This collaborative paper looks at how libraries can engage with and offer leadership in the Open Science movement. It is based on case studies and the results of an EU-funded research project on Research Data Management taken from European research-led universities and their libraries. It begins by analysing three recent trends in Science, and then links component parts of the research process to aspects of Open Science. The paper then looks in detail at four areas and identifies roles for libraries: Open Access and Open Access publishing, Research Data Management, E-Infrastructures (especially the European Open Science Cloud), and Citizen Science. The paper ends in suggesting a model for how libraries, by using a 4-step test, can assess their engagement with Open Science. This 4-step test is based on lessons drawn from the case studies.
Achard, P., Ayris, P., Fdida, S., Gradmann, S., Horstmann, W., Labastida, I., …, & Smit, A. (2013). LERU Roadmap for research data. Leuven: LERU. Retrieved June 25, 2017, from http://www.leru.org/files/publications/AP14_LERU_Roadmap_for_Research_data_final.pdfSearch in Google Scholar
Ayris, P., Berthou, J.-Y., Bruce, R., Lindstaedt, S., Manreale, A., Mons, B.,…, & Wilkinson, R. (2016). Realising the European open science cloud. First report and recommendations of the Commission High Level Expert Group on the European open science cloud. Brussels: European Commission. Retrieved June 25, 2017, from http://ec.europa.eu/research/openscience/pdf/realising_the_european_open_science_cloud_2016.pdf#view=fit&pagemode=noneSearch in Google Scholar
Bennett, S.H. (1968). The scope and limitations of science. Zigon ® Journal of Religion and Science, 3(3), 343-353. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9744.1968.tb00155.x10.1111/j.1467-9744.1968.tb00155.xSearch in Google Scholar
BioBlitz Australia (2015). Australian guide to running a BioBlitz. Retrieved July 24, 2017, from http://www.ala.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/BIOBLITZ_Guidelines_WEB-final-201507.pdfSearch in Google Scholar
Bonney, R., Cooper, C.B., Dickinson, J., Kelling, S., Phillips, T., Rosenberg, K.V., & Shirk, J. (2009). Citizen Science: A developing tool for expanding science knowledge and scientific literacy. BioScience 59(11) 977-984. https://doi.org/10.1525/bio.2009.59.11.910.1525/bio.2009.59.11.9Search in Google Scholar
Bunge, E. (2017). Citizen Science in der Bibliotheksarbeit - Möglichkeiten und Chancen. Wiesbaden, Germany: Dinges & Frick. Retrieved August 8, 2017, from http://www.b-i-t-online.de/daten/bit_Innovativ_63_Bunge_Leseprobe.pdfSearch in Google Scholar
Grey, F. et al. (2016). Citizen science at universities: Trends, guidelines and recommendations. Leuven: LERU. Retrieved December 18th, 2017, from https://www.leru.org/files/Citizen-Science-at-Universities-Trends-Guidelines-and-Recommendations-Full-paper.pdfSearch in Google Scholar
Nielsen, M. (2013). Reinventing Discovery: The New Era of Networked Science. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University PressSearch in Google Scholar
RCUK Policy (2013). RCUK policy on Open Access and supporting guidance. Retrieved June 13, 2017, from http://www.rcuk.ac.uk/documents/documents/rcukopenaccesspolicy-pdf/Search in Google Scholar
Societize (2013). Green paper on Citizen Science - Citizen Science for Europe - Towards a better society of empowered citizens and enhanced research. European Commission. Retrieved July 24, 2017, from https://ec.europa.eu/digital-singlemarket/en/news/green-paper-citizen-science-europe-towards-society-empowered-citizens-and-enhanced-researchSearch in Google Scholar
Wilsdon, J. (2016, July 29). The road to REF 2021: why I welcome Lord Stern’s blueprint for research assessment. The Guardian. Retrieved June 13, 2017, from https://www.theguardian.com/science/political-science/2016/jul/29/why-i-welcome-lordsterns-blueprint-for-research-assessment-ref-2021-stern-review#commentsSearch in Google Scholar
© 2018 Paul Ayris, Tiberius Ignat, published by De Gruyter
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.