Abstract
Perhaps there are never too many different theories about the organization of society, ideas about the normative framework of life in a political community and suggestions on how to institutionalize the political system. Perhaps they go out in public too early. This could also apply to those reflections on society and to those political philosophies that bear the label of utopia. There is no doubt about the importance of such human investigations of what is and what should be. And there is no doubt about the usefulness of constantly imagining what it should be. However, analytical and explanatory caution is required when the word utopia is used to suggest the utopian nature of an idea. In other words, what looks like a utopia can already be presented to us as a provable and tangible fact, only that too many people do not perceive it for too long, and therefore it remains unfulfilled in social practice. Is this really a utopia? On the other hand, what may seem completely understandable, feasible or even self-evident can appear extremely utopian when it comes to the normative approaches to social regulation and the conditions for achieving a “better society.” The deviation of political practice and legal practice from what should be understandable or even self-evident according to the text of the constitution and international law, the findings of jurisprudence, philosophical insights and common sense in political decision-making and in the drafting and implementation of the applicable law is so great that, paradoxically, precisely that which is understandable, feasible or even self-evident appears utopian. And how can utopianism be combined with the realization that so many major and persistent social problems can be solved so easily and quickly - even if only by rethinking the legal system and social realm? How can a human being efficiently oppose neoliberal politics and unbridled capitalist practice, the poor functioning of the rule of law, the low quality of the welfare state, the excessive threat to fundamental human rights and freedoms, the inadequate protection of social rights, the insufficient commitment to the value of solidarity and the inadequate role and weakness of morality in social practice? Can the answers to fundamental social questions and solutions to the greatest problems only be found in a real and literal utopia? I do not believe so. I believe that communitarianism can be a good political alternative. Understood as social liberalism and as a social democracy based on the rule of law, morally founded on social solidarity as a fundamental value. I am convinced that the constitutions of the EU Member States and the EU legal order enable it. A strong and interventionist state is needed to realize the constitutional possibilities of a high-quality welfare state, effectively protected social rights, the realized social function of property and a society based on solidarity. Ideas are needed. Even if they seem so crazy, even if they seem utopian. In these times when the devil has taken the joke away, when people are again protesting massively in the streets, when they protest (unsuccessfully, of course), when it is difficult to know exactly what is happening and why, when more and more people are increasingly confused and frightened, when systemic violence increasingly turns into physical violence, when it is difficult to remain calm and thoughtful, when it is difficult to tame anger and rage..., it is necessary to step out of the existing coordinate system, out of the cube, to form and communicate ideas that seem crazy, utopian... Now, right now, ideas are needed, crazy ideas. We need a utopia. And faith and hope in it. Faith and hope, which will be the driving force of active action, of striving for realization – of a utopia.
References
Ackerman, B.: WE THE PEOPLE. VOLUME 1. FOUNDATIONS. Belknap Press of the Harvard University Press, 1993.Search in Google Scholar
Akvinski, T.: DRŽAVA (The State). Globus, Zagreb, 1990.Search in Google Scholar
Teršek, A.: USTAVNA DEMOKRACIJA IN VLADAVINA PRAVA. USTAVNOPRAVNI ESEJI (Constitutional democracy and the rule of law. Constitutional essays), UP FAMNIT, Koper, 2009.Search in Google Scholar
Aristotle: NIKOMAHOVA ETIKA (Nicomachean ethics). Slovenska matica, Ljubljana, 1994.Search in Google Scholar
Aristotle: POLITIKA (Politics). Hrvatska sveučilišna naklada. Zagreb, 1991.Search in Google Scholar
Avineri, S., De Shalit, A.: INDIVIDUALIZEM IN KOMUNITARIZEM (Individualism and Communitarism). Sodobna družba, Ljubljana, 2004.Search in Google Scholar
Bauman, Z.: POSTMODERNA ETIKA (Postmodern ethics). Znanstven založba Filozofske fakultete, Ljubljana, 2016.Search in Google Scholar
Berdjajev, N.: O ČLOVEKOVI ZASUŽNJENOSTI IN SVOBODI. PERSONALISTIČNI POGLED NA ČLOVEKA (About human enslavement and freedom. A personalistic view of man). Celje: Mohorjeva družba, 1998.Search in Google Scholar
Cassirer, E.: FILOZOFIJA RAZSVETLJENSTVA (Philosophy of enlightenment). Claritas, Ljubljana 1998.Search in Google Scholar
Chomsky, N.: PROFIT PRED LJUDMI (Profit over People). Založba Tigr, Ljubljana, 2005.Search in Google Scholar
Crouch, C.: POSTDEMOKRACIJA (Postdemocracy). Založba Krtina, Ljubljana, 2013.Search in Google Scholar
Dahl, R.: UVOD V TEORIJO DEMOKRACIJE (Introduction into Theory of Democracy). Krt, Ljubljana, 1997.Search in Google Scholar
Dilas-Rocherieux, J.: UTOPIJA ALI SPOMIN NA PRIHODNOST. OD THOMASA MORA DO LENINA, VEČNE SANJE O DRUGAČNI DRUŽBI (Utopia or memory of the future. From Thomas More to Lenin, eternal dreams of different society). Mladinska knjiga, Premiki, Ljubljana, 2004.Search in Google Scholar
Dolar, M.: VREDNOTE SO SMRTNO NEVARNA STVAR (Values are a deadly thing). Pogovor z Mladenom Dolarjem, enim najbolj znanih filozofov doma in v tujini, o politiki in splošnem stanju duha pri nas. Intervju (A conversation with Mladen Dolar, one of the most famous philosophers at home and abroad, about politics and the general state of mind in our country. Interview) (journalist: Jela Krečič). April 15, 2012.Search in Google Scholar
Duncombe, S.: ODPRTA UTOPIJA. SPREMNA BESEDA K MOROVI UTOPIJI (Open Utopia- Foreword to Mores‘ Utopia), Studia Humanitatis, Ljubljana, 2014.Search in Google Scholar
Dworkin, R.: LAW‘S EMPIRE. Hart Publishing, Oxford, 1998.Search in Google Scholar
Eddy, B.: WHY WE ELECT NARCISSISTS AND SOCIOPATHS―AND HOW WE CAN STOP. Berrett-Koehler Publishers, 2019.Search in Google Scholar
Finley, M., I.: ANTIČNA IN MODERNA DEMOKRACIJA (Ancient and Modern Democracy). Založba Krtina, Ljubljana, 1999.Search in Google Scholar
Frankfurt, H., G.: RAZLOGI LJUBEZNI (Reasons of Love). Založba Krtina, Ljubljana, 2009.10.2307/j.ctt7rqh3Search in Google Scholar
Fukuyama, F.: KONEC ČLOVEŠTVA. POSLEDICE REVOLUCIJE V BIOTEHNOLOGIJI (The end of humanity. Consequences of the revolution in biotechnology). Učila, Tržič, 2003.Search in Google Scholar
Galimberti, U.: GROZLJIVI GOST. NIHILIZEM IN MLADI (Terrible guest. Nihilism and the Youth). Modrijan, Ljubljana, 2010.Search in Google Scholar
Gilbert, D.: STUMBLING ON HAPPINESS. Vintage, 2007.Search in Google Scholar
Gutmann, A.: KOMUNITARISTIČNA KRITIKA LIBERALIZMA (Communitarian critique of liberalism). In Avineri & De Shalit (ed.): IVIDUALIZEM IN KOMUNITARIZEM. Sodobna družba, Ljubljana 2004, str. 127.Search in Google Scholar
Habermas, J.: BETWEEN FACTS AND NORMS. The MIT Press, Cambridge, 1998.Search in Google Scholar
Haidt, J.: PRAVIČNIŠKI UM (A Righteous Mind). UMco, Ljubljana, 2013.Search in Google Scholar
Hood, B.: THE SELF ILLUSION: HOW THE SOCIAL BRAIN CREATES IDENTITY. Oxford University Press, 2013.Search in Google Scholar
Judt, T.: DEŽELI SE SLABO GODI. RAZPRAVA O SEDANJEM NEZADOVOLJSTVU (The country is doing poorly. Discussion of current dissatisfaction). Mladinska knjiga. Premiki. Ljubljana 2011.Search in Google Scholar
Judt, T.: ZATOČIŠČE SPOMINA (A refuge of memory). Produkcijska hiša RED, Zavod za užitke branja. Bled, 2012.Search in Google Scholar
Konrad, G.: ANTIPOLITIKA, SREDNJEEVROPSKE MEDITACIJE (Antipolitics. Central European meditations). Knjižna zbirka Krt. Ljubljana, 1988.Search in Google Scholar
Kuzmanić, T.: DEMOKRACIJA NI ISTO KOT REPUBLIKA (Democracy is not the same as Republic). V Teršek Andraž, Kuzmanić Tonči (Ur.): MOŽNOSTI POLITIKE DANES? (Posibilities of Politics Today). Univerzitetna založba Annales, Koper, 2015.Search in Google Scholar
Kuzmanić, T.: NAZAJ K POLITIKI (Back to the Politics). Časopis za kritiko znanosti, domišljijo in novo antropologijo. Vol. 23, no. 174, 1995.Search in Google Scholar
Kuzmanić, T.: USTVARJANJE ANTIPOLITIKE: ELEMENTI GENEALOGIJE DRUŽBOSLOVJA (Creating antipolitics: elements of the genealogy of the social sciences), Znanstveno in publicistično središče, Ljubljana, 1996.Search in Google Scholar
Loic, W.: PENALIZACIJA REVŠČINE IN VZPON NEOLIBERALIZMA (Penalization of society and the rise of Neoliberalism). Družboslovne razprave, vol. XIX, no. 43 (2003).Search in Google Scholar
Loic, W.: PENALIZACIJA REVŠČINE IN VZPON NEOLIBERALIZMA (Penalization of poverty and the rise of neoliberalism). Družboslovne razprave, vol. 19, no. 43/2003.Search in Google Scholar
Machiavelli, N.: VLADAR (The Prince). Slovenska matica, Ljubljana, 1990.Search in Google Scholar
Marshall, T., H.: DRŽAVLJANSTVO, RAZRED IN SOCIALNA DRŽAVA (Citizenship, class and welfare state). Založba Sophia, Ljubljana, 2012.Search in Google Scholar
Mason, P: POSTCAPITALISM. A GUIDE TO OUR FUTURE. Penguin Books, 2016.Search in Google Scholar
Mastnak, T.: KAJ JE ŽIVO IN KAJ MRTVO V SOCIALNI DEMOKRACIJI (What is alive and what is dead in social democracy). In Judt, T.: DEŽELI SE SLABO GODI. Mladinska knjiga, Ljubljana, 2011, str. 181.Search in Google Scholar
Mastnak, T.: REŠEVANJE POLITIČNEGA JEZIKA IN IMAGINACIJE (Solving political language and imagination). In Judt, T.: DEŽELI SE SLABO GODI. RAZPRAVA O SEDANJEM NEZADOVOLJSTVU. Mladinska knjiga, Ljubljana, 2011.Search in Google Scholar
Mavčič, A.: CONCOURTS.NET. Last update 2018. Available at <https://www.concourts.net/> (1.9.2020)Search in Google Scholar
Mladen Dolar, intervju, Mladina, 31.12.2014.Search in Google Scholar
More, T.: Utopija (Utopia). Studia Humanitatis. Ljubljana, 2014.Search in Google Scholar
Mowbray, A.: CASES AND MATERIALS ON THE EUROPEAN CONVENTION ON HUMAN RIGHTS. London, Edinburgh, Dublin: Butterworths, 2001.Search in Google Scholar
n.n.: A LETTER FROM POLAND – WE ARE ALL ALREADY IN DEEP SHIT. August 21, 2020. Available at < https://andraz-tersek.si/a-letter-from-poland-we-all-are-in-deep-shit/> (my personal webpage).Search in Google Scholar
Pagon, N. (ed.): UTOPIJE – ŠE VEDNO. Zbornik o utopijah v 21. stoletju (Utopias – still. A collection of utopias in the 21st century), Studia Humanitatis, Ljubljana, 2015.Search in Google Scholar
Perlmutter, D.: ZDRAVI MOŽGANI (Healthy Brains). UMco, Ljubljana, 2017.Search in Google Scholar
Platon (Plato): Država (The Republic). Mihelač, Ljubljana, 1995.Search in Google Scholar
Radbruch, G.: FILOZOFIJA PRAVA (Philosophy of Law), Cankarjeva založba, Ljubljana, 2001.Search in Google Scholar
Rawls, J.: A THEORY OF JUSTICE. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachisetts, 1999.Search in Google Scholar
Rawls, J.: POLITIČKI LIBERALIZAM (Political Liberalism). Kruzak, Zagreb 2000.Search in Google Scholar
Runzo, J., Martin, N., M., Sharma, A. (eds.): HUMAN RIGHTS AND RESPONSIBILITIES IN THE WORLDS RELIGIONS. Oxford, Oneworld, 2003.Search in Google Scholar
Rutar, D.: MATRICA FOREVER. TOTALNA ANALIZA FILMSKE TRILOGIJE (Matrix Forever. Total Analysis of the Movie Trilogy). UMco, Ljubljana, 2003.Search in Google Scholar
Salecl, R.: (PER)VERZIJE LJUBEZNI IN SOVRAŠTVA ((Per) versions of Love and Hate). Mladinska knjiga (Kultura), Ljubljana, 2011.Search in Google Scholar
Schmitt, C.: TRI RAZPRAVE (Three Discussions). Založba Krt, Ljubljana, 1994.Search in Google Scholar
Spinoza, de B.: ETIKA (Ethics). Slovenska matica, Ljubljana 1988.Search in Google Scholar
Srnicek Williams, A.: INVENTING THE FUTURE. POSTCAPITALISM AND A WORLD WITHOUT WORK. Verso, 2016.Search in Google Scholar
Sruk, V.: MORALA IN ETIKA – LEKSIKON (Morality and Ethics – Lexicon). Cankarjeva založba, Ljubljana,1986.Search in Google Scholar
Šumič-Riha, J. (ed.): PRAVO IN POLITIKA (Law and Politics). Liberalna akademija, Ljubljana, 2001Search in Google Scholar
Teršek, A. & Dragan, J.: USTAVNOPRAVNA ANALIZA OMEJITVE USTAVNIH PRAVIC V ČASU PANDEMIJE 2020 (Constitutional analysis of the restriction of constitutional rights during the 2020 pandemic). Javna uprava (Public Administration), no. 1-2/2020.Search in Google Scholar
Teršek, A. (2020a): PRAVICA DO ZAŠČITE PRED STRAHOM IN PRED PONIŽEVANJEM (The right to protection from fear and humiliation). IUS INFO, 6. 3. 2020. Available at <https://www.iusinfo.si/medijsko-sredisce/kolumne/258783> (16. 8. 2020)Search in Google Scholar
Teršek, A. (2020b): THE RIGHT TO BE PROTECTED FROM FEAR. EDITORIAL. The Slovenia Times. 20. July 2020. Available at < http://www.sloveniatimes.com/the-right-to-be-protected-from-fear> (22.8.2020)Search in Google Scholar
Teršek, A. (2020c): THE BIGGEST AND URGENT CHALLENGES OF THE SLOVENIAN PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION AND EU MEMBER STATES AFTER THE 2020 PANDEMIC. EDITORIAL. Javna uprava, no. 1-2/2020.Search in Google Scholar
Teršek, A. (2020d): A CRITIQUE OF WRONG CONSTITUTIONAL TEACHING REGARDING THE CONCEPT OF “SOVEREIGNTY OF THE PEOPLE” AND THE PREVAILING MODEL OF CONSTITUTIONAL DEMOCRACIES IN EUROPE. ECHRCASELAW.com. June 18, 2020. Available at <https://www.echrcaselaw.com/en/constitutional-democracy/a-critique-of-wrong-constitutional-teaching-regarding-the-concept-of-sovereignty-ofthe-people-and-the-prevailing-model-of-constitutional-democracies-in-europe/> (open access)Search in Google Scholar
Teršek, A., et al.: ON THE LEGALITY AND CONSTITUTIONALITY OF MEASURES AND RESTRICTIONS ON CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS IN SLOVENIA, DURING AN OFFICIAL CORONAVIRUS PANDEMIC 2020. ECHRCASELAW.com. July 10, 2020. Available at < https://www.echrcaselaw.com/en/2020-pandemic/on-the-legality-and-constitutionality-of-measures-and-restrictions-on-constitutional-rights-in-slovenia-during-an-official-coronavirus-pandemic-2020/> (open access)Search in Google Scholar
Teršek, A., Kuzmanić T. (eds.): MOŽNOSTI POLITIKE DANES (Possibilities of Politics Today). Univerzitetna založba Annales, Koper, 2015.Search in Google Scholar
Teršek, A.: MORALA KOT TEMELJ IN KRITERIJ VLADAVINE PRAVA (Morality as the Foundation and Criterium of the Rule of Law). REVUS. Journal for Constitutional Theory and Philosopfy of Law, no. 13/2010.10.4000/revus.1285Search in Google Scholar
Teršek, A.: PODREJANJE IN DISCIPLINIRANJE NAMESTO VLADANJA (Subordination and discipline instead of rule). Dnevnik, Objektiv, 14. marec 2015.Search in Google Scholar
Teršek, A.: REFLECTION ON LEGAL AND POLITICAL DELIBERATIONS REGARDING HUMAN LIFE AND DIGNITY AFTER THE 2020 CORONAVIRUS PANDEMIC. ECHRCASELAW.com. June 12, 2020. Available at < https://www.echrcaselaw.com/en/2020-pandemic/reflection-on-legal-and-political-deliberations-regarding-human-life-and-dignity-after-the-2020-coronavirus-pandemic/> (open access)Search in Google Scholar
Teršek, A.: SOCIALNA DRŽAVA – UTOPIJA ALI PRILOŽNOST? (Welfare State: Utopia or Opportunity?). Pravnik, št. 1/2009.Search in Google Scholar
Teršek, A.: SOCIALNA USTAVNA DEMOKRACIJA (Social Constitutional Democracy). Založba Univerze na Primorskem, Koper, 2017.Search in Google Scholar
Teršek, A.: TEORIJA LEGITIMNOSTI IN SODOBNO USTAVNIŠTVO (Theory of Legitimacy and Modern Constitutionalism). Univerzitetna založba Annales, Koper, 2014.Search in Google Scholar
Terzani, T.: ŠE EN KROG NA VRTILJAKU (Another round on the carousel). Založba Eno, 2008.Search in Google Scholar
Tocqueville, A.: DEMOKRACIJA V AMERIKI (Democracy in America). Založba Krt, Ljubljana, 1996.Search in Google Scholar
Weiler, J. H. H. & Wind, M., EUROPEAN CONSTITUTIONALISM BEYOND THE STATE. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, Weiler, 2003.Search in Google Scholar
Zupančič, B. M.: TEMBATSU. DRUGA OD SUHIH KRAV (Tembatsu. Second of the dry cows), Self-publishing, Strasbourg, 2011.Search in Google Scholar
Žižek, S.: NAJPREJ KOT TRAGEDIJA, NATO KOT FARSA (First as Tragedy, Then as Farce). Analecta, Ljubljana 2010.Search in Google Scholar
Žižek, S.: ZAHTEVNI ČASI TERJAJO ZAHTEVNE PREMISLEKE (Difficult times require demanding considerations). Interview for Radio and Television of Slovenia web portal. March 21. 2020.Search in Google Scholar
Žižek, S.: ŽIVLJENJE V ČASU KONCA (Living in End Times). Cankarjeva založba, Ljubljana, 2012.Search in Google Scholar
Žižek, S: NASILJE (Violence). Založba Analecta, Ljubljana, 2007.Search in Google Scholar
Žižek. S:: ŽIVLJENJE V ČASU KONCA (Living in End Times), Cankarjeva založba, Ljubljana 2012.Search in Google Scholar
© 2020 Andraž Teršek, published by De Gruyter
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
