Abstract
We investigate how the potential burden of processing ever more knowledge has affected the careers and research output of researchers in mathematics over the past 64 years. We construct a panel dataset of 48.851 researchers who published in ten top-ranking journals in mathematics. For this population of researchers, we supplement the dataset with years of birth from public sources. Our results show a significant increase of the average age of researchers at their first publication in one of our top-ranking journals, of the number of references of single-author articles, and of the number of coauthors that contribute to an article. Our findings extend earlier empirical findings on patents, as well as on researchers in economics, and hint at a burden of knowledge pervading different areas of human development. Moreover, our results indicate that researchers develop strategies like the division of labor to deal with this burden.
References
Arbesman, S. (2011). Quantifying the ease of scientific discovery. Scientometrics, 86(2), 245–250.10.1007/s11192-010-0232-6Search in Google Scholar
Archibald, G., & Line, M. B. (1991). The size and growth of serial literature 1950-1987, in terms of the number of articles per serial. Scientometrics, 20(1), 173–196.10.1007/BF02018154Search in Google Scholar
Ayres, R. (1996). Technology, progress and economic growth. European Management Journal, 14(6), 562–575.10.1016/S0263-2373(96)00053-9Search in Google Scholar
Bethard, S., & Jurafsky, D. (2010). Who should I cite? Learning literature search models from citation behavior. Proceedings of the 19th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, 609–617.Search in Google Scholar
Bloom, N., Jones, C., Van Reenen, J., & Webb, M. (2017). Are ideas getting harder to find?10.3386/w23782Search in Google Scholar
Bornmann, L., & Mutz, R. (2015). Growth rates of modern science: A bibliometric analysis based on the number of publications and cited references. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 66(11), 2215–2222.10.1002/asi.23329Search in Google Scholar
Brynjolfsson, E., & McAfee, A. (2011). Race against the machine: How the digital revolution is accelerating innovation, driving productivity, and irreversibly transforming employment and the economy. Digital Frontier Press, Lexington, Massachusetts.Search in Google Scholar
Castelvecchi, D. (2015). Physics paper sets record with more than 5,000 authors.10.1038/nature.2015.17567Search in Google Scholar
Conley, J. P., Crucini, M. J., Driskill, R. A., & Onder, A. S. (2013). The¨ effects of publication lags on life-cycle research productivity in economics. Economic Inquiry, 51(2), 1251–1276.10.1111/j.1465-7295.2012.00480.xSearch in Google Scholar
Cordero, R. J., De Leo´n-Rodriguez, C. M., Alvarado-Torres, J. K., Rodriguez, A. R., & Casadevall, A. (2016). Life science’s average publishable unit (APU) has increased over the past two decades. PLoS ONE, 11(6), 1–14.10.1371/journal.pone.0156983Search in Google Scholar
Cronin, B. (2001). Hyperauthorship: A postmodern perversion or evidence of a structural shift in scholarly communication practices? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 52(7), 558–569.10.1002/asi.1097Search in Google Scholar
Cronin, B., Shaw, D., & La Barre, K. (2003). A cast of thousands: Coauthorship and subauthorship collaboration in the 20th century as manifested in the scholarly journal literature of psychology and philosophy. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54(9), 855–871.10.1002/asi.10278Search in Google Scholar
Economist (2013). Has the ideas machine broken down?Search in Google Scholar
Ellison, G. (2002). The slowdown of the economics publishing process. Journal of Political Economy, 110(5), 947–993.10.1086/341868Search in Google Scholar
Esen, S., Tunahan, H., & Takil, D. (2016). A comparative bibliometric analysis of finance papers published in high impact journals and developing country-addressed journals: the case of Turkish journals. Journal of Economics, Finance and Accounting, 3(1), 37–37.10.17261/Pressacademia.2016116534Search in Google Scholar
Evenson, R. E. (1984). International invention: Implications for technology market analysis. In R & D, Patents, and Productivity, 89–126. University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar
Evenson, R. E. (1993). Patents, R & D, and invention potential: International evidence. The American Economic Review, 83(2), 463–468.Search in Google Scholar
Fernández-Cano, A., Torralbo, M., & Vallejo, M. (2004). Reconsidering Price’s model of scientific growth: An overview. Sciento-metrics, 61(3), 301–321.10.1023/B:SCIE.0000045112.11562.11Search in Google Scholar
Galor, O., & Tsiddon, D. (1997). Progress, mobility, and economic growth. The American Economic Review, 87(3), 363–382.Search in Google Scholar
Garfield, E. (2006). The history and meaning of the journal impact factor. Journal of the American Medical Association, 295(1), 90–93.10.1001/jama.295.1.90Search in Google Scholar
Gonzalez-Brambila, C., & Veloso, F. M. (2007). The determinants of research output and impact: A study of mexican researchers. Research Policy, 36(7), 1035–1051.10.1016/j.respol.2007.03.005Search in Google Scholar
Gordon, R. J. (1999). U. S. economic growth since 1870: One big wave? The American Economic Review, 89(2), 123–128.Search in Google Scholar
Hamermesh, D. S. (2015). Age, cohort and co-authorship.10.3386/w20938Search in Google Scholar
Henriksen, D. (2016). The rise in co-authorship in the social sciences (19802013). Scientometrics, 107(2), 455–476.10.1007/s11192-016-1849-xSearch in Google Scholar
Hirsch, J. E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102(46), 16569–16572.10.1073/pnas.0507655102Search in Google Scholar
Jones, B. F. (2009). The burden of knowledge and the death of the renaissance man: Is innovation getting harder? Review of Economic Studies, 76(1), 283–317.10.1111/j.1467-937X.2008.00531.xSearch in Google Scholar
Krampen, G. (2010). Acceleration of citing behavior after the millennium? Exemplary bibliometric reference analyses for psychology journals. Scientometrics, 83(2), 507–513.10.1007/s11192-009-0093-zSearch in Google Scholar
Kuld, L., & O’Hagan, J. (2018). Rise of multi-authored papers in economics: Demise of the lone star’ and why? Scientometrics, 114(3), 1207–1225.10.1007/s11192-017-2588-3Search in Google Scholar
Kurzweil, R. (1990). The age of intelligent machines. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Search in Google Scholar
Laband, D. N., & Tollison, R. D. (2000). Intellectual collaboration. Journal of Political Economy, 108(3), 632–662.10.1086/262132Search in Google Scholar
Levin, S. G., & Stephan, P. E. (1991). Research productivity over the life cycle: Evidence for academic scientists. Economic Review, 81(1), 114–132.Search in Google Scholar
Lin, W. Y. C., & Huang, M. H. (2012). The relationship between co-authorship, currency of references and author self-citations. Scientometrics, 90(2), 343–360.10.1007/s11192-011-0523-6Search in Google Scholar
Lucas, R. E. (1988). On the mechanics of economic development. Journal of Monetary Economics, 22, 3–42.10.1016/0304-3932(88)90168-7Search in Google Scholar
Mabe, M., & Amin, M. (2001). Growth dynamics of scholarly and scientific journals. Scientometrics, 51(1), 147–162.10.1023/A:1010520913124Search in Google Scholar
McDowell, J. M., & Melvin, M. (1983). The determinants of co-authorship: An analysis of the economics literature. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 65(1), 155–160.10.2307/1924423Search in Google Scholar
Moore, G. E. (1975). Progress in digital integrated electronics. 1975 International Electron Devices Meeting, 21, 11–13.Search in Google Scholar
Nelson, R. R., & Phelps, E. S. (1966). Investment in humans, technological diffusion, and economic growth. The American Economic Review, 56(1/2), 69–75.Search in Google Scholar
Price, D. J. d. S. (1963). Little science, big science ...and beyond. Columbia University Press, New York.10.7312/pric91844Search in Google Scholar
Romer, P. M. (1986). Increasing returns and long-run growth. The Journal of Political Economy, 94(5), 1002–1037.10.1086/261420Search in Google Scholar
Romer, P. M. (1990). Endogenous technological change. Journal of Political Economy, 98(5):S71–S102.Search in Google Scholar
Schankerman, M., & Pakes, A. (1986). Estimates of the value of patent rights in european countries during post-1950 period. The Economic Journal, 96(384), 1052–1076.10.2307/2233173Search in Google Scholar
Schweitzer, S. (2017). Python package persons 0.2a. https://github.com/SaschaSchweitzer/persons.Search in Google Scholar
Schweitzer, S. & Brendel, J. (2020). A Burden of Knowledge Creation in Academic Research: Evidence from Publication Data. Industry and Innovation, Special Issue “Innovation and Entrepreneurship in Academia” (forthcoming).Search in Google Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (2013). Scientific genius is extinct. Nature, 493(7434), 602.10.1038/493602aSearch in Google Scholar
Singh, J., & Fleming, L. (2010). Lone inventors as sources of breakthroughs: Myth or reality? Management Science, 56(1), 41–56.10.1287/mnsc.1090.1072Search in Google Scholar
Solow, R. M. (1962). Technical progress, capital formation, and economic growth. The American Economic Review, 52(2), 76–86.Search in Google Scholar
Stephan, P. E. (1996). The economics of science. Journal of Economic Literature, 34(3), 1199–1235.Search in Google Scholar
Tabah, A. N. (1999). Literature dynamics: Studies on growth, diffusion, and epidemics. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 34, 249–286.Search in Google Scholar
Tague, J., Beheshti, J., & Rees-Potter, L. (1981). The law of exponential growth: Evidence, implications and forecasts. Library Trends, 30(1), 125–149.Search in Google Scholar
Teodorescu, D., & Andrei, T. (2014). An examination of ’citation circles’ for social sciences journals in eastern european countries. Scientometrics, 99(2), 209–231.10.1007/s11192-013-1210-6Search in Google Scholar
Torgler, B., & Piatti, M. (2013). A Century of American Economic Review: Insights on Critical Factors in Journal Publishing. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke.Search in Google Scholar
Ucar, I., Lopez-Fernandino, F., Rodriguez-Ulibarri, P., Sesma-Sanchez, L., Urrea-Mico, V., & Sevilla, J. (2013). Growth in the number of references in engineering journal papers during the 1972-2013 period. Scientometrics, 1–11.Search in Google Scholar
Wuchty, S., Jones, B. F., & Uzzi, B. (2007). The increasing dominance of teams in production of knowledge. Science, 316(5827), 1036–1039.Search in Google Scholar
Yitzhaki, M., & Ben-Tamar, D. (1991). Number of references in biochemistry and other fields; A case study of the Journal of Biological Chemistry throughout 1910-1985. Scientometrics, 21(1), 3–22.10.1007/BF02019179Search in Google Scholar
© 2019 Jan Brendel et al., published by De Gruyter
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
