Skip to content
BY-NC-ND 4.0 license Open Access Published by De Gruyter Open Access March 15, 2018

Pottery Goes Public. Performing Archaeological Research Amid the Audience

  • Loes Opgenhaffen EMAIL logo , Martina Revello Lami and Ivan Kisjes
From the journal Open Archaeology

Abstract

The project Pottery Goes Public explores the potential of 3D analytical tools to assess to what extent they can provide us with new interpretations and insights into the technological aspects of ancient pottery manufacturing. However, developing innovative 3D imaging techniques for ceramic analysis is not the only aim of the project. Since its inception, Pottery Goes Public has been designed to involve a wider audience not only into the study of ancient potting techniques, but also into the very process of carrying out the research. As advocated by the proponents of a reflexive approach to archaeology, in order to make the past relevant to contemporary society it is imperative for the archaeologist to include all interested parties into every stage of the analysis, from the formulation of the research questions to the dissemination of outputs. In this sense, the deployment of modern 3D technologies proved to be an indisputably powerful medium of communication and interaction with the public at large. Performing live archaeological research with cutting edge tools is a key step towards opening up academic research to multiple actors and actively engaging them with the archaeological interpretative process.

References

Berggren, Å., Dell’Unto, N., Forte, M., Haddow, S., Hodder, I., Issavi, J., Lercari, N. Mazzuccato, C., Allison, M. & Taylor, J. S. (2015). Revisiting reflexive archaeology at Çatalhöyük: integrating digital and 3D technologies at the trowel’s edge. Antiquity, 89 (344), 433-448.10.15184/aqy.2014.43Search in Google Scholar

Bernab. Brea, L., & Cavalier, M. (1985). Archeologia subacquea nelle isole Eolie,. Archeologia Subacquea 2, 11-127.Search in Google Scholar

Blanck, H. (1978). Der Schiffsfund von der Secca di Capistello bei Lipari. Mitteilungen des Deutsches Archäologischen Instituts, Römische Abteilung, 85, 91-111.Search in Google Scholar

Bolger, D. (2014). Gender, labor, and pottery production in prehistory. In D. Bolger (Ed.), A companion to gender prehistory. (pp. 161-179). West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.Search in Google Scholar

Burgersdijk, D., Calis, R., Kelder, J., Sofroniew, A., Tusa, S. & Beek, R. van (Eds.). (2015). Sicily and the Sea. Zwolle: WBooks.Search in Google Scholar

Costin, C. L. (2000). The use of ethnoarchaeology for the archaeological study of ceramic production. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 7 (4), 377-403.10.1023/A:1026523023550Search in Google Scholar

Di Giuseppe, H. (2012). Black-Gloss Ware in Italy. Production management and local histories. Oxford: Archaeopress (BAR International Series 2335).Search in Google Scholar

Dobres, M. A. (2010). Archaeologies of technology. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 34 (1), 103-114.10.1093/cje/bep014Search in Google Scholar

Gliozzo, E. & Memmi Turbanti, I. (2004). Black Gloss Pottery: Production Sites and Technology in Northern Etruria, Part I: Provenance Studies. Archaeometry, 46 (2), 201-225.10.1111/j.1475-4754.2004.00153.xSearch in Google Scholar

Grosman, L. (2016). Reaching the Point of No Return: The Computational Revolution in Archaeology. Annu.Rev.Anthropol, 45, 129-145.10.1146/annurev-anthro-102215-095946Search in Google Scholar

Hodder, I. (1991). Interpretive Archaeology and Its Role. American Antiquity, 56 (1), 7-18.10.2307/280968Search in Google Scholar

Hodder, I. (1997). ‘Always momentary, fluid and flexible’: towards a reflexive excavation methodology. Antiquity, 71 (273), 691-700.10.1017/S0003598X00085410Search in Google Scholar

Hodder, I. (Ed.). (2000). Towards reflexive method in archaeology: the example at Çatalhöyük (No. 28). Cambridge: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research.Search in Google Scholar

Hodder, I. (2003). Archaeological Reflexivity and the “Local” Voice. Anthropological Quarterly, 76 (1), 55-69.10.1353/anq.2003.0010Search in Google Scholar

Hodder, I. (2005). Reflexive methods. In H. D. Maschner & C. Chippindale (Eds.), Handbook of archaeological methods (Vol. 1). (pp. 643-649). Lanham, MD: Rowman AltaMira Press.Search in Google Scholar

Knappett, C. (1999). Tradition and innovation in pottery forming technology: wheel-throwing at Middle Minoan Knossos. Annual of the British School at Athens, 94, 101-12.10.1017/S0068245400000538Search in Google Scholar

Kohring, S. (2006). Let’s NOT talk technology? Bringing production into a discussion of technological knowledge. Archaeological Review from Cambridge, 21 (1), 98-116.Search in Google Scholar

Llobera, M. (2011). Archaeological Visualization: towards an Archaeological Information Science (AISc). Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 18, 193-223.10.1007/s10816-010-9098-4Search in Google Scholar

Louwaard, M. (2007). Ceramica a vernice nera. In M. Gnade (Ed.), Satricum. Trenta anni di scavi olandesi. (pp. 176-179). Leuven: Peeters.Search in Google Scholar

Maaskant-Kleibrink, M. (1991). Early Latin settlement plans at Borgo Le Ferriere (Satricum). Bulletin antieke beschaving (BaBesch), 66, 51-114.10.2143/BAB.66.0.2005981Search in Google Scholar

Maschner, H. D. G., Schou, C. D. & Holmes, J. (2013). Virtualization and the Democratization of Science: 3D Technologies Revolutionize Museum Research and Access. In: A. C. Addison, G. Guidi, L. De Luca, S. Pescarin (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2013 Digital Heritage International Congress (DigitalHeritage), Volume 1. (pp. 265-271). Marseille: IEEE.Search in Google Scholar

Mirti, P. & Davit, P. (2001). Technological Characterization of Campanian Pottery of Type A, B and C and of Regional Products from Ancient Calabria (Southern Italy). Archaeometry, 43 (1), 19-33.10.1111/1475-4754.00002Search in Google Scholar

Morel, J.-P. (1969). Etudes de céramique campanienne, I: L’atelier des petites estampilles. Mélanges d’archéologie et d’histoire, 81 (1), 59-117.10.3406/mefr.1969.7569Search in Google Scholar

Morel, J.-P. (1981). Céramique campanienne: les formes. Rome: École française de Rome (Bibliothèque des écoles françaises d’Athènes et de Rome 244).Search in Google Scholar

Morel, J.-P. (2004). Quatre épaves des Îles Éoliennes dans le contexte méditerranéen. In: P. Pelagatti, G. Spadea (Eds.), Dalle Arene Candide a Lipari. Scritti in onore di Luigi Bernabò Brea, Atti del Convegno (Genova, 3-5 febbraio 2001). Roma: Istituto poligrafico e Zecca dello Stato, Libreria dello Stato, (pp. 75-102) (Bolletino d’arte, 124).Search in Google Scholar

Morgan, C. & Eve, S. (2012). DIY and digital archaeology: what are you doing to participate? World Archaeology, 44 (4), 521-537.10.1080/00438243.2012.741810Search in Google Scholar

Morgan, C. (2015). Punk, DIY, and Anarchy in Archaeological Thought and Practice. AP: Journal of Online Public Archaeology, 5, 123-146.Search in Google Scholar

Olcese, G. (2012). Atlante dei siti di produzione ceramica (Toscana, Lazio, Campania e Sicilia): con le tabelle dei principali relitti del Mediterraneo occidentale con carichi dall’Italia centro meridionale: IV secolo aC-I secolo dC. Roma: Quasar.Search in Google Scholar

Pedroni, L. (1989). Nuova matrice per decorazioni a rilievo da Cales. Samnium, 62, 225-230.Search in Google Scholar

Revello Lami, M., Opgenhaffen, L. & Kisjes, I. (2016). Pottery goes digital. 3D laser scanning technology and the study of archaeological ceramics. In: S. Campana, R. Scopigno, G. Carpentiero, M. Cirillo (Eds.), Proceedings of the 43rd Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology Conference ‘Keep the Revolution Going’ (CAA, 30 March - 3 April 2015), University of Siena (pp. 421-432). Siena. Oxford: Archaeopress,.Search in Google Scholar

Shirk, J. L., Ballard, H. L., Wilderman, C. C., Phillips, T., Wiggins, A., Jordan, R., McCallie, E., Minarchek, M., Lewenstein, B. V., Krasny, M. E. & Bonney, R. (2012). Public participation in scientific research: a framework for deliberate design, Ecology and Society 17(2): 29, https://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol17/iss2/art29/10.5751/ES-04705-170229Search in Google Scholar

Stanco, E. A. (2009). La seriazione cronologica della ceramica a vernice nera etrusco-laziale nell’ambito del III secolo aC.Search in Google Scholar

Suburbium II, In V. Jolivet, C. Pavolini, M. A. Tomei, R. Volpe (Eds.), Suburbium II. Il Suburbio di Roma dalla fine dell’età monarchica alla nascita del sistema delle ville (V-II sec. a.C.). Atti del Convegno (Roma 16 novembre, 3 dicembre 2004, 17-18 febbraio 2005) (pp. 157-93). Roma.Search in Google Scholar

Tringham, R. & López, M. A. (2001). The Democratization of Technology. In: L. Addison & H. Thwaites (Eds.), Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Virtual Systems and Multimedia (VSMM’01). (pp. 271-279). Berkeley: UC Berkeley.Search in Google Scholar

Wendrich, W. (Ed.). (2013). Archaeology and apprenticeship: Body knowledge, identity, and communities of practice. Tucson, AZ: University of Arizona Press.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2017-03-30
Accepted: 2018-01-01
Published Online: 2018-03-15

© 2018

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.

Downloaded on 3.10.2023 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/opar-2018-0004/html
Scroll to top button