Abstract
In this paper I will pose a challenge to digital heritage visualisation that takes as its starting point the weirdness of the digital world in comparison to everyday experience. Related to this is the apparent inability for digital objects to benefit from or acquire aura from their originals. I contend that, unless mitigated, these properties will cause a continuing lack of engagement with digital heritage visualisation beyond the professional and academic circles in which they are created. Contrary to expectations, I will argue digital objects can indeed manifest an auratic quality and that this is in fact fundamental to how they are received by various audiences. I contend that both aura and the intimate relationship between digital representation, aesthetics and the creative imagination need to be understood and embraced in practice. Finally, I will suggest some ways of addressing the challenge by looking at modes of co-production, physical replication and aesthetic quality.
References
[1] Huggett, J., Archaeology and the new technological fetishism. Archeologia e Calcolatori, 2004, 15. pp. 81-92. ISSN 1120-6861 Search in Google Scholar
[2] Banks, S., Connected Communities scoping study, 2011, http://www.ahrc.ac.uk/Funding-Opportunities/Researchfunding/ Connected-Communities/Scoping-studies-and-reviews/Documents/Community-based%20Participatory%20 Research.pdf Search in Google Scholar
[3] Shanks, M. and Tilley, C., Re-Constructing Archaeology: Theory and Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987 Search in Google Scholar
[4] Lowenthal, D., Changing Criteria of Authenticity. In K. E. Larsen (Ed.), NARA Conference on Authenticity in Relation to the World Heritage Convention, Paris: ICOMOS 1995, pp. 121–35. Search in Google Scholar
[5] Niven, K., Jeffrey, S. and Richards, J. D., Archiving Three-Dimensional Archaeology: New Technologies, New Solutions? In E. Graeme, T. Sly, A. Chrysanthi, P. Murrieta-Flores, C. Papadopoulos, I. Romanowska, & D. Wheatley (Eds.), Archaeology in the Digital Era Volume II, e-Papers from the 40th Conference on Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology, Southampton, 26-30 March 2012, 2012, pp.289-294 Search in Google Scholar
[6] Holtorf, C., On pastness: a reconsideration of materiality in archaeological object authenticity. Anthropological Quarterly, 2013 86(2): 427-443 10.1353/anq.2013.0026Search in Google Scholar
[7] Jones, S., Negotiating authentic objects and authentic selves: beyond the deconstruction of authenticity. Journal of Material Culture, 2010, 15(2): 188-97. 10.1177/1359183510364074Search in Google Scholar
[8] Pye, E., Caring for the Past: Issues in Conservation for Archaeology and Museums. London: James and James. 2001, 58-9 Search in Google Scholar
[9] Benjamin, W., “The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction.” In Illuminations, 217-51. New York: Schocken Books, (1936), 1968 Search in Google Scholar
[10] Macdonald, S., A people’s story: heritage, identity and authenticity. In C. Rojek and J. Urry (Eds.), Touring Cultures: transformations of travel and theory, London: Routledge ,1997, 155–175 (169). Search in Google Scholar
[11] Latour B. & Lowe A., The migration of the aura, or how to explore the original through its facsimiles. In T. Bartscherer (Ed.), Switching Codes, 275-98. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2011 Search in Google Scholar
[12] Gillings, M,. The real, the virtually real and the hyperreal. In S. Smiles and S. Moser (Eds.), Envisioning the Past: Archaeology and the image. NewYork: Blackwells, 2005, 223-39 Search in Google Scholar
[13] Bolter, D., MacIntyre, B., Gandy, M., & Schweitzer, P. New Media and the Permanent Crisis of Aura. The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, London, Thousand Oaks & New Delhi 2006, 01354-8565 Vol 12(1): 21–39. DOI: 10.1177/1354856506061550 10.1177/1354856506061550Search in Google Scholar
[14] Macdonald, S., Memorylands: Heritage and Identity in Europe Today, Routledge, 2013, 109-36 10.4324/9780203553336Search in Google Scholar
[15] RCAHMS, Scotland’s Rural Past, 2011 http://www.rcahms.gov.uk/scotlands-rural-past.html accessed 14/11/2014 Search in Google Scholar
[16] Scotland’s Coastal Heritage at Risk (SCH@RP),The SHARP project, 2014, http://scharp.co.uk/ accessed 14/11/2014 Search in Google Scholar
[17] Jeffrey, S., Hale, A., Jones C., Jones, S., & Maxwell, M., The ACCORD project: Archaeological Community Co-Production of Research Resources . In Proc. 42st Int. Conf. on Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology (CAA), Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne. Paris, France, 2014. 2015 Search in Google Scholar
[18] Micropasts, A community platform for conducting, designing and funding research into our human past. (UCL and the British Museum). 2014 http://micropasts.org/ accessed 14/11/2014 Search in Google Scholar
[19] Reilly, P. (in press). Additive Archaeology: an alternative framework for recontextualising archaeological entities, Open Archaeology, 2015, 1(1). 10.1515/opar-2015-0013Search in Google Scholar
[20] Smithsonian Institution (Digitization Program Office/Office of the Chief Information Officer), Smithsonian X3d, 2014 http://3d.si.edu/ accessed 14/11/2014 Search in Google Scholar
[21] Russell, I.A., Cochrane, A. (Eds), Collaborations, Conversations, Criticisms. One World Archaeology, Vol. 11 ISBN 978-1-4614-8990-0, Springer, New York, 2014 Search in Google Scholar
[22] Watterson, A., Archaeological Visualisation Portfolio (personal website) 2014 http://www.alicewatterson.co.uk/ accessed 14/11/2014 Search in Google Scholar
[23] Rua, H, Alvito, P., Living the past: 3D models, virtual reality and game engines as tools for supporting archaeology and the reconstruction of cultural heritage – the case-study of the Roman villa of Casal de Freiria. Journal of Archaeological Science Volume 38, Issue 12, December 2011, Pages 3296–3308 10.1016/j.jas.2011.07.015Search in Google Scholar
[24] Keys To Rome,. V-MusT - the Virtual Museum Transnational Network, 2014 http://keys2rome.eu/eng/ accessed 14/11/2014. Search in Google Scholar
[25] Gillings, M. and Goodrick, G.T. ‘Sensuous and Reflexive GIS: exploring visualisation and VRML’, Internet Archaeology, Issue 1, 1996 http://intarch.ac.uk/journal/issue1/gillings_index.html, accessed 12/11/14. 10.11141/ia.1.2Search in Google Scholar
© 2015 Stuart Jeffrey
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.
