Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter April 13, 2021

Energy efficiency in mechanical pulping – definitions and considerations

Christer Sandberg, Olof Ferritsius and Rita Ferritsius

Abstract

Production of mechanical pulps requires high specific electrical energy compared to many other attrition processes. In Scandinavia, the lowest specific refining energy for production of thermomechanical pulp is around 1800 kWh/t for newsprint quality, which is roughly 60 times higher than for crushing of stone to a similar size distribution. The high specific energy demand for refining has naturally motivated large efforts in the search for improved efficiency. It is always practical to be able to quantify improvements in efficiency for comparison of process designs and of different machine types. However, there is no commonly accepted definition of efficiency for mechanical pulping processes. In published work within mechanical pulping, energy efficiency has been presented in different ways. In this paper, we discuss definitions of energy efficiency and aspects that ought to be considered when energy efficiency is presented. Although focus of this work is on energy efficiency for refiner processes, the principles can be applied to other types of mechanical pulping processes such as stone groundwood.

Funding source: Stora Enso

Funding statement: This work was supported by Holmen and Stora Enso.

Acknowledgments

The authors appreciate valuable comments on the manuscript by Jan-Erik Berg and the linguistic revision by Ester Quintana.

  1. Conflict of interest: The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Appendix

Data shown in this study has been collected from mill processes in three printing paper mills in Sweden. Raw material in all mills were Norway spruce. Data for the processes are summarized in Table A1 and in the text below.

Brief descriptions of the experimental procedures for the trials not in referred literature are given below:

TMP line in the Holmen, Hallsta mill, Sweden. Figure 8B.

Raw material: Mix of roundwood and sawmill chips of Norway spruce.

For Figure 8B, pulp samples were taken from one of the four parallel main lines. The sampled line has an RTS refiner (SB170, Andritz) as primary stage and a Jylhä SD65 (Valmet) refiner as second stage. Samples were taken from the blow lines of the primary RTS refiner at two levels of production rate (14 and 17 adt/h) and two levels of disc gap at each production rate (Motor power 11–15 MW).

Pulp from two RTS-lines and one 2-stage Jylhä SD65 lines are mixed and refined in two stages with LC refiners (TwinFlo 52, Andritz) equipped with 58” segments. For Figure 10, pulp samples were taken from the chest before the LC refiners and after first and second LC refiners. The TMP line is also described by Ferritsius et al. (2020).

Pulp samples were hot disintegrated according to ISO 5263-3 and handsheets were made according to a modified version of ISO 5269–1:2005. Tensile index was measured on handsheets according to ISO 1924-2.

RGP68 DD StoraEnso Kvarnsveden Mill, Sweden. Figure 8A.

Raw material: Roundwood of Norway spruce.

Pulp samples were taken from the blow-line of one of the single-stage RGP68 DD refiners at two levels of production rate (14 and 17 adt/h) and three levels of disc gap at each production rate. Pulps were hot disintegrated before testing according to ISO 5263-3:2004. Laboratory sheets were made according to ISO 5270:2012, but using 20 strips for tensile testing instead of 10 strips. Since all samples were tested twice, tensile index values are based on 40 strips for each point.

References

ABB (2021) https://www.abb-conversations.com/2017/07/abb-motor-sets-world-record-in-energy-efficiency/. Accessed 02-02-2021.Search in Google Scholar

Andersson, S., Sandberg, C., Engstrand, P. (2012) Comparison of mechanical pulps from two stage HC single disc and HC double disc – LC refining. Appita J. 65(1):57–62.Search in Google Scholar

Atack, D. (1981) Fundamental differences in energy requirement between the mechanical pulping processes. In: Int. Mech. Pulping Conf., Oslo, Norway, Session VI(5).Search in Google Scholar

Ballantyne, G.R., Powell, M.S., Tiang, M. (2012) Proportion of Energy Attributable to Comminution. In: 11th Mill Operators’ Conference, Hobart, Tasmania, 29–31 October.Search in Google Scholar

Berg, J.E. (2001) Effect of impact velocity on the fracture of wood as related to the mechanical pulping process. Wood Sci. Technol. 35(4):343–351.10.1007/s002260100100Search in Google Scholar

Bousquet, J.P., Villeneuve, J., Weber, M., Hogan, D. (2016) Summary of ISS conversion at the Grenada Resolute TMP mill. In: Int. Mech. Pulping Conf., Jacksonville, USA, pp. 780–786.Search in Google Scholar

Brecht, B., Müller, H. (1952) Comparison between Jordan-type and disc refiners in a groundwood mill. Papier 6(5/6):86–94.Search in Google Scholar

Campbell, W.B. (1934) Groundwood Studies; Theoretical Efficiency. Pulp Pap. Can. 35(3):218–219.Search in Google Scholar

Chang, X.F., Miller, M., Sun, Y., Olson, J., Beatson, R. (2016) A pilot scale comparison of the effect of chemical treatments of wood chips on the properties of high freeness TMP. In: Int. Mech. Pulping Conf., Jacksonville, USA, pp. 362–380.Search in Google Scholar

Ciężkowski, P., Maciejewski, J., Bąk, S. (2017) Analysis of energy consumption of crushing processes – Comparison of one-stage and two-stage processes. Stud. Geotech. Mech. 39(2):18–24.10.1515/sgem-2017-0012Search in Google Scholar

Corson, S.R. (1984) Influence of wood quality characteristics on TMP and RMP New Zealand – grown radiata pine. Appita J. 37(3):400–408.Search in Google Scholar

Fernando, D., Gorski, D., Sabourin, M., Daniel, G. (2013) Characterization of fiber development in high- and low-consistency refining of primary mechanical pulp. Holzforschung 67(7):735–745.10.1515/hf-2012-0135Search in Google Scholar

Ferritsius, O., Ferritsius, J., Ferritsius, R., Rundlöf, M. (2019) Heterogeneity. Fundamental Mechanical Pulping Research Seminar, Norrköping, Sweden. Data presented, but not in the proceedings.Search in Google Scholar

Ferritsius, O., Ferritsius, R. (1997) Improved quality control and process design in production of mechanical pulp by the use of factor analysis. In: Int. Mech. Pulping Conf., Stockholm, Sweden, pp. 111–125.Search in Google Scholar

Ferritsius, O., Mörseburg, K., Ferritsius, R. (2014) BAT of CTMP and TMP plants with respect to quality development and energy efficiency. In: Int. Mech. Pulping Conf., Helsinki, Finland, Poster No. 10.Search in Google Scholar

Ferritsius, R., Sandberg, C., Ferritsius, O., Rundlöf, M., Daniel, G., Mörseburg, K., Fernando, D. (2020) Development of fiber properties in full scale HC and LC refining. Nord. Pulp Pap. Res. J. 35(4):589–599.10.1515/npprj-2020-0027Search in Google Scholar

Forgacs, O. (1963) The characterization of mechanical pulps. Pulp Pap. Can. 64(conv.):T89–T118.Search in Google Scholar

Gorski, D., Luukkonen, A., Sabourin, M., Olson, J. (2012) Two-stage low-consistency refining of mechanical pulp. Appita J. 65(3):244–249.Search in Google Scholar

Gorski, D., Mörseburg, K., Axelsson, P., Engstrand, P. (2011) Peroxide-based ATMP refining of spruce: energy efficiency, fibre properties and pulp quality. Nord. Pulp Pap. Res. J. 26(1):47–63.10.3183/npprj-2011-26-01-p047-063Search in Google Scholar

Hill, J., Johansson, L., Mörsburg, K. (2017) ATMP pulping of Norway spruce – pulp property development and energy efficiency. Nord. Pulp Pap. Res. J. 32(1):70–86.10.3183/npprj-2017-32-01-p070-086Search in Google Scholar

Höglund, H., Bäck, R., Falk, B., Jackson, M. (1997) Thermopulp – a new energy-efficient mechanical pulping process. Pulp Pap. Can. 98(6):82–89.Search in Google Scholar

Höglund, H., Sohlin, U., Tistad, G. (1976) Physical properties of wood in relation to chip refining. Tappi J. 59(6):144–147.Search in Google Scholar

Johansson, O., Jackson, M., Wild, N.W. (2007) Three steps to improved TMP operating efficiency. In: Int. Mech. Pulping Conf., Minneapolis, USA. Pres. No. 33.Search in Google Scholar

Jones, H.W. (1962) The Interdependence of properties in Mechanical Pulps. Pulp Pap. Mag. Can. 63 (Conv. Issue 1962):T82–T86.Search in Google Scholar

Kerekes, R.J. (2010) Energy and forces in refining. J. Pulp Pap. Sci. 36(1-2):10–15.Search in Google Scholar

Kure, K.-A., Sabourin, M.J., Dahlqvist, G., Helle, T. (2000) Adjusting refining intensity by changing refiner plate design and rotational speed – Effects on structural fibre properties. J. Pulp Pap. Sci. 26:346–352.Search in Google Scholar

Lecourt, M., Struga, B., Delagoutte, T., Petit-Conil, M. (2007) Saving energy by application of ozone in the thermomechanical pulping process. In: Int. Mech. Pulping Conf., Minneapolis, USA. Pres. No. 11.Search in Google Scholar

Lexico (2021) https://www.lexico.com/definition/efficiency. Accessed 02-02-2021.Search in Google Scholar

Miles, K.B., Karnis, A. (1995) Wood characteristics and energy consumption in refiner pulps. J. Pulp Pap. Sci. 21(11):J383–J389.Search in Google Scholar

Muhic, D., Sundström, L., Sandberg, C., Ullmar, M., Engstrand, P. (2010) Influence of temperature on energy efficiency in double disc chip refining. Nord. Pulp Pap. Res. J. 25(4):420–427.10.3183/npprj-2010-25-04-p420-427Search in Google Scholar

Nurminen, I. (1999) Influence of refining temperature and intensity (disc rotating speed) on TMP energy consumption and pulp and fibre fraction properties. In: Int. Mech. Pulping Conf., Houston, USA, pp. 333–345.Search in Google Scholar

Pan, X.G. (2004) Relationship between dissolution of fiber materials and development of pulp strength in alkaline peroxide bleaching of mechanical pulp. Holzforschung 58:369–374.10.1515/HF.2004.056Search in Google Scholar

Persson, E., Engstrand, P., Karlsson, L., Nilsson, F., Wahlgren, M. (2003) Utilization of the natural variation in wood properties – a comparison between pilot plant trials and mill scale trials. In: Int. Mech. Pulping Conf., Quebec, Canada, pp. 83–90.Search in Google Scholar

Sabourin, M., Aichinger, J., Wiseman, N. (2003) Effect of increasing wood chip defibration on thermomechanical and chemi-thermomechanical refining efficiency. In: Int. Mech. Pulping Conf., Quebec, Canada, pp. 163–170.Search in Google Scholar

Salmén, L., Fellers, C. (1982) The fundamentals of energy consumption during viscoelastic and plastic deformation of wood, Transactions of the Technical Section. CPPA 8(4):tr93–tr99.Search in Google Scholar

Sandberg, C., Berg, J.-E., Engstrand, P. (2017a) Low consistency refining of mechanical pulp – system design. Tappi J. 16(7):419–429.10.32964/TJ16.7.419Search in Google Scholar

Sandberg, C., Berg, J.-E., Engstrand, P. (2017b) Mill evaluation of an intensified mechanical pulping process. Nord. Pulp Pap. Res. J. 32(2):204–210.10.3183/npprj-2017-32-02-p204-210Search in Google Scholar

Strand, B.C. (1987) Factor Analysis as Applied to the Characterization of High Yield Pulps. In: TAPPI Pulping Conf. Proceedings, pp. 61–66.Search in Google Scholar

Tuovinen, O. (2016) End of stone age. In: Int. Mech. Pulping Conf., Jacksonville, USA, pp. 724–731.Search in Google Scholar

Tyrväinen, J. (1995) The influence of wood properties on the quality of TMP made from Norway spruce (Picea abies) – wood from old-growth forest, first-thinnings and sawmill chips. In: Int. Mech. Pulping Conf., Minneapolis, USA, pp. 23–33.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2021-02-20
Accepted: 2021-03-02
Published Online: 2021-04-13
Published in Print: 2021-09-27

© 2021 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Scroll Up Arrow