office of Naval Research (N00014-22-1-2448), the Simons Foundation and the Air Force Office of Scientific Research (FA9550-18-1-0379). E.G. was supported via a Junior Fellowship of the Simons Society of Fellows (855344, EG).
-
Conflict of interest statement: The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest related to this article.
-
Supplemental document: See Supplement 1 for supporting content.
References
[1] S. A. Maier, Plasmonics: Fundamentals and Applications, 1st ed. Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, Springer Science & Business Media, 2007.10.1007/0-387-37825-1Search in Google Scholar
[2] S. Dai, Z. Fei, Q. Ma, et al.., “Tunable phonon polaritons in atomically thin van der Waals crystals of boron nitride,” Science, vol. 343, no. 6175, pp. 1125–1129, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1246833.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[3] W. Ma, G. Hu, D. Hu, et al.., “Ghost hyperbolic surface polaritons in bulk anisotropic crystals,” Nature, vol. 596, no. 7872, pp. 362–366, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-03755-1.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[4] N. Passler, X. Ni, G. Hu, et al.., “Hyperbolic shear polaritons in low-symmetry crystals,” Nature, vol. 602, pp. 595–600.10.1038/s41586-021-04328-ySearch in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[5] N. Engheta, “Metamaterials with high degrees of freedom: space, time, and more,” Nanophotonics, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 639–642, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110710687-051.Search in Google Scholar
[6] A. M. Shaltout, V. M. Shalaev, and M. L. Brongersma, “Spatiotemporal light control with active metasurfaces,” Science, vol. 364, p. eaat3100, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aat3100.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[7] A. S. Disa, T. F. Nova, and A. Cavalleri, “Engineering crystal structures with light,” Nat. Phys., vol. 17, no. 10, pp. 1087–1092, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-021-01366-1.Search in Google Scholar
[8] A. Cartella, T. F. Nova, M. Fechner, R. Merlin, and A. Cavalleri, “Parametric amplification of optical phonons,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., vol. 115, no. 48, pp. 12148–12151, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1809725115.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[9] M. H. Michael, M. Först, D. Nicoletti, et al.., “Generalized Fresnel-Floquet equations for driven quantum materials,” 2021, arXiv preprint arXiv:2110.03704.10.1103/PhysRevB.105.174301Search in Google Scholar
[10] V. Bruno, C. DeVault, S. Vezzoli, et al.., “Negative refraction in time-varying strongly coupled plasmonic-antenna-epsilon-near-zero systems,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 124, p. 043902, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.124.043902.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[11] Y. Zhou, M. Z. Alam, M. Karimi, et al.., “Broadband frequency translation through time refraction in an epsilon-near-zero material,” Nat. Commun., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 1–7, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-15682-2.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[12] F. Miyamaru, C. Mizuo, T. Nakanishi, et al.., “Ultrafast frequency-shift dynamics at temporal boundary induced by structural-dispersion switching of waveguides,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 127, no. 5, p. 053902, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.127.053902.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[13] Z. Wu and A. Grbic, “Serrodyne frequency translation using time-modulated metasurfaces,” IEEE Trans. Antenn. Propag., vol. 68, no. 3, pp. 1599–1606, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1109/apusncursinrsm.2019.8888738.Search in Google Scholar
[14] D. Ramaccia, D. L. Sounas, A. Alu, A. Toscano, and F. Bilotti, “Phase-induced frequency conversion and Doppler effect with time-modulated metasurfaces,” IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., vol. 68, pp. 1607–1617, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1109/tap.2019.2952469.Search in Google Scholar
[15] M. R. Shcherbakov, S. Liu, V. V. Zubyuk, et al.., “Ultrafast all-optical tuning of direct-gap semiconductor metasurfaces,” Nat. Commun., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 1–6, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1364/cleo_qels.2017.ftu4g.1.Search in Google Scholar
[16] A. Dutt, Q. Lin, L. Yuan, M. Minkov, M. Xiao, and S. Fan, “A single photonic cavity with two independent physical synthetic dimensions,” Science, vol. 367, no. 6473, pp. 59–64, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaz3071.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[17] E. Galiffi, P. A. Huidobro, and J. B. Pendry, “Broadband nonreciprocal amplification in luminal metamaterials,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 123, no. 20, p. 206101, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.123.206101.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[18] P. A. Huidobro, E. Galiffi, S. Guenneau, R. V. Craster, and J. B. Pendry, “Fresnel drag in space–time-modulated metamaterials,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., vol. 116, no. 50, pp. 24943–24948, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1915027116.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[19] E. Lustig, Y. Sharabi, and M. Segev, “Topological aspects of photonic time crystals,” Optica, vol. 5, no. 11, pp. 1390–1395, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1364/optica.5.001390.Search in Google Scholar
[20] D. L. Sounas and A. Alù, “Non-reciprocal photonics based on time modulation,” Nat. Photonics, vol. 11, pp. 774–783, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41566-017-0051-x.Search in Google Scholar
[21] A. E. Cardin, S. R. Silva, S. R. Vardeny, et al.., “Surface-wave-assisted nonreciprocity in spatio-temporally modulated metasurfaces,” Nat. Commun., vol. 11, p. 1469, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-15273-1.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[22] C. Caloz and Z. L. Deck-Léger, “Spacetime metamaterials—part I: general concepts,” IEEE Trans. Antenn. Propag., vol. 68, no. 3, pp. 1569–1582, 2019.10.1109/TAP.2019.2944225Search in Google Scholar
[23] Y. Hadad, D. L. Sounas, and A. Alù, “Space-time gradient metasurfaces,” Phys. Rev. B, vol. 92, no. 10, p. 100304, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.92.100304.Search in Google Scholar
[24] L. Zhang, X. Q. Chen, S. Liu, et al.., “Space-time-coding digital metasurfaces,” Nat. Commun., vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 1–11, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-06802-0.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[25] V. Pacheco-Peña and N. Engheta, “Temporal aiming,” Light Sci. Appl., vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 1–12. 2020.10.1038/s41377-020-00360-1Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[26] V. Pacheco-Peña and N. Engheta, “Antireflection temporal coatings,” Optica, vol. 7, pp. 323–331, 2020.10.1364/OPTICA.381175Search in Google Scholar
[27] D. Torrent, “Strong spatial dispersion in time-modulated dielectric media,” Phys. Rev. B, vol. 102, no. 21, p. 214202, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.102.214202.Search in Google Scholar
[28] L. He, Z. Addison, J. Jin, E. J. Mele, S. G. Johnson, and B. Zhen, “Floquet Chern insulators of light,” Nat. Commun., vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 1–6, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-12231-4.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[29] Y. T. Wang, Y. W. Tsai, and W. Gao, “Floquet topological photonic crystals with temporally modulated media,” Opt. Express, vol. 28, pp. 21268–21274, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1364/oe.395504.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[30] R. Fleury, A. B. Khanikaev, and A. Alù, “Floquet topological insulators for sound,” Nat. Commun., vol. 7, p. 11744, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms11744.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[31] A. Darabi, X. Ni, M. Leamy, and A. Alù, “Reconfigurable Floquet elastodynamic topological insulator based on synthetic angular momentum bias,” Sci. Adv., vol. 6, no. 29, p. eaba8656, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aba8656.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[32] E. Galiffi, P. A. Huidobro, and J. B. Pendry, “An Archimedes’ screw for light,” Nat. Commun., vol. 13, p. 2523, 2022.10.1038/s41467-022-30079-zSearch in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[33] E. Galiffi, R. Tirole, S. Yin, et al.., “Photonics of time-varying media,” Advanced Photonics, vol. 4, no. 1, p. 014002, 2022.10.1117/1.AP.4.1.014002Search in Google Scholar
[34] M. Hajizadegan, L. Zhu, and P. Y. Chen, “Superdirective leaky radiation from a PT-synthetic metachannel,” Opt. Express, vol. 29, pp. 12330–12343, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1364/oe.419775.Search in Google Scholar
[35] P. Y. Chen, C. Argyropoulos, G. D’Aguanno, and A. Alù, “Enhanced second-harmonic generation by metasurface nanomixer and nanocavity,” ACS Photonics, vol. 2, pp. 1000–1006, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsphotonics.5b00205.Search in Google Scholar
[36] T. Low, P. Y. Chen, and D. N. Basov, “Superluminal plasmons with resonant gain in population inverted bilayer graphene,” Phys. Rev. B: Rapid Commun., vol. 98, p. 041403(R), 2018. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.98.041403.Search in Google Scholar
[37] P. Y. Chen, H. Huang, D. Akinwande, and A. Alù, “Graphene-based plasmonic platform for reconfigurable terahertz nanodevices,” ACS Photonics, vol. 1, pp. 647–654, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1021/ph500046r.Search in Google Scholar
[38] E. Galiffi, Y. T. Wang, Z. Lim, J. B. Pendry, A. Alù, and P. A. Huidobro, “Wood anomalies and surface-wave excitation with a time grating,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 125, p. 127403, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.125.127403.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[39] T. J. Constant, S. M. Hornett, D. E. Chang, and E. Hendry, “All-optical generation of surface plasmons in graphene,” Nat. Phys., vol. 12, pp. 124–127, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys3545.Search in Google Scholar
[40] Y. Hadad, D. L. Sounas, and A. Alù, “Space-time gradient metasurfaces,” Phys. Rev. B, vol. 92, p. 100304(R), 2015. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.92.100304.Search in Google Scholar
[41] W. Li, B. Chen, C. Meng, et al.., “Ultrafast all-optical graphene modulator,” Nano Lett., vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 955–959, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1021/nl404356t.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[42] A. Tomadin, S. Hornett, H. Wang, et al.., “The ultrafast dynamics and conductivity of photoexcited graphene at different Fermi energies,” Sci. Adv., vol. 4, no. 5, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aar5313.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[43] C. Phare, Y. Daniel Lee, J. Cardenas, and M. Lipson, “Graphene electro-optic modulator with 30 GHz bandwidth,” Nat. Photonics, vol. 9, no. 8, pp. 511–514, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1038/nphoton.2015.122.Search in Google Scholar
[44] L. Banszerus, M. Schmitz, S. Engels, et al.., “Ultrahigh-mobility graphene devices from chemical vapor deposition on reusable copper,” Sci. Adv., vol. 1, no. 6, p. e1500222, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1500222.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
Supplementary Material
The online version of this article offers supplementary material (https://doi.org/10.1515/nanoph-2022-0253).
© 2022 the author(s), published by De Gruyter, Berlin/Boston
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.