Skip to content
BY-NC-ND 4.0 license Open Access Published by De Gruyter Open Access April 3, 2018

Wonderful Things? A Consideration of 3D Modelling of Objects in Material Culture Research

Barry Molloy and Marina Milić
From the journal Open Archaeology

Abstract

The role of 3D modelling in archaeology is increasing exponentially, from fieldwork to architecture to material culture studies. For the study of archaeological objects the roles of digital and print models for public engagement has been much considered in recent literature. For model makers, focus has typically been placed on exceptional and visually striking objects with inherent appeal. In contrast, this paper explores some of the potential roles for 3D digital models for routine artefact research and publication. Particular emphasis is placed on the challenges this technology raises for archaeological theory and practice. Following a consideration of how 3D models relate to established illustration and photographic traditions, the paper evaluates some of the unique features of 3D models, focussing on both positive and negative aspects of these. This is followed by a discussion of the role of potential research connections between digital and craft models in experimental research. Our overall objective is to emphasise a need to engage with the ways in which this gradual development has begun to change aspects of longestablished workflows. In turn, the increasing use of this technology is argued to have wider ramifications for the development of archaeology, and material culture studies in particular, as a discipline that requires reflection.

References

Bader, T. (1991). Die Schwerter in Rumänien. Prahistorische Bronzefunde. Franz Steiner Verlag Wiesbaden GmbH, Stuttgart.Search in Google Scholar

Barrett, J.C. (2016). The new antiquarianism? Antiquity 90, 1681-1686.10.15184/aqy.2016.216Search in Google Scholar

Bevan, A., Xiuzhen, L., Martinon-Torres, M., Green, S., Xia, Y., Zhao, K., Zhao, Z., Shengtao, M., Cao, W., Rehren, T. (2014). Computer vision, archaeological classification and China’s terracotta warriors. J. Archaeol. Sci. 49, 249-254.10.1016/j.jas.2014.05.014Search in Google Scholar

Buchanan, B. & Collard, M. (2010). A geometric morphometrics-based assessment of blade shape differences among Paleoindian projectile point types from western North America. J. Archaeol. Sci. 350-359.10.1016/j.jas.2009.09.047Search in Google Scholar

Carlson, E. S. (2014). Representation and Structure Conflict in the Digital Age Reassessing Archaeological Illustration and the Use of Cubist Techniques in Depicting Images of the Past. Adv. Archaeol. Pract. 2, 269-284.10.7183/2326-3768.2.4.269Search in Google Scholar

Costa, C. (2010). A Geometric Morphometric Assessment of Plan Shape in Bone and Stone Acheulean Bifaces from the Middle Pleistocene Site of Castel di Guido, Latium, Italy, in: Lycett, S. J., Chauhan, P. R. (Eds.), New Perspectives on Old Stones: Analytical Approaches to Palaeolithic Technology (pp. 23-41). Springer, New York.Search in Google Scholar

Di Giuseppantonio Di Franco, P., Camporesi, C., Galeazzi, F., Kallmann, M. (2015). 3D Printing and Immersive Visualization for Improved Perception of Ancient Artifacts. Presence 24, 243-264.10.1162/PRES_a_00229Search in Google Scholar

Eve, S. (2018). Losing our Senses, an Exploration of 3D Object Scanning. Open Archaeology, 4(1), 114-122. doi: https://doi.org/10.1515/opar-2018-0007Search in Google Scholar

Fahlander, F. (2007). Third space encounters: Hybridity, mimicry and interstitial practice. In P. Cornell and F. Fahlander (Eds.), Encounters | Materialities | Confrontations Archaeologies of Social Space and Interaction (pp. 15-41). Cambridge Scholars Press, Newcastle.Search in Google Scholar

Georganas, I. (2010). Weapons and warfare. In Cline, E. H. (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of the Bronze Age Aegean (Ca. 3000-1000 BC) (pp. 305-314). Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Golubiewski-Davis, K. (2018). From 3D Scans to Networks: Using Swords to Understand Communities of Central European Bronze Age Smiths. Open Archaeology, 4(1), 123-144. doi: https://doi.org/10.1515/opar-2018-0008Search in Google Scholar

Harding, A. (1995). Die Schwerter Im Ehemaligen Jugoslawien. Prahistorische Bronzefunde. Franz Steiner Verlag Wiesbaden GmbH, Stuttgart.Search in Google Scholar

Hassett, B. & Lewis-Bale, T. (2017). Comparison of 3D Landmark and 3D Dense Cloud Approaches to Hominin MandibleMorphometrics Using Structure-From-Motion. Archaeometry 59, 191-203. 10.1111/arcm.12229Search in Google Scholar

Hodder, I. (2012). Entangled: an archaeology of the relationships between humans and things. Wiley-Blackwell, Malden.10.1002/9781118241912Search in Google Scholar

Jaklič, A., Erič, M., Mihajlović, I., Stopinšek, Ž., & Solina, F. (2015). Volumetric models from 3D point clouds: The case study of sarcophagi cargo from a 2nd/3rd century AD Roman shipwreck near Sutivan on island Brač, Croatia. J. Archaeol. Sci. 62, 143-152. doi:10.1016/j.jas.2015.08.007Search in Google Scholar

Kemenczei, T. (1988). Die Schwerter in Ungarn. Griffplatten-, Griffangel-, Griffzungenschwerter. Prahistorische Bronzefunde. C.H. Beck, Munich.Search in Google Scholar

Kienlin, T. & Ottaway, B. (1998). Flanged axes of the northalpine Region: an assessment of the possibilities of use wear analysis on metal artefacts. In: Mordant, C., Pernot, M., Rychner, V. (Eds.), L’Atelier Du Bronzier En Europe Du XXe Au VIIIe Siecle Avant Notre Ere (pp. 271-286). CTHS, Paris.Search in Google Scholar

Kilian-Dirlmeier, I. (1993). Die Schwerter in Griechenland (ausserhalb der Peloponnes), Bulgarien und Albanien. Prahistorische Bronzefunde. F. Steiner, Stuttgart.Search in Google Scholar

Knappett, C. (2010). Communities of Things and Objects: a Spatial Perspective. In Malafouris, L. & Renfrew, C. (Eds.), The Cognitive Life of Things: Recasting the Boundaries of the Mind (pp. 81-90). MacDonald Institute for Archaeological Research, Oxford.Search in Google Scholar

Lycett, S. J. & von Cramon-Taubadel, N. (2013). A 3D morphometric analysis of surface geometry in Levallois cores: Patterns of stability and variability across regions and their implications. J. Archaeol. Sci. 40(3), 1508-1517.10.1016/j.jas.2012.11.005Search in Google Scholar

Marić, M. & Pendić, J. (2017). Analog vs. Digital documentation - cutting the costs, expanding the possibilities. Idjoš Gradište case study. Interdisciplinaria Archaeologica 8/2, online first.Search in Google Scholar

Mathieu, J. R. (2002). Introduction: replicating past objects, behaviours and processes. In Mathieu, J. R. (ed.), Experimental Archaeology (pp. 1-10). British Archaeological Reports, Oxford.Search in Google Scholar

Moitinho de Almeida, V. & Anton Barcelo, J. (2013). Towards Reverse Engineering Archaeological Artefacts. In Earl, G., Sly, T., Chrysanthi, A., Murrieta-Flores, P., Papadopoulos, C., Romanowska, I., Wheatley, D. (Eds.), Archaeology in the Digital Era Volume II (pp. 432-433). Amsterdam University Press, Amsterdam.Search in Google Scholar

Molloy, B. P. C. (2016). Nought may endure but Mutability: Intercultural encounters and material transformations in the thirteenth to eleventh century BC Southeast Europe. In Molloy, B. P. C. (Ed.), Of Odysseys and Oddities: Scales and Modes of Interaction in the Prehistoric Aegean (pp. 343-384). Sheffield Studies in Aegean Archaeology. Oxbow Books, Oxford.Search in Google Scholar

Molloy, B. P. C. (2011). Use-wear analysis and use-patterns of Bronze Age swords. In Uckelmann, M., Modlinger, M. (Eds.), New Approaches to Studying Weapons of the Bronze Age (pp. 67-84). British Archaeological Reports, Oxford.Search in Google Scholar

Molloy, B. P. C. (2006). The role of combat weaponry in Bronze Age societies: The cases of the Aegean and Ireland in the Middle and Late Bronze Age. University College Dublin, Dublin.Search in Google Scholar

Molloy, B. P. C., Wisnieski, M., Lynam, F., O’Neill, B., O’Sullivan, A., & Peatfield, A. (2016). Tracing edges: A consideration of the applications of 3D modelling for metalwork wear analysis on Bronze Age bladed artefacts. J. Archaeol. Sci. 76, 79-87.10.1016/j.jas.2016.09.007Search in Google Scholar

Morgan, C. (2012). Emancipatory Digital Archaeology. University of California, Berkeley.Search in Google Scholar

Morgan, C. & Wright, H. (2018). Pencils and Pixels: Drawing and Digital Media in Archaeological Field Recording. Journal of Field Archaeology 43(2), 136-151. doi: 10.1080/00934690.2018.1428488.Search in Google Scholar

Moser, S. (1992). The visual language of archaeology: A case study of the Neandrathals. Antiquity 66, 831-844.10.1017/S0003598X0004477XSearch in Google Scholar

O Faolain, S. & Northover, P. (1998). The Technology of Late Bronze Age Sword Production in Ireland. J. Ir. Archaeol. IX, 69-86.Search in Google Scholar

O’Faolain, S. (2004). Bronze Artefact Production in Late Bronze Age Ireland: a survey. Archaeopress, Oxford.Search in Google Scholar

Olsen, B., Shanks, M., Webmoor, T., & Witmore, C. (2012). Archaeology: the discipline of things. University of California Press, Berkeley.10.1525/california/9780520274167.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Opgenhaffen, L., Revello Lami, M., & Kisjes, I. (2018). Pottery Goes Public. Performing Archaeological Research Amid the Audience. Open Archaeology, 4(1), 62-80. doi: https://doi.org/10.1515/opar-2018-0004Search in Google Scholar

Peatfield, A. (1999). The Paradox of Violence: Weaponry and Martial Art in Minoan Crete. In Polemos, Aegaeum (pp. 67-74). Univerite de Liege, Liege.Search in Google Scholar

Peroni, V. B. (1970). Die Schwerter in Italien. Prahistorische Bronzefunde. Beck, Munich.Search in Google Scholar

Perry, S. (2015). Crafting knowledge with (digital) visual media in archaeology. In Chapman, R., Wylie, A. (Eds.), Material Evidence: Learning from Archaeological Practice (pp. 189-210). Routledge, London.Search in Google Scholar

Perry, S. (2013). Archaeological visualisation and the manifestation of the discipline: model-making at the Institute of Archaeology, London. In Alberti, B., Jones, A.M., Pollard, J. (Eds.), Archaeology after Interpretation: Returning Materials to Archaeological Theory. Left Coast Press, Walnut.Search in Google Scholar

Revello Lami, M., Opgehaffen, L. & Kisjes, I. (2016). Pottery Goes Digital. 3D Laser Scanning Technology and the Study of Archaeological Ceramics. In Campana, S., Scopigno, R., Carpentiero, G. (Eds.), Keep The Revolution Going. Proceedings of the 43rd Annual Conference on Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology 2015 (pp. 421-428). Archaeopress Archaeology.Search in Google Scholar

Rico, T. (2017). Technologies, technocracy, and the promise of “alternative” heritage values. In Silverman, H., Waterton, E., Watson, S. (Eds.), Heritage in Action (pp. 217-230). Springer, New York.10.1007/978-3-319-42870-3_15Search in Google Scholar

Schauer, P. (1971). Die Schwerter in Süddeutschland, Österreich und der Schweiz. Griffplatten-, Griffangel- und Griffzungenschwerter. Prahistorische Bronzefunde. C.H. Beck, Munich.Search in Google Scholar

Selden Jr., R., Perttula, T., & O’Brien, M. (2014). Advances in Documentation, Digital Curation, Virtual Exhibition, and a Test of 3D Geometric Morphometrics: A Case Study of the Vanderpool Vessels from the Ancestral Caddo Territory. Adv. Archaeol. Pract. 2, 65-79.Search in Google Scholar

Sørensen, M. L. S. (2015). “Paradigm lost” - on the State of Typology within Archaeological Theory. In Kristiansen, K., Šmejda, L., Turek, J. (Eds.), Paradigm Found: Archaeological Theory Present, Past and Future Essays in Honour of Evžen Neustupný (pp. 84-94). Oxbow, Oxford.Search in Google Scholar

Stockhammer, P.W. (2012). Entangled pottery: Phenomena of appropriation in the Late Bronze Age Eastern Mediterranean. In J.Maran & P. W. Stockhammer (Eds.), Materiality and Social Practice: The Transformative Capacities of Intercultural Encounters (pp. 89-103). Oxbow Books, Oxford.Search in Google Scholar

Taylor, J. & Gibson, L. K. (2016). Digitisation, digital interaction and social media: embedded barriers to democratic heritage. Int. J. Herit. Stud. 23, 408-420.10.1080/13527258.2016.1171245Search in Google Scholar

Van Dommelen, P. & Rowlands, M. (2012). Material concerns and colonial encounters. In J.Maran & P. W. Stockhammer (Eds.), Materiality and Social Practice: The Transformative Capacities of Intercultural Encounters (pp. 20-31). Oxbow Books, Oxford.Search in Google Scholar

Witmore, C. (2014). Archaeology and the New Materialisms. J. Contemp. Archaeol. 1, 203-46.10.1558/jca.v1i2.16661Search in Google Scholar

Wilczek, J., Monna, F., Barral, P., Burlet, L., Chateau, C., & Navarro, N. (2014). Morphometrics of Second Iron Age ceramics - strengths, weaknesses, and comparison with traditional typology. J. Archaeol. Sci. 50, 39-50. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2014.05.033Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2017-10-12
Accepted: 2018-03-06
Published Online: 2018-04-03

© 2018

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.

Scroll Up Arrow