Skip to content
BY-NC-ND 4.0 license Open Access Published by De Gruyter Open Access November 14, 2017

Reproducibility in the Field: Transparency, Version Control and Collaboration on the Project Panormos Survey

  • Néhémie Strupler EMAIL logo and Toby C. Wilkinson
From the journal Open Archaeology


Archaeological fieldwork is rarely considered reproducible in the sense of the ideal scientific method because of its destructive nature. But new digital technology now offers field practitioners a set of tools that can at least increase the transparency of the data-collection process as well as bring other benefits of an Open Science approach to archaeology. This article shares our perspectives, choices and experiences of piloting a set of tools (namely: ODK, Git, GitLab CE and R) which can address reproducibility of fieldwork in the form of an intensive survey project in western Turkey, and highlights the potential consequences of Open Science approaches for archaeology as a whole.


Alcock, S., & Cherry, J. (Eds.). (2004). Side-by-side Survey: Comparative Regional Studies in the Mediterranean World. Oxford: Oxbow.Search in Google Scholar

American Association for the Advancement of Science. (2016). Ancient History, Modern Destruction: Assessing the Status of Syria’s Tentative World Heritage Sites Using High-Resolution Satellite Imagery. (May 18, 2017).Search in Google Scholar

Anokwa, Y., Hartung, C., Brunette, W., Lerer, A., & Borriello, G. (2009). Open Source Data Collection in the Developing World. IEEE Computer, 97-99. in Google Scholar

Bartling, S., & Friesike, S. (Eds.). (2014). Opening Science. The Evolving Guide on How the Internet is Changing Research, Collaboration and Scholarly Publishing. Springer. in Google Scholar

Bazerman, C. (1983). Scientific Writing as a Social Act: A Review of the Literature of the Sociology of Science. In Paul V. Anderson R. John Brockmann & C. R. Miller (Eds.), New essays in technical and scientific communication: Research, theory, practice (pp. 156-184). Amityville: Baywood. Search in Google Scholar

Bevan, A. (2012). Value, Authority and the Open Society. Some Implications for Digital and Online Archaeology. In C. Bonacchi (Ed.), Archaeology and digital communication: Towards strategies of public engagement (pp. 1-14). London: Archetype.Search in Google Scholar

Bevan, A. (2015). The data deluge. Antiquity, 89, 1473-1484. in Google Scholar

Bissell, M. (2013). Reproducibility: the Risks of the Replication Drive. Nature, 593, 333-334. in Google Scholar

Bowers, J. (2011). Six steps to a Better Relationship with Your Future Self. The Political Methodologist, 18(2), 2-8.Search in Google Scholar

Chacon, S., & Straub, B. (2014). Pro Git. (May 18, 2017).10.1007/978-1-4842-0076-6Search in Google Scholar

Costa, S., Beck, A., Bevan, A., & Ogden, J. (2013). Defining and advocating open data in archaeology. In G. Earl, T. Sly, A. Chrysanthi, P. Murrieta-Flores, C. Papadopoulos, I. Romanowska, & D. Wheatley (Eds.), Archaeology in the Digital Era. Papers from the 40th Annual Conference of Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology (CAA), Southampton, 26-29 March 2012 (pp. 449-456). in Google Scholar

Creative Commons (2013). Responses of Creative Commons to House of Lords Comments Concerning the CC BY License. (May 18, 2017).Search in Google Scholar

Düring, B., & Glatz, C. (Eds.). (2016). Kinetic Landscapes. The Cide Archaeological Project: Surveying the Turkish Western Black Sea Region. Warsaw/Berlin: De Gruyter Open. in Google Scholar

Ellis, S. J. (2016). Are We Ready for New (Digital) Ways to Record Archaeological Fieldwork? A Case Study from Pompeii. In E. W. Averett, J. M. Gordon, & D. B. Counts (Eds.), Mobilizing the past for a digital future: The potential of digital archaeology (pp. 51-75). Grand Forks: The Digital Press at the University of North Dakota.Search in Google Scholar

Ersoy, Y., & Koparal, E. (2008). Urla ve Seferihisar İlçeleri Yüzey Araştırması 2007 Yılı çalışmaları. Araştırma Sonuçları Toplantısı, 26(3), 73-9.Search in Google Scholar

Ersoy, Y., Tuna, N., & Koparal, E. (2010). Urla ve Seferihisar İlçeleri Yüzey Araştırması 2009 Yılı Çalışmaları. Araştırma Sonuçları Toplantısı, 28(2), 339-360.Search in Google Scholar

EU. (2016). H2020 Programme - Annotated Model Grant Agreement (Version 2.1.1). (May 18, 2017).Search in Google Scholar

Fanelli, D. (2013). Redefine misconduct as distorted reporting. Nature, 494, 149. in Google Scholar

Fitzpatrick, K. (2011). Planned obsolescence: Publishing, technology, and the future of the academy. New York: New York University.10.1632/ade.150.41Search in Google Scholar

Germán, D. M., Adams, B., & Hassan, A. E. (2016). Continuously mining distributed version control systems: An empirical study of how linux uses git. Empirical Software Engineering, 21(1), 260-299. in Google Scholar

Gewin, V. (2013). Turning Point: Carl Boettiger. Nature, 493, 711. in Google Scholar

Götz, N., & Marklund, C. (2014). The Paradox of Openness: Transparency and Participation in Nordic Cultures of Consensus. Leiden: Brill.10.1163/9789004281196Search in Google Scholar

Harley, D., Acord, S. K., Earl-Novell, S., Lawrence, S., & King, C. J. (2010). Archaeology Case Study. In Assessing the Future Landscape of Scholarly Communication: An Exploration of Faculty Values and Needs in Seven Disciplines. (pp. 29-136). UC Berkeley: Center for Studies in Higher Education. in Google Scholar

HEFCE. (2015). Policy for open access in the post-2014 Research Excellence Framework: Updated July 2015. Higher Education Funding Council for England. (May 18, 2017).Search in Google Scholar

Heller, L., The, R., & Bartling, S. (2014). Dynamic Publication Formats and Collaborative Authoring. In S. Bartling & S. Friesike (Eds.), Opening science (pp. 191-211). Springer International Publishing. in Google Scholar

Hodder, I. (1999). The Archaeological Process: An Introduction. Oxford: Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

Hodder, I. (2008). Evaluating Multiple Narratives: Beyond Nationalist, Colonialist, Imperialist Archaeologies. In J. Habu, C. Fawcett, & J. M. Matsunaga (Eds.), Evaluating multiple narratives: Beyond nationalist, colonialist, imperialist archaeologies (pp. 196-200). New York: Springer New York. in Google Scholar

Huggett, J. (2015). Digital Haystacks: Open Data and the Transformation of Archaeological Knowledge. In A. T. Wilson and B. Edwards (Ed.), Open source archaeology (pp. 6-29). Warsaw/Berlin: De Gruyter Open. in Google Scholar

Ihaka, R., & Gentleman, R. (1996). R: A Language for Data Analysis and Graphics. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, 5(3), 299-314.Search in Google Scholar

Journal of Open Archaeology Data. (2017). Research integrity. (May 25, 2017).Search in Google Scholar

Kansa, E. (2012). Openness and archaeology’s information ecosystem. World Archaeology, 44(4), 498-520. in Google Scholar

Kansa, E. (2014). The Need to Humanize Open Science. In S. A. Moore (Ed.), Issues in open research data (pp. 31-58). London: Ubiquity Press. in Google Scholar

Kansa, E., & Whitcher Kansa, S. (2013). We All Know That a 14 Is a Sheep: Data Publication and Professionalism in Archaeological Communication. Journal of Eastern Mediterranean Archaeology and Heritage Studies, 1(1), 88-97. in Google Scholar

Kansa, E., Whitcher Kansa, S., & Arbuckle, B. (2014). Publishing and Pushing: Mixing Models for Communicating Research Data in Archaeology. International Journal of Digital Curation, 9.1, 57-70. in Google Scholar

Kelty, C. M. (2005). Free Science. In J. Feller, B. Fitzgerald, S. A. Hissam, & K. R. Lakhani (Eds.), Perspectives on free and open source software (pp. 415-430). MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Kelty, C. M. (2008). Two Bits: The Cultural Significance of Free Software. Durham: Duke University Press. in Google Scholar

Kelty, C. M. (2014). Beyond Copyright and Technology: What Open Access can tell us about Precarity, Authority, Innovation, and Automation in the University Today. Cultural Anthropology, 29(2), 203-215. in Google Scholar

Knorr, K. D., & Knorr, D. W. (1978). From Scenes to Scripts: On the Relationship between Laboratory Research and Published Paper in Science. Vienna: Institute for Advanced Studies.Search in Google Scholar

Knuth, D. E. (1984). Literate Programming. The Computer Journal, 27(2), 97-111. in Google Scholar

Lagoze, C., Block, W. C., Williams, J., Abowd, J., & Vilhuber, L. (2013). Data management of confidential data. International Journal of Digital Curation, 8(1), 265-278.10.2218/ijdc.v8i1.259Search in Google Scholar

Lake, M. (2012). Open archaeology. World Archaeology, 44(4), 471-478. in Google Scholar

Latour, B., & Woolgar, S. (1979). Laboratory Life: The Social Construction of Scientific Facts. Beverley Hills: Sage.Search in Google Scholar

Marwick, B. (2016). Computational Reproducibility in Archaeological Research: Basic Principles and a Case Study of Their Implementation. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 1-27. in Google Scholar

Masic, I. (2012). Plagiarism in scientific publishing. Acta Informatica Medica, 20(4), 208-213. in Google Scholar

Matthews, R., & Glatz, C. (Eds.). (2009). At Empires’ Edge. Project Paphlagonia Regional Survey in North-Central Turkey. London: British Institute at Ankara.Search in Google Scholar

Morin, A., Urban, J., Adams, P. D., Foster, I., Sali, A., Baker, D., & Sliz, P. (2012). Shining Light into Black Boxes. Science, 336(6078), 159-160. in Google Scholar

Nielsen, M. (2011). An informal definition of openscience. (May 18, 2017).Search in Google Scholar

Nuzzo, R. (2015). How scientists fool themselves - and how they can stop. Nature, 526, 182-185. in Google Scholar

Open Definition. (2016). Conformant license (version 2.1). (May 18, 2017).Search in Google Scholar

R Core Team. (2017). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. (May 18, 2017).Search in Google Scholar

Schloen, D. (2001). Archaeological Data Models and Web Publication Using XML. Computers and the Humanities, 35(2), 123-152. in Google Scholar

Schloen, D., & Schloen, S. (2014). Beyond Gutenberg: Transcending the Document Paradigm in Digital Humanities. Digital Humanities Quarterly, 8(4). in Google Scholar

Smith, J. (2013). Adapting Git for simple data. (May 14, 2017).Search in Google Scholar

Strupler, N. (2016). Archaeology as Community Enterprise. In S. Campana, R. Scopigno, G. Carpentiero, & M. Cirillo (Eds.), CAA2015 keep the revolution going, proceedings of the 43 rd annual conference on computer applications and quantitative methods in archaeology (Vol. 1, pp. 1015-1018).Search in Google Scholar

The Free Software Foundation. (2016). Various Licenses and Comments about Them. (May 18, 2017).Search in Google Scholar

Vinck, D., & Clivaz, C. (2014). The Humanities Unbound. Knowledge and Culture Reinvented Outside the Book. Revue d’anthropologie des connaissances, 8(4), a-w. in Google Scholar

Wallis, J., Rolando, E., & Borgman, C. (2013). If We Share Data, Will Anyone Use Them? Data Sharing and Reuse in the Long Tail of Science and Technology. PLoS ONE, 8(7), e67332. in Google Scholar

Wallrodt, J. (2016). Why Paperless: Technology and Changes in Archaeological Practice, 1996-2016. In E. W. Averett, J. M. Gordon, & D. B. Counts (Eds.), Mobilizing the past for a digital future: The potential of digital archaeology (pp. 33-50). Grand Forks: The Digital Press at the University of North Dakota.Search in Google Scholar

Xie, Y. (2015). Dynamic Documents with R and knitr (2nd ed.). Boca Raton, Florida: Chapman; Hall/CRC.Search in Google Scholar

Xie, Y. (2016). Knitr: A General-Purpose Package for Dynamic Report Generation in R (R package version 1.12). in Google Scholar

Received: 2016-10-19
Accepted: 2017-7-10
Published Online: 2017-11-14
Published in Print: 2017-11-27

© 2017

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.

Downloaded on 4.2.2023 from
Scroll Up Arrow