Abstract
C20H27ClN2OTi, monoclinic, P21/c (no. 14), a = 9.4006(2) Å, b = 10.8185(3) Å, c = 19.4821(5) Å, β = 97.941(1)°, V = 1962.34(9) Å3, Z = 4, Rgt(F) = 0.0270, wRref(F2) = 0.0731, T = 150(2) K.

The asymmetric unit of the title crystal structure is shown in the figure. Tables 1 and 2 contain details of the measurement method and a list of the atoms including atomic coordinates and displacement parameters.
Data collection and handling.
Crystal: | Red prism |
Size: | 0.76 × 0.26 × 0.16 mm |
Wavelength: | Mo Kα radiation (0.71073 Å) |
μ: | 5.8 cm−1 |
Diffractometer, scan mode: | Bruker APEX-II, φ and ω |
2θmax, completeness: | 55°, >99% |
N(hkl)measured, N(hkl)unique, Rint: | 31967, 4511, 0.019 |
Criterion for Iobs, N(hkl)gt: | Iobs > 2 σ(Iobs), 4047 |
N(param)refined: | 232 |
Programs: | SHELX [1], Bruker programs [2, 3] , PLATON [4] |
Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2).
Atom | x | y | z | Uiso*/Ueq |
---|---|---|---|---|
Ti1 | 0.39233(2) | 0.72268(2) | 0.05916(2) | 0.01812(7) |
Cl1 | 0.35931(4) | 0.74202(3) | −0.06246(2) | 0.02734(9) |
C1 | 0.24075(15) | 0.63584(12) | 0.13522(7) | 0.0226(3) |
C2 | 0.37101(16) | 0.56768(12) | 0.14078(8) | 0.0267(3) |
H2 | 0.4405 | 0.5630 | 0.1810 | 0.032* |
C3 | 0.38117(19) | 0.50806(13) | 0.07722(9) | 0.0340(3) |
H3 | 0.4577 | 0.4567 | 0.0673 | 0.041* |
C4 | 0.25819(19) | 0.53828(14) | 0.03154(8) | 0.0350(4) |
H4 | 0.2362 | 0.5103 | −0.0149 | 0.042* |
C5 | 0.17244(16) | 0.61722(14) | 0.06604(7) | 0.0282(3) |
H5 | 0.0835 | 0.6524 | 0.0464 | 0.034* |
C6 | 0.17921(15) | 0.70290(13) | 0.19326(7) | 0.0237(3) |
C7 | 0.01808(16) | 0.72491(16) | 0.17098(9) | 0.0347(3) |
H7A | 0.0049 | 0.7862 | 0.1336 | 0.052* |
H7B | −0.0255 | 0.7555 | 0.2106 | 0.052* |
H7C | −0.0280 | 0.6471 | 0.1546 | 0.052* |
C8 | 0.1943(2) | 0.61380(15) | 0.25581(8) | 0.0363(4) |
H8A | 0.1454 | 0.5358 | 0.2421 | 0.055* |
H8B | 0.1507 | 0.6513 | 0.2937 | 0.055* |
H8C | 0.2962 | 0.5977 | 0.2713 | 0.055* |
C9 | 0.25705(14) | 0.83111(12) | 0.21449(6) | 0.0211(3) |
C10 | 0.18060(18) | 0.90025(14) | 0.26789(7) | 0.0311(3) |
H10A | 0.1700 | 0.8451 | 0.3068 | 0.047* |
H10B | 0.0855 | 0.9271 | 0.2460 | 0.047* |
H10C | 0.2376 | 0.9726 | 0.2849 | 0.047* |
C11 | 0.41417(16) | 0.81311(14) | 0.24663(7) | 0.0265(3) |
H11A | 0.4606 | 0.8939 | 0.2545 | 0.040* |
H11B | 0.4645 | 0.7644 | 0.2151 | 0.040* |
H11C | 0.4176 | 0.7694 | 0.2909 | 0.040* |
C12 | 0.25342(13) | 0.90590(12) | 0.14670(6) | 0.0182(2) |
N1 | 0.30410(12) | 0.86165(10) | 0.09510(5) | 0.0197(2) |
C13 | 0.18667(14) | 1.03220(12) | 0.13918(7) | 0.0212(3) |
C14 | 0.25301(19) | 1.13288(14) | 0.17428(8) | 0.0341(3) |
H14 | 0.3366 | 1.1210 | 0.2070 | 0.041* |
C15 | 0.1977(2) | 1.25080(15) | 0.16178(11) | 0.0484(5) |
H15 | 0.2449 | 1.3196 | 0.1852 | 0.058* |
C16 | 0.0753(2) | 1.26878(17) | 0.11587(11) | 0.0529(6) |
H16 | 0.0374 | 1.3497 | 0.1078 | 0.064* |
C17 | 0.00728(19) | 1.16927(19) | 0.08144(10) | 0.0462(5) |
H17 | −0.0783 | 1.1816 | 0.0501 | 0.055* |
C18 | 0.06328(16) | 1.05091(15) | 0.09240(8) | 0.0305(3) |
H18 | 0.0171 | 0.9828 | 0.0679 | 0.037* |
O1 | 0.58651(11) | 0.70922(9) | 0.09743(5) | 0.0277(2) |
N2 | 0.58926(13) | 0.82452(11) | 0.06261(6) | 0.0235(2) |
C19 | 0.63339(17) | 0.92363(15) | 0.11208(8) | 0.0342(3) |
H19A | 0.5678 | 0.9267 | 0.1470 | 0.051* |
H19B | 0.6307 | 1.0028 | 0.0875 | 0.051* |
H19C | 0.7313 | 0.9078 | 0.1349 | 0.051* |
C20 | 0.68516(17) | 0.81764(17) | 0.00943(8) | 0.0360(4) |
H20A | 0.7839 | 0.8040 | 0.0316 | 0.054* |
H20B | 0.6801 | 0.8953 | −0.0167 | 0.054* |
H20C | 0.6555 | 0.7490 | −0.0222 | 0.054* |
Source of material
The title compound was obtained as a by-product during the preparation of [{η5-C5H4CMe2CMe2C(Ph) = N-κN}TiCl2] from [{η5-C5H4CMe2CMe2C(Ph) = N-κN}TiCl(NMe2)] as described in literature [5]. The by-product was formed in low yield (less than 10%) by a yet undisclosed mechanism (see the Discussion section) and crystallized from a concentrated toluene solution at 277 K as red prisms. NMR (benzene-d8) 1H: δ 0.86, 0.91, 0.94, 0.99(4x s, 3 H, CMe2), 2.45, 2.86(2x s, 3 H, NMe2) 5.68, 5.96, 6.04, 6.90(4x m, 1 H, C5H4), 6.98–7.17 (m, 5 H, Ph) ppm.
Experimental details
The structure was solved by direct methods (SHELXS [1]) and refined by full-matrix least-squares based on F2 (SHELXL [1]). All hydrogen atoms were included at their calculated positions and treated as riding atoms with the Uiso values assigned to a multiple of Ueq of their bonding carbon atom. The structural drawing and all numerical parameters were obtained with a recent version of the PLATON program [4].
Discussion
The chemistry of group 4 metal complexes bearing bifunctional cyclopentadienyl-ketimide ligands was recently studied aiming at functional group transformations and potential utilization in catalysis [5], [6], [7]. The title compound resulted as an undesired side-product of the conversion of titanium half-sandwich complex [{η5-C5H4CMe2CMe2C(Ph)=N-κN}TiCl(NMe2)] to the corresponding dichloride using Me3SiCl in toluene under exclusion of air and moisture [5]. The η2-N,N-dimethylhydroxylaminato moiety (cf. the figure) formed from the original dimethylamido ligand by an unknown mechanism, however, adventitious oxidation by air might be suspected as a plausible pathway since a similar transformation of the dimethylamido ligand by dioxygen was observed for tantalum(V) amido silyl complexes [8]. Related cyclopentadienyl titanium complexes with the η2-hydroxylaminato moiety were previously obtained by different approaches including reactions of Me2NOSiMe3 with CpTiCl3 [9] or N,N-dialkylhydroxylamines or nitroso compounds with methyl titanium precursors [10, 11] .
The title compound crystallizes in a centrosymmetric monoclinic space group P21/c as a racemate (the chiral center being situated at the unsymmetrically substituted titanium atom). The Cp-tethered ketimide moiety forms a formally six-membered azametallacycle with a non-planar conformation. The intramolecular tethering causes a significant distorsion of the ketimide from the ideal (close to linear) arrangement for its coordination to titanium. This distorsion can be characterized by the C12—N1—Ti1 angle of 145.62(9)° and it compares well with the values for related structurally characterized half sandwich Ti complexes [{η5-C5H4CMe2CMe2C(Ph)=N-κN}TiCl(NMe2)] (145.71(8)°) and [{η5-C5H4CMe2CMe2C(Ph)=N-κN}TiCl2] (146.52(12)°) or the metallocene compound [(η5-C5Me5){η5-C5H4CMe2CMe2C(Ph)=N-κN}TiCl] (150.16(11)°) [5]. The overall conformation of the Cp-ketimide ligand in the title compound is similar to the mentioned reference complexes. The distance Ti1—N1 1.8971(11) Å is only slightly longer than in [{η5-C5H4CMe2CMe2C(Ph)=N-κN}TiCl(NMe2)] (1.8877(10) Å). The Ti1—N2 bond of the η2-hydroxylaminato moiety is obviously much longer than in the above dimethylamido complex (2.1473(12) Å vs. 1.8797(10) Å), the value, however, compares reasonably well with that of the complex [(η5-C5H5)TiCl2(η2-ONMe2)] (Ti-N distance of 2.128(2) Å) [9]. The Ti-O distance in the title compound, 1.8796(10) Å, is again only slightly longer than that reported for the discussed reference complex (1.866(1) Å) [9]. It shall be noted that no significant intermolecular interactions were detected in the title structure.
Acknowledgement
This work was supported by the Czech Science Foundation (project No. 14–08531S).
References
1 Sheldrick, G. M.: A short history of SHELX. Acta Crystallogr. A64 (2008) 112–122.10.1107/S0108767307043930Search in Google Scholar PubMed
2 Bruker. SADABS. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA, (2008).Search in Google Scholar
3 Bruker. APEX2 and SAINT. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA, (2012).Search in Google Scholar
4 Spek, A. L.: Single-crystal structure validation with the program PLATON. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 36 (2003) 7–13.10.1107/S0021889802022112Search in Google Scholar
5 Večeřa, M.; Varga, V.; Císařová, I.; Pinkas, J.; Kucharczyk, P.; Sedlařík, V.; Lamač, M.: Group 4 metal complexes of chelating cyclopentadienyl-ketimide ligands. Organometallics 35 (2016) 785–798.10.1021/acs.organomet.6b00019Search in Google Scholar
6 Pinkas, J.; Lamač, M.: Transformations of functional groups attached to cyclopentadienyl or related ligands in group 4 metal complexes. Coord. Chem. Rev. 296 (2015) 45–90.10.1016/j.ccr.2015.03.007Search in Google Scholar
7 Pinkas, J.; Císařová, I.; Kubišta, J.; Horáček, M.; Lamač, M.: Synthetic transformations of a pendant nitrile moiety in group 4 metallocene complexes. Dalton Trans. 42 (2013) 7101–7110.10.1039/c3dt50209kSearch in Google Scholar PubMed
8 Wu, Z.; Cai, H.; Yu, X.; Blanton, J. R.; Diminnie, J. B.; Pan, H.-J.; Xue, Z.; Bryan, J. C.: Synthesis of tantalum(V) amido silyl complexes and the unexpected formation of (Me2N)3Ta(e2-ONMe2)[OSi(SiMe3)3] from the reaction of (Me2N)4Ta[Si(SiMe3)3] with O2. Organometallics 21 (2002) 3973–3978.10.1021/om020537gSearch in Google Scholar
9 Hughes, D. L.; Jimenez-Tenorio, M.; Leigh, G. J.; Walker, D. G.: Hydrazido(1–)- and N,N-dimethylhydroxylaminato(1–)-complexes of titanium(IV). J. Chem. Soc. Dalton Trans. (1989) 2389–2395.10.1039/DT9890002389Search in Google Scholar
10 Dove, A. P.; Xie, X.; Waymouth, R. M.: Cyclopentadienyl titanium hydroxylaminato complexes as highly active catalysts for the polymerization of propylene. Chem. Commun. (2005) 2152–2154.10.1039/b418778dSearch in Google Scholar PubMed
11 Dove, A. P.; Kiesewetter, E. T.; Ottenwaelder, X.; Waymouth, R. M.: Propylene polymerization with cyclopentadienyltitanium(IV) hydroxylaminato complexes. Organometallics 28 (2009) 405–412.10.1021/om800571jSearch in Google Scholar
©2017 Miloš Večeřa et al., published by De Gruyter, Berlin/Boston
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.