Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter December 11, 2019

Does Digital Exclusion Undermine Social Media’s Democratizing Capacity?

  • Bruce Mutsvairo EMAIL logo and Massimo Ragnedda
From the journal New Global Studies

Abstract

Claims have been made that the advent of social media and its assumed ability to fuel social strife and organize anti-government protests has empowered people around the world to successfully challenge repressive authorities. However, in an era in which several issues ranging from digital colonialism to digital exclusion among other challenges, have become so dominant, it is our role as researchers to question some of these claims especially when they seem unsubstantiated. Sharing or finding solidarity is something that can be done on social media platforms but nothing is as critical as being part of the digital community. In that regard, questions surrounding digital exclusion are critical especially when discussing the extent to which social media influences democracy, questions that several scholars from every corner of the world are currently seized with. In this article, we not only identify social media’s potential but we also probe problems associated with beliefs that digital networks have the capacity to support democratization. Contemporary societies should be asking what the real gains of the fall of the Berlin Wall are in the work of these fundamental digital shifts, which have left both negative and positive outcomes on all countries including established Western democracies.

References

Anderson, Chris. 2005. The Origins of “The Long Tail” [Electronic Version]. Retrieved November 2019 from http://longtail.typepad.com/the_long_tail/2005/05/the_origins_of_.html.Search in Google Scholar

Attewell, Paul. 2001. “The First and Second Digital Divides.” Sociology of Education 74 (3): 252–59.10.2307/2673277Search in Google Scholar

Barber, John T. 2006. The Black Digital Elite: African American Leaders of the Information Revolution. Santa Barbara, California: Greenwood Publishing Group.Search in Google Scholar

Castells, Manuel. 1996. The Information Age. Economy, Society and Culture, 3 vols. Oxford: Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

Castells, Manuel. 2001. The Internet Galaxy: Reflections on the Internet, Business, and Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1007/978-3-322-89613-1Search in Google Scholar

Daniel, Mumbere. 2018. “Digital in 2018: Africa’s Internet Users Increase by 20%.” Africa News. Retrieved https://www.africanews.com/2018/02/06/digital-in-2018-africa-s-internet-users-increase-by-20-percent//.Search in Google Scholar

Faulkner, Wendy, and Tine Kleif. 2003. One Size Does not Fit All! Digital In/exclusion in a Rural Community. SIGIS case study report. Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh.Search in Google Scholar

Latouche, Serge. 2010. Farewell to Growth. Oxford: Polity Press.Search in Google Scholar

Litt, Eden. 2003. “Measuring Users’ Internet Skills: A Review of Past Assessments and A Look toward the Future.” New Media and Society 15 (4): 612–30.10.1177/1461444813475424Search in Google Scholar

Livingstone, Sonia, and Ellen Helsper. 2007. “Gradations in Digital Inclusion: Children, Young People and the Digital Divide.” New Media and Society 9 (4): 671–96.10.1177/1461444807080335Search in Google Scholar

Lyotard, Jean-François. 1984. The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge. Manchester: Manchester University Press.10.2307/1772278Search in Google Scholar

Mattelart, Armand. 2003. The Information Society. An Introduction. London: Sage.Search in Google Scholar

McPhail, Thomas L. 1981. Electronic Colonialism: the Future of International Broadcasting and Communication. London: Sage Publications.Search in Google Scholar

Mutsvairo, Bruce, ed. 2016. Perspectives on Participatory Politics and Citizen Journalism in A Networked Africa: A Connected Continent. London: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9781137554505Search in Google Scholar

Ragnedda, Massimo. 2017. The Third Digital Divide: a Weberian Approach to Digital Inequalities. Oxford: Routledge.10.4324/9781315606002Search in Google Scholar

Ragnedda, Massimo. 2018. “Conceptualizing Digital Capital.” Telematics and Informatics 35: 2366–75.10.1016/j.tele.2018.10.006Search in Google Scholar

Ragnedda, Massimo, and Maria Laura Ruiu. 2017. “Social Capital and the Three Levels of Digital Divide.” In Theorizing Digital Divides, edited by M. Ragnedda, and G. Muschert, 21–34. Oxford: Routledge.10.4324/9781315455334-3Search in Google Scholar

Ragnedda, Massimo, Maria Laura Ruiu, and Felice Addeo. 2019. “Measuring Digital Capital: an Empirical Investigation.” New Media and Society 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444819869604.Search in Google Scholar

Said, Edward W. 2001. Power, Politics, and Culture; Interviews with Edward W. Said. New York: Knopf Doubleday Publishing Group.Search in Google Scholar

Selwyn, Neil. 2004. “Reconsidering Political and Popular Understandings of the Digital Divide.” New Media & Society 6 (3): 341–62.10.1177/1461444804042519Search in Google Scholar

Thomas, Graham, and Sally Wyatt. 2001. “Access Is Not the Only Problem.” In Technology and in/equality: Questioning the Information Society, edited by Flis Henwood, Nod Miller, Peter Senker, and Sally Wyatt, 21–45. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Tomlinson, John. 1991. Cultural Imperialism. A Critical Introduction. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Van Dijk, Jan. 1999. The Network Society. Social Aspects of New Media. London: Sage.Search in Google Scholar

Van Dijk, Jan. 2005. The Deepening Divide: Inequality in the Information Society. London: Sage.10.4135/9781452229812Search in Google Scholar

Warshauer, M. 2004. Technology and Social Inclusion: Rethinking the Digital Divide. London: The MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/6699.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Witte, James C., and E. Mannon. Susan. 2010. The Internet and Social Inequalities. New York, NY: Routledge.10.4324/9780203861639Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2019-12-11
Published in Print: 2019-11-18

© 2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 19.3.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/ngs-2019-0035/html
Scroll to top button