Skip to content
BY 4.0 license Open Access Published by De Gruyter Open Access February 28, 2019

Effect of biodynamic preparations on the soil biological and agrochemical properties and coloured potato tubers quality

  • Nijolė Vaitkevičienė EMAIL logo , Elvyra Jarienė , Reto Ingold and Jasmin Peschke
From the journal Open Agriculture


The aim of this research, which was undertaken in three years (2013-2015), was to evaluate the effect of biodynamic (BD) preparations 500 and 501 on soil biological and agrochemical properties and potato tuber quality. The soil samples were analyzed for: available phosphorus, available potassium, ammonia nitrogen, nitrogen (sum of nitrate and nitrite nitrogen) and mineral nitrogen. The potato samples were analyzed for: total polyphenols content, total anthocyanin’s content and antiradical activity. The research revealed that significantly the highest concentrations of available phosphorus, available potassium, nitrogen and mineral nitrogen in the soil throughout the growing season were identified on the 14th day after soil application of BD preparation 500 (before potato planting). As well as, soil spray application of BD preparation 500 resulted in higher enzyme activity (urease and saccharase). When the BD preparation 501 was applied, the content of total phenolic compounds in the tubers of cultivars Blue Congo and Red Emmalie was significantly higher, 20.1% and 5.4%, respectively; the content of anthocyanins were significantly higher in the tubers of three tested cultivars. However, the application of this preparation did not have any effect on the content of total phenolic compounds and on the antioxidant activity of Vitelotte tubers. The use of both preparations (500+501) had significant effects only on anthocyanins accumulation in the tubers of Blue Congo and Vitelotte. The application of preparation 500 significantly decreased the content of anthocyanins in the tubers of cvs. Red Emmalie and Vitelotte.


Bacchus G.L., An evaluation of the influence of biodynamic practices including foliar-applied silica spray on nutrient quality of organic and conventionally fertilised lettuce (Lactuca Sativa L.), J. Org. System., 2010, 5, 4-13Search in Google Scholar

Baležentienė L., Indicating soil quality using urease and saccharase activity in abandoned grassland and differently managed crop fields, In: Sokolović D., Huyghe C., Radović J. (Eds.), Quantitative traits breeding for multifunctional grasslands and turf, Springer, Dordrecht, 201410.1007/978-94-017-9044-4_53Search in Google Scholar

Burkitt L.L., Small D.R., Mcdonald J.W., Wales W.J., Jenkin M.L., Comparing irrigated biodynamic and conventionally managed dairy farms. 1. Soil and pasture properties, Aust. J. Exp. Agric., 2007, 47, 479-48810.1071/EA05196Search in Google Scholar

Carbonaro M., Mattera M., Vicoli S., Cappelloni M., Antioxidant power of apples from organic and conventional agriculture and changes during preservation, Riv. Sci. Aliment., 2000, 30 267-274Search in Google Scholar

Carpenter-Boggs L., Kennedy A., Reganold J., Organic and biodynamic management: effects on soil biology. Soil. Sci. Soc. Am. J., 2000, 64, 1651-165910.2136/sssaj2000.6451651xSearch in Google Scholar

Demeter International. 2013. Handbuch - Einführung in die biodynamische präparatearbeitSearch in Google Scholar

Deng G., Liu L.J., Zhong X.Y., Lao C.Y., Wang H.Y., Wang B., et al., Comparative proteome analysis of the response of ramie under N, P and K deficiency, Planta, 2014, 239, 1175-118610.1007/s00425-014-2040-3Search in Google Scholar

Dick R.P., Soil enzyme activities as integrative indicators of soil health, In: Pankhurst C.E., Doube B.M., Gupta V.V.S.R. (Eds.), Biological indicators of soil health, CABI Publishing, USA, 1997Search in Google Scholar

Gao X., Bjork L., Trajkovski V., Uggla M., Evaluation of antioxidant activities of rosehip ethanol extracts in different test systems, J. Sci. Food Agric., 2000, 80, 2021-202710.1002/1097-0010(200011)80:14<2021::AID-JSFA745>3.0.CO;2-2Search in Google Scholar

Giannattasio M., Vendramin E., Fornasier F., Alberghini S., Zanardo M, Stellin F, et al., Microbiological features and bioactivity of a fermented manure product (preparation 500) used in biodynamic agriculture, J. Microb. Biotech., 2013, 23, 644-65110.4014/jmb.1212.12004Search in Google Scholar

Gilsenan C., Burke R., Barry-Ryan C., A study of the physicochemical and sensory properties of organic and conventional potatoes (Solanum tuberosum) before and after baking, Int. J. Food Sci. Tech., 2010, 45, 475-48110.1111/j.1365-2621.2009.02148.xSearch in Google Scholar

Hamouz K., Lachman J., Hejtmánková K., Pazderů K., Čížek M., Dvořák P., Effect of natural and growing conditions on the content of phenolics in potatoes with different flesh colour, Plant Soil Envir., 2010, 56, 368-37410.17221/49/2010-PSESearch in Google Scholar

Hamouz K., Lachman J., Pazderů K., Tomášek J., Hejtmánková K., Pivec V., Differences in anthocyanin content and antioxidant activity of potato tubers with different flesh colour, Plant Soil Envir., 2011, 57, 478-48510.17221/265/2011-PSESearch in Google Scholar

Heimler D., Vignolini P., Arfaioli P., Isolani L., Romani A., Conventional, organic and biodynamic farming: differences in polyphenol content and antioxidant activity of Batavia lettuce, J. Sci. Food Agric., 2012, 92, 551-55610.1002/jsfa.4605Search in Google Scholar

Hejtmankova K., Kotikova Z., Hamouz K., Pivec V., Vacek J., Lachman J., Influence of flesh colour, year and growing area on carotenoid and anthocyanin content in potato tubers, J. Food Compost. Anal., 2013, 32, 20-2710.1016/j.jfca.2013.07.001Search in Google Scholar

Hofmann E., Schmidt W., Uber das enzymsystem unserer kulturboden-II. Urease, Biochem. Zeits., 1953, 324, 125-127Search in Google Scholar

Hofmann E., Seegerer A., Der fermenten gehalt des bodens als masstab seiner biologischen aktivität, Biochem. Zeits., 1950, 321, 97-99Search in Google Scholar

Juknevičienė E. The effect of biodynamic preparations on the pr operties of soil, yield of great pumpkin (Cucurbita maxima D.) fruits and their quality, PhD thesis, Aleksandras Stulginskis University, Akademija, LT, 2015 (in Lithuanian)Search in Google Scholar

Lachman J., Hamouz K., Orsák M., Pivec V., Hejtmánková K., Pazderů K., et al., Impact of selected factors - cultivar, storage, cooking and baking on the content of anthocyanins in coloured-flesh potatoes, Food Chem., 2012, 133, 1107-111610.1016/j.foodchem.2011.07.077Search in Google Scholar

Langenkämper G., Zörb C., Seifert M., Mäder P., Fretzdorff B., Betsche T., Nutritional quality of organic and conventional wheat, J. Appl. Botany Food Qual., 2006, 80, 150-154Search in Google Scholar

Maciel L.F., Oliveira C., Bispo E., Miranda M.P.S., Antioxidant activity, total phenolic compounds and flavonoids of mangoes coming from biodynamic, organic and conventional cultivations in three maturation stages, Brit. Food J., 2011, 113, 1103-111310.1108/00070701111180319Search in Google Scholar

Maggio A., Carillo P., Bulmetti, G.S., Fuggi A., Barbieri G., Pascale S.D., Potato yield and metabolic profiling under conventional and organic farming, Europ. J. Agr., 2008, 28, 343-35010.1016/j.eja.2007.10.003Search in Google Scholar

Mie A., Andersen H.R., Gunnarsson S., Kahl J., Kesse-Guyot E., Rembiałkowska E., Quaglio G., Grandjean P., Human health implications of organic food and organic agriculture: a comprehensive review, Environ. Health, 2017, 16(1), 111. doi: 10.1186/s12940-017-0315-4Search in Google Scholar

Nayak B., Berrios J.J., Powers J.R., Tang J., Ji Y, Colored potatoes (Solanum tuberosum L.) dried for antioxidant-rich value-added foods, J. Food Process. Preserv., 2011, 35, 5, 571-58010.1111/j.1745-4549.2010.00502.xSearch in Google Scholar

Nicolopoulou-Stamati P., Maipas S., Kotampasi C., Stamatis P., Hens L., Chemical pesticides and human health: the urgent need for a new concept in agriculture, Front. Public Health, 2016, 4, 148. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2016.00148Search in Google Scholar

Ponzio C., Gangatharan R., Neri D., Organic and biodynamic agriculture: A review in relation to sustainability, Int. J. Plant Soil Sci., 2013, 2, 95-11010.9734/IJPSS/2013/4493Search in Google Scholar

Raupp J., Konig U.J., Biodynamic preparations cause opposite yield effects depending upon yield levels, Biol. Agric. Hortic., 1996, 13, 175-18510.1080/01448765.1996.9754776Search in Google Scholar

Re R., Pellegrini N., Proteggente A., Pannala A., Yang M., Rice-Evans C., Antioxidant activity applying an improved ABTS radical cation decolourisation assay, Free Radic. Biol. Medic., 1999, 26, 1231-123710.1016/S0891-5849(98)00315-3Search in Google Scholar

Reeve J.R., Carpenter-Boggs L., Reganold J.P., York A.L., Mcgourthy G., Mccloskey L.P., Soil and winegrape quality in biodynamically and organically managed vineyards, Am. J. Eno. Viticul., 2005, 56, 367-37610.5344/ajev.2005.56.4.367Search in Google Scholar

Sahebi M., Hanafi M.M., Siti N.O.R., Akmar A., Rafii M.Y., Azizi P., et al., Importance of silicon and mechanisms of biosilica formation in plants, Biomed Res. Int., 2015, in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Tassoni A., Tango N., Ferri M., Polyphenol and biogenic amine profiles of albana and lambrusco grape berries and wines obtained following different agricultural and oenological practices, Food Nutr. Sci., 2014, 5, 8-1610.4236/fns.2014.51002Search in Google Scholar

Turinek M., Grobelnik-Mlakar S., Bavec M., Bavec F., Biodynamic agriculture from past to present, Agricultura, 2008, 6, 1-4Search in Google Scholar

Zaller J. G., Köpke U., Effects of traditional and biodynamic farmyard manure amendment on yields, soil chemical, biochemical and biological properties in a long-term field experiment, Biol Fertil Soils., 2004, 40, 222-229.10.1007/s00374-004-0772-0Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2018-08-23
Accepted: 2018-12-06
Published Online: 2019-02-28

© by Nijolė Vaitkevičienė, et al., published by De Gruyter

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Public License.

Downloaded on 23.9.2023 from
Scroll to top button