Skip to content
BY-NC-ND 4.0 license Open Access Published by De Gruyter Open Access April 3, 2018

Citizens as smart, active sensors for a quiet and just city. The case of the “open source soundscapes” approach to identify, assess and plan “everyday quiet areas” in cities

  • Antonella Radicchi EMAIL logo , Dietrich Henckel and Martin Memmel
From the journal Noise Mapping


Today the so-called “smart city” is connoted by massive implementation of novel, digital technology, which is often considered as the best solution to global issues affecting contemporary cities. Sophisticated and low-cost technological solutions are developed also in the field of noise monitoring and they are expected to play an important role for acousticians, city planners and policy makers. However, the “smart city” paradigm is controversial: it relies on advanced technological solutions, yet it fails to consider the city as a social construct and it often overlooks the role of citizens, in the quest for technological advances and novel methods. This is especially true in the field of smart acoustic solutions addressing the issue of urban quiet areas: main methods and technologies developed so far barely involve citizens and consider their preferences. This contribution tackles this challenge, by illustrating a novel mixed methodology, which combines the soundscape approach, the citizen science paradigm and a novel mobile application - the Hush City app - with the ultimate goal of involving people in identifying, assessing and planning urban quiet areas. Firstly, the theoretical background and the methods applied are described; secondly initial findings are discussed; thirdly potential impact and future work are outlined.


[1] Hill D., Essay: On the Smart City; or, A ‘Manifesto’ for Smart Citizens Instead, City of Sound, 2013, in Google Scholar

[2] Manville C., et al., Mapping Smart Cities in the EU, Bruxelles, 2014 [3] Icitylab, I City Rate 2016, La classifica delle città intelligenti italiane. Edizioni FPA, 2017, (in Italian)Search in Google Scholar

[4] Mumford E., The CIAM discourse on urbanism, 1928-1960, The MIT Press, Cambridge (USA), 2002Search in Google Scholar

[5] Greenfield A., Against theSmart City, Do projects, New York City, 2013Search in Google Scholar

[6] Aurigi A., Willis K., Digital and Smart Cities, Taylor and Francis, Milton, 201710.4324/9781315712451Search in Google Scholar

[7] Montgomery C., Happy city: transforming our lives through urban design, Penguin Books, London, 2013Search in Google Scholar

[8] McCay L., Centre For Urban Design And Mental Health, 2015, https://www.urbandesignmentalhealth.comSearch in Google Scholar

[9] Gehl J., The human scale, DVD, EuroVideo Medien, Ismaning, 2012, in Google Scholar

[10] Barton H., City of Well-Being: A Radical Guide to Planning, Routledge, Oxford, 201710.4324/9781315438689Search in Google Scholar

[11] Stollmann, J., et al. (Eds.), Beware of smart people! Redefining the smart city paradigm towards inclusive urbanism, Proceedings of the 2015 Beware of Smart People! Symposium, Universitätsverlag der TU Berlin, Berlin, 2016Search in Google Scholar

[12] Timmeren van A., Henriquez L., Ubiquity and the Illuminated City. From Smart to Intelligent Urban Environments, TU Delft press, Delft, 2015Search in Google Scholar

[13] Seiz G., Balestrini M., Making Sense: Advances and Experiments in Participatory sensing, In: (Ed.), Making by Hacking: citizens of change creating the future now, Fundacioń Cibervoluntarios, 2017, in Google Scholar

[14] World Health Organization, Burden of disease from environmental noise. Quantification of healthy life years lost in Europe, Regional Oflce for Europe/European Commission Joint Research Centre, Brussels, 2011Search in Google Scholar

[15] European Environmental Agency, Good Practice guide on quiet areas, Technical Report n.4. Publications Oflce of the European Union, Luxembourg, 2014Search in Google Scholar

[16] European Environmental Agency, Managing noise exposure in Europe, EEA Briefing 1/2017, Publications Oflce of the European Union, Luxembourg, 2017Search in Google Scholar

[17] European Parliament and Council, Directive 2002/49/EC of 25 June 2002 relating to the assessment and management of environmental noise, Off. J. Eur. Communities L 189(45), 2002, 12-26Search in Google Scholar

[18] Licitra G., et al., Quiet areas definition in the implementation of European directive 2002/49/EC, presented at ISSA, Auckland, New Zealand, 29-31 August 2010Search in Google Scholar

[19] Licitra G. (Ed.), Special issue on Environmental aspects in EU funded projects, Noise Mapping, 2016, 3, 110.1515/noise-2016-0019Search in Google Scholar

[20] Radicchi, A., Beyond the Noise: Open Source Soundscapes. A mixed methodology to analyse, evaluate and plan "everyday quiet areas”, Proc. Mtgs. Acoust. 30, 2017, doi:10.1121/2.0000565Search in Google Scholar

[21] ISO/DIS 12913-1, Acoustics. Soundscape - Part 1: Definition and conceptual framework, International Standardization organization, Geneva, 2014Search in Google Scholar

[22] Hintzsche M., Heinrichs E., Ruhige Gebiete - Das Vorsorgeprinzip in der EU-Umgebungslärmrichtlinie, Immissionsschutz 2017, 2, 54-58 (in German)10.37307/j.1868-7776.2017.02.04Search in Google Scholar

[23] Heinrichs E., et al., Technisch wissenschaftliche Unterstützung bei der Novellierung der EU-Umgebungslärmrichtlinie, Arbeitspaket 3: Ruhige Gebiete, Text 74/2015,Umweltbundesamt, Dessau-Roßlau, 2015 (in German)Search in Google Scholar

[24] Karlsson H., The Acoustic Environment as a Public Domain, Soundscape Journal, 2000, 1, 2, 10-13Search in Google Scholar

[25] Radicchi A., The notion of soundscape in the realm of sensuous urbanism. A historical perspective, In: Wilson A. (Ed.), Listen! Sound worlds from body to City, Cambridge Scholars Publ., Cambridge (in press)Search in Google Scholar

[26] Kang J., at al., Soundscape of European Cities and Landscapes, Soundscape-COST, Oxford, 2013Search in Google Scholar

[27] Kang J., Schulte-Fortkamp B. (Eds.), Soundscape and the Built Environment, CRC Press, New York, 2015Search in Google Scholar

[28] Schulte-Fortkamp B., Soundscape - focusing on resources, Proc. Mtgs. Acoust. 19, 2013, doi: in Google Scholar

[29] Kang J., et al., Ten questions on the soundscapes of the built environment, Building and Environment, 2016, 108, 284-29410.1016/j.buildenv.2016.08.011Search in Google Scholar

[30] Brooks B., Schulte-Fortkamp B., The Soundscape Standard, paper presented at Internoise, Hamburg, Germany, 21-24 August 2016Search in Google Scholar

[31] Bauwens M., et al., Common Transition and P2P: A Primer, The Transnational Institute 2017, publication/commons-transition-and-p2p10.21721/p2p.2016v2n2.p62-77Search in Google Scholar

[32] Welle B., et al., Cities Safer by Design, World Resources Institute, Washington, D.C., 2015Search in Google Scholar

[33] Schafer M., The Soundscape. Our Sonic Environment and The Tuning of the World, A. Knopf, New York, 1977Search in Google Scholar

[34] Lin W., The hearing, the mapping, and the Web: Investigating emerging online sound mapping practices, Landscape and Urban Planning, 2015, 142, 187-19710.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.08.007Search in Google Scholar

[35] Ludovico L.,Mauro D., Sound and the city: multi-layer representation and navigation of audio scenarios, paper presented at the 6th Sound and Music Computing Conference, Porto, Portugal, 23-25 July 2009Search in Google Scholar

[36] Zorzanello S., Multilevel sound maps in telematic sound cartography. Some input towards the definition of the academic statute of Soundscape Studies, paper presented at “Keep an ear on...” International FKL Symposium on Soundscape, Firenze, Italy, 20-22 May 2011Search in Google Scholar

[37] Radicchi A., Signorelli V., Soundmaps, quiet areas and noise control strategies/ Mappature sonore, aree di quiete e strategie di controllo del rumore, Urbanistica, 2014, 154, 131-136 (in Italian and in English)Search in Google Scholar

[38] Theunis J., et al., Sensing the Environment, In: Loreto V., et al. (Eds.), Participatory Sensing, Opinions and Collective Awareness, Cham Springer International Publishing, 2017, 21-4610.1007/978-3-319-25658-0_2Search in Google Scholar

[39] Berlin Senate, Berlin Environmental Atlas, Senatsverwaltung für Stadtentwicklung und Wohnen, 2015, (in German and in English)Search in Google Scholar

[40] Berlin Senate, Noise reduction plan for Berlin - Action plan, Senatsverwaltung fu¨r Gesundheit, Umwelt und Verbraucherschutz, Berlin, 2008, (in German and in English)Search in Google Scholar

[41] Radicchi A., The HUSH CITY app, In: Castro R. (Ed.), Proceedings of Invisible Places, the International Conference on Sound, Urbanism and the Sense of Place, 2017 (in press)Search in Google Scholar

[42] D’Hondt E., et al., Participatory noise mapping works! An evaluation of participatory sensing as an alternative to standard techniques for environmental monitoring, Pervasive Mob. Comput 2013, 9, 5, 681-69410.1016/j.pmcj.2012.09.002Search in Google Scholar

[43] Drosatos G., et al., A privacy-preserving cloud computing system for creating participatory noise maps, Proceedings of Computer Software and Applications Conference, 2012, 581-58610.1109/COMPSAC.2012.78Search in Google Scholar

[44] Huang K., et al., Are you contributing trust- worthy data? The case for a reputation system in participatory sensing, Proceedings of the 13th ACM international conference on modeling, analysis, and simulation of wireless and mobile systems, 2010, 14-2210.1145/1868521.1868526Search in Google Scholar

[45] Kardous, C., Shaw, P., Evaluation of smartphone sound measurement applications, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 2014, 135, 4, 186- 19210.1121/1.4865269Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[46] Kardous, C., Shaw, P., Do Sound Meter Apps Measure Noise Levels Accurately?, in Google Scholar

[47] Kardous, C., Shaw, P., Evaluation of smartphone sound measurement applications (apps) using external microphones - A follow-up study, J. Acoust. Soc. Am 140, EL327, 2016, doi: http: // in Google Scholar

[48] Aumond P., et al., A study of the accuracy of mobile technology for measuring urban noise pollution in large scale participatory sensing campaigns, Applied Acoustics, 2017, 117, 219-22610.1016/j.apacoust.2016.07.011Search in Google Scholar

[49] Loreto V., et al., (Eds.), Participatory Sensing, Opinions and Collective Awareness, Cham Springer International Publishing, 201710.1007/978-3-319-25658-0_19Search in Google Scholar

[50] Maissoneuve N., et al., NoiseTube: Measuring and mapping noise pollution with mobile phones, paper presented at the 4th International ICSC Symposium, Thessaloniki, Greece, 28-29 May 2009Search in Google Scholar

[51] Murphy E., Kin, E., Testing the accuracy of smartphones and sound level meter applications for measuring environmental noise, Applied Acoustics, 2016, 106,16-2210.1016/j.apacoust.2015.12.012Search in Google Scholar

[52] Stevens M., Community memories for sustainable societies: the case of environmental noise, Ph.D. thesis, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, 2012, in Google Scholar

[53] Aiello L. M., Schifanella R., Quercia D., Aletta F., Chatty Maps: Constructing sound maps of urban areas from social media data, Royal Society Open Science 3, 2016, doi:10.1098/rsos.150690Search in Google Scholar

[54] Guillaume G., et al., Noisemapping based on participative measurements, Noise Mapping, 2016, 3, 1, 140-15610.1515/noise-2016-0011Search in Google Scholar

[55] Rana R., Chou C. T., Bulusu N., Kanhere S., Hu W., Ear-Phone: A context-aware noise mapping using smart phones, Pervasive and Mobile Computing, 2014, doi:10.1016/j.pmcj.2014.02.001Search in Google Scholar

[56] Unsworth K., Forte A., Dilworth R., Urban Informatics: The Role of Citizen Participation in Policy Making, Journal of Urban Technology, 2014, 21, 4, 1-510.1080/10630732.2014.971527Search in Google Scholar

[57] Ruge L., Altakrouri B., Schrader S., SoundOfTheCity-Continuous Noise Monitoring for a Healthy City, paper presented at the 5th International Workshop onSmart Environments andAmbient Intelligence at IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communication, 201310.1109/PerComW.2013.6529577Search in Google Scholar

[58] Droumeva M., Mobile soundscape mapping, Canadian Acoustics, 2010, 38, 3, 106-107Search in Google Scholar

[59] Droumeva M., Curating Everyday Life: Approaches to Documenting Everyday Soundscapes, M/C Journal, 2015, 18, 4, in Google Scholar

[60] Kanjo E., NoiseSPY: A Real-Time Mobile Phone Platform for Urban Noise Monitoring and Mapping, Mobile Networks and Applications, 2010, 15, 4, 562-57410.1007/s11036-009-0217-ySearch in Google Scholar

[61] Aspuru A., Garciá I., Herranz K., Santander A., CITI-SENSE: methods and tools for empowering citizens to observe acoustic comfort in outdoor public spaces, Noise Mapping, 2016, 3, 37-4810.1515/noise-2016-0003Search in Google Scholar

[62] Craig A., Moore D., Knox D., Experience Sampling: Assessing Urban Soundscapes Using In-Situ Participatory Methods, Applied Acoustics, 2016, 117, doi: 10.1016/j.apacoust.2016.05.026Search in Google Scholar

[63] Maisonneuve N., Stevens M., Niessen M., Steels L., NoiseTube: Measuring andmapping noise pollutionwith mobile phones, In: Athanasiadis, A., et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 4th International ICSC Symposium, Thessaloniki, Greece, 28-29May 2009, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, 215-22810.1007/978-3-540-88351-7_16Search in Google Scholar

[64] LIFE QUADMAP project, Guidelines for the identification, selection, analysis and management of Quiet Urban Areas, March 2015, in Google Scholar

[65] Carfagni M., et al., LIFE+ 2010 QUADMAP Project (Quiet Areas Definition andManagementin Action Plans): The New Methodology Obtained after Applying the Optimization Procedures, Proceedings of 21st International Congress on Sound and Vibration (ICSV 21), Beijing, China, 13-17 July 2014, 2576-83Search in Google Scholar

[66] Bild, E., et al., Considering Sound in Planning and Designing Public Spaces: A Review of Theory and Applications and a Proposed Framework for Integrating Research and Practice, Journal of Planning Literature, 2016, 1-16Search in Google Scholar

[67] Haklay M., The Three Eras of Environmental Information: The Roles of Experts and the Public, In: Loreto V., et al. (Eds.), Participatory Sensing, Opinions and Collective Awareness, Cham Springer International Publishing, 2017, 163-18010.1007/978-3-319-25658-0_8Search in Google Scholar

[68] Pettibone L., et al., Citizen science for all - a guide for citizen science practitioners, Bu¨rger Schaffen Wissen (GEWISS) publication, Berlin, 2016Search in Google Scholar

[69] Schulte-Fortkamp B., Dubois D., Recent advances in Soundscape research, Acta Acustica united with Acustica, Special Issue, 2006Search in Google Scholar

[70] Luna S., et al., Developing mobile applications for environmental and biodiversity citizen science: considerations and recommendations, In: Joly et al. (Eds.), Multimedia Technologies for Environmental & Biodiversity Informatics, Springer International Publishing (in press)Search in Google Scholar

[71] Zardini M. (Ed.), Sense of the city. An Alternative Approach to Urbanism, Canadian Center for Architecture and Lars Muller Publishers, Montreal, 2005Search in Google Scholar

[72] Radicchi A., Sull’immagine sonora della città, Firenze University Press, Firenze, 2012 (in Italian)10.36253/978-88-6655-278-9Search in Google Scholar

[73] Lynch K., A Theory of A Good City Form, The MIT Press, Cambridge (MA), 1981Search in Google Scholar

[74] Lynch K., Good city form, The MIT Press, Cambridge (MA), 1984Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2017-11-29
Accepted: 2018-02-02
Published Online: 2018-04-03

© 2018 Antonella Radicchi, et al., published by De Gruyter

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.

Downloaded on 6.6.2023 from
Scroll to top button