Skip to content
BY 4.0 license Open Access Published by De Gruyter Open Access December 31, 2021

The use of endophytic growth-promoting bacteria to alleviate salinity impact and enhance the chlorophyll, N uptake, and growth of rice seedling

  • Mieke Rochimi Setiawati EMAIL logo , Listiani Sugiyono , Nadia Nuraniya Kamaluddin and Tualar Simarmata
From the journal Open Agriculture

Abstract

Soil salinity is a major limiting factor for crop productivity, which increases continuously due to climate change. This barrier can possibly be overcome with the occurrence of halotolerant endophytic bacteria which reportedly plays an important role in protecting plants against various environmental stresses. Therefore, plant growth-promoting microbes are used in agriculture as an inexpensive and eco-friendly technology to enhance crop productivity in saline areas. In this study, the three isolates with nitrogen fixation ability were applied for mitigation of salt stress. The isolates were coded as C3A1, C8D2, and K10P4 and applied to rice plants by seed priming method. Furthermore, they were given as single innoculant or combined as a consortium compared to control, which was without the addition of endophytic bacteria, while the inoculated seed was planted on saline semisolid Fahraeus media at 4 dS m−1. The results showed that the single isolate of K10P4 endophytic bacteria increased the dry weight of rice plants, N uptake, and chlorophyll of plants in saline conditions. The combination of K10P4 isolate with C8D2 was synergistic and increased the population of endophytic bacteria in root tissue and chlorophyll content compared to the combination of C3A1 or three isolates. Meanwhile, the use of the 16S ribosomal RNA method on C3A1, C8D2, and K10P4 indentified the isolates as Ochrobactrum tritici (C3A1), Pseudomonas stutzeri (C8D2), and Pseudomonas stutzeri (K10P4).

1 Introduction

Agricultural land close to the coastal area is vulnerable to salinity stress [1] because salts from the sea easily enter the ground through tides and seawater intrusion. In the long term, constant tidal wave will lead to salt saturation in soil and ground water sources [2]. Salt buildup in upper soil layer may also occur as the water used for irrigation often contains high levels of salt. Similarly, climate change, massive groundwater use, increased use of poor quality water in irrigation, and the introduction of large-scale irrigation associated with intensive agriculture and poor drainage accelerates the emergence of various salt-related environmental stress [3]. Land irrigation that uses salt-contaminated water for a long period can accumulate NaCl in the soil and damage crops [4], which affects crop growth and productivity worldwide [5]. Based on the Natural Resources Conservation Service criteria, one indicator to determine land salinity threat is the value of electric conductivity (EC), where the soil is considered to be high in salinity when the EC value is >4 dS m−1 [6,7]. In Indonesia, the main rice-producing areas are along the northern coast of the island of Java. The provinces of East, Central, West Java and Banten are the four provinces in north coast of Java with the coastal length of 1,316  km. These areas usually experience decline in rice production during the dry season. In 2017, seawater intrusion hit around 540,000 ha of rice fields during the dry season and the rice yields decreased by an average of 0.65 t ha−1 compared to the rainy season [8].

Salinity affects agricultural production [9], reduces the productivity of many crops [3], and causes a complexly adverse effect between morphology, physiology, and biochemical processes such as seed germination, plant growth, and the absorption of nutrients and water in plants [10]. Therefore, plants that grow on saline soils experience high osmotic stress, poisoning, and crop nutrient disorders, or equilibrium [11]. Soil salinity is caused by the accumulation of salt in the soil and causes decrease in fertility. Its effect on plants includes osmotic stress and ionic toxicity, which affect all the major plant processes, such as photosynthesis, cellular metabolism, and nutrition [12].

The use of saline soil for agriculture requires handling salinity issues; meanwhile, using an ecofriendly and sustainable approach will be the microbe-based strategy of reducing salt stress [5]. This includes the use of endophytic bacteria living in saline soils in rice plants, which colonize plant tissue without causing harm to the host and can be beneficial to plants [13]. However, the bacteria can be detrimental when their presence is pathogenic in plants, and neutral when they do not affect plants.

Saline soil habitats are generally low in nitrogen (N) [14], therefore N inputs from N2-fixing bacteria are very important in this environment. Salt effect in plant habitat can interfere with water and nutrients (especially N) absorption from the soil and are toxic to most organisms [15]. Potential of indigenous rice microbiomes, which mostly are endophytic, epiphytic, and rhizoplane diazotrophs, should be explored in order to obtain efficient N-fixing microorganims that can be directly or genetically improved and sustain crop production under the N-deficient condition and also decrease the application of chemical fertilizer [16]. The N2-fixing bacteria that live in saline soils colonize the rhizosphere and salt-tolerant plants because of the presence of root exudate. The rhizosphere of the plant is very active and abundant in microbial habitat due to the secretion of plant root exudates of various nutritive substances and the microbial community in the surroundings. Therefore, the existence of nutritional substances in the rhizosphere plays an important role in the development and activity of the microbial community [17]. These microbes are associated with plant roots or live inside the host plant tissue.

Endophytic bacteria improve plant nutrition by fixing nitrogen from the air. Its contribution as plant nitrogen supplier is greater than that of free-living bacteria because fixed nitrogen is distributed and can be utilized immediately and loss from leaching is close to negligible. Furthermore, endophytes are better than the other rhizospheric and rhizoplane bacteria by providing fixed nitrogen directly to their host [18]. This is because nitrogen-fixing endosymbiont supplies nitrogen that is biologically fixed directly to plants [19]. Study on the application of superior stain of nitrogen-fixing endophytes in rice plant can aid the nitrogen uptake in plants, especially in the saline land ecosystem. This study observes the effect of a single and consortium of endophytic bacterial isolate addition towards the total population, N uptake, chlorophyll content, and rice plant dry weight in saline conditions.

2 Materials and methods

Endophytic bacterial isolates used were isolated from the tissues of rice plants grown in saline soils of Cirebon and Karawang district in West Java. These isolates were selected by acetylene reduction assay method in order to their ability to fixate nitrogen. The three isolates of N-fixing endophytic bacteria were from the paddy plants in saline soils of two locations; two isolates were obtained from the root and leaf tissues of paddy plants from Cirebon (codes C3A1 and C8D2), while that from leaf tissue of paddy plants were from Karawang (code K10P4). Meanwhile, the three isolates from paddy plants were inoculated in rice seeds planted on Fahraeus semisolid saline medium with EC value of 4 dS m−1 with the addition of single and a combination of the three isolates. The rice seeds also were grown on sterile straw paper under saline conditions. Straw paper was immersed in 4 dS m−1 sodium chloride solution based on the equation y = 0.653 + 8.19x obtained from the standard NaCl and EC curves and sterilized using an autoclave at 121°C for 15  min.

The semisolid Fahraeus media used consisted of NaCl, MgSO4, CaCl2, KH2PO4, 2H2O, ferric citrate, yeast extract, and microelement ingredients, which were dissolved in distilled water of 1 L. Sodium chloride was added into semisolid Fahraeus medium and salinity level was adjusted to 4 dS m−1 based on the equation y = 1.064 + 7.649x which was obtained from the the standard NaCl and EC curves. One agar slant of endophytic bacteria isolate was suspended into 200 mL of sterile nutrient broth and incubated at room temperature (±25°C) on a 120 rpm rotary shaker for 24 h. At the end of incubation, the bacterial density of the suspension was 108 CFU mL−1.

The samples were completely randomized and consisted of eight treatments. Each treatment was replicated three times. The treatments tested were control (untreated), isolate C3A1, isolate C8D2, isolate K10P4, bacterium consortium of isolates C3A1 and C8D2, bacterium consortium of isolates C3A1 and K10P4, bacterium consortium of isolates C8D2 and K10P4, and bacterium consortium of isolates C3A1, C8D2, and K10P4.

The data variance was analyzed by IBM SPSS version 17. If variance was detected, data were subjected to Duncan’s Multiple Range Test with 5% confidence level. Observations were made on several parameters such as the population of endophytic bacteria, chlorophyll content, N uptake of rice plants, and dry weight of plants. Furthermore, the population of endophytic bacteria was analyzed by the pour plate count method. For measuring dry weight, plants were dehydrated in a 80°C oven for 48  h and placed inside a desiccator for 2 h until a constant weight was achieved. The analysis of chlorophyll content was performed with a chlorophyll meter soil plant analysis development (SPAD). In the measurement of chlorophyll, the sample used consisted of two plants with each comprising three points: upper, middle, and lower leaves. The equation for conversion from SPAD (chorophyll content index, CCI) to μmol m−2 for rice plants is: −64 + 57*(CCI)0.68 based on ref. [20], while the N content of rice plants was analyzed using the Kjeldahl method.

The DNA from bacterial isolates of rice plants was extracted using the Wizard DNA genomic extraction kit (Promega), and the 16S rRNA gene was amplified with primers 27F (5′ AGA GTT TGA TCC TGG CTC AG 3′) and 1492R (5′ GTT TAC CTT GTT ACG ACT T 3′) [21]. The amplification process was carried out by mixing 2 µL of printed DNA, 1.0 µL of each primer, 12.5 µL of GoTaq Green Master Mix 2×, and nuclease-free water to a volume of 25  µL. This was conducted under these conditions: initial denaturation at 94°C for 5 min, followed by 30 cycles of denaturation at 94°C for 1.5 min, primer attachment at 55°C for 45 s, polymerization for 1 min at 72°C, and polymerization time extension for 1 min in the last cycle. The reaction was stopped when temperature declined to 15°C and the purification of PCR products was carried out by the ethanol precipitation method [22].

3 Results and discussion

3.1 Population of endophytic bacteria in roots and shoot of rice plant

The inoculant density or inoculated population at the time of seed treatment was 1 × 107 CFU mL−1 and when it was isolated from rice plants, the density ranged from 1.0 × 104 to 1.0 × 105 CFU mL−1 (Table 1). The population density was applied based on a study [23] recommendation of 1.0 × 107 CFU mL−1. Application with this population density has succeeded in roots and leaves colonization of cotton plants with the population of endophytes being 1.1 × 103 to 8.7 × 105 CFU g−1 in root tissue and 1.6 × 104  CFU g−1 in leaf weight. Application of 5 × 108 CFU mL−1 of endophytic bacteria in canola plantations successfully colonized 104−107 CFU g−1 of bacteria per plant [24].

Table 1

Endophytic bacteria population (×104) in root and shoot of rice plant in saline media

Treatments Root SD Shoot SD
Control (NB) 00.00 0.00a 00.00 0.00a
C3A1 (isolates from rice plant roots from Cirebon) 10.05 3.24ab 31.80 8.36c
C8D2 (isolates from rice plant leaves from Cirebon) 59.83 28.20c 16.32 17.40abc
K10P4 (isolates from rice plant leaves from Karawang) 10.14 12.55ab 13.57 21.59abc
C3A1 and C8D2 33.87 4.26bc 08.98 6.52ab
C3A1 and K10P4 40.77 33.39bc 25.40 12.61bc
C8D2 and K10P4 13.37 3.67ab 01.10 0.00a
C3A1, C8D2, and K10P4 27.50 9.92ab 04.40 5.72ab

Numbers followed with the same letter in superscript are not significantly different (Duncan Multiple Range Test, α = 5%).

Based on the observations, the highest population of endophytic bacteria was in the roots. This is in line with a previous study that identified the plant roots with a higher population density of endophytic bacteria compared to other parts above the ground [25]. The highest population of the bacteria in roots of rice plants was in the C8D2 single isolate and C8D2-K10P4 consortium. In the shoot, only C3A1 was detected. Synergism between two or more types of microbes occurs when microorganisms do not compete in the same nutrient source. Similarly, mixed microbial cultures also allowed their components to interact with each other synergistically via physical or biochemical activities, thereby simultaneously improving viability [26]. Soaking seeds with high bacterial density gives bacteria a higher chance of invading due to the differences in suspension pressure, which pressed the cell into the seeds through the pedicel. Therefore, when the seeds are removed from the suspension, the bacteria remain in the embryo [27].

3.2 Plant N uptake in saline media

The observations showed that the highest plant N uptake was obtained through the addition of K10P4 isolates in the form of a single bacterial isolate treatment (Table 2). This occurred because, in the previous stages of the study, K10P4 isolate produced the highest phytohormone on GA3 growth hormone, which stimulated the nutrient uptake of N, P, and K.

Table 2

Effect of single and consortium of endophytic bacteria on N uptake of rice plants in saline media

Treatments N (%) SD
Control (NB) 1.52 0.19a
C3A1 (isolates from rice plant roots from Cirebon) 2.72 0.15c
C8D2 (isolates from rice plant leaves from Cirebon) 2.44 0.35bc
K10P4 (isolates from rice plant leaves from Karawang) 3.52 0.46d
C3A1 and C8D2 2.35 0.26bc
C3A1 and K10P4 2.27 0.26bc
C8D2 and K10P4 2.24 0.33bc
C3A1, C8D2, and K10P4 1.95 0.28ab

Numbers followed with the same letter in superscript are not significantly different (Duncan Multiple Range Test, α = 5%).

Furthermore, the highest plant N content was in the K10P4 treatment of a single endophytic bacterial isolate because the synergistic effect was not in a consortium. Meanwhile, bacteria nitrogen fixation is a natural process of changing atmospheric nitrogen (N2) into a simple soluble nontoxic form ( NH 4 + primarily) which is used by plant cells for the synthesis of various biomolecules. It is one of the major sources of nitrogen for plants and an important step of distribution in the ecosystem [28].

Synergistic bacterial consortium isolates showed better results compared to the isolates in a single culture. It also stimulated physical and biochemical activities by increasing several beneficial aspects of plant physiology [29]. Meanwhile, synergism between two or more types of microbes occurs when there is no competition in the process of getting the nutrients needed by each microbe. Therefore, both microbes provide a beneficial effect on the host plant through a greater supply of nitrogen when one releases the metabolites needed by other microbes in fulfilling nutrients. A study showed that the use of a single inoculant Acinetobacter sp. which has the highest nitrogenase activity leads to a lower N supply when compared to the use of Pseudomonas sp. and Acinetobacter sp. mixture at each level of N fertilizer dosage [26].

Nitrogen is part of the chlorophyll molecule that controls the ability of plants to carry out photosynthesis. It acts as a constituent of chlorophyll, where a sufficient amount of chlorophyll gives greener and more durable leaves. Meanwhile, nitrogen-deficient plants can be detected through the yellowish to dark greenish leaves, which is closely related to photosynthesis rate and grain yield in rice. It is also a sensitive indicator for the dynamic changes in plants, therefore, its status monitoring during the growing period is essential to achieve efficient fertilizer management and higher grain yield in rice production [30].

3.3 Chlorophyll content of rice plants

The application of endophytic bacterial consortium increases the chlorophyll content of leaves of rice plants (Table 3). The highest chlorophyll content was discovered in the application of K10P4 and C8D2 endophytic bacterial isolates, and their combination.

Table 3

Chlorophyll content of rice plants due to endophytic bacteria application in saline media

Treatments Chlorophyll
CCI μmol m−2 SD
Control (NB) 12.06 21.01 3.59a
C3A1 (isolates from rice plant roots from Cirebon) 19.85 55.28 3.69abc
C8D2 (isolates from rice plant leaves from Cirebon) 21.95 63.70 1.61c
K10P4 (isolates from rice plant leaves from Karawang) 22.92 67.51 4.97c
C3A1 and C8D2 15.43 36.49 3.95abc
C3A1 and K10P4 12.31 22.17 7.55ab
C8D2 and K10P4 20.13 56.40 2.96bc
C3A1, C8D2, and K10P4 13.85 29.39 1.07ab

Conversion equation for CCI to μmol m−2 (−64 + 57 *[CCI]0.68) based on ref. [20]. Numbers followed with the same letter in superscript are not significantly different (Duncan Multiple Range Test, α = 5%).

During photosynthesis, the function of chlorophyll is the formation of plant biomass and the capacity of photosynthesis. According to Moharana and Dutta [31], the total chlorophyll content in rice plants ranges from 1.13 mg g−1 to 7.26 mg g−1 in the reproductive phase of rice cultivation. Dobermann and Fairhurst [32] also reported a SPAD value of 35 for the most developed upper leaves used as a value of the N deficiency limit in the superior varieties of indica rice that were transplanted. Moreover, the limit for direct planting is SPAD 32–33 and was lower in the observed values due to the growth phase of plants aged 21 days after plantation. Chlorophyll synthesis such as Chlorophyll a (C55H72O5N4Mg) and Chlorophyll b (C55H70O6N4Mg) requires certain factors such as light intensity, nitrogen, magnesium, iron, temperature, water, and trace elements (Mn, Cu, and Zn). If any of the factor is incomplete, the synthesis of chlorophyll will be affected [33].

The rice seedlings introduced with isolates K10P4 and C8D2 endophytic bacteria which can fix nitrogen also have a higher chlorophyll compared to control seedlings. The high chlorophyll value measured on the inoculated oil palm seedlings shows a good sign of plant health and it is closely related to photosynthesis activity and N status of the leaves. Lack of N in leaves can be identified through loss of green pigment as observed in control seedlings which reduced their photosynthesis ability [34]. Nitrogen is a macronutrient needed by plants in large quantities and is a major factor in the formation and constituent of chlorophyll in the form of protein. Furthermore, its influence on photosynthesis and other pathways is dependent on the genotype and the leaf region [35]. The formation of chlorophyll begins with the fixation of N2 gas present in the soil and air by bacteria and converted to ammonia, which is transported through the xylem to the leaves. Therefore, the larger the quantity of ammonia in the leaves, the more chlorophyll will be formed [36].

3.4 Dry weight of rice plants

The results of this study showed that endophytic bacteria consortium did not increase the percentage of germination compared to a single isolate. Significant increase in plant’s dry weight was detected in plants treated with K10P4 isolate (Table 4). Furthermore, both the single inoculate and consortium treatments showed a greater dry plant weight compared to control. This indicated that carrying a consortium and one endophytic bacterial isolate is good at increasing plant dry weight. Treatment with all endophytic bacterial isolates also increased the root’s fresh and dry weights of inoculated rice plants. Therefore, rice seedlings’ growth promotion can be attributed to the multiple plant growth-promoting properties of inoculated bacteria such as indole-3-acetic acid production, nitrogen fixation, and phosphate solubilization [37].

Table 4

Effect of endophytic bacteria on dry weight of rice plant in saline media

Treatments Dry plant weight (mg) SD
Control (NB) 13.87 0.21a
C3A1 (isolates from rice plant roots from Cirebon) 18.69 0.44b
C8D2 (isolates from rice plant leaves from Cirebon) 18.97 0.37bc
K10P4 (isolates from rice plant leaves from Karawang) 20.93 0.60d
C3A1 and C8D2 18.69 0.44b
C3A1 and K10P4 18.69 0.44b
C8D2 and K10P4 20.41 2.20cd
C3A1, C8D2, and K10P4 19.24 0.44bc

Numbers followed with the same letter in superscript are not significantly different (Duncan Multiple Range Test, α = 5%).

An increase in rice plant growth is caused by the ability of endophytic bacteria to produce growth hormones. Meanwhile, plant growth hormone regulates several aspects of growth and development such as the formation and maintenance of meristem tissue [38]. A previous study has shown that rice plants inoculated with antioxidant-producing bacteria have high dry weight compared to controls [39]. The application of endophytic bacteria also increases the dry weight of plants because the production of antioxidant enzymes by bacteria reduces the chloroplast damage for photosynthesis to proceed more optimally.

The dry plant weight is strongly influenced by the availability of endophytic diazotroph bacteria. According to Ji et al. [40], plants treated with CB-R05 endophytic isolate were taller with a significantly enhanced dry weight of leaf and root compared to the control. The five endophytic isolates (KW7-S22, KW7-S06, SW521-L21, CB-R05, and HS-R01), particularly CB-R05, can be used to facilitate an effective growth promotion in rice plants. Furthermore, the CB-R05 isolate showed a more significant growth effect than the type from the rhizosphere. Dongjin plants treated with CB-R05 isolate also showed a significant growth-promoting effect than the untreated control.

3.5 Identification of endophytic bacteria

The results of molecular identification of bacteria types against three isolates with codes C3A1 (origin from rice plant roots from Cirebon), C8D2 (origin from rice plant leaves from Cirebon), and K10P4 (origin from rice plant leaves from Karawang) are shown in Table 5.

Table 5

Molecular endophytic bacteria identification

No. Isolate code Results of molecular identification
Nucleotide order and type (% similarity)
1 C3A1 GCGCACGTAGGCGGACTTTTAAGTCAGGGGTGAAATCCCGGGGCTCAACCCCGGAACT GCCTTTGATACTGGAAGTCTTGAGTATGGTAGAGGTGAGTGGAATTCCGAGTGTAGAGGT GAAATTCGTAGATATTCGGAGGAACACCAGTGGCGAAGGCGGCTCACTGGACCATTACTG ACGCTGAGGTGCGAAAGCGTGGGGAGCAAACAGGATTAGATACCCTGGTAGTCCACGCCGT AAACGATGAATGTTAGCCGTTGGGGAGTTTACTCTTCGGTGGCGCAGCTAACGCATTAAAC ATTCCGCCTGGGGAGTACGGTCGCAAGATTAAAACTCAAAGGAATTGACGGGGGCCCGCA CAAGCGGTGGAGCATGTGGTTTAATTCGAAGCAACGCGCAGAACCTTACCAGCCCTTGACAT ACCGGTCGCGGACACAGAGATGTGTCTTTCAGTTTGGCTGGACCGGATACAGGTGCTGCATG GCTGTCGTCAGCTCGTGTCGTGAGATGTTGGGTTAAGTCCCGCAACGAGCGCAACCCTCGCC CTTAGTTGCCAGCATTTAGTTGGGCACTCTAAGGGGACTGCCGGTGATAAGCCGAGAGGAA GGTGGGGATGACGTCAAGTCCTCATGGCCCTTACGGGCTGGGCTACACACGTGCTACAATGG TGGTGACAGTGGGCAGCGAGCACGCGAGTGTGAGCTAATCTCCAAAAGCCATCTCAGTTCGG ATTGCACTCTGCAACTCGAGTGCATGAAGTTGGAATCGCTAGTAATCGCGGATCAGCATGC CGCGGTGAATACGTTCCCGGGCCTTGTACAC
Ochrobactrum tritici 16S ribosomal RNA gene, partial sequence (100%)
2 C8D2 CGCGTAGGTGGTTCGTTAAGTTGGATGTGAAAGCCCCGGGCTCAACCTGGGAACTGCCTCCA AAACTGGCGAGCTAGAGTATGGCAGAGGGTGGTGGAATTTCCTGTGTAGCGGTGAAATGCG TAGATATAGGAAGGAACACCAGTGGCGAAGGCGACCACCTGGGCTAATACTGACACTGAGGTG CGAAAGCGTGGGGAGCAAACAGGATTAGATACCCTGGTAGTCCACGCCGTAAACGATGTCGAC TAGCCGTTGGGATCCTTGAGATCTTAGTGGCGCAGCTAACGCATTAAGTCGACCGCCTGGGGAG TACGGCCGCAAGGTTAAAACTCAAATGAATTGACGGGGGCCCGCACAAGCGGTGGAGCATGTGGTTTAATTCGAAGCAACGCGAAGAACCTTACCAGGCCTTGACATGCAGAGAACTTTCCAGAGATGGATTGGTGCCTTCGGGAACTCTGACACAGGTGCTGCATGGCTGTCGTCAGCTCGTGTCGTGAGATGTTGGGTTAAGTCCCGTAACGAGCGCAACCCTTGTCCTTAGTTACCAGCACGTTAAGGTGGGCACTCTAAGGAGACTGCCGGTGACAAACCGGAGGAAGGTGGGGATGACGTCAAGTCATCATGGCCCTTACGGCCTGGGCTACACACGTGCTACAATGGTCGGTACAAAGGGTTGCCAATCCGCGAGGTGGAGCTAATCCCATAAAACCGATCGTAG
Pseudomonas stutzeri 16S ribosomal RNA gene, partial sequence (99%)
3 K10P4 CGCGCGTAGGTGGTTCGTTAAGTTGGATGTGAAAGCCCCGGGCTCAACCTGGGAACTGCATCCAAAACTGGCGAGCTAGAGTATGGCAGAGGGTGGTGGAATTTCCTGTGTAGCGGTGAAATGCGTAGATATAGGAAGGAACACCAGTGGCGAAGGCGACCACCTGGGCTAATACTGACACTGAGGTGCGAAAGCGTGGGGAGCAAACAGGATTAGATACCCTGGTAGTCCACGCCGTAAACGATGTCGACTAGCCGTTGGGATCCTTGAGATCTTAGTGGCGCAGCTAACGCATTAAGTCGACCGCCTGGGGAGTACGGCCGCAAGGTTAAAACTCAAATGAATTGACGGGGGCCCGCACAAGCGGTGGAGCATGTGGTTTAATTCGAAGCAACGCGAAGAACCTTACCAGGCCTTGACATGCAGAGAACTTTCCAGAGATGGATTGGTGCCTTCGGGAACTCTGACACAGGTGCTGCATGGCTGTCGTCAGCTCGTGTCGTGAGATGTTGGGTTAAGTCCCGTAACGAGCGCAACCCTTGTCCTTAGTTACCAGCACGTTAAGGTGGGCACTCTAAGGAGACTGCCGGTGACAAACCGGAGGAAGGTGGGGATGACGTCAAGTCATCATGGCCCTTACGGCCTGGGCTACACACGTGCTACAATGGTCGGTACAAAGGGTTGCCAAGCCGCGAGGTGGAGCTAATCCCATAAAACCGATCGTAGTCCGGATCGCAGTCTGCAACTCGACTGCGTGAAGTCGGAATCGCTAGTAATCGTGAATCATAATGTCACGGTGAATACGTTCCCGGGCCTTGTCGA
Pseudomonas stutzeri 16S ribosomal RNA gene, partial sequence (99%)

Endophytic N-fixing bacteria identified by C8D2 and K10P4 are Pseudomonas stutzeri. Meanwhile, previous studies showed that the ability of nitrogen fixation is determined by the characteristics of nif genes and nitrogenase enzymes in Pseudomonas stutzeri [41], which increases the growth and fixation of N2 in upland rice [42,43]. Inoculation with N2-fixing Pseudomonas stutzeri A1501 significantly altered the diazotrophic communities of the rhizosphere and root surface composition, where it became dominant in the rhizosphere, increased the indigenous diazotrophs’ population and ammonia oxidizers [44], and was used as seed treatment [45]. According to Hakeem and Akhtar [46], Pseudomonas mendocina Khrs2, Pseudomonas stutzeri Khsr2, and Pseudomonas putida Khsr4 can produce indole-3-acetic acid, gibberellic acid, trans-zeatin riboside, and abscisic acid. In the rhizosphere colonization of rice plants by Pseudomonas putida A15, Rediers et al. [47] discovered an expression of miaA involved in the production of trans-zeatin cytokinins and associated with plant growth hormones.

Endophytic N2-fixing bacteria identified from C3A1 are Ochrobactrum tritici, which was originally isolated from wheat rhizoplane [48] and recently discovered from wastewater [49]. A previous study has shown that endophytic bacteria in rice seeds consisted of Ochrobactrum spp., namely R3–O. tritici and R12–O. grignonense [50]. Anthropactic anthropic isolated from Helianthus tuberosus plants has the effect of stimulating plant growth in the form of N fixation symbiosis, optimizing the formation of root morphology and increasing plant absorption [51]. Ochrobactrum intermedium L115 can increase the dry weight of the upper parts and roots of plants, indicating that the bacteria have the ability as plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria, which is capable of producing indole acetic acid, siderophore, and ACC deaminase [52]. Furthermore, the bacteria also have a high tolerance to high temperature and 300 mM NaCl.

4 Conclusion

The isolate of K10P4 endophytic Pseudomonas stutzeri bacteria from Karawang increases the dry weight, N uptake, and chlorophyll by 20.93 mg, 3.5%, and 67.51 μmol m−2, respectively, of rice plants in saline conditions. Furthermore, its combination with C8D2 synergistically increased the population of endophytic bacteria in root tissue and chlorophyll content compared to the combination with C3A1 isolate or the combination of the three isolates. Meanwhile, the isolates were identified as follows: C3A1 endophytic bacteria from rice plant roots of Cirebon (Ochrobactrum tritici), C8D2 from rice plant leaves of Cirebon (Pseudomonas stutzeri), and K10P4 from rice plant leaves of Karawang (Pseudomonas stutzeri).

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the Universitas Padjadjaran for supporting and providing laboratory facilities and financial support of the Academic Leadership Grant (ALG) 2020.

  1. Funding information: This research is part of Academic Leadership Grant (ALG) research, funded by Universitas Padjadjaran Indonesia.

  2. Author contributions: M.R.S. and L.S.: designed the experiments; M.R.S., T.S., and L.S.: designed methodology and conceptualization; N.N.K. and L.S.: prepared the manuscript with contributions from all co-authors; L.S. and M.R.S.: writing original draft; L.S. and N.N.K.: writing review and editing; M.R.S. and N.N.K.: review and writing final manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

  3. Conflict of interest: The authors state no conflict of interest.

  4. Data availability statement: The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

[1] Zelensky G. Rice on saline soils of Russia. In: Chataigner J, editor. 113 Future of Water Management for Rice in Mediterranean Climate Areas: Proceedings of the Workshops; 1999. p. 109–13.Search in Google Scholar

[2] Shaaban M, Abid M, Abou-Shanab RAI. Amelioration of salt affected soils in rice paddy system by application of organic and inorganic amendments. Plant Soil Environ. 2013;59(5):227–33.10.17221/881/2012-PSESearch in Google Scholar

[3] Machado RMA, Serralheiro RP. Soil salinity: effect on vegetable crop growth. Management practices to prevent and mitigate soil salinization. Horticul. 2017;3(2):30.10.3390/horticulturae3020030Search in Google Scholar

[4] Rezaei M, Davatgar N, Ashrafzade A, Pirmoradian N, Khaledian MR, Kavosi M, et al. Intermittent irrigation: a procedure to use saline water in rice cultivation. In ICID 21st Congress. Tehran; 2011. p. 55–64.Search in Google Scholar

[5] Srividhya S, Kumari N, Surendranath R, Jeyakumar P. Role of rhizobacteria in alleviating salt stress. In: Molecular aspects of plant beneficial microbes in agriculture. Vol. 1; 2020. p. 279–94. 10.1016/b978-0-12-818469-1.00023-7.Search in Google Scholar

[6] Food and Agriculture Organization. 2005. 20 Things to know about the impact of salt water on agricultural land in Aceh province. Banda Aceh: United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization.Search in Google Scholar

[7] Horneck DA, Elssworth JW, Hopkins BG, Sullivan dan DM, Stevens RG. Managing salt-affected soils for crop production. Oregon, United States: Oregon State University/A Pacific Northwest Extension Publication; 2007.Search in Google Scholar

[8] Statistics Indonesia. Statistical Yearbook of Indonesia 2017; Jakarta, Indonesia: Statistics Indonesia; 2017. p. 750.Search in Google Scholar

[9] Hu Y, Schmidhalter U. Limitation of salt stress to plant growth. Plant Toxicol. 2002;4:191–224.10.1201/9780203023884.ch5Search in Google Scholar

[10] Akbarimoghaddam H, Galavi M, Ghanbari A, Panjehkeh N. Salinity effects on seed germination and seedling growth of bread wheat cultivars. Trakia J Sci. 2011;9(1):43–50.Search in Google Scholar

[11] Shrivastava P, Kumar R. Soil salinity: a serious environmental issue and plant growth promoting bacteria as one of the tools for its alleviation. Saudi J Biol Sci. 2015;22(2):123–31. 10.1016/j.sjbs.2014.12.001.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[12] Safdar H, Amin A, Shafiq Y, Ali A, Yasin R, Shoukat A, et al. A review: Impact of salinity on plant growth. Nat Sci. 2019;17(1):34–40.Search in Google Scholar

[13] Hallmann J, Quadt-Hallmann A, Mahafee WF, Kloepper JW. Bacterial endophytes in agricultural crops. Can J Microbiol. 1997;43:895–914.10.1139/m97-131Search in Google Scholar

[14] Zahran HH, Ahmad MS, Afkar EA. Isolation and characterization of nitrogen fixing moderate halophilic bacteria from saline soils of Egypt. J Basic Microbiol. 1995;35:269–75.10.1002/jobm.3620350412Search in Google Scholar

[15] Zahran HH. Diversity, adaptation and activity of the bacterial flora in saline environments. Biol Fertil Soils. 1997;25:211–23.10.1007/s003740050306Search in Google Scholar

[16] Banik A, Dash GK, Swain P, Kumar U, Mukhopadhyay SK, Dangar TK. Application of rice (Oryza sativa L.) root endophytic diazotrophic Azotobacter sp. strain Avi2 (MCC 3432) can increase rice yield under green house and field condition. Microbiol Res. 2019;219:56–65.10.1016/j.micres.2018.11.004Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[17] Patel JS, Yadav SK, Bajpai R, Teli B, Rashid Md M. PGPR secondary metabolites: an active syrup for improvement of plant health. In: Molecular aspects of plant beneficial microbes in agriculture. Vol. 1. India: Academic Press; 2020. p. 195–208. 10.1016/B978-0-12-818469-1.00017-1.Search in Google Scholar

[18] Cocking EC. Endophytic colonization of plant roots by nitrogen-fixing bacteria. Plant Soil. 2003;252:169–75.10.1023/A:1024106605806Search in Google Scholar

[19] Stoltzfus JR, So R, Malarvithi PP, Ladha JK, de Bruijn FJ. Isolation of endophytic bacteria from rice and assessment of their potential for supplying rice with biologically fixed nitrogen. Plant Soil. 1997;194:25–36.10.1007/978-94-011-5744-5_4Search in Google Scholar

[20] Parry C, Blonquist M, Bugbee B. In situ measurement of leaf chlorophyll concentration: analysis of the optical/absolute relationship. Plant Cell Environ. 2014;7(11):2508–20. 10.1111/pce.12324.Search in Google Scholar

[21] Lane DJ. 16S/23S rRNA sequencing. In: Stackebrandt E, Goodfellow M, editors. Nucleic acid techniques in bacterial systematic. New York: John Wiley and Sons; 1991. 115–75.Search in Google Scholar

[22] Sambrook J, Russel DW. Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual. 2nd edn. New York (US): Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; 2001.Search in Google Scholar

[23] Quadt-Hallmann A, Hallmann J, Kloepper JW. Bacterial endophytes in cotton: location and interaction with other plant-associated bacteria. Can J Microbiol. 1997;43:254–9.10.1139/m97-035Search in Google Scholar

[24] Etesami HH, Hosseini M, Alikhani HA. In planta selection of plant growth promoting endophytic bacteria for rice (Oryza sativa L.). J Soil Sci Plant Nutr. 2014;14(2):491–503.10.4067/S0718-95162014005000039Search in Google Scholar

[25] Rosenblueth M, Martínez-Romero E. Rhizobium etli maize populations and their competitiveness for root colonization. Arch Microbiol. 2004;181:337–44.10.1007/s00203-004-0661-9Search in Google Scholar

[26] Wang Z, Chen Z, Fu X. Integrated effects of co-inoculation with phosphate-solubilizing bacteria and N2-fixing bacteria on microbial population and soil amendment under C deficiency. Int J Env Res Public Health. 2019;16:2442.10.3390/ijerph16132442Search in Google Scholar

[27] Fahey JW, Dimock MB, Tomasino SF, Taylor JM, Carlson PS. Genetically engineered endophytes as biocontrol agents: a case study in industry. In: Microbial ecology of leaves. New York: Springer-Verlag; 1991. p. 402–11.10.1007/978-1-4612-3168-4_20Search in Google Scholar

[28] Sur S, Bothra AK, Sen A. A symbiotic nitrogen fixation-A bioinformatics perspective. Biotechnol. 2010;9:257–73.10.3923/biotech.2010.257.273Search in Google Scholar

[29] Bashan Y. Inoculants of plant growth promoting bacteria for use in agriculture. Biotechnol Adv. 1998;16(4):729–70.10.1016/S0734-9750(98)00003-2Search in Google Scholar

[30] Esfahani R, Abbasi HRA, Rabiei A, Kavousi M. Improvement of nitrogen management in rice paddy fields using chlorophyll meter (SPAD). Paddy Water Env. 2008;6:181–8.10.1007/s10333-007-0094-6Search in Google Scholar

[31] Moharana S, Dutta S. Spatial variability of chlorophyll and nitrogen content of rice from hyperspectral imagery. ISPRS J Photogram Remote Sens. 2014;122:17–29.10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2016.09.002Search in Google Scholar

[32] Dobermann A, Fairhurst T. Rice nutrient disorders & nutrient management. Handbook Series. Philippine: Potash & Phosphate Institute (PPI), Potash & Phosphate Institute of Canada (PPIC) and International Rice Research Institute; 2000. p. 191.Search in Google Scholar

[33] Emamverdian A, Ding Y, Mokhberdoran F, Xie Y. Heavy metal stress and some mechanisms of plant defense response. Sci World J. 2015;2015:756120.10.1155/2015/756120Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[34] Razak BA, Sha‟ari SH, Fishal EMM, Bohari NH, Ibrahim H. The effectiveness of biological nitrogen fixation bacteria on the growth of oil palm seedlings. J Agricult Vet Sci. 2019;12(10):58–65.Search in Google Scholar

[35] Bassi D, Menossi M, Mattiello L. Nitrogen supply infuences photosynthesis establishment along the sugarcane leaf. Sci Rep. 2018;8:2327. 10.1038/s41598-018-20653-1.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[36] Gholizadeha A, Saberioonb M, Boruvkaa L, Wayayokc A, Soom MAM. Leaf chlorophyll and nitrogen dynamics and their relationship to lowland rice yield for site-specific paddy management. Inf Process Agricult. 2017;4(2017):259–68.Search in Google Scholar

[37] Kumarapeli KADV, Perera UID, Welikala N. Isolation and characterization of plant growth promoting endophytic diazotrophic bacteria from Sri Lankan rice cultivars and rapid screening for their effect on plant growth promotion. Int J Environ Agricult Biotechnol. 2018;3(4):1536–46.10.22161/ijeab/3.4.51Search in Google Scholar

[38] Su YH, Liu YB, Zhang XS. Auxin–cytokinin interaction regulates meristem development. Mol Plant. 2011;4(4):616–25.10.1093/mp/ssr007Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[39] Jha Y, Subramanian RB. Endophytic Pseudomonas pseudoalcaligenes shows better response against the Magnaporthe grisea than a rhizospheric Bacillus pumilus in Oryza sativa (Rice). Arch Phytopathol PFL. 2011;44:592–604.10.1080/03235400903145400Search in Google Scholar

[40] Ji SH, Gururani MA, Chun SC. Isolation and characterization of plant growth promoting endophytic diazotrophic bacteria from Korean rice cultivars. Microbiol Res. 2014;169:83–98.10.1016/j.micres.2013.06.003Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[41] Desnoues N, Lin M, Guo X, Ma L, Carrebo-Lopez R, Elmerich C. Nitrogen fixation genetics and regulation in a Pseudomonas stutzeri strain associated with rice. Microbiology. 2003;149:2251–62. 10.1099/mic.0.26270-0.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[42] Mahmud K, Makaju S, Ibrahim R, Missaoui A. Current progress in nitrogen fixing plants and microbiome research. Plants. 2020;9(1):97.10.3390/plants9010097Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[43] Pham VT, Rediers H, Ghequire MG, Nguyen HH, De Mot R, Vanderleyden J, et al. The plant growth-promoting effect of the nitrogen-fixing endophyte Pseudomonas stutzeri A15. Arch Microbiol. 2017;199(3):513–7.10.1007/s00203-016-1332-3Search in Google Scholar

[44] Li Y, Li Q, Chen S. Diazotroph Paenibacillus triticisoli BJ-18 drives the variation in bacterial, diazotrophic and fungal communities in the rhizosphere and root/shoot endosphere of maize. Int J Mol Sciences. 2021;22(3):1460.10.3390/ijms22031460Search in Google Scholar

[45] Islam S, Akanda AM, Prova A, Islam MT, Hossain MM. Isolation and identification of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria from cucumber rhizosphere and their effect on plant growth promotion and disease suppression. Front Microbiol. 2015;6:1360.10.3389/fmicb.2015.01360Search in Google Scholar

[46] Hakeem KR, Akhtar MS. Plant, soil and microbes. Mechanisms and molecular interactions. Vol. 2. Switzerland: Springer; 2016.10.1007/978-3-319-29573-2Search in Google Scholar

[47] Rediers H, Bonnecarrere V, Rainey PB, Hamonts K, Vanderleyden J, De Mot R. Development and application of a dapB-based in vivo expression technology system to study colonization of rice by the endophytic nitrogen-fixing bacterium Pseudomonas stutzeri A15. Appl Env Microbiol. 2003;69(11):6864–74.10.1128/AEM.69.11.6864-6874.2003Search in Google Scholar

[48] Lebuhn M, Bathe S, Achouak W, Hartmann A, Heulin T, Schloter M. Comparative sequence analysis of the internal transcribed spacer 1 of Ochrobactrum species. Syst Appl Microbiol Syst Appl Microbiol. 2006;29:265–75.10.1016/j.syapm.2005.11.003Search in Google Scholar

[49] Goris J, Boon N, Lebbe L, Verstraete W, De Vos P. Diversity of activated sludge bacteria receiving the 3-chloroaniline degradative plasmid pC1gfp. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2003;46:221–30.10.1016/S0168-6496(03)00231-9Search in Google Scholar

[50] Hardoim PR, Hardoim CCP, Overbeek LSV, Elsas JDV. Dynamics of seed borne rice endophytes on early plant growth stages. PLoS One. 2012;7(2):e30438.10.1371/journal.pone.0030438Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[51] Meng X, Yan D, Long X, Wang C, Liu Z, Rengel Z. Colonization by endophytic Ochrobactrum anthropi Mn1 promotes growth of Jerusalem artichoke. Microb Biotechnol. 2014;7(6):601–10.10.1111/1751-7915.12145Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[52] Paulucci NS, Gallarato LA, Reguera YB, Vicario JC, Cesari AB, de Lema MBG, et al. Arachis hypogaea PGPR isolated from Argentine soil modifies its lipids components in response to temperature and salinity. Microbiol Res. 2015;173:1–9.10.1016/j.micres.2014.12.012Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Received: 2020-12-21
Revised: 2021-11-05
Accepted: 2021-11-12
Published Online: 2021-12-31

© 2021 Mieke Rochimi Setiawati et al., published by De Gruyter

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Downloaded on 21.2.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/opag-2021-0059/html
Scroll to top button