The First Italian Farmers: The Role of Stone Ornaments in Tradition, Innovation, and Cultural Change


 When the first farmers landed on the eastern coast of the Italian peninsula (end of seventh millennium cal BC), they brought with them a system of knowledge and technologies that quickly spread along both the Tyrrhenian and Adriatic coasts. The study of the material culture, therefore, assumes an important role in understanding the social and cultural identity of these incoming groups. Analyses of ornament production – involving manufacture technology, raw materials, and stylistic choices – may supply information about the cultural choices and the technical skills of human groups and shed light on the social and symbolic system of these ancient populations. Data obtained from this work show that the ornaments became symbols of a growing cultural identity, which began to be developed within Italian territory. In the ornamental assemblages of the newcomers, the relevance of shaped lithic items is clearly visible, and there was the development of types that will become more and more standardized during the Neolithic period. However, elements in the symbolic culture of these first settlers, such as the use of Columbella rustica and the exclusive production of hard animal matter ornaments in some sites, recall previous traditions. This study intends to extend our knowledge on the ornamental customs of the first Italian Neolithic communities. It will attempt to establish if the chronological and the geographical differences that emerge from our analyses reflect diversities in the cultural and symbolic systems of the incoming farmers and different possible interactions with the native population.


Introduction
In Europe, the transition to farming was not a linear process (Manen et al., 2019;Shennan, Downey, & Timpson, 2013), and in many regions, the question remains as to the relationship between the newcomers and the indigenous inhabitants.
The spread of the Neolithic culture throughout the Mediterranean area was facilitated by human groups that brought with them innovative technologies and new artifacts as part of the "Neolithic package." The passage from foraging to a production economy had an impact not only on different aspects of the daily life of the human groups but also on their symbolic codes.
When the first farmers reached the south-eastern coasts of the Italian peninsula (end of seven millennium cal BC), new systems of knowledge and technologies quickly spread along both coasts and then carried on through to the north.
As many authors claim, a holistic approach to the personal ornament productioninvolving manufacture technology, raw materials, and stylistic choicessupplies information about the cultural choices and the technical skills of human groups, but it can also shed light on the role these objects played in the social and symbolic system of the ancient populations (Vanhaeren & D'Errico, 2006).
Data provided from the study of early Neolithic ornamental assemblage show the presence of new highly elaborated items and the progressive development of local customs and behavior patterns due to the progressive formation and stabilization of new communities (Pessina & Tiné, 2008).
However, some elements reveal that these incoming farmers also adopted some features of the previous local traditions, such as the use of Columbella rustica and perforated teeth. The kind of interaction they had with the local hunter-gatherer communities, especially in the central-southern part of the Italian peninsula, remains a widely debated issue due to the scarcity of Late Mesolithic sites (Franco, 2011;Radi & Petrinelli Pannocchia, 2018). Data do not allow for the exclusion that some elements were already part of the traditional heritage of the newcomers (Tozzi, 1996).
In Italy, detailed studies on the prehistoric personal body adornments to date has been focused on northern regions and on specific cultural groups (Bernabò Brea, Maffi, Mazzieri, & Salvadei, 2010;Micheli, 2012) or raw materials (Borrello & Micheli, 2005;Borrello & Rossi, 2005), so that the picture we have remains very limited.
This article intends to review the evidence relating to the production of Neolithic personal ornaments relating to the whole Italian peninsula through the analyses of the main stone elements: pendants, shaped beads, and bracelets.
The evidence provided is collected from published sources, so it may not fully represent the actual composition of the Neolithic repertoire. Publications, especially the older ones, often omit the presence of ornaments in the sites or provide only a hint to their presence. Moreover, during the past excavations, their number could have been, at times, underestimated due to inadequate recovery techniques employed.
A brief overview of the pre-Neolithic ornamental assemblages is followed by an analysis about how and where new Neolithic stone ornaments spread in the Italian peninsula, underlining the eventual differences in their production and geographical distribution. To complete the picture of early Neolithic adornments customs, a synthesis of nonlithic items will also be presented.
The chronological and the geographical differences are examined to understand more fully if they reflect diversities in the cultural and symbolic systems of the incoming groups, as well as suggest potential interrelations among the newcomers and the native population.
2 The Neolithization of Italy: A Brief Overview Guilaine (2018) remarked that "the early Neolithic of the Central Mediterranean is a real kaleidoscope and, beyond distinct common basic denominators, it exhibits strong ceramic and lithic variability". The framework at our disposal for the early Italian Neolithic period is continuously refined by new data (Biagi & Starnini, 2021;Binder et al., 2017;Delpino, 2020). The first farmers arrived in south-eastern Italy (Apulia) around the end of seventh millennium cal BC (i.e., Pulo di Molfetta: LTL-142A 7130 ± 60 BP, Binder et al., 2017; Ripa Tetta: Beta-47808 6988 ± 45 BP, Binder et al., 2017;Favella: LTL-778A 7003 ± 55 BP, Tiné, 2009; Table 1). They rapidly penetrated to the hinterland, into the Ionic area and along the Tyrrhenian coast, as shown by the impressed-ceramic levels discovered at the Arene Candide Cave (Beta-66553 6880 ± 60 BP, Bernabò Brea, 1946Brea, , 1956Binder & Maggi, 2001;Maggi, 1997). The early Neolithic of southern Italy, in relation to the Impressed Ware groups, shows a regional variability in the morphological and decorative pattern of the vessels, most likely influenced by the different origin of the first settlers and local evolution of their material culture. The first pioneers on the Tyrrhenian coast, as mentioned earlier, were related to the archaic style of the impressed pottery but were rapidly replaced by the Cardial Ware groups, who spread as far as the Franco-Cantabrian area (Binder & Maggi, 2001;Binder et al., 2017;Guilaine & Manen, 2007).
The neolithization of the Adriatic coast occurred due to settlers coming from south Italy, linked to an evolved phase of the Impressed Ware Culture. At the beginning of sixth millennium cal BC, they reached the Abruzzi region and then spread to the northernmost area around the middle of the same millennium (Bagolini & Von Eles, 1978;Pessina, 2002;Radi, 2010, Table 1; Radmilli, 1974).
In northern Italy, apart from the western zones where the impressed ware mentioned earlier is documented, several early Neolithic groups have been recognized, different in geographical distribution and in some aspects of materials culture: Fiorano, Vhò, Isolino, Gaban, Friulani Groups, and Vlaška Group (Bagolini, 1980b;Pessina, 1998;Pessina & Tiné, 2008). To date, based on available new data, research strictly underlines affinities between some of these groups, the boundaries of which appear increasingly blur (Biagi et al., 2020;Perini, Starnini, D'Amico, & Ottomano, 2001;Perrin, 2006). Despite the evidence of regionalism, the whole peninsula was crossed by a wide exchange network permitting the circulations of artifacts, raw materials, as well as ideas.
This richness and variety of the cultural framework of the early Italian Neolithic are reflected in the personal adornment habits of the diverse human groups.
From the end of the late Epigravettian, the use of Columbella rustica and Cyclope sp. items increases, in particular C. neritea (i.e. Riparo Tagliente Calattini, 2005). Nevertheless, other species of shells such as Glycimeris, Mitra sp., or even the rarer Nassarius reticolata and Dentalium sp. (Antalis dentalis) were collected with the same purpose.
Late Palaeolithic adornment assemblages revealed not only the presence of exchange networks but also the existence of a symbolic language shared or at least understood by the different human groups (Noble & Davidson, 1996;Roach-Higgins & Eicher, 1992;Stiner, Kuhn, & Güleç, 2013;Vanhaeren & D'Errico, 2006). With the emergence of the Holocene, this "language" undergoes changes. The environmental changes affected the relationship between humans and nature. The human communities had to adapt their daily life to these changes that also inevitably involved their spiritual and symbolic sphere.

Neolithic Personal Ornaments
With the neolithization, several changes related to raw material, shape, manufacture quality, and technology as well as the suspension mode occur in the ornamental repertoire of the Italian peninsula. The exploitation of hard animal matter, recalling the previous tradition, continues alongside a significant increment in the use of stone materials, connected to an increase in manufacture complexity.
Data indicate the emergence of high-modified items' productions, with differences in geographical distribution and raw material selection (Figure 3).
These new stone ornament productions can be considered as a marker of the demic migrations who settled the peninsula and are therefore a representation of the new cultural aspects developing in the different areas (Pessina & Tiné, 2008).
The presence in the early Neolithic ornamental assemblage of new types along with pre-Neolithic ones reflects the ornamental trend observed in Southern and Central Europe (Rigaud, D'Errico, & Vanhaeren, 2015).
Among the stone ornaments, pendants are few and scattered throughout the peninsula. The use of the engraved decoration disappears completely, and their shape became more regular and well defined.
Ring bracelets and shaped beads, mainly the discoid one, appear for the first time in the ornamental repertoire. The former shows a particular geographical concentration, while shaped beads have a wider diffusion. The sources of lithic raw materials used were mainly local and were collected in outcrops or riverbanks. However, steatite, greenstone, and marble artifacts have been found in sites far from the outcrops, revealing the existence of a long-distance exchange system and the choice of hard materials for specific items. Shell and bone were also employed, in some cases preferred, to obtain these new shaped ornaments.

Stone Pendants
There is a scarce occurrence of lithic pendants dated to the beginning of the early Neolithic, mostly consisting of minimally processed items, obtained by local raw materials.
Related to the same period are two sub-rectangular pendants, fractured at the level of the hole, coming from the Arene Candide Cave (Traversone, 1999;Figure 4a). Moving on to the north-eastern side of the peninsula, some greenstone pendants have been found at the site of Sammardenchia (D'Amico, 1998; Figure 4c).
From the end of the early and the beginning of the middle Neolithic, the shape of the pendants became more defined, tending toward a geometrical morphology, often trapezoidal or sub-rectangular, but not properly standardized. In the literature, the trapezoidal and thin elongated shaped ones are often defined as miniature axe-heads or chisels, probably with a ritual value (i.e., Passo di Corvo: Tiné, 1983; Capo Alfiere: Morter & Robb, 2010;Murgia Timone, Tirlecchia: Aurino & Mancusi, 2016).
It is interesting to observe that some geometric pendants found in Apulia were exclusively made of jadeite, very similar in color and translucency with the raw material used for the early Neolithic pendant of Colle Santo Stefano. Conversely, in central-northern Italy, the middle Neolithic stone ornaments show a preferential use of dark-colored soapstone. During the last phase of the Neolithic, pendants become more common (i.e., Mulino da Basso: Gravina, 2014; Casali di Porta Medaglia: Carboni & Anzidei, 2020; All' Onda Cave: Amadei & Grifoni Cremonesi, 1986Sant'Andrea di Travo, Vollein: Micheli, 2016), both in burials and settlements, mostly in north Italy.

Stone-Shaped Beads
With the advent of the Neolithic, the use of shaped beads spread throughout the Italian peninsula. Morphologically and technically different from the ornaments of the Palaeolithic and Mesolithic, these beads probably represent a new way in which the people adorned themselves.
The discoid type represents the most abundant category, and their simple shapes may recall the late Paleolithic and Mesolithic tradition of using fish vertebrae as necklace elements (i.e., Balzi Rossi: Gravettian burials BG2,3,5, Formicola, 1988; Polesini Cave, Epigravettian levels; Riparo Gaban, Castelnovian levels). The next most important is the cylindrical shape, usually the short type, while other forms are rarer: i.e., bottle, ovoid, and ring shape. Since, in general, they are recovered in smaller numbers, it can be suggested that they were worn as part of heterogenic compositions, as some finds in the Near East indicate (Baysal, 2019).
The distribution of this type of ornament highlights clearly the time and trajectories of the Neolithic penetration into central-south Italy. Unfortunately, the archeological evidence and the absolute dates at our disposal are extremely limited.
At Favella della Corte (Tiné, 2009), dated to the first centuries of sixth millennium cal BC, Micheli (2009) pointed out the presence of a beads workshop, which used radiolarite, ophiolite, and serpentine indifferently. The five unfinished beads recovered (Figure 4k) testify to a manufacture sequence starting from flakes, which were shaped by rough grinding, then perforated, and finally calibrated and polished. It is also important to underline the production of terracotta beads carried out on this site.
Another attestation in the south is the limestone bottle-shaped bead, found at Coppa Nevigata (Puglisi, 1955).
Along the Tyrrhenian coast, four preform beads, four shale beads, and one quartz bead have been discovered at Serotino-Le Secche (Giglio Island: Brandaglia, 1987;Figure 4l). These beads were shaped through a flaking retouch of the edges and only in a few cases show traces of grinding.
For this site, there are no radiocarbon dates, but the associated pottery allowed us to attribute Le Secche to the beginning of the early Neolithic.
Moving further north, three discoidal siltstone beads and a nonperforated steatite cylinder have been discovered in the Impressed Ware levels of the Arene Candide Cave, in Liguria (Traversone, 1999;Starnini & Voytek, 1997; Figure 4e and i).
The presence of preforms at Favella della Corte, Arene Candide Cave, and Le Secche points to a local production of beads, employing raw materials available in the immediate surroundings of the sites.
Along the same coastline, stone-shaped beads have been found in slightly later early Neolithic contexts.
At La Marmotta (Fugazzola Delpino, D'Eugenio, & Pessina, 1999; Table 1), numerous discoid and short cylindrical beads occur with different dimensions (Figure 4j). Despite the absence of a comprehensive study, it is possible to observe a certain standardization of these beads, showing calibrated perforations to the diameter and well-defined surfaces.
In the same region, one of the rare attestations of beads found within a burial context occurs, which dates to the second half of the sixth millennium cal BC. In the inner room sector of Mora Cavorso Cave (Silvestri et al., 2020; Table 1), about 28 burials associated with a few grave goods, composed of pottery, flint artifacts, as well as beads in shell and stone, have been found (Figure 4g).
Slightly more recent are the eight serpentinite and four steatite discoid beads found at Cala Giovanna Piano (Tuscan archipelago) (Bisconti & Zamagni, 2007;Figure 4f). Four of them, due to the width of the hole, can be better classified more specifically as ring beads. The raw materials used, not available on the island, as well as the absence of bead blanks, suggest their importation.
During several surveys in the Livorno's territory of Tuscany (Vassanelli, 2018), 119 pieces, including blanks and finished stone beads, were collected. Despite the absence of chronological information, the morphology and the manufacturing process suggest a Neolithic attribution of some of these items.
The evidence in the Northern area and along the Adriatic coast are even poorer. At Monte Alfeo-Godiasco (Simone Zopfi, 2004), a site attributed to the Vhò culture one blank bead has been found, associated with one ring and one discoid steatite bead. Based on literature reports, similar findings are also testified at the sites of Riparo Gaban (Borrello & Dalmeri, 2005) and Sammardenchia (Micheli, 2009; Table 1). In the former, some short limestone cylindrical beads have been identified, and in the second, a few paragonite schist beads.
Belonging to the early Neolithic of the Istria region are four very small, perforated beads made of sandstone, discovered at the Edera Cave (Biagi, Starnini, & Voytek, 2008). These beads were found in a stratigraphic unit (3a) containing few potsherds and domesticated animal bones, dated to the first centuries of sixth millennium cal BC (Biagi, 2003).
At the Pollera Cave, one green steatite discoidal bead, referable to the end of the early Neolithic/ beginning of the middle Neolithic, has been recovered (Odetti, 1990; Figure 4i).
The evidence of stone beads production in northern Italy increases from the fifth millennium cal BC with the spread of the Square Mouth Pottery culture (Mazzieri & Micheli, 2007. The use of the black steatite beads became almost exclusive. On the Adriatic coast, a discoid steatite bead at Ripabianca di Monterado (Lollini, 1991; Figure 4h) and two beads, one globular and one long cylindrical, in the Villaggio Rossi of Marcianese (Geniola, 1982) have been discovered.
According to Micheli (2012), the distribution of these ornamental objects was "trans-cultural and had a long-lasting tradition as an important component of Neolithic costume." From the middle of sixth millennium cal BC, occurrences of these objects are numerous ranging from the Alpine region to the Emilia (i.e.,  Figure 5c). In Tuscany, of a slightly later date, evidence has been found at Castagneto Carducci (Sammartino, 2007) and Casa Querciolaia (Iacopini, 2000) in layers referred to the Fiorano Culture.
At Alba-Cooperativa Lavoratori (D' Amico & Ghedini, 1996) and Brignano Frascata (Zamagni, 1996;Figure 5b), numerous blanks at different stages of production were found, permitting the reconstruction of the whole manufacturing chain (D'Amico, 1998). In general, metamorphic rocks of the greenstone group were those most largely employed in the manufacture of arm rings. However, differences have been recognized in the exploitation of raw materials within the different northern cultural groups, probably relating to the availability of the supplying area as well as the preference for peculiar raw materials.
During the middle and final Neolithic, this kind of ornament also spread to the remainder of the Peninsula, as shown by the numerous examples at Pollera and Arene Candide.
In the Adriatic area, two steatite bracelet fragments, probably arrived from the Tyrrhenian coast, have been found at Catignano (Zamagni, 2003) and Villa Badessa di Cepagatti (Radi, 1980). In the former, a fragment made in quartz was also collected. In the south, evidence of these objects is extremely rare (Picciano-Malvezzi in Basilicata: Cremonesi, 1976), suggesting occasional imports from external cultural spheres.
Evidence of repair on the broken items has been found, testifying the importance and the symbolic value of this type of ornaments.
Since the beginning of the Neolithic, the manufacturing of ornaments also involved the use of shells and bone to produce the shaped beads (i.e., Ostiano-Dugali Alti: Biagi, 1995;Pollera Cave).
At the Arene Candide Cave, among the early Neolithic ornament assemblage mentioned earlier, three discoid shell beads must be added (Figure 6a(2 and 3)). This production persists into subsequent Neolithic phases at the same site and in other northern contexts, such as the Spondylus cylindrical beads in the grave goods of la Vela di Trento prove (Bagolini, 1990;Micheli, 2012).
Along the Tyrrhenian coast examples of shaped organic beads have been found at Cala Giovanna Piano (Figure 6b(2-4)) and in the Mora Cavorso Cave (Figure 6e). Along the Adriatic coast, at Colle Santo Stefano (Figure 6c(7-10)) and at Torre Sabea, the only shaped beads recovered were made with hard animal matter (Figure 6d(2-4)). The shell was exploited the most (Colle Santo Stefano: 4; Torre Sabea: 3), and only one piece from Colle Santo Stefano was made from the bone.
At Arene Candide Cave, in a layer dated to the end of early Neolithic and mostly in the upper Square Mouth Pottery layers, numerous fragments of Spondylus were found, which probably can be interpreted as evidence of a ring bracelets workshop. Belonging to this same cultural horizon are other examples that have been found in Liguria, at Pollera Cave (Bernabò Brea, 1946) and Arma delle Anime Cave (Giuggiola, Imperiale, Lamberti, Piacentino, & Vicino, 1966).

Discussion and Final Remarks
During our overview, peculiar aspects emerged that deserve some evaluation and consideration.
Data at our disposal show that the stabilization and the social definition of the early Neolithic communities have been a slow and complex process that the study of the ornaments can help to identify. Throughout the whole peninsula, most production of personal ornaments was made using shells and hard animal matter. Therefore, the spread of new ornamental practices does not seem to have marked the end of the previous traditions.
From the beginning of the Neolithic, visible differences in both the types of ornament distribution and the use of specific raw materials testifies to the variety of the cultural traditions prevalent among the farmers spreading along the peninsula (Figure 7).
The earliest shaped stone beads are in the south and along the Tyrrhenian coast, clearly underlining the trajectory of the spread of the pioneers who first reached the southern regions of the peninsula and then quickly moved northward along the Tyrrhenian coast (Favella della Corte, Serotino-Giglio Island, Arene Candide Cave, Binder & Maggi, 2001;Binder et al., 2017;Guilaine & Manen, 2007;Guilaine, 2018; Figure 7a; Radi & Petrinelli Pannocchia, 2018). It is interesting to note, and maybe not by accident, that the pottery productions of Favella della Corte, although part of the earliest Impressed Pottery Groups of the southeast, show the absence of some peculiar stylistic features in the decoration such as the rocker pattern. The latter is also missing in the archeological contexts of the Tyrrhenian coast.
Shaped beads in the central-Adriatic area are rare but are enough to underline a difference between the two sides of the Apennine. The earliest specimens, in fact, are made from the shell and bone (Torre Sabea and Colle Santo Stefano). The stone items of Villaggio Rossi are more recent, and the evidence at Ripabianca di Monterado must be referred to exchanges with the central-northern Tyrrhenian area. Significant steatite outcrops, in fact, are in the ophiolitic masses of the northern Apennines mountain range.
In the north of Italy, although scarce, the stone beads production (Monte Alfeo-Godiasco, Riparo Gaban, Sammardenchia, Edera Cave) seems to be attributable to local productions.
Shell and bone discoid and bottle beads are disseminated throughout the whole peninsula, but along the Tyrrhenian area, these items are always associated with the stone ones, while, as pointed earlier, right through the rest of the peninsula, they often represent the only shaped types.
The chronological and geographical framework presented above shows that with the neolithization the shaped beads spread throughout the peninsula as a new "model" of ornament, rich in significance. Possibly as a vehicle for communication: a symbol of identity or social status, or as a simple "modern way" used by people to adorn themselves. This model, over time, has been absorbed and reworked with different raw materials, probably most related to the local habits. Similar considerations can be offered for the bracelets, differently transposed in the Italian territory. The occurrences of stone ring bracelets are mainly distributed in the northern area of the peninsula; however, items in the south have been found that were made from the shell and bone (Ripatetta and Torre Sabea), with radiometric dates earlier than those of the stone ones found in the north. This leads us to consider the first arrival of this type of ornament in the south, where, however, it remains a sporadic presence. On the contrary from around 5700 cal BC (Figure 7, Table 1) onward, the item was largely employed in the north as indicated by the numerous bracelets made of stone and hard animal matter collected (Ca' Bissara, Isorella-Cascina Bocche, Fiorano-Fornaci Carani; Figure 7c and d).
To date, the only elaborate pendant has been found at Colle Santo Stefano, and the other evidence consists of minimally processed items, obtained by local raw materials. Literature about symbolic values often points out the importance of color instead of the raw material. The choice to create this pendant with actinolite, perhaps accidentally recovered, was embedding not only an esthetic value but probably also a symbolic message that the maker intended to transmit. In northern Italy, a similar choice is inferred from the ring bracelets, mostly produced from green stones. Many ethnographic and anthropological studies suggest that in ancient times great importance could be attributed to green color and surfaces that shined. These characteristics could symbolize water, a fundamental nourishment element for plants and crops, hence a clear reminder of the fertility (Bar-Yosef Mayer & Porat, 2008;Bar-Yosef Mayer, 2019). Rituals recalling fertility at Colle Santo Stefano are distinctly shown by a circular pit surrounded by pebbles, containing a zoomorphic vase (Radi & Petrinelli Pannocchia, 2018). We might use this interpretative key to link the pendant from Colle Santo Stefano with the feminine sphere and extrapolate from this that it was designed for a female member of the group. In the Adriatic area, the choice of green color rocks for pendant production also seems to be prevalent during the middle Neolithic.
The middle Neolithic Square Mouth Pottery society of northern Italy (Bernabò Brea, 1946; Barfield, 1972;Bagolini & Biagi, 1977;Bernabò Brea et al., 2010;Del Lucchese & Starnini, 2015;Laviosa Zambotti, 1943;Maggi, Starnini, & Voytek, 1997) shows, on the contrary, a change in the conceptualization of personal ornaments in favor of shaped beads and pendants manufactured from black steatite, which become an identity element of distinction among these communities (Mazzieri & Micheli, 2014;Micheli, 2014). In the same period, in the central-Tyrrhenian area, the use of steatite ornaments increases, probably due to the influence of northern cultures, but without a specific color preference.
Data show that the ornamental items were important aspects of life in every early Neolithic community that spent time and energy producing non-utilitarian objects to materialize their social and ideological beliefs (Bains, 2012). The ornaments have been found almost exclusively in residential areas; burials from this period are scarcely attested and grave goods are poor or not properly linked with single inhumations (Continenza Cave and Mora Cavorso Cave). Although this lack of information does not allow the reconstruction of an exhaustive framework about a possible division of the ornaments by gender or age, these items were clearly linked to the everyday life and status of the individuals. To wear an ornament was a way to emphasize their own uniqueness and identity (Hodder, 1986), as a single individual or part of a specific ethnicity. Results show that, from the beginning of the Neolithic, the sharing of similar choices between individuals and groups determined the emergence of symbolic languages having specific geographical distributions, almost in accordance with the results from lithic and pottery studies (Figure 7). The use of shaped beads seems to be principally related to Impressed and Cardial Groups, with significant differences in raw materials and quantity between the south-west (numerous and made principally in stone) and the south-east part of the peninsula (numerically scarce and made predominantly with hard animal materials). Considering the dense exchange network testified by other categories of artifacts, this difference cannot be attributed to the lack of raw materials but rather to specific cultural choices. Bracelets are a primary production of the north, a symbol shared between the different groups that constitute the articulate cultural picture of the earliest Neolithic of this area (Figure 7c and d). This shared symbol attests to a cohesion that perhaps can be seen as a precursor of a collective identity that will subsequently develop in the middle Neolithic.

Conflict of interest:
The authors state no conflict of interest.