Skip to content
BY-NC-ND 4.0 license Open Access Published by De Gruyter Open Access September 1, 2018

Archaeological Knowledge Production and Global Communities: Boundaries and Structure of the Field

  • Rimvydas Laužikas EMAIL logo , Costis Dallas , Suzie Thomas , Ingrida Kelpšienė , Isto Huvila , Pedro Luengo , Helena Nobre , Marina Toumpouri and Vykintas Vaitkevičius
From the journal Open Archaeology


Archaeology and material cultural heritage enjoys a particular status as a form of heritage that, capturing the public imagination, has become the locus for the expression and negotiation of regional, national, and intra-national cultural identities. One important question is: why and how do contemporary people engage with archaeological heritage objects, artefacts, information or knowledge outside the realm of an professional, academically-based archaeology? This question is investigated here from the perspective of theoretical considerations based on Yuri Lotman’s semiosphere theory, which helps to describe the connections between the centre and peripheries of professional archaeology as sign structures. The centre may be defined according to prevalent scientific paradigms, while periphery in the space of creolisation in which, through interactions with other culturally more distant sign structures, archaeology-related nonprofessional communities emerge. On the basis of these considerations, we use collocation analysis on representative English language corpora to outline the structure of the field of archaeology-related nonprofessional communities, identify salient creolised peripheral spaces and archaeology-related practices, and develop a framework for further investigation of archaeological knowledge production and reuse in the context of global archaeology.


Acropolis of Athens. (2018). in Google Scholar

Adie, B. A., Hall, C. M., & Prayag, G. (2017). World Heritage as a placebo brand: a comparative analysis of three sites and marketing implications. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, DOI: 10.1080/09669582.2017.135927710.1080/09669582.2017.1359277Search in Google Scholar

Adopt-a-Monument. (2018). http://adoptoimonumentti.fiSearch in Google Scholar

Akropolis. (2018). in Google Scholar

ARKWORK (2016). Memorandum of Understanding for the implementation of the COST action “Archaeological practices and knowledge work in the digital environment” (ARKWORK) CA15201 (COST 002/16). Brussel: COST, in Google Scholar

Atalay, S. (2012). Community-based archaeology: research with, by, and for indigenous and local communities. Berkeley, Ca.: University of California Press.Search in Google Scholar

Barranha, H., Caldas, J. V., & Silva, R. (2017). Translating heritage into museums: two architectural strategies inside Lisbon Castle. Journal of Cultural Heritage Management and Sustainable Development, 7(1), 33-47. DOI: 10.1108/JCHMSD-05-2016-003310.1108/JCHMSD-05-2016-0033Search in Google Scholar

Bauman, Z. (2000). Liquid modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.Search in Google Scholar

Boeuf, P., Doerr, M., Ore, C. E., & Stead, S. (Eds.). (2017). Definition of the CIDOC Conceptual Reference Model. Produced by the ICOM/CIDOC Documentation Standards Group, Continued by the CIDOC CRM Special Interest Group Version 6.2.3, in Google Scholar

Bonacchi, C., Pett, D., Bevan, A., & Keinan-Schoonbaert, A. (2015) Experiments in Crowd-funding Community Archaeology. Journal of Community Archaeology and Heritage, 2(3), 184-198. DOI: in Google Scholar

Boyd, D. M. & Ellison, B. N. (2007). Social Network Sites: Definition, History, and Scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1). DOI: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00393.x10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00393.xSearch in Google Scholar

Brodie, N. (2011). Congenial bedfellows? The academy and the antiquities trade. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 27(4), 408-437.10.1177/1043986211418885Search in Google Scholar

Brodie, N., Contreras, D., Merryman, J., Harrison, P., Seligman, T., & Meskell, L. (2009). Buying, Selling, Owning the Past, in Google Scholar

Brown, M. F. (2005). Heritage Trouble: Recent Work on the Protection of Intangible Cultural Property. International Journal of Cultural Property, 12(01), 40-61. DOI: 10.1017/S094073910505001010.1017/S0940739105050010Search in Google Scholar

Bruchac, M., Hart, S., & Wobst, H. M. (2016). Indigenous Archaeologies: A Reader on Decolonization. Walnut Creek: Left Coast Press.10.4324/9781315426778Search in Google Scholar

Castells, M. (2000). The Rise of The Network Society: The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture. Oxford: John Wiley & Sons.Search in Google Scholar

Castells, M. (2009). The Power of Identity: The Information Age: Economy, Society, and Culture. Oxford: John Wiley & Sons.Search in Google Scholar

Cave of Altamira. (2018).;jsessionid=C90FA0A903BE25AB89691921AD9336E7Search in Google Scholar

Choo, C. W. (2002). Information Management for the Intelligent Organization: The Art of Scanning the Environment. Medford Township: Information Today, Inc.Search in Google Scholar

Christie, A. (1936). Murder in Mesopotamia. London: Collins Crime Club.Search in Google Scholar

Clack, T., & Brittain, M. (2007). Archaeology and the media. Walnut Creek: Left Coast Press.Search in Google Scholar

Cleere, H. (2005). Archaeological heritage management in the modern world. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Cowell, B. (2013). The National Planning Policy Framework and Archaeology: A Discussion. Papers from the Institute of Archaeology, 22, 27-29. DOI: in Google Scholar

Dallas, C. (2007). Archaeological knowledge, virtual exhibitions and the social construction of meaning. In P. Moscati (Ed.), Virtual museums and archaeology: the contribution of the Italian National Research Council (pp. 31-64). Roma: Insegna del Giglio. Retrieved from in Google Scholar

Dallas, C. & Kelpšienė, I. (2017). Archaeological interactions between objects, amateurs and professionals on Facebook: a meta-analysis and conceptual framework. Presented at the Building Bridges: 23rd Annual Meeting of the European Association of Archaeologists (EAA2017), Maastricht, The Netherlands.Search in Google Scholar

Dallas, C., & Kelpšienė, I. (2018). Archaeology and social networking sites: a systematic literature review and conceptual analysis of topics, questions and approaches. In Abstracts: Human History and Digital Future: CAA Tubingen 2018 (p. 198). Tubingen: University of Tubingen.Search in Google Scholar

Dallas, C. & Kelpšienė, I. (forthcoming). “Archaeology on Facebook: a Qualitative Data Analysis Based on Interviews and Focus Groups with Administrators”.Search in Google Scholar

Davies, M. (2016a). BYU corpora: billions of words of data. Retrieved June 24, 2018, from in Google Scholar

Davies, M. (2016b). Mutual information. Retrieved June 24, 2018, from in Google Scholar

Darvill, T. (2008). The Concise Oxford Dictionary of Archaeology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Eriksen, T. H. (2018). An Overheated World: An Anthropological History of the Early Twenty-First Century. Oxford: Routledge.10.4324/9781315182322Search in Google Scholar

Evans, M. M., Dalkir, K., & Bidian, C. (2014). A Holistic View of the Knowledge Life Cycle: The Knowledge Management Cycle (KMC) Model. The Electronic Journal of Knowledge Management (EJKM), 12(2), in Google Scholar

Fagan, G. G. & Feder, K. L. (2006). Crusading against straw men: an alternative view of alternative archaeologies: response to Holtorf. World Archaeology, 38(4). 718-729.10.1080/00438240600963528Search in Google Scholar

Foxell, E. & Trafford, A. (2010). Repositioning Malta as a cultural heritage destination. International Journal of Culture, Tourism and Hospitality Research, 4(2), 156-168. DOI: in Google Scholar

Friedman, T. (2005). The World is Flat. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Search in Google Scholar

Gablasova, D., Brezina, V., & McEnery, T. (2017). Collocations in Corpus-Based Language Learning Research: Identifying, Comparing, and Interpreting the Evidence. Language learning, Volume 67, Issue S1, 155-179. DOI: in Google Scholar

Gonzalez, M. V. (2008). Intangible heritage tourism and identity.Tourism Management, 29, 807-810. DOI:10.1016/j.tourman.2007.07.00310.1016/j.tourman.2007.07.003Search in Google Scholar

Great Excavations: Volunteering on Archaeological Sites Worldwide. (2018). in Google Scholar

Grove, L. & Thomas, S. (2014). What’s the Future for Heritage Crime Research? Heritage Crime, (pp. 224-230), in Google Scholar

Guarino, N., Oberle, D., & Staab, S. (2009). What is an ontology? In Handbook on ontologies (pp. 1-17). Springer. Retrieved from in Google Scholar

Hayward, P. & Kuwahara, S. (2014). Takarajima: A Treasured Island Exogeneity, folkloric identity and local branding. Journal of Marine and Island Cultures, 3, 20-30. DOI: in Google Scholar

Hansson, S. O. (2008). Science and Pseudoscience. In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, in Google Scholar

Harding, A. (2006). That Bosnian pyramid! The European Archaeologist, 25, in Google Scholar

Harvey, D. C. (2001). Heritage pasts and heritage presents: temporality, meaning and the scope of heritage studies. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 7(4), 319-338. DOI: in Google Scholar

Henson, D. (2014) Avocational Archaeology. In: Smith C. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Global Archaeology. Springer, New York, NY. DOI: in Google Scholar

Holtorf, C. (2005). Beyond crusades: how (not) to engage with alternative archaeologies. World Archaeology, Vol. 37(4), 544-551.10.1080/00438240500395813Search in Google Scholar

Holtorf, C. (2005). From Stonehenge to Las Vegas: Archaeology as Popular Culture. Lanham: Rowman Altamira.Search in Google Scholar

Holtorf, C. (2007). Archaeology is a Brand!: The Meaning of Archaeology in Contemporary Popular Culture. Oxford: Archaeopress.Search in Google Scholar

Hosany, S., Ekinci, Y., & .Uysal, M. (2006). Destination image and destination personality: An application of branding theories to tourism places. Journal of Business Research, 59, 638-642. DOI:10.1016/j.jbusres.2006.01.00110.1016/j.jbusres.2006.01.001Search in Google Scholar

Huvila, I. & Huggett, J. (2018). Archaeological practices, knowledge work and digitalisation. Journal of Computer Applications in Archaeology, 1(1), 88-100. DOI: in Google Scholar

ICOM-COMCOL. (2018). COMCOL. Collecting. International Committee for Collecting, in Google Scholar

ICOM-ICMAH. (2018). ICMAH. Archaeology and History. International Committee for Museums and Collections of Archaeology and History, in Google Scholar

ICOMOS. (2018). The International Scientific Committee on Archaeological Heritage Management (ICAHM), in Google Scholar

Kaplan, A. M. & Heinlein, M. (2012). Social media: back to the roots and back to the muture. Journal of Systems and Information Technology, 14(2), 101-104. DOI: 10.1108/13287261211232126.10.1108/13287261211232126Search in Google Scholar

Kelly, K. (2016). The Inevitable. New York: Viking Press.Search in Google Scholar

Kerr, J. (2017). Heritage crime: progress, prospects and prevention. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 23(7), 677-678. DOI: in Google Scholar

Kjellmer, G. (1991). A Mint of Phrases. In Aijmer, K., Altenberg, B. (Eds.), English Corpus Linguistics (111-128). London : Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Koskinen-Koivisto, E. & Thomas, S. (2017). Lapland’s Dark Heritage: Responses to the legacy of World War II. In Silverman, H., Waterton, E., Watson S. (Eds.), Heritage in Action (pp. 121-133). Cham: Springer International Publishing.Search in Google Scholar

Kull, K. (2011). Juri Lotman in English: Bibliography. Sign Systems Studies, 39(2/4), 343-356, in Google Scholar

Kull, K. (2014). Juri Lotman in English: Updates to bibliography. Sign Systems Studies 42(4), 549-552, in Google Scholar

Lahdesmaki, T. (2014). The EU’S Explicit and Implicit Heritage Politics. European Societies, 16(3), 401-421.10.1080/14616696.2014.894547Search in Google Scholar

Lisbon Castle. (2018). in Google Scholar

Lobachev, S. (2008). Top languages in global information production. Partnership: The Canadian Journal of Library and Information Practice and Research, 3(2), in Google Scholar

Lotman, J. (2001). Universe of the Mind: A Semiotic Theory of Culture. London: I.B.Tauris.Search in Google Scholar

Lotman, J. (2005). On the semiosphere. Sign Systems Studies, 33(1/4), 205-229, in Google Scholar

Lowenthal, D. (2005). Why Sanctions Seldom Work: Reflections on Cultural Property Internationalism. International Journal of Cultural Property, 12(3), 393-423. DOI: 10.1017/S094073910505021610.1017/S0940739105050216Search in Google Scholar

Marcinkevičienė, R. (2010). Lietuvių kalbos kolokacijos. Kaunas: Vytauto Didžiojo universitetas.Search in Google Scholar

Marx A., Nurra F., & Salas Rossenbach K. (2017). Europeans & Archaeology. A survey on the European perception of archaeology and archaeological heritage, Paris: NEARCH. DOI: in Google Scholar

Matten, M. A. (2012). Places of Memory in Modern China: History, Politics, and Identity. Leiden: Brill.10.1163/9789004220966Search in Google Scholar

McLuhan, M. (1962). The Gutenberg Galaxy: The Making of Typographic Man. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Search in Google Scholar

Merriman, N. (Ed.). (2004). Public archaeology. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203646052Search in Google Scholar

Mutual information. (2018). BYU corpora, in Google Scholar

Nuckolls, C. W. (2008). Archaeology, mormonism, and the claims of history. Marburg journal of religion, 13(1). DOI: in Google Scholar

Pauwels, A. (2015). ISIS and illicit trafficking in cultural property: Funding terrorism through art. Freedom from fear magazine, 1 November 2015, (22.02.2018).Search in Google Scholar

Pearce, S. M. (1990). Archaeological curatorship. Washington: Smithsonian Institution Press.Search in Google Scholar

Pezzini, I. (2013). Nuovi spazi semiotici nella citta. Due casi a Roma. Lexia, 1-2, 49-67.Search in Google Scholar

Poor, J. P. & Snowball, J. D. (2010). The valuation of campus built heritage from the student perspective: Comparative analysis of Rhodes University in South Africa and St. Mary’s College of Maryland in the United States. Journal of Cultural Heritage, 11(2), 145-154. DOI: 10.1016/j.culher.2009.05.00210.1016/j.culher.2009.05.002Search in Google Scholar

Raja, R. (2017). A virtual market for illegal trade in cultural goods: Palmyra in Syria as an example. Report. Copenhagen: Nordic Council of Ministers.Search in Google Scholar

Rasmussen, J. M. (2014) Securing cultural heritage objects and fencing stolen goods? A case study on museums and metal detecting in Norway. Norwegian Archaeological Review, 47(1), 83-107. DOI: in Google Scholar

Richardson, L. J. (2017). I’ll give you ‘punk archaeology’, sunshine. World Archaeology, 49(3), 306-317. DOI: in Google Scholar

Ross, D., Saxena, G., Correia, F., & Deutzb, P. (2017). Archaeological tourism: A creative approach. Annals of Tourism Research, 67, 37-47. DOI: in Google Scholar

Roued-Cunliffe, H. (2017). Collection building amongst heritage amateurs. Collection Building, 36(3), 108-114. DOI: in Google Scholar

Rountree, K. (2014). Neo-Paganism, Native Faith and indigenous religion: a case study of Malta within the European context. Social Anthropology/Anthropology Sociale, 22, 81-100. DOI:10.1111/1469-8676.1206310.1111/1469-8676.12063Search in Google Scholar

Scotland’s Rural Past project. (2018). in Google Scholar

Sebastian, L. & Lipe, W. D. (2010). Archaeology and Cultural Resource Management: Visions for the Future. Santa Fe: School for Advanced Press.Search in Google Scholar

Seitsonen, O. (2017) Crowdsourcing cultural heritage: public participation and conflict legacy in Finland, Journal of Community Archaeology and Heritage, 4(2), 115-130. DOI: in Google Scholar

Simo, F. (2014). The Latest on Facebook Video. Facebook Newsroom, 7 September, 2014. in Google Scholar

Sinclair, J. (1991). Corpus, Concordance, Collocation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Skeates, R. (2017). Museums and archaeology. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Smith, L. & Waterton, E. (2009). Heritage, Communities and Archaeology. London: Bloomsbury Academic.Search in Google Scholar

Soininen, T. L. (2017). Adopt-a-Monument: Preserving archaeological heritage for the people, with the people. Journal of Community Archaeology & Heritage, 4(2), 131-137.10.1080/20518196.2017.1293926Search in Google Scholar

Souza, E. (2010). AD Classics: Le Grande Louvre / I.M. Pei. Arch Daily, 18 November, 2010. (22.02.2018).Search in Google Scholar

StoneAge Inc. (2018). in Google Scholar

Stubbs, M. (2001). Words and Phrases. Corpus Studies of Lexical Semantics. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.Search in Google Scholar

The Archaeological Park: Bosnian Pyramid of the Sun Foundation (2018). in Google Scholar

The British Numismatic Society. (2018). in Google Scholar

Thomas, S. (2012) Searching for Answers: A Survey of Metal-Detector Users in the UK. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 18(1), 49-64. DOI: in Google Scholar

Van Eyck. (2017 29 August ‒ 26 November). The Materiality of the Invisible. Maastricht. in Google Scholar

Vikings. (2013). A television series, in Google Scholar

White, L., Schutt, S., & Roberts, S. (2016). Uncovering ghost signs and their meanings. In S. Schutt, S. Roberts, L. White (Eds.), Advertising and Public Memory: Social, Cultural and Historical Perspectives on Ghost Signs (pp. 1-14). 2017. London: Routledge, Taylor & Francis. DOI: 10.4324/978131567775010.4324/9781315677750Search in Google Scholar

Williams, S. (1992). Fantastic archaeology: What should we do about it?. Journal of Field Archaeology, 19(4), 521-524. DOI: 10.2307/530434.10.2307/530434Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2018-02-23
Accepted: 2018-06-21
Published Online: 2018-09-01

© by Rimvydas Laužikas et al., published by De Gruyter

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.

Downloaded on 1.3.2024 from
Scroll to top button