Orthodox Diplomatic History, with its focus on government sources, aims to piece together the decision-making reasoning of policy-makers and the apparatuses and outcomes of foreign policy implementation. In contrast, New Diplomatic History looks to broaden and deepen the analysis of international interactions along three planes: spatially, in the sense of granting more importance to the role of individuals and non-governmental institutions; temporally, since the examination of a wider field of diplomatic ‘actors’ challenges the standard periodisations; behaviorally, in that the very nature of diplomatic practice and the role (indeed the very notion) of the diplomat is being transformed in an ever-more-dynamic global context of multilateral agreements and transactions. Once the frame of ‘diplomacy’ is altered, so the kinds of actors who become visible change with it – and the designations ‘diplomacy’ and ‘diplomat’ become more fluid. The articles collected in this special issue of New Global Studies examine the input and influence of particular individuals in international relations who were able to pursue their own agendas either in alliance with, separate from, or sometimes against the interests of states. Such ‘private international relations’ opens up a rich research field highly relevant in the context of increasing global flows of people and ideas.
Berman, M., and J.Johnson, eds. 1977. Unofficial Diplomats. New York: Columbia University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Clinton, H2010. “Leading through Civilian Power.” Foreign Affairs89. http://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/66799/hillary-rodham-clinton/leading-through-civilian-power.Search in Google Scholar
Gram-Skjoldager, K. 2011. “Bringing the Diplomat Back in: Elements of a New Historical Research Agenda.” EUI Working Paper RSCAS 2011/13.Search in Google Scholar
Gregory, J. D. 1931. On the Edge of Diplomacy: Rambles and Reflections 1902–1928. London: Hutchinson & Co.Search in Google Scholar
Hocking, B., J.Melissen, S.Riordan, and P.Sharp. 2012. Futures for Diplomacy: Integrative Diplomacy in the 21st Century. Clingendael: Netherlands Institute of International Relations.Search in Google Scholar
Knudsen, D. 2013. “The Trilateral Commission: The Global Dawn of Informal Elite Governance and Diplomacy, 1972–1982.” PhD diss., University of Copenhagen.Search in Google Scholar
Lee, K. J., and G.-W.Shin, eds. 2011. US-DPRK Educational Exchanges: Assessment and Future Strategy. Stanford, CA: Walter H. Shorenstein Asia-Pacific Research Center.Search in Google Scholar
Mattingly, G. 1955. Rennaissance Diplomacy. Baltimore, MD: Penguin.Search in Google Scholar
New York Times. 2013. “American Group Begins Controversial Trip to North Korea.” NewYork Times, January 7.Search in Google Scholar
Pigman, G. 2010. Contemporary Diplomacy: Representation and Communication in a Globalized World. Cambridge: Polity Press.Search in Google Scholar
Scott, J. 2007. “History-Writing as Critique.” In Manifestos for History, edited by K.Jenkins, S.Morgan, and A.Munslow. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar
Yahoo News. 2014. “Rodman Sings Happy Birthday to North Korean Leader.” YahooNews, January 8. http://news.yahoo.com/rodman-sings-happy-birthday-north-korean-leader-110201526--spt.htmlSearch in Google Scholar
See Akira Iriye (2013).
See Gram-Skjoldager (2011).
See Lee and Shin (2011).
See the Project’s website at <http://www.pyongyangproject.org/about.html>
Schmidt subsequently commented on his mission on Google+: <https://plus.google.com/+EricSchmidt/posts/UZnAUzpszHX#+EricSchmidt/posts/UZnAUzpszHX>
The articles presented here have been selected from among the presentations at the conference Reframing Diplomacy: New Diplomatic History in the Benelux and Beyond, which took place at Leiden University during 6–7 September 2013.
©2014 by Walter de Gruyter Berlin / Boston