Skip to content
BY-NC-ND 3.0 license Open Access Published by De Gruyter Open Access March 4, 2015

A Manifesto for an Introspective Digital Archaeology

Jeremy Huggett
From the journal Open Archaeology


This paper presents a grand challenge for Digital Archaeology of a different kind: it is not technical in and of itself, it does not seek out technological solutions for archaeological problems, it does not propose new digital tools or digital methodologies as such. Instead, it proposes a broader challenge, one which addresses the very stuff of archaeology: an understanding of how digital technologies influence and alter our relationships with data, from their creation and storage ultimately through to the construction of archaeological knowledge. It argues that currently this area is under-theorised, under-represented, and under-valued, yet it is increasingly fundamental to the way in which we arrive at an understanding of the past.


[1] Bridle, J., About The New Aesthetic, nd, Search in Google Scholar

[2] Bridle, J., #sxaesthetic, 2012, Search in Google Scholar

[3] Sterling, B., An essay on the New Aesthetic, Wired, 2012, 20 (4), Search in Google Scholar

[4] Bridle, J., The New Aesthetic and its Politics, 2013, Search in Google Scholar

[5] Thomas, J., Archaeology and Modernity, Routledge, Abingdon, 2004 10.4324/9780203491119Search in Google Scholar

[6] Berry, D.M., Critical Theory and the Digital, Bloomsbury Academic, London, 2014 Search in Google Scholar

[7] Huggett, J., What lies beneath: Lifting the lid on archaeological computing, In: Crysanthi, A., Murietta Flores, P., Papadopoulos, C. (Eds.), Thinking beyond the Tool: Archaeological computing and the interpretive process, British Archaeological Reports International Series 2344, Archeopress, Oxford, 2012 Search in Google Scholar

[8] Huggett, J., Archaeology and the new technological fetishism, Archeologia e Calcolatori, 2004, 15, 81-92 Search in Google Scholar

[9] Poster, M., The Mode of Information: Poststructuralism and Social Context. Polity, Cambridge, 1990. Search in Google Scholar

[10] Schnapp, J., Presner, T., The Digital Humanities Manifesto 2.0, 2009, Manifesto_V2.pdf Search in Google Scholar

[11] Huggett, J., The Past in Bits: towards an archaeology of information technology, Internet Archaeology, 2004, 15, http:// 10.11141/ia.15.4Search in Google Scholar

[12] Huggett, J., Core or periphery? Digital Humanities from an archaeological perspective, Historical Research / Historische Sozialforschung, 2012, 37 (3), 86-105 Search in Google Scholar

[13] Ihde, D., Philosophy of technology, In: Kemp, P., (Ed.) World and Worldhood, 2004, Springer, Netherlands, 2004 10.1007/1-4020-3027-4_3Search in Google Scholar

[14] Berry, D.M., The computational turn - thinking about the digital humanities, Culture Machine, 2011, 12, 1-22 Search in Google Scholar

[15] Berry, D.M., The Philosophy of Software: Code and Mediation in the Digital Age, Palgrave, London, 2011 Search in Google Scholar

[16] Denning, K., ‘The Storm of Progress’ and Archaeology for an Online Public, Internet Archaeology, 2004, 15. http://dx.doi. org/10.11141/ia.15.1 10.11141/ia.15.1Search in Google Scholar

[17] Florman, S., The Introspective Engineer, St Martin’s Press, New York, 1997 Search in Google Scholar

[18] Kansa, E., Whitcher Kansa, S., Burton, M., Stankowsli, C., Googling the grey: open data, web services and semantics, Archaeologies: Journal of the World Archaeological Congress, 2010, 6 (2), 301-326 10.1007/s11759-010-9146-4Search in Google Scholar

[19] Lucas, G., Understanding the Archaeological Record. Cambridge University Press, New York, 2012 10.1017/CBO9780511845772Search in Google Scholar

[20] Huggett, J., Digital haystacks: open data and the transformation of archaeological knowledge, In: Edwards, B., Wilson, A., (Eds.), Open Source Archaeology: Ethics and Practice, De Gruyter Open, Warsaw, 2015 Search in Google Scholar

[21] Llobera, M., Archaeological visualization: towards an Archaeological Information Science (AISc), Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 2011, 18, 193-223 10.1007/s10816-010-9098-4Search in Google Scholar

[22] Huggett, J., Promise and paradox: accessing open data in archaeology, In: Mills, C., Pidd, M., Ward, E. (Eds.), Proceedings of the Digital Humanities Congress 2012 (Studies in the Digital Humanities), HRI Online Publications, Sheffield, 2014, Search in Google Scholar

[23] Naylor, J., Richards, J., Third-party data for first class research, Archeologia e Calcolatori, 2005, 16, 83-91 Search in Google Scholar

[24] Faniel, I., Kansa, E., Witcher Kansa, S., Barrera-Gomez, J., Yakel, E., The challenges of digging data: a study of context in archaeological data reuse, Proceedings of the 13th ACM/IEEE-CS Joint conference on Digital Libraries (JCDL ‘13), Association for Computing Machinery, New York, 2013, 295-304, 10.1145/2467696.2467712Search in Google Scholar

[25] Beagrie, N., Houghton, J., The Value and Impact of the Archaeology Data Service: A study and methods for enhancing sustainability, 2013, Search in Google Scholar

[26] Huggett, J., Lost in information? Ways of knowing and modes of representation in e-archaeology, World Archaeology, 2012, 44 (4), 538-552 10.1080/00438243.2012.736274Search in Google Scholar

[27] Postman, N., Technopoly. The Surrender of Culture to Technology, Random House, New York, 1993 Search in Google Scholar

[28] Weinberger, D., Too Big to Know, Basic Books, New York, 2011 Search in Google Scholar

[29] Anderson, C., The End of Theory: the Data Deluge Makes the Scientific Method Obsolete, Wired, 2008, 16 (7), http://www. Search in Google Scholar

[30] boyd, d., Crawford, K., Critical questions for Big Data, Information, Communication & Society, 2012, 15 (5), 662-679 10.1080/1369118X.2012.678878Search in Google Scholar

[31] Lock, G., Harris, T., Introduction: return to Ravello, In: Lock, G. (Ed.), Beyond the map: archaeology and spatial technologies, IOS Press, Amsterdam, 2000, xiii-xxv Search in Google Scholar

[32] Haraway, D., Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective, Feminist Studies, 1988, 14 (3), 575-599 10.2307/3178066Search in Google Scholar

[33] Hodder, I., Archaeology and global information systems, Internet Archaeology, 1999, 6. 10.11141/ia.6.1Search in Google Scholar

[34] Holtorf, C., The future of electronic scholarship, Internet Archaeology, 2004, 15. 10.11141/ia.15.11Search in Google Scholar

[35] Moretti, F., Conjectures on World Literature, New Left Review, 2000, 1, 54-68 Search in Google Scholar

[36] Serlen, R., The Distant Future? Reading Franco Moretti, Literature Compass, 2010, 7 (3), 214-225 10.1111/j.1741-4113.2009.00669.xSearch in Google Scholar

[37] Ross, S., In Praise of Overstating the Case: A review of Franco Moretti, Distant Reading (London: Verso, 2013), Digital Humanities Quarterly, 2014, 8 (1).1. Search in Google Scholar

[38] Beale, G., Reilly, P., Additive Archaeology: the spirit of virtual archaeology reprinted, In: Papadopoulos, C., Paliou, E., Chrysanthi, A., Kotoula, E., Sarris, A. (Eds.) Archaeological Research in the Digital Age: Proceedings of the 1st Conference on Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology Greek Chapter (CAA-GR), Institute for Mediterranean Studies - Foundation of Research and Technology (IMS-FORTH), Rethymno, 2015, 120-128 Search in Google Scholar

[39] Floridi, L., The information society and its philosophy: introduction to the special Issue on the philosophy of information, The Information Society, 2009, 25 (3), 153-58 10.1080/01972240902848583Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2014-12-4
Accepted: 2015-2-2
Published Online: 2015-3-4

© 2015 Jeremy Huggett

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Downloaded on 9.12.2022 from
Scroll Up Arrow