Abstract
The frequency mixing property of time-modulated metasurfaces, attributed to the well-known phenomenon of temporal photonic transition, has led to several exotic functionalities in the last lustrum. Based on this concept, we demonstrate the possibility of achieving nonreciprocal responses in the near-infrared regime via combining a time-modulated platform and a static high-Q metasurface. In particular, the temporal metasurface is designed to up-convert the incident tone to the first higher-order harmonic, while the static platform is implemented to establish a filtering behavior with respect to the incident frequency. It is shown that while the receiver port acquires the transmitted signal in the forward direction, the amount of received power becomes negligible under the time-reversal scenario, which indicates the presented configuration exhibits different optical responses from opposite directions. In addition, the role of operating wavelength and the modulation frequency on the power isolation level are investigated, and it is demonstrated that by appropriate selection, the isolation level can reach −30 dB. Since this is the first time a nonreciprocal response is obtained in the near-infrared regime via a pure temporal modulation, we believe the idea of this paper can be of utmost importance in various applications, such as tunable optical isolators.
1 Introduction
The nonreciprocity theorem, which states the optical fields generated by a light source at a particular point in space are not the same compared to the scenario wherein the source and observation point are interchanged, is a fundamental scientific concept whose roots date back to the pioneering works of Stokes and Helmholtz in the middle of the 18th century [1–3]. Nonreciprocal devices have paved the way toward many exotic functionalities in wide branches of science, wherein one-way propagation is of utmost importance, such as full-duplex antennas [4], and signal isolation from a power supply [1], to cite a few. Although utilizing the magneto-optical effect via a static magnetic field has been the most common approach for establishing nonreciprocal responses, challenges such as bulkiness and space occupation have hindered the applicability of this method [5, 6]. Furthermore, on account of the significantly weak cyclotron frequency of free electrons and the Larmor frequency of spin precession of bound electrons in the optical regime, achieving an efficient nonreciprocal response in higher frequencies is an open challenge that needs to be addressed for the future generation of nonreciprocal devices [7–9]. In this light, the last decade has witnessed a significant growth of interest for obtaining nonreciprocal responses via exploiting nonlinear materials [10–16]. However, the need for high-intensity pump waves and poor isolation levels between the input and output ports have also limited the practicality of this approach for being utilized in realistic experimental setups. Therefore, according to the points mentioned above, it could be understood that another added layer of complexity in this field of research would be the establishment of asymmetric optical responses with a high level of isolation and via compact footprints.
Metasurfaces, consisting of a two-dimensional (2D) array of densely packed subwavelength elements, have emerged as new compact and easy-to-fabricate platforms that are competent to manipulate light in an unprecedented manner [17–19]. In sharp contrast to the conventional optical elements that rely on phase accumulation, the operation of metasurfaces relies on imparting abrupt resonant or geometric phase shifts to the scattered light, such that its wavefront could be engineered for a broad spectrum of applications, including beam deflection, focusing, and holography [17, 20]. While these ultra-thin platforms have opened up a new avenue in the optics community, their fixed functionality hinders their applicability in realistic scenarios. To overcome such a long-standing limitation of static metasurfaces and control their optical response in real-time, recently, an immense effort has been made to incorporate different thermal, mechanical, and electro-optical (EO) tuning mechanisms into these platforms [21, 22]. Among all the proposed approaches, EO-based techniques that rely on free-carrier effects in semiconductors [23, 24], and 2D materials [25] have attracted significant attention on account of their fast response time, low power consumption, and robust continuous tunability of individual unit cells. It should be remarked that while EO-based active metasurfaces are widely proposed for operating in the reflection mode, transmissive tunable metasurfaces in the near-infrared (NIR) spectrum are rarely presented due to the lack of suitable material and their low range of tunability [26]. For instance, while silicon has been the most widely utilized material for active platforms in the NIR regime, its electro-refraction coefficient is significantly reduced when it is configured into p−i−n and p−n junctions for implementation in all-dielectric metasurfaces [26–29]. As a result of such a decrement, the maximal achievable phase modulation via these materials is reduced significantly. A novel approach to address this issue is to increase the photons’ lifetime and their corresponding field confinement within the consisting resonators of the metasurface, such that a wide modulation is obtained via a slight change in the refractive index [26]. Such design criteria can be satisfied via implementing metasurfaces that are competent in supporting high-quality (high-Q) factor resonances, including the quasi-bound state in the continuum (QBIC) [30, 31], guided-mode resonances (GMR) [32–34], and anapole resonances [35–37], to name a few.
It should be remarked that while these geometrically fixed tunable platforms have enabled a myriad of applications, they cannot be utilized to establish nonreciprocal responses. This is attributed to the fact that when the incident light interacts with these quasi-static platforms, the scattered wave merely undergoes spatial photonic transition while its spectral information remains unchanged. To circumvent these limitations, recently, an increasing number of studies have focused on designing metasurfaces with time-variant properties in which time-reversal symmetry can be explicitly broken to achieve a nonreciprocal response.
These recently proposed structures, known as time-modulated metasurfaces (TMM), are another class of active platforms capable of engineering both the spectral and spatial content of the light on account of transition between different temporal and spatial photonic modes, respectively [38–41]. Such a capability will, in turn, extend the degree of light manipulation and lead to novel physical phenomena for different applications such as pulse shaping and time-reversal [42–44], dynamic beam steering [45–47], spatiotemporal light manipulation [48–50], signal amplification [51], extreme energy accumulation [52], wideband impedance matching [53], and wave camouflaging [54–56]. Moreover, it has been demonstrated that by introducing spatial variation into the temporal modulation, the time-reversal symmetry will be broken, and subsequently, nonreciprocal responses can be obtained [57–66]. This is attributed to the fact that a spatiotemporal modulation mimics a directional motion at the macroscopic scale, which breaks the symmetry of optical response by imparting different momenta to the forward and backward propagating waves under time-reversal. In sharp contrast to the conventional methods of achieving nonreciprocal responses, the nonreciprocity in TMM does not rely on heavy and bulky platforms, which makes them promising alternatives for on-chip applications. Furthermore, as opposed to nonlinear systems, the nonreciprocity in TMMs is independent of the intensity of the incident light and can be obtained for simultaneous excitation, which gives rise to several advantages in terms of power throughput and efficiency. In this perspective, the nonreciprocity of space-time photonic transitions of nonlocal guided and leaky modes have been previously exploited to achieve isolation in leaky-wave antennas, waveguides, and metasurfaces [67, 68]. However, while a spatiotemporally modulated metasurface provides isolation for different optical modes, it is impossible to achieve a nonreciprocal response via a purely temporal metasurface (i.e., spatial modulation) zero, since the scattering response becomes independent on the illumination direction. It should be mentioned that although under time-reversal, a pure TMM is capable of changing the wavelength of light along the same spatial pathway, which in turn yields the rejection of interference between transmitted and received signals by virtue of their orthogonality, the power isolation will be negligible due to the same frequency conversion performance and invariant spatial pathway under time-reversal. Therefore, a stand-alone, purely time-modulated platform can be safely classified as a reciprocal optical component. To the best of our knowledge, merely two works have been proposed to achieve nonreciprocal responses via pure temporal platforms, which are not only in the microwave regime, wherein designing a transmissive metasurface is straightforward, but also their design suffers from a complex configuration that requires other bulky optical elements such as Bragg grating [66, 69]. Therefore, in light of the points mentioned above, it is interesting to ask whether it is possible to obtain a nonreciprocal response via a purely time-modulated platform in the NIR regime while minimizing the number of the required optical elements of the configuration.
In this paper, for the first time to the best of our knowledge, we propose a purely temporal configuration in the NIR regime to achieve an asymmetric optical response that can be exploited to establish optical isolation between two channels. The provided configuration is demonstrated schematically in Figure 1a, consisting of two ultra-thin metasurfaces layers. In particular, the first layer that is competent in supporting an ultrahigh-Q factor resonance is a static metasurface consisting of 2D arrays of silicon-based nanocuboids mounted on top of a quartz substrate with square holes in their center, as shown in the inset of Figure 1a. On the other hand, the second platform, which is composed of silicon-based asymmetrical bars sandwiched between two layers of distributed Bragg reflectors (DBR), is a transmissive time-modulated metasurface capable of supporting a wide phase span

The nonreciprocity performance via transmissive metasurfaces. (a) The schematic depiction of the presented configuration that consists of two all-dielectric high-Q metasurfaces, which are under the illumination of an incident transverse electric (TE) polarized wave with its electric field pointing toward
The rest of the manuscript is organized as follows. In the next section, we will intuitively explain the core idea of our idea. Then in the third section, we will design the required elements of both mentioned metasurfaces and discuss their corresponding quasi-static results. Afterward, we will provide the temporal response of the first metasurface and evaluate the nonreciprocal efficiency of the configurations. Finally, the paper will be concluded in Section 5.
2 Underlying physics
On account of supporting a temporal photonic transition, the dynamic modulation of metasurfaces provides the necessary momentum for the transition of fundamental tone to higher-order harmonics defined as f n = f o + nf m with n ∈ Z being an integer number denoting the order of generated frequency harmonics [45]. In sharp contrast to the static and quasi-static metasurfaces, by utilizing such a phenomenon in TMMs, known as frequency mixing property, both the spectral and spatial content of the light can be manipulated arbitrarily. The key idea to take advantage of the frequency mixing property of TMMs lies at the heart of engineering the frequency conversion performance of a time-modulated platform, which is a cascaded procedure and depends on its resonant characteristics and modulation waveform [72]. In particular, the temporal distribution of the scattered fields at the steady state is related to the desired output spectrum of frequency harmonics. In this light, the steady-state time-domain incident, transmitted, and reflected fields can be expressed as:
wherein ω
o
= 2πf
o
and ω
m = 2πf
m are the optical and modulation angular frequencies, respectively,
In order to explain the underlying physical mechanism of the presented idea, we will first assume an ideal case wherein a transmissive time-modulated metasurface (i.e.,
3 Metasurface design
In this section, we are aiming at designing two transmissive metasurfaces that are capable of supporting the criteria mentioned above. To this end, the spectral position of the resonance dip should correspond to the second higher-order frequency harmonic (i.e., ω +2 = ω o + 2ω m), such that in the time-reversal scenario (blue light in Figure 1a), the incoming wave reflected to the second port upon its interaction with the static platform. In this perspective, we designed the first layer based on a 2D array of hollow silicon nanocuboid characterized by external and internal side lengths of L 1 and L 2, respectively, the thickness of H a, and periodicity of P as it is shown in the inset of Figure 1a. It should be remarked that the 2D array is mounted on a quartz substrate, which demonstrates negligible material dispersion in the NIR spectral window and has the refractive index of n quartz = 1.45. It is noteworthy to mention that the same material is also utilized to cover the nanocuboids such that the refractive index between substrate and superstrate matches each other. In order to investigate the effect of structural parameters (H a and L 2) on the strength, linewidth, and spectral positions of the supported resonances, we have performed two parametric studies based on rigorous coupled-wave analysis (RCWA) method, and their corresponding results are collated in Figure 2. Firstly, we have examined the effect of nanocuboids thickness on the optical response of the static layer by fixing the periodicity and lengths of the nancuboids to P = 603 nm, L 1 = 554 nm, and L 2 = 0.17 × L 1, respectively, as it is shown in Figure 2a. It is evident from this figure that changing the thickness of the nano-resonators will induce two types of resonances, each with different linewidth and Q-factors. In particular, operating in the vicinity of the second resonance, whose linewidth is much narrower than its counterpart, is of utmost importance because of the reasons mentioned above. Therefore, we set the thickness of the nano-resonators to H a = 471 nm, which ensures the existence of merely one ultrahigh-Q resonance in the transmission mode. On the other hand, as it is depicted in Figure 2b, varying the hollow region side length will directly affect the spectral location of the resonance dip, while leaving its linwidth (Q-factor) unchanged. In this perspective, in order to operate in the most common wavelength of the telecommunication band (i.e., λ o ≈ 1550 nm) we have chosen the geometrical dimensions of the consisting elements to be L 1 = 554 nm, L 2 = 0.17 × L 1, H a = 471 nm, and P = 603 nm. The transmission response of the static metasurface, with the given structural parameters is provided in the inset of Figure 2b, which clearly demonstrates a high level of transmission in a broad spectrum except at a significantly narrow region locating at λ = 1549.2 nm. Moreover, the magnetic and electric field distributions within the consisting unit-cells of the static layer in the (Y − Z) and (X − Y) planes, are calculated and demonstrated in Figure 2c and d, respectively. It is clear from these two figures that while the magnetic field is confined around the hollow region, the electric field distributions are localized inside the nanocuboid holes. In particular, such a field confinement that controls the spectral position and strength of the resonant dip is directly attributed to the existence of the hollow region [73]. As it will be demonstrated in the following sections, such a filtering behavior plays a crucial role for establishing a nonreciprocal response via a purely time-modulated platform.

Transmission response of the static metasurface. The optical response of the ultrahigh-Q static metasurface with respect to the change in the operating wavelength ranging from λ 1 = 1540 nm to λ 2 = 1555 nm when (a) the thickness of the nanocuboids and (b) the length of the hollow region are varying. By fixing the structural topology of the consisting elements to be L 1 = 554 nm, L 2 = 0.17 × L 1, H a = 471 nm, and P = 603 nm, the optical response of the metasurface will demonstrate an extremely narrowband filtering in the transmission mode as it is shown in the inset of panel (b). The near-field distribution of (c) magnetic and (d) electric field within the unit cell in the (Y–Z) and (X–Y) plane, respectively. The calculated transmission (e) amplitude and (f) phase of the temporal platform as functions of its consisting elements thicknesses and operating wavelength. Increasing the height of the resonators leads to two sets of spectral overlaps between (FP-GMR) and (FP-QBIC) resonance modes. The corresponding magnetic field distributions of (g) FP and (h) GMR modes in the (X–Z) plane.
The second metasurface, which serves as a temporal platform, consists of an array of asymmetrical silicon nanobars that are sandwiched between two distributed Bragg reflectors (DBR) and have the periodicities of Λ
x
= Λ, Λ
y
= Λ/2 the height of H
g
, and width of w
1 and w
2 as it is shown in the inset of Figure 1a. The DBR Contains three quarter-wave stacks of silicon and alumina (Al2O3) with the thicknesses of λ
o
/4n, wherein n represents the refractive index of the corresponding materials, which have been obtained from experimentally measured data [74], and λ
o
is the operating wavelength. It should be remarked that the grating height can be decomposed into the nanobar and DBR thicknesses as
It is clear that changing the height of the nanobars will subsequently shift the spectral positions of the emerged resonance modes on account of the change in the effective refractive index. However, the spectral position of the Fabry–Pérot mode experiences more shift due to the modification of the cavity size between top and bottom DBRs. Further increment of H Si, leads to two sets of spectral overlaps between (FP-GMR) and (FP-QBIC) resonance modes, shown with yellow and pink color stars in Figure 2e and f, which subsequently establish a Huygens-like regime at two distinctive wavelength and thicknesses. It should be remarked that such a Huygens-like behavior is attributed to the fact that each mode experiences a spectral phase shift of π at each excited resonance [75]. In other words, upon the spectral overlap of each pair of resonances, the spectral phase span can reach up to 2π while its amplitude can remain close to 100% in the transmission mode, which is a manifestation of a Huygens regime. In order to operate in the vicinity of the telecommunication band, we have set the geometrical dimensions of the second metasurface to w 1 = 380 nm, H g = 520 nm, and Λ = 2 × 580 nm, which gives rise to two sets of resonances that occur at λ 1 = 1549.6 nm, and λ 2 = 1544.6 nm. As it is evident from Figure 2e and f, the first resonance, originated from the overlap of FP and GMR modes, has a Huygens-like behavior (i.e., unitary transmission with 2π phase span), while the second resonance corresponds to the QBIC mode. Therefore, the presented metasurface can also be utilized for dual-band operation in NIR regime.
4 Quasi-static and temporal response
As mentioned earlier, the working principle of the presented setup for establishing asymmetric optical response is based on the frequency mixing property of the TMM (i.e., the second layer) and the filtering response of the static metasurface (i.e., first layer). To this aim, the quasi-static response of the temporal platform should be obtained via changing the refractive indices of the consisting elements. In this perspective, the refractive indices of the asymmetrical nanobars are electrically modulated via p−i−n junction configuration. The same as that of our previous work [75], while the N and P doped regions are located at the two ends of the nanobars, with the length of L
n
= 0.6 μm and L
p
= 0.4 μm and carrier concentration of n = 4.5 × 1020 cm−3 and p = 1 × 1020 cm−3, the length and carrier concentration of the intrinsic region are fixed to L
i
= 6 μm and 1010 cm−3, respectively. By changing the applied bias voltage from 0 to 2 V, the electron and hole carrier distributions inside the intrinsic region are calculated via Lumerical device solver, which self-consistently evaluates the Poisson and drift-diffusion equations, as demonstrated in Figure 3a and b in logarithm scale, respectively. As it is evident from these figures, while for the applied bias voltages of V < 0.6 V, both the electron and hole carrier densities inside the intrinsic region undergo significant exponential changes in the vicinity of highly N and P doped regions, for the greater applied voltages (V > 0.6 V), the carrier densities remain almost uniform across the intrinsic region. To investigate how such a carrier density distribution affects the refractive index of the asymmetrical nanobars, we employ the silicon plasma-Drude model as

Carrier density distributions with respect to the applied voltage. The calculated (a) electron and (b) hole carrier densities as functions of position and applied bias voltage across the intrinsic region in the logarithmic scale. When the applied bias voltage is lower 0.6 V, both the electron and hole distribution inside the intrinsic region experience significant exponential changes in the vicinity of highly N and P regions. The calculated (c) real and (d) imaginary part dependency of the silicon refractive index on the spatial position and applied bias voltage along the intrinsic region. When the applied bias voltage is 0.6 V < V < 1.2 V, the refractive index undergoes −0.01 change in its real part, while its imaginary part varies negligibly.

The active and time-modulated response of the second layer metasurface. The calculated transmission (a) amplitude and (b) phase of the temporal layer with respect to the operating wavelength and silicon refractive index change. Since the presented design is capable of supporting two types of resonances, its tunable response can also function in dual-bands around λ
1 ≈ 1549.6 nm and λ
2 ≈ 1544.6 nm as shown with black dashed lines. (c) The optical response of the same metasurface at the operating wavelength of λ
o
= 1549.6 nm, which exhibits high transmission amplitude above 60% and phase modulation of
As mentioned earlier, the main idea of this paper lies at the heart of the frequency mixing property of TMMs. To this aim, the frequency conversion performance of a time-modulated metasurface should be obtained via determining the temporal evolution of the steady-state amplitude and phase, which depend on the applied modulation waveform. In this perspective, utilizing an evolutionary algorithm for optimizing the modulation waveform leads to an optimal response since the correlation and trade-offs between phase and amplitude will be taken into account. For this purpose, we have expressed the temporal dependency of the silicon refractive indices in terms of a truncated Fourier series as
To investigate the possibility of establishing nonreciprocal responses via the presented purely time-modulated configuration, we set the operating wavelength to λ
o
= 1549.6 nm and fix the modulation frequency to f
m = 20 GHz, which ensures the adiabatic regime of modulation

The nonreciprocal performance of the presented configuration. The spectral evolution of the (a) incident (b) transmitted signal prior to and after its interaction with the static layer. It is clear that while the signal amplitude slightly decreases, its spectral information remains untouched (c, d) the calculated output frequency spectrum of the signal after interacting with the time-modulated platform. In this case, both the amplitude and spectral content of the light will be manipulated. (e) The derived spectral information of the light after passing through the time-modulated metasurface in the time-reversal scenario. Owing to the second temporal photonic transition, the spectral distribution of the light will be changed once again. (f) The output spectrum of the signal that reaches the first port. On account of the special design of the static layer and its filtering behavior, the components of the light whose frequencies fall within the range of ω o ± ω m and ω o ± 2ω m, will be totally reflected, leaving a negligible amount of signal to reach to the first port.

Tunable optical nonreciprocity. (a) The calculated optical power isolation between the existing higher-order harmonics dwelling at port 1 with respect to ω o + ω m, as a function of the operating wavelength. On account of the filtering behavior of the static layer, changing the operating wavelength will affect the isolation level from 0 to −80 dB. (b) The dependency of the power isolation between ω o and ω o + ω m on the modulation frequency, when the operating wavelength is fixed to λ o = 1549.6 nm.
5 Conclusions
Since the advent of time-modulated metasurfaces, their frequency mixing property has attracted the attention of the scientific community due to the wealth of applications that they can offer. Based on such a feature of TMMs, we demonstrated the possibility of establishing optical isolation in the NIR regime via a purely temporal configuration. In particular, the presented setup consisted of a time-modulated metasurface and a static high-Q platform that acts as a filter with a sharp optical response. While the refractive indices of the consisting elements of the TMM were optimized in such a way that it can up-convert the incident tone to the first higher-order harmonics, the static layer was designed to be transparent in a broad spectrum except in a narrow band region. It was shown that while the first port is competent in acquiring the transmitted signal in the forward direction, optical power isolation with the level of −15 dB can be established under the time-reversal scenario. We have also calculated the amount of isolation level between other higher-order harmonics and demonstrated that their values change in the range of −10 to −40 dB. The role of modulation frequency on the level of power isolation has also been investigated, and it was shown that the isolation level could reach −30 dB if the modulation frequency increases to 90 GHz. Since this is the first time a nonreciprocal response is obtained in the NIR regime via a pure temporal modulation, we believe the idea of this paper can be of utmost importance in various applications, such as tunable optical isolators.
Funding source: Air Force Office of Scientific Research
Award Identifier / Grant number: FA9550-18-1- 0354
Funding source: Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency
Award Identifier / Grant number: FA8650-20-1-7038
Funding source: Air Force Research Laboratory
Award Identifier / Grant number: FA8650-20-1-7038
-
Author contributions: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.
-
Research funding: This paper is supported in part by the U.S. Air Force Office of Scientific Research (AFOSR) (Grant No. FA9550-18-1- 0354), and in part by the Air Force Research Laboratory (AFRL) and Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) (Grant No. FA8650-20-1-7038).
-
Conflict of interest statement: The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
[1] V. S. Asadchy, M. S. Mirmoosa, A. Díaz-Rubio, S. Fan, and S. A. Tretyakov, “Tutorial on electromagnetic nonreciprocity and its origins,” Proc. IEEE, vol. 108, pp. 1684–1727, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1109/jproc.2020.3012381.Search in Google Scholar
[2] C. Caloz, A. Alu, S. Tretyakov, D. Sounas, K. Achouri, and Z.-L. Deck-Léger, “Electromagnetic nonreciprocity,” Phys. Rev. Appl., vol. 10, p. 047001, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevapplied.10.047001.Search in Google Scholar
[3] A. Kord, D. L. Sounas, and A. Alu, “Microwave nonreciprocity,” Proc. IEEE, vol. 108, pp. 1728–1758, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1109/jproc.2020.3006041.Search in Google Scholar
[4] S. Taravati and G. V. Eleftheriades, “Full-duplex nonreciprocal beam steering by time-modulated phase-gradient metasurfaces,” Phys. Rev. Appl., vol. 14, p. 014027, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevapplied.14.014027.Search in Google Scholar
[5] Y. Shoji, K. Miura, and T. Mizumoto, “Optical nonreciprocal devices based on magneto-optical phase shift in silicon photonics,” J. Opt., vol. 18, p. 013001, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1088/2040-8978/18/1/013001.Search in Google Scholar
[6] B. Fan, M. E. Nasir, L. H. Nicholls, A. V. Zayats, and V. A. Podolskiy, “Magneto-optical metamaterials: Nonreciprocal transmission and faraday effect enhancement,” Adv. Opt. Mater., vol. 7, p. 1801420, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1002/adom.201801420.Search in Google Scholar
[7] L. D. Landau, J. Bell, M. Kearsley, L. Pitaevskii, E. Lifshitz, and J. Sykes, Electrodynamics of Continuous Media, vol. 8, Amsterdam, Elsevier, 2013.Search in Google Scholar
[8] N. W. Ashcroft and N. D. Mermin, Solid State Physics, Philadelphia, W. B. Saunders, 1976.Search in Google Scholar
[9] D. M. Pozar, Microwave Engineering, Hoboken, John wiley & sons, 2011.Search in Google Scholar
[10] K. Gallo and G. Assanto, “All-optical diode based on second-harmonic generation in an asymmetric waveguide,” JOSA B, vol. 16, pp. 267–269, 1999. https://doi.org/10.1364/josab.16.000267.Search in Google Scholar
[11] X.-S. Lin, J.-H. Yan, L.-J. Wu, and S. Lan, “High transmission contrast for single resonator based all-optical diodes with pump-assisting,” Opt. Express, vol. 16, pp. 20949–20954, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1364/oe.16.020949.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[12] A. E. Miroshnichenko, E. Brasselet, and Y. S. Kivshar, “Reversible optical nonreciprocity in periodic structures with liquid crystals,” Appl. Phys. Lett., vol. 96, p. 26, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3300824.Search in Google Scholar
[13] S. Lepri and G. Casati, “Asymmetric wave propagation in nonlinear systems,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 106, p. 164101, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.106.164101.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[14] Y. Shi, Z. Yu, and S. Fan, “Limitations of nonlinear optical isolators due to dynamic reciprocity,” Nat. Photonics, vol. 9, pp. 388–392, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1038/nphoton.2015.79.Search in Google Scholar
[15] D. L. Sounas, J. Soric, and A. Alu, “Broadband passive isolators based on coupled nonlinear resonances,” Nat. Electron, vol. 1, pp. 113–119, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41928-018-0025-0.Search in Google Scholar
[16] D. L. Sounas and A. Alu, “Nonreciprocity based on nonlinear resonances,” IEEE Antenn. Wireless Propag. Lett., vol. 17, pp. 1958–1962, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1109/lawp.2018.2866913.Search in Google Scholar
[17] H.-T. Chen, A. J. Taylor, and N. Yu, “A review of metasurfaces: Physics and applications,” Rep. Prog. Phys., vol. 79, p. 076401, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1088/0034-4885/79/7/076401.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[18] S. S. Bukhari, J. Y. Vardaxoglou, and W. Whittow, “A metasurfaces review: Definitions and applications,” Appl. Sci., vol. 9, p. 2727, 2019. https://doi.org/10.3390/app9132727.Search in Google Scholar
[19] F. Ding, A. Pors, and S. I. Bozhevolnyi, “Gradient metasurfaces: A review of fundamentals and applications,” Rep. Prog. Phys., vol. 81, p. 026401, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6633/aa8732.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[20] S. M. Kamali, E. Arbabi, A. Arbabi, and A. Faraon, “A review of dielectric optical metasurfaces for wavefront control,” Nanophotonics, vol. 7, pp. 1041–1068, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1515/nanoph-2017-0129.Search in Google Scholar
[21] T. Cui, B. Bai, and H.-B. Sun, “Tunable metasurfaces based on active materials,” Adv. Funct. Mater., vol. 29, p. 1806692, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201806692.Search in Google Scholar
[22] L. Kang, R. P. Jenkins, and D. H. Werner, “Recent progress in active optical metasurfaces,” Adv. Opt. Mater., vol. 7, p. 1801813, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1002/adom.201801813.Search in Google Scholar
[23] W. Cai, J. S. White, and M. L. Brongersma, “Compact, high-speed and power-efficient electrooptic plasmonic modulators,” Nano Lett., vol. 9, pp. 4403–4411, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1021/nl902701b.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[24] G. T. Reed, G. Mashanovich, F. Y. Gardes, and D. Thomson, “Silicon optical modulators,” Nat. Photonics, vol. 4, pp. 518–526, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1038/nphoton.2010.179.Search in Google Scholar
[25] M. C. Sherrott, P. W. Hon, K. T. Fountaine, et al.., “Experimental demonstration of >230 phase modulation in gate-tunable graphene–gold reconfigurable mid-infrared metasurfaces,” Nano Lett., vol. 17, pp. 3027–3034, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.7b00359.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[26] M. M. Salary and H. Mosallaei, “Tunable all-dielectric metasurfaces for phase-only modulation of transmitted light based on quasi-bound states in the continuum,” ACS Photonics, vol. 7, pp. 1813–1829, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsphotonics.0c00554.Search in Google Scholar
[27] K. Y. Lee, J. W. Yoon, S. H. Song, and R. Magnusson, “Multiple pn junction subwavelength gratings for transmission-mode electro-optic modulators,” Sci. Rep., vol. 7, pp. 1–8, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep46508.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[28] C. Qiu, J. Chen, Y. Xia, and Q. Xu, “Active dielectric antenna on chip for spatial light modulation,” Sci. Rep., vol. 2, pp. 1–7, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep00855.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[29] A. C. Overvig, S. Shrestha, and N. Yu, “Dimerized high contrast gratings,” Nanophotonics, vol. 7, pp. 1157–1168, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1515/nanoph-2017-0127.Search in Google Scholar
[30] C. W. Hsu, B. Zhen, A. D. Stone, J. D. Joannopoulos, and M. Soljačić, “Bound states in the continuum,” Nat. Rev. Mater., vol. 1, pp. 1–13, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1038/natrevmats.2016.48.Search in Google Scholar
[31] K. Koshelev, A. Bogdanov, and Y. Kivshar, “Meta-optics and bound states in the continuum,” Sci. Bull., vol. 64, pp. 836–842, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scib.2018.12.003.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[32] S. Wang, R. Magnusson, J. S. Bagby, and M. Moharam, “Guided-mode resonances in planar dielectric-layer diffraction gratings,” JOSA A, vol. 7, pp. 1470–1474, 1990. https://doi.org/10.1364/josaa.7.001470.Search in Google Scholar
[33] S. Han, M. V. Rybin, P. Pitchappa, Y. K. Srivastava, Y. S. Kivshar, and R. Singh, “Guided-mode resonances in all-dielectric terahertz metasurfaces,” Adv. Opt. Mater., vol. 8, p. 1900959, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1002/adom.201900959.Search in Google Scholar
[34] G. Quaranta, G. Basset, O. J. Martin, and B. Gallinet, “Recent advances in resonant waveguide gratings,” Laser Photon. Rev., vol. 12, p. 1800017, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1002/lpor.201800017.Search in Google Scholar
[35] V. Savinov, N. Papasimakis, D. Tsai, and N. Zheludev, “Optical anapoles,” Commun. Phys., vol. 2, pp. 1–4, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42005-019-0167-z.Search in Google Scholar
[36] K. V. Baryshnikova, D. A. Smirnova, B. S. Luk’yanchuk, and Y. S. Kivshar, “Optical anapoles: Concepts and applications,” Adv. Opt. Mater., vol. 7, p. 1801350, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1002/adom.201801350.Search in Google Scholar
[37] P. C. Wu, C. Y. Liao, V. Savinov, et al.., “Optical anapole metamaterial,” ACS Nano, vol. 12, pp. 1920–1927, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.7b08828.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[38] A. M. Shaltout, V. M. Shalaev, and M. L. Brongersma, “Spatiotemporal light control with active metasurfaces,” Science, vol. 364, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aat3100.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[39] S. Taravati and A. A. Kishk, “Space-time modulation: principles and applications,” IEEE Microw. Mag., vol. 21, pp. 30–56, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1109/mmm.2019.2963606.Search in Google Scholar
[40] C. Caloz and Z.-L. Deck-Léger, “Spacetime metamaterials—part I: General concepts,” IEEE Trans. Antenn. Propag., vol. 68, pp. 1569–1582, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1109/tap.2019.2944225.Search in Google Scholar
[41] C. Caloz and Z.-L. Deck-Léger, “Spacetime metamaterials—part II: Theory and applications,” IEEE Trans. Antenn. Propag., vol. 68, pp. 1583–1598, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1109/tap.2019.2944216.Search in Google Scholar
[42] Y. Sivan and J. B. Pendry, “Time reversal in dynamically tuned zero-gap periodic systems,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 106, p. 193902, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.106.193902.Search in Google Scholar
[43] N. Chamanara and C. Caloz, “Linear pulse compansion using co-propagating space-time modulation,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1810.04129, 2018.Search in Google Scholar
[44] N. Chamanara, Y. Vahabzadeh, and C. Caloz, “Simultaneous control of the spatial and temporal spectra of light with space-time varying metasurfaces,” IEEE Trans. Antenn. Propag., vol. 67, pp. 2430–2441, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1109/tap.2019.2891706.Search in Google Scholar
[45] H. B. Sedeh, M. M. Salary, and H. Mosallaei, “Adaptive multichannel terahertz communication by space-time shared aperture metasurfaces,” IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 185919–185937, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2020.3030200.Search in Google Scholar
[46] S. Taravati and G. V. Eleftheriades, “Intelligent-metasurface-assisted full-duplex wireless communications,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2105.09436, 2021.Search in Google Scholar
[47] S. Taravati and G. V. Eleftheriades, “Full-duplex reflective beamsteering metasurface featuring magnetless nonreciprocal amplification,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2101.10067, 2021.10.21203/rs.3.rs-139662/v1Search in Google Scholar
[48] H. B. Sedeh, M. M. Salary, and H. Mosallaei, “Time-varying optical vortices enabled by time-modulated metasurfaces,” Nanophotonics, vol. 9, no. 9, p. 1, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1515/nanoph-2020-0202.Search in Google Scholar
[49] S. Inampudi, M. M. Salary, S. Jafar-Zanjani, and H. Mosallaei, “Rigorous space-time coupled-wave analysis for patterned surfaces with temporal permittivity modulation,” Opt. Mater. Express, vol. 9, pp. 162–182, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1364/ome.9.000162.Search in Google Scholar
[50] H. Barati Sedeh, M. M. Salary, and H. Mosallaei, “Topological space-time photonic transitions in angular-momentum-biased metasurfaces,” Adv. Opt. Mater., vol. 8, p. 2000075, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1002/adom.202000075.Search in Google Scholar
[51] E. Galiffi, P. Huidobro, and J. Pendry, “Broadband nonreciprocal amplification in luminal metamaterials,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 123, p. 206101, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.123.206101.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[52] M. S. Mirmoosa, G. Ptitcyn, V. S. Asadchy, and S. A. Tretyakov, “Time-varying reactive elements for extreme accumulation of electromagnetic energy,” Phys. Rev. Appl, vol. 11, p. 014024, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevapplied.11.014024.Search in Google Scholar
[53] A. Shlivinski and Y. Hadad, “Beyond the bode-fano bound: Wideband impedance matching for short pulses using temporal switching of transmission-line parameters,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 121, p. 204301, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.121.204301.Search in Google Scholar
[54] M. Liu, A. B. Kozyrev, and I. V. Shadrivov, “Time-varying metasurfaces for broadband spectral camouflage,” Phys. Rev. Appl, vol. 12, p. 054052, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevapplied.12.054052.Search in Google Scholar
[55] X. Wang and C. Caloz, “Spread-spectrum selective camouflaging based on time-modulated metasurface,” IEEE Trans. Antenn. Propag., vol. 69, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1109/tap.2020.3008621.Search in Google Scholar
[56] H. B. Sedeh, M. M. Salary, and H. Mosallaei, “Active multiple access secure communication enabled by graphene-based time-modulated metasurfaces,” IEEE Trans. Antenn. Propag., vol. 70, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1109/tap.2021.3102117.Search in Google Scholar
[57] A. Shaltout, A. Kildishev, and V. Shalaev, “Time-varying metasurfaces and Lorentz non-reciprocity,” Opt. Mater. Express, vol. 5, pp. 2459–2467, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1364/ome.5.002459.Search in Google Scholar
[58] Y. Hadad, D. L. Sounas, and A. Alu, “Space-time gradient metasurfaces,” Phys. Rev. B, vol. 92, p. 100304, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.92.100304.Search in Google Scholar
[59] Y. Shi and S. Fan, “Dynamic non-reciprocal meta-surfaces with arbitrary phase reconfigurability based on photonic transition in meta-atoms,” Appl. Phys. Lett., vol. 108, p. 021110, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4939915.Search in Google Scholar
[60] Y. Shi, S. Han, and S. Fan, “Optical circulation and isolation based on indirect photonic transitions of guided resonance modes,” ACS Photonics, vol. 4, pp. 1639–1645, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsphotonics.7b00420.Search in Google Scholar
[61] L. Zhang, X. Q. Chen, R. W. Shao, et al.., “Breaking reciprocity with space-time-coding digital metasurfaces,” Adv. Mater., vol. 31, p. 1904069, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201970295.Search in Google Scholar
[62] S. Taravati and G. V. Eleftheriades, “Full-duplex nonreciprocal beam steering by time-modulated phase-gradient metasurfaces,” Phys. Rev. Appl. vol. 14, no.1, p. 014027, 2020.10.1103/PhysRevApplied.14.014027Search in Google Scholar
[63] J. W. Zang, D. Correas-Serrano, J. Do, X. Liu, A. Alvarez-Melcon, and J. S. Gomez-Diaz, “Nonreciprocal wavefront engineering with time-modulated gradient metasurfaces,” Phys. Rev. Appl, vol. 11, p. 054054, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevapplied.11.054054.Search in Google Scholar
[64] X. Wang, A. Díaz-Rubio, H. Li, S. A. Tretyakov, and A. Alù, “Theory and design of multifunctional space-time metasurfaces,” Phys. Rev. Appl, vol. 13, p. 044040, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevapplied.13.044040.Search in Google Scholar
[65] D. L. Sounas and A. Alù, “Non-reciprocal photonics based on time modulation,” Nat. Photonics, vol. 11, pp. 774–783, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41566-017-0051-x.Search in Google Scholar
[66] D. Ramaccia, D. L. Sounas, A. V. Marini, A. Toscano, and F. Bilotti, “Electromagnetic isolation induced by time-varying metasurfaces: Nonreciprocal Bragg grating,” IEEE Antenn. Wireless Propag. Lett., vol. 19, pp. 1886–1890, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1109/lawp.2020.2996275.Search in Google Scholar
[67] M. M. S. Shahrbabaki, “Space-time photonic metamaterials,” Ph.D. dissertation, Northeastern University, Boston, 2020.Search in Google Scholar
[68] H. Lira, Z. Yu, S. Fan, and M. Lipson, “Electrically driven nonreciprocity induced by interband photonic transition on a silicon chip,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 109, p. 033901, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.109.033901.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[69] B. Liu, S.-W. Wong, and Y. Li, “Rotational Doppler effect by space-time-coding metasurfaces for nonreciprocal electromagnetic isolation,” Opt. Express, vol. 29, pp. 24500–24507, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1364/oe.432886.Search in Google Scholar
[70] Z. Yu and S. Fan, “Complete optical isolation created by indirect interband photonic transitions,” Nat. Photonics, vol. 3, pp. 91–94, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1038/nphoton.2008.273.Search in Google Scholar
[71] N. Chamanara, S. Taravati, Z.-L. Deck-Léger, and C. Caloz, “Optical isolation based on space-time engineered asymmetric photonic band gaps,” Phys. Rev. B, vol. 96, p. 155409, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.96.155409.Search in Google Scholar
[72] M. M. Salary, S. Farazi, and H. Mosallaei, “A dynamically modulated all-dielectric metasurface doublet for directional harmonic generation and manipulation in transmission,” Adv. Opt. Mater., vol. 7, p. 1900843, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1002/adom.201900843.Search in Google Scholar
[73] J. Algorri, D. Zografopoulos, A. Ferraro, B. García-Cámara, R. Beccherelli, and J. Sánchez-Pena, “Ultrahigh-quality factor resonant dielectric metasurfaces based on hollow nanocuboids,” Opt. Express, vol. 27, pp. 6320–6330, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1364/oe.27.006320.Search in Google Scholar
[74] D. P. Edward and I. Palik, Handbook of Optical Constants of Solids, San Diego, Academic Press, 1998.Search in Google Scholar
[75] A. Forouzmand and H. Mosallaei, “A tunable semiconductor-based transmissive metasurface: Dynamic phase control with high transmission level,” Laser Photon. Rev., vol. 14, p. 1900353, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1002/lpor.201900353.Search in Google Scholar
[76] G. Backenstoss, “Conductivity mobilities of electrons and holes in heavily doped silicon,” Phys. Rev., vol. 108, p. 1416, 1957. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrev.108.1416.Search in Google Scholar
© 2022 the author(s), published by De Gruyter, Berlin/Boston
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.