Skip to content
BY-NC-ND 3.0 license Open Access Published by De Gruyter Open Access May 19, 2015

The Social Web and Archaeology’s Restructuring: Impact, Exploitation, Disciplinary Change

  • Sara Perry and Nicole Beale
From the journal Open Archaeology


From blogs to crowdfunding, YouTube to LinkedIn, online photo-sharing sites to open-source community-based software projects, the social web has been a meaningful player in the development of archaeological practice for two decades now. Yet despite its myriad applications, it is still often appreciated as little more than a tool for communication, rather than a paradigm-shifting system that also shapes the questions we ask in our research, the nature and spread of our data, and the state of skill and expertise in the profession. We see this failure to critically engage with its dimensions as one of the most profound challenges confronting archaeology today. The social web is bound up in relations of power, control, freedom, labour and exploitation, with consequences that portend real instability for the cultural sector and for social welfare overall. Only a handful of archaeologists, however, are seriously debating these matters, which suggests the discipline is setting itself up to be swept away by our unreflective investment in the cognitive capitalist enterprise that marks much current web-based work. Here we review the state of play of the archaeological social web, and reflect on various conscientious activities aimed both at challenging practitioners’ current online interactions, and at otherwise situating the discipline as a more informed innovator with the social web’s possibilities.


[1] Reilly, P., Rahtz S., Archaeology and the Information Age: A Global Perspective, Routledge, London, 1992 Search in Google Scholar

[2] Miller, P., Richards, J., The good, the bad, and the downright misleading: Archaeological adoption of computer visualisation. In Huggett, J., Ryan, N. (Eds.) Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology 1994, British Archaeological Reports International Series 600, 1995, 19-22 Search in Google Scholar

[3] Henson, D., Digital media and public engagement in archaeology: an opinion piece, Archäologische Informationen, 2013, 36, 13-20 Search in Google Scholar

[4] Smith, L., The Uses of Heritage. Routledge, Abingdon, 2006. 10.4324/9780203602263Search in Google Scholar

[5] Colwell-Chanthaphonh, C., Ferguson, T., Collaboration in Archaeological Practice: Engaging Descendant Communities, Altamira, Lanham, 2008 Search in Google Scholar

[6] Conkey, M. Dwelling at the margins, action at the intersection? Feminist and indigenous archaeologies, Archaeologies, 2005, 1(1), 9-59 10.1007/s11759-005-0003-9Search in Google Scholar

[7] Moshenska, G., Schadla-Hall, T. Mortimer Wheeler’s theatre of the past, Public Archaeology, 2011, 10 (1), 46–55 10.1179/175355311X12991501673221Search in Google Scholar

[8] Shanks, M., Tilley, C. Re-constructing Archaeology: Theory and Practice, Routledge, London, 1992 Search in Google Scholar

[9] Tarlow, S., Nilsson-Stutz, L. Can an archaeologist be a public intellectual?, Archaeological Dialogues, 2013, 20 (1), 1-5 10.1017/S1380203813000032Search in Google Scholar

[10] Bintliff, J., Gaffney, C.F. (Eds.) Archaeology at the Interface: Studies in Archaeology’s Relationships with History, Geography, Biology, and Physical Science, British Archaeological Reports, British Archaeological Reports, Oxford, 1986, 300(i–iv) 10.30861/9780860543879Search in Google Scholar

[11] Kintigh, K., Altschul, J., Beaudry, M., Drennan, R., Kinzig, A., Kohler, T., Grand challenges for archaeology, American Antiquity, 2014, 79 (1), 5-24 10.7183/0002-7316.79.1.5Search in Google Scholar

[12] Berners-Lee, T., Fischetti, M., Weaving the Web: The Original Design and Ultimate Destiny of the World Wide Web by its Inventor, Harper, San Francisco, 1999 Search in Google Scholar

[13] Gruber, T., Collective knowledge systems: Where the social web meets the semantic web, Web Semantics: Science, Services and Agents on the World Wide Web, 2008, 6 (1), 4-13 10.1016/j.websem.2007.11.011Search in Google Scholar

[14] Walker, D., Antisocial media in archaeology? Archaeological Dialogues, 2014, 21 (2), 217-235 10.1017/S1380203814000221Search in Google Scholar

[15] Moscati, P., Towards a history of archaeological computing: An introduction, 2014, http://caa2014.sciencesconf. org/46082/document Search in Google Scholar

[16] Scollar, I., 25 years of computer applications in archaeology. In Dingwall, L., Exon, S., Gaffney, V., Laflin, S., van Leusen, M. (Eds.), Archaeology in the Age of the Internet: CAA 97, Archaeopress, Oxford, 1997, 5-10 Search in Google Scholar

[17] Zubrow, E., Digital archaeology: A historical context. In Evans, T., Daly, P. (Eds.), Digital Archaeology: Bridging Method and Theory, Abingdon, Routledge, 2006, 10-31 Search in Google Scholar

[18] Graham, S., Watrall, E., A digital archaeology of digital archaeology: work in progress, November 6, 2014, http://electricarchaeology. ca/2014/11/06/a-digital-archaeology-of-digital-archaeology-work-in-progress/ Search in Google Scholar

[19] Kansa, E., Kansa, S., Watrall, E. (Eds.) Archaeology 2.0: New Approaches to Communication and Collaboration, Cotsen Institute of Archaeology Press, Los Angeles, 2011, 10.2307/j.ctvhhhfgwSearch in Google Scholar

[20] Jeffrey, S., A new digital dark age? Collaborative web tools, social media and long-term preservation, World Archaeology, 2012, 44 (4), 553-570 10.1080/00438243.2012.737579Search in Google Scholar

[21] Sayer, F., Politics and the development of community archaeology in the UK, The Historic Environment: Policy and Practice, 2014, 5 (1), 55-73, Search in Google Scholar

[22] Phillips, L.B., The temple and the bazaar: Wikipedia as a platform for open authority in museums, Curator: The Museum Journal, 2013, 56 (2), 219-235 10.1111/cura.12021Search in Google Scholar

[23] Spiliopoulou, A., Mahony, S., Routsis, V., Kamposiori, C., Cultural institutions in the digital age: British Museum’s use of Facebook Insights, Participations, 2014, 11 (1), 286-303 Search in Google Scholar

[24] Richardson, L., Twitter and archaeology: an archaeological network in 140 characters or less. In Bonacchi, C. (Ed.), Archaeologists and the Digital: Towards Strategies of Engagement, Archetype, London, 2012, 15-24 Search in Google Scholar

[25] Terras, M., The digital wunderkammer: Flickr as a platform for amateur cultural and heritage content, Library Trends, 2011, 59 (4), 686-706 10.1353/lib.2011.0022Search in Google Scholar

[26] Huvila, I., Engagement has its consequences: The emergence of the representations of archaeology in social media, Archäologische Informationen, 2013, 36, 21-30 Search in Google Scholar

[27] Harris, T., Interfacing archaeology and the world of citizen sensors: Exploring the impact of neogeography and volunteered geographic information on an authenticated archaeology, World Archaeology, 2012, 44 (4), 580-591 10.1080/00438243.2012.736273Search in Google Scholar

[28] Richardson, L., The Day of Archaeology: Blogging and online archaeological communities, European Journal of Post-Classical Archaeologies, 2014, 4, 421-446 Search in Google Scholar

[29] Rocks-Macqueen, D., Webster, C. (Eds.) Blogging Archaeology, 2014, Archaeology-eBook-35vc.pdf Search in Google Scholar

[30] Bonacchi, C., Bevan, A., Pett, D., Keinan-Schoonbaert, A., Developing crowd- and community-fuelled archaeological research. Early research from the MicroPasts project. In Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology: CAA14, Paris, April 22-25, 2015 Search in Google Scholar

[31] Steinbach, L., Digital cultural heritage is getting crowded: Crowdsourced, crowd-funded, and crowd-Engaged. In Din, H., Wu, S. (Eds.), Digital Heritage and Culture: Strategy and Implementation, London, World Scientific, 2014, 261-294 Search in Google Scholar

[32] Jameson Jr., J. H., Toward multivocality in public archaeology: Public empowerment through collaboration. In Scott-Ireton, D. (Ed.), Between the Devil and the Deep: Meeting Challenges in the Public Interpretation of Maritime Cultural Heritage, Springer, New York, 2013, 3-10 Search in Google Scholar

[33] Alcock, S., Dufton, A., Durusu-Tanriover, M., Archaeology for the people: First foray into the world of MOOCs, Anthropology News, 2013, 54 (11-12), 24 Search in Google Scholar

[34] Earl, G., First thoughts from the Portus MOOC, Hestia2 Seminar: Digital pedagogy: How are new technologies transforming the interface between research and learning?, 2014, 6 June, LBArmT3XAY Search in Google Scholar

[35] Ducke, B., Natives of a connected world: free and open source software in archaeology, World Archaeology, 2012, 44 (4), 571-579, 10.1080/00438243.2012.743259Search in Google Scholar

[36] Bonacchi, C. (Ed.) Archaeology and the Digital: Towards Strategies of Engagement, Archetype, London, 2012 Search in Google Scholar

[37] Giaccardi, E. (Ed.) Heritage and Social Media: Understanding Heritage in a Participatory Culture, Routledge, London, 2012 10.4324/9780203112984Search in Google Scholar

[38] Kansa, E., New directions for the digital past. In Kansa, E., Kansa, S., Watrall, E. (Eds.), Archaeology 2.0: New Approaches to Communication and Collaboration, Cotsen Institute of Archaeology Press, Los Angeles, 2011, 1-25, http://escholarship. org/uc/item/1r6137tb 10.2307/j.ctvhhhfgw.9Search in Google Scholar

[39] Law, M., Morgan, C., The archaeology of digital abandonment: Online sustainability and archaeological sites, Present Pasts, 2014, 6 (1), 2, 10.5334/pp.58Search in Google Scholar

[40] Beale, N., Local Authority Museums and the Web: New Directions for Curatorial Practice, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK, forthcoming, Unpublished PhD thesis Search in Google Scholar

[41] Richardson, L., Public Archaeology in a Digital Age, University College London, London, UK, 2014, Unpublished PhD thesis Search in Google Scholar

[42] Walker, D., Towards a Decentered Museum: Authority, Museums, and the Web, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK, forthcoming, Unpublished PhD thesis Search in Google Scholar

[43] Colley, S., Archaeological Communication and Digital Technology Use, in prep. Search in Google Scholar

[44] Colley, S., Social media and archaeological communication. An Australian survey, Archäologische Informationen, 2014, 36, 65-80 Search in Google Scholar

[45] Perry, S., Shipley, L., Osborne, J., Digital media, power and (in)equality in archaeology and heritage, Internet Archaeology, 2015, 38, 10.11141/ia.38.4Search in Google Scholar

[46] Richardson, L., Online survey data from Twitter and archaeology surveys 2011-2013, Journal of Open Archaeology Data, 2014, 3, 10.5334/joad.aeSearch in Google Scholar

[47] Perry, S., Changing the way archaeologists work: Blogging and the development of expertise, Internet Archaeology, in press Search in Google Scholar

[48] Sylaiou, S., Basiouka, S., Patias, P., Stylianidis, S., The volunteered geographic information in archaeology, ISPRS Annals of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, 2013, II-5/W1, 301-306 10.5194/isprsannals-II-5-W1-301-2013Search in Google Scholar

[49] Pietrobruno, S., Between narratives and lists: Performing digital intangible heritage through global media, International Journal of Heritage Studies, 2014, 20 (7-8), 742-759, 10.1080/13527258.2013.807398Search in Google Scholar

[50] Austin, M., Archaeological blogging and engagement. In Rocks-Macqueen, D., Webster, C. (Eds.), Blogging Archaeology, 2014, 9-19, Search in Google Scholar

[51] Williams, S., Terras, M., Warwick, C., What do people study when they study Twitter? Classifying Twitter related academic papers, Journal of Documentation, 2013, 69 (3), 384-410 10.1108/JD-03-2012-0027Search in Google Scholar

[52] Clack, T., Brittain, M. (Eds.), Archaeology and the Media, Left Coast Press, Walnut Creek, 2007 Search in Google Scholar

[53] Perry, S., The Archaeological Eye: Visualisation and the Institutionalisation of Academic Archaeology in London, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK, 2011, Unpublished PhD thesis Search in Google Scholar

[54] Walker, D., Decentering the discipline? Archaeology, museums and social media. Online Journal in Public Archaeology, 2014, 1, 77-102 10.23914/ap.v4i2.61Search in Google Scholar

[55] Richardson, L., A digital public archaeology?, Papers from the Institute of Archaeology, 2013, 23, 10, http://dx.doi. org/10.5334/pia.431 10.5334/pia.431Search in Google Scholar

[56] Limp, W.F., Web 2.0 and beyond, or on the web nobody knows you’re an archaeologist. In Kansa, E., Kansa, S., Watrall, E. (Eds.), Archaeology 2.0: New Approaches to Communication and Collaboration, Cotsen Institute of Archaeology Press, Los Angeles, 2011, 265-280, 10.2307/j.ctvhhhfgw.24Search in Google Scholar

[57] Hill, L., From field to media fodder: A cautionary tale from the trenches, Cultural Geographies in Practice, 2012, 20 (2), 249-255 10.1177/1474474012455001Search in Google Scholar

[58] Lake, M., Open archaeology, World Archaeology, 44 (4), 471-478 10.1080/00438243.2012.748521Search in Google Scholar

[59] Law, J., Seeing Like a Survey, 2008, Search in Google Scholar

[60] Morgan, C., (ed.) Special Issue: Blogging, Internet Archaeology, forthcoming Search in Google Scholar

[61] Colley, S., Ethics and digital heritage. In Ireland, T., Schofield, J. (Eds.), The Ethics of Cultural Heritage, Springer, New York, 2015, 13-32 10.1007/978-1-4939-1649-8_2Search in Google Scholar

[62] Oomen, J., Aroyo, L., Crowdsourcing in the cultural heritage domain: opportunities and challenges. In C&T ‘11 Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Communities and Technologies, New York, ACM, 2011, 138-149, Search in Google Scholar

[63] Ridge, M., From tagging to theorizing: Deepening engagement with cultural heritage through crowdsourcing, Curator: The Museum Journal, 2013, 56 (4), 435-450 10.1111/cura.12046Search in Google Scholar

[64] O’Neil, M., The sociology of critique in Wikipedia, Journal of Peer Production, 2011, 0, issue-0/ Search in Google Scholar

[65] Moon, C., The Collective Power of Safeguarding Intangible Cultural Heritage: Research on Wiki Inventory-Making Focusing on South Korea’s ‘ICHPEDIA’ and Scotland’s ‘ICH Wiki List’, University of York, York, UK, 2014, Unpublished MSc Dissertation Search in Google Scholar

[66] Restivo, M., van de Rijt, A., No praise without effort: Experimental evidence on how rewards affect Wikipedia’s contributor community, Information, Communication & Society, 2014, 17 (4), 451-462 10.1080/1369118X.2014.888459Search in Google Scholar

[67] Flamenbaum, R., Buyandelger, M., Downey, G., Starn, O., Laserna, C., Kelkar, S., Rouse, C., Looser, T., Anthropology in and of MOOCs, American Anthropologist, 2014, 116 (4), 1-10 10.1111/aman.12143Search in Google Scholar

[68] Meisenhelder, S., MOOC mania, Thought and Action, 2013, Fall, 7-26 Search in Google Scholar

[69] Jones, J., Introduction: MOOCs as media world, American Anthropologist, 2014, 116 (4), 1-2 Search in Google Scholar

[70] Smith, M., Citizen science in archaeology, American Antiquity, 2014, 79 (4), 749-762 10.7183/0002-7316.79.4.749749Search in Google Scholar

[71] Bonacchi, C., Bevan, A., Pett, D., Keinan-Schoonbaert, A., Sparks, R., Wexler, J., Crowd-sourced archaeological research: The MicroPasts project, Archaeology International, 2014, 17, 61-68 10.5334/ai.1705Search in Google Scholar

[72] Chandler, D., Kapelner, A., Breaking monotony with meaning: Motivation in crowdsourcing markets, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 2013, 90, 123-133, Search in Google Scholar

[73] Owens, T., Making crowdsourcing compatible with the missions and values of cultural heritage organisations. In Ridge M. (Ed.), Crowdsourcing our Cultural Heritage, Ashgate, Oxford, 2014, 269-280 Search in Google Scholar

[74] Fuchs, C., Digital prosumption labour on social media in the context of the capitalist regime of time, Time and Society, 2014, 23 (1), 97-123 10.1177/0961463X13502117Search in Google Scholar

[75] Fuchs, C., Social Media: A Critical Introduction, 2014, Sage, London 10.4135/9781446270066Search in Google Scholar

[76] Fuchs, C., Sevignani, S., What is digital labour? What is digital work? What’s their difference? And why do these questions matter for understanding social media? triple, 2013, 11 (2), 237-298 10.31269/triplec.v11i2.461Search in Google Scholar

[77] Taylor B., Amateurs, professionals and the knowledge of archaeology, British Journal of Sociology, 1995, 46 (3), 499-508 10.2307/591853Search in Google Scholar

[78] Faulkner, N., Archaeology from below, Public Archaeology, 2000, 1 (1), 21-33, Search in Google Scholar

[79] Jones, S., Dialogues between past, present and future: Reflections on engaging the recent past. In Daglish, C. (Ed.) Archaeology, the Public and the Recent Past, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2014, 163-176 Search in Google Scholar

[80] Sayre, M., Student-initiated projects, the flipped classroom, and crowdfunding, The SAA Archaeological Record, 2014, 14 (1), 14-17 Search in Google Scholar

[81] Holtorf, C., Archaeology is a Brand! The Meaning of Archaeology in Contemporary Popular Culture, Archaeopress, Oxford, 2007 10.1016/B978-012373962-9.00253-3Search in Google Scholar

[82] Simpson, F., Williams, H., Evaluating community archaeology in the UK, Public Archaeology, 2008, 7 (2), 69-90, http:// 10.1179/175355308X329955Search in Google Scholar

[83] Beale, N., Beale, G., Community-driven approaches to open source archaeological imaging. In Edwards, B., Wilson, A. (Eds.), Open Source Archaeology: Ethics and Practice, in press, De Gruyter Open Search in Google Scholar

[84] Noordegraaf, J., Barholomew, A., Eveleigh, A., Modeling crowdsourcing for cultural heritage. In Proctor, N., Cherry, R. (Eds.), Museums and the Web 2014: Selected Papers from an International Conference, Silver Spring, Museums and the Web, 2014, Search in Google Scholar

[85] Holmes, K., Slater, A., Patterns of Voluntary Participation in Membership Associations: A Study of UK Heritage Supporter Groups, Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 2011, 41 (5), 850-869, 10.1177/0899764011420881Search in Google Scholar

[86] Johnson, E., Why archaeologists must stop working for free: A response inspired by the #FreeArchaeology debate, Papers from the Institute of Archaeology, 2014, 24 (1), 20, 10.5334/pia.473Search in Google Scholar

[87] Hamilton, S., Under-representation in contemporary archaeology, Papers from the Institute of Archaeology, 2014, 24 (1), 24, 10.5334/pia.469Search in Google Scholar

[88] Hardy, S., Obstacles to career progression in archaeology: Precarious labour and unemployment, Papers from the Institute of Archaeology, 2014, 24 (1), 21, 10.5334/pia.474Search in Google Scholar

[89] Crary, J., 24/7: Late Capitalism and the Ends of Sleep, Verso, London, 2013 Search in Google Scholar

[90] Parikka, J., What is Media Archaeology? Polity Press, Cambridge, 2012 Search in Google Scholar

[91] Ekbia H., Nardi, B., Inverse instrumentality: how technologies objectify patients and players. In Leonardi, P., Nardi, B., Kallinikos, J. (Eds.), Materiality and Organizing: Social Interaction in a Technological World, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2012, 157-176 Search in Google Scholar

[92] Owens, T., Digital heritage and the crowd, Curator: The Museum Journal, 2013, 56 (1), 121-130 10.1111/cura.12012Search in Google Scholar

[93] Cefkin, M., Anya, O., Moore, R., A perfect storm? Reimagining work in the era of the end of the job, Ethnographic Praxis, 2014, 1, 3–19, 10.1111/1559-8918.01002Search in Google Scholar

[94] Standing, G., The Precariat: The New Dangerous Class, Bloomsbury, London, 2011 10.5040/9781849664554Search in Google Scholar

[95] Standing G., Why the precariat is not a “bogus concept”, Open Democracy, March 4, 2014, https://www.opendemocracy. net/guy-standing/why-precariat-is-not-“bogus-concept” Search in Google Scholar

[96] Moshenska, G., Reflections on the 1943 ‘Conference on the Future of Archaeology’, Archaeology International, Present Pasts, 2013, 16, 128-139, 10.5334/ai.1606Search in Google Scholar

[97] Piscitelli M., Using social networks to fundraise: Crowdfunding for the archaeologist, The SAA Archaeological Record, 2013, 13 (4), 36-39, Search in Google Scholar

[98] Knowles, K., Britain must dig deeper to save its archaeology, The Independent, November 15, 2014, http://www. Search in Google Scholar

[99] Jackson, S., Lennox, R., Neal, C., Roskams, S., Hearle, J., Brown, S., Engaging Communities in the Big Society: What Impact is the Localism Agenda having on Community Archaeology, The Historic Environment, 2014, 5 (1) 10.1179/1756750513Z.00000000043Search in Google Scholar

[100] Ekbia H., Nardi, B., Heteromation and its (dis)contents: The invisible division of labor between humans and machines, First Monday, 2014, 19 (6), 10.5210/fm.v19i6.5331Search in Google Scholar

[101] Haklay, M., Neogeography and the delusion of democratisation, Environment and Planning, 2013, 45, 55-69 10.1068/a45184Search in Google Scholar

[102] Parikka, J., The Anthrobscene, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, 2014 Search in Google Scholar

[103] Morgan, C., Eve, S., DIY and digital archaeology: what are you doing to participate? World Archaeology, 2012, 44, 521-37 10.1080/00438243.2012.741810Search in Google Scholar

[104] Insole, P., Piccini, A., Your place or mine? Crowdsourced planning, moving image archives and community archaeology, Archaologische Informationen, 2013, 36, 31-43Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2014-12-12
Accepted: 2015-4-14
Published Online: 2015-5-19

© 2015 Sara Perry, Nicole Beale

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Downloaded on 5.6.2023 from
Scroll to top button