Skip to content
BY 4.0 license Open Access Published by De Gruyter Open Access July 11, 2019

Could biodynamics help bridge the gap in developing farmer intuition?

  • Saskia G. von Diest EMAIL logo
From the journal Open Agriculture


Several scientific studies indicate that farmers do not often use formalised decision support tools as expected, and many prefer to rely on their intuition to make practical management decisions. While agricultural science and education acknowledge the different types of knowledge that farmers utilize, intuition continues to receive little attention in agricultural science, indicating a gap in farmer decision-making research.

The mechanism driving intuition remains under debate, but is described as a pervasive, involuntary, rapid way of knowing, offering access to tacit (internal, intangible) knowledge that complements analytic processes. Many studies agree that intuition can be trained to increase accuracy and reliability. However, the comprehensive works on intuition by Rudolf Steiner hardly feature in modern science, and yet his writings and biodynamic agriculture approach offer farmers and non-farmers guidelines for systematic development of subtle abilities like intuition.

There may be value in collaborative, transdisciplinary exploration between agricultural research and biodynamic theory and practice, for supporting farmers to develop their intuitive knowing. Such an alliance could help increase the awareness and practice of biodynamics, expand the knowledge base and lexicon for the em erging research field of intuitive farming, and help reinvigorate agricultural research toward more efficient, customized and connected farming practices.


[1] Alvarez J., Nuthall P., Adoption of computer based information systems: The case of dairy farmers in Canterbury, NZ, and Florida, Uruguay, Comput. Electron. Agric., 2006, 50, 48-6010.1016/j.compag.2005.08.013Search in Google Scholar

[2] Boateng W., Knowledge management working tool for agricultural extension: the case of Ghana, Knowl. Manag. Development J., 2006, 2, 19-29Search in Google Scholar

[3] Bramley, R.G.V., Lessons from nearly 20 years of Precision Agriculture research, development, and adoption as a guide to its appropriate application. Crop Pasture Sci., 2009, 60, 197-21710.1071/CP08304Search in Google Scholar

[4] Cain J.L., The Aesthetics of Rudolf Steiner and Spiritual Modernism. PhD dissertation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA, 2016Search in Google Scholar

[5] Chilisa B., Indigenous Research Methodologies. Sage Publications, Los Angeles, 2012Search in Google Scholar

[6] Code J., Alternative agriculture: Innovations for growing and cultivating diverse ways of knowing, In: Zeunert J., Waterman T. (Eds.), Routledge Handbook of Landscape and Food, Routledge, London, 2018Search in Google Scholar

[7] Code, J., Ecoliteracy and the trouble with reading: ecoliteracy considered in terms of Goethe’s ‘delicate empiricism’ and the potential for reading in the book of nature. Environ. Educ. Res., 2019, in Google Scholar

[8] Curry N., Kirwan J., The role of tacit knowledge in developing networks for sustainable agriculture. Sociol. Ruralis, 2014, 54, 341-36110.1111/soru.12048Search in Google Scholar

[9] Fountas S., Carli G., Sørensen C.G., Tsiropoulos Z., Cavalaris C., Vatsanidou A., Farm management information systems: Current situation and future perspectives Comput. Electron. Agric., 2015, 115, 40-5010.1016/j.compag.2015.05.011Search in Google Scholar

[10] Fountas S., Wulfsohn D., Blackmore B.S., Jacobsen H.L., Pedersen S.M., A model of decision-making and information flows for information-intensive agriculture, Agric. Sys., 2006, 87, 192-21010.1016/j.agsy.2004.12.003Search in Google Scholar

[11] Haraway D., Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective, Fem. Stud., 1988, 14, 575–59910.2307/3178066Search in Google Scholar

[12] Hochman Z., Carberry P.S., Emerging consensus on desirable characteristics of tools to support farmers’ management of climate risk in Australia, Agric. Sys., 2011, 104, 441–45010.1016/j.agsy.2011.03.001Search in Google Scholar

[13] Hodgkinson G.P., Langan-Fox J., Sadler-Smith E., Intuition: A fundamental bridging construct in the behavioural sciences, Brit. J. Psychol., 2008, 99, 1–2710.1348/000712607X216666Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[14] IAASTD (International Assessment of Agricultural Knowledge, Science and Technology for Development), Agriculture at a crossroads: A synthesis of the global and sub-global IAASTD reports. McIntyre, B.D., Herren, H.R., Wakhungu, J., Watson, R.T. (Eds.) Island Press, Washington D.C., USA, 2009Search in Google Scholar

[15] Jung C.G., Psychological Types, Princeton University Press, New York, USA, 1976Search in Google Scholar

[16] Kahneman, D., Maps of Bounded Rationality: Psychology for Behavioral Economics. Am. Econ. Rev., 2003, 93, 1449-147510.1257/000282803322655392Search in Google Scholar

[17] Khatri N., Ng H. A., The role of intuition in strategic decision making, Hum. Relat., 2000, 53, 57-8610.1177/0018726700531004Search in Google Scholar

[18] Kieft H., Intuitive Farming: Towards a New Vision on Nature. Proceedings of the XI International People-Plant Symposium on Diversity: Towards a New Vision on Nature, Acta Hort., 2015, 1093, 179-194Search in Google Scholar

[19] Kieft H., Quantum Agriculture: bridging frontline physics and intuitive knowledge of nature? In: Haverkort B., Reijntjes, C. (Eds)., Moving Worldviews, reshaping sciences, policies and practices for endogenous sustainable development. ETC/COMPAS, Leusden, The Netherlands, 2006, 209-218Search in Google Scholar

[20] Knowler D., Bradshaw B., Farmers’ Adoption of Conservation Agriculture: A Review and Synthesis of Recent Research, Food Pol., 2007, 32, 25–4810.1016/j.foodpol.2006.01.003Search in Google Scholar

[21] Lang D.J., Wiek A., Bergmann M., Stauffacher M., Martens P., Moll P., et al., Transdisciplinary research in sustainability science – practice, principles and challenges, Sustain. Sci., 2012, 7 (Supplement 1), 25-4310.1007/s11625-011-0149-xSearch in Google Scholar

[22] Lufityanto G., Donkin C., Pearson J., Measuring Intuition: Nonconscious Emotional Information Boosts Decision Accuracy and Confidence, Psychol. Sci. 2016, 27, 622–63410.1177/0956797616629403Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[23] Lynch T., Gregor S., Midmore D., Intelligent support systems in agriculture: how can we do better? Aust. J. Exp. Agric., 2000, 40, 609–62010.1071/EA99082Search in Google Scholar

[24] McCown R.L., A cognitive systems framework to inform delivery of analytic support for farmers’ intuitive management under seasonal climatic variability, Agric. Sys., 2012, 105, 7–2010.1016/j.agsy.2011.08.005Search in Google Scholar

[25] McCown R.L., Carberry P.S., Dalgliesh N.P., Foale M.A., Hochman Z., Farmers use intuition to reinvent analytic decision support for managing seasonal climatic variability, Agric. Sys., 2012, 106, 33–4510.1016/j.agsy.2011.10.005Search in Google Scholar

[26] McCraty R., Atkinson M., Bradley R.T., Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine Electrophysiological Evidence of Intuition. Part 1, the Surprising Role of the Heart. Part 2, a System Wide Process. J. Altern. Complement. Med., 2004, 10, 133-143 and 325-33610.1089/107555304323062310Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[27] Miller J.R., Biodiversity conservation and the extinction of experience. Trends Ecol. Evol., 2005, 20, 430–43410.1016/j.tree.2005.05.013Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[28] Nonaka I., A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation, Organ. Sci., 1994, 5, 14-3610.1287/orsc.5.1.14Search in Google Scholar

[29] Nonaka I., van Krogh, G., Tacit Knowledge and Knowledge Conversion: Controversy and Advancement in Organizational Knowledge Creation Theory, Organ. Sci., 2009, 20, 635-65210.1287/orsc.1080.0412Search in Google Scholar

[30] Nuthall P.L., Old K.M., Intuition, the farmers’ primary decision process: A review and analysis, J. Rural Stud., 2018, 58, 28-3810.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.12.012Search in Google Scholar

[31] Nuthall P.L., The intuitive world of farmers – The case of grazing management systems and experts, Agric. Sys., 2012, 107, 65–7310.1016/j.agsy.2011.11.006Search in Google Scholar

[32] Öhlmér B., The Need and Design of Computerized Farm Management Tools – Lessons Learned from a Swedish Case, Working Paper Series 2007: 5, Department of Economics, SLU, Uppsala, 2007Search in Google Scholar

[33] Paxton R., Klimek M., Vieweger A., Döring R., Bloch R., Bachinger J., Woodward L., “The Role of Intuition in Managing Organic Farm System Health” in: Rahmann, Gerold (Ed.) et al.: Innovative research for Organic 3.0 - Volume 1: Proceedings of the scientific track at the Organic World Congress 2017, November 9-11 in Delhi, India. Thünen Report, 2017, No. 54,1Search in Google Scholar

[34] Pimbert M., Agro-ecology as an Alternative Vision to Conventional Development and Climate-smart Agriculture, Development, 2015, 58, 286–29810.1057/s41301-016-0013-5Search in Google Scholar

[35] Pyle RM., Nature matrix: reconnecting people and nature, Oryx, 2003, 37, 206–21410.1017/S0030605303000383Search in Google Scholar

[36] Radin D., Schlitz M.J., Gut Feelings, Intuition, and Emotions: An Exploratory Study, J. Altern. Complement. Med., 2005, 11, 1, 85–9110.1089/acm.2005.11.85Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[37] Robert M., Dury J., Thomas A., Therond O., Sekhar M., Badiger S., Ruiz L., Bergez J-E., CMFDM: A methodology to guide the design of a conceptual model of farmers’ decision-making processes, Agric. Sys., 2016, 148, 86–9410.1016/j.agsy.2016.07.010Search in Google Scholar

[38] Rosenberg L.L., Turi kumwe (we are together): A transdisciplinary exploration of the Burundian specialty coffee sector and its sustainability challenges, PhD Dissertation, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa, 2017Search in Google Scholar

[39] Sadler-Smith E., Shefy E., The intuitive executive: Understanding and applying ‘gut feel’ in decision-making, Acad. Manag. Learn. Educ., 2004, 18, 76-9110.5465/ame.2004.15268692Search in Google Scholar

[40] Samways, M., Rescuing the extinction of experience. Biodivers. Conserv., 2007, 16, 1995–199710.1007/s10531-006-9144-4Search in Google Scholar

[41] Saunders C.D., The emerging field of conservation psychology. Hum. Ecol. Rev., 2003, 10, 137–149Search in Google Scholar

[42] Sinclair, M., Ashkanasy, N. M., Chattopadhyay, P., Affective antecedents of intuitive decision making. J. Manag. Organ., 2010, 16, 382-39810.1017/S1833367200002030Search in Google Scholar

[43] Sinclair, M., Ashkanasy, N. M., Intuition: Myth or a decision-making tool? Manag. Learn., 2005, 36, 353–37010.1177/1350507605055351Search in Google Scholar

[44] Steiner R., Intuitive Thinking as a Spiritual Path; A Philosophy of Freedom. Centennial Edition, Anthroposophic Press, Hudson, New York, USA, 1995Search in Google Scholar

[45] Steiner R., Knowledge of the Higher Worlds and How it is Achieved, Rudolf Steiner Press, Forest Row, UK, 2012Search in Google Scholar

[46] Steiner R., The Stages of Higher Knowledge, Anthroposophic Press, Hudson, New York, USA, 1967Search in Google Scholar

[47] Van Breda J., Swilling M., The guiding logics and principles for designing emergent transdisciplinary research processes: learning experiences and reflections from a transdisciplinary urban case study in Enkanini informal settlement, South Africa, Sustain. Sci., 2018, DOI: 10.1007/s11625-018-0606-x10.1007/s11625-018-0606-xSearch in Google Scholar

[48] Van Eijk T., Farming Systems Research and Spirituality, PhD dissertation, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands, 1998Search in Google Scholar

[49] Van Haaften E.H., Linking Ecology and Culture: Towards a Psychology of Environmental Degradation, PhD dissertation, University of Tilburg, Tilburg, the Netherlands, 2002Search in Google Scholar

[50] Vangala R.N.K., Hiremath B.N., Banerjee A., A Theoretical Framework for Knowledge Management in Indian Agricultural Organizations, In: Proceedings of the 2014 International Conference on Information and Communication Technology for Competitive Strategies (November 2014, Udaipur, Rajasthan, India), 2014, Article 610.1145/2677855.2677861Search in Google Scholar

[51] Zylstra M. J., Exploring meaningful nature experience, connectedness with nature, and the revitalization of transformative education for sustainability. PhD dissertation, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa, 2014Search in Google Scholar

[52] Zylstra M.J., Knight A.T., Esler K.J., Lesley L.L.L., Connectedness as a Core Conservation Concern: An Interdisciplinary Review of Theory and a Call for Practice, Springer Sci. Rev., 2014, 2, 119–14310.1007/s40362-014-0021-3Search in Google Scholar

[53] Zylstra M.J., Knight A.T., Esler K.J., Lesley L.L.L., Integrating multiple perspectives on the human-nature relationship: A reply to Fletcher 2017, J. Environ. Educ., 2018, DOI: 10.1080/00958964.2018.149758210.1080/00958964.2018.1497582Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2018-08-30
Accepted: 2019-05-23
Published Online: 2019-07-11

© 2019 Saskia G. von Diest, published by De Gruyter

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Public License.

Downloaded on 4.3.2024 from
Scroll to top button