Skip to content
BY-NC-ND 4.0 license Open Access Published by De Gruyter Open Access March 15, 2018

Managing the Electronic Resources Lifecycle with Kanban

  • Jaclyn McLean EMAIL logo and Robin Canham
From the journal Open Information Science

Abstract

This paper discusses the implementation of Kanban as the framework for managing electronic resources workflows by presenting case studies from the University of Saskatchewan Library and at the Saskatchewan Polytechnic Library in Saskatchewan, Canada. Librarians at both institutions independently chose to adopt Kanban to manage electronic resources work, applying the essential Kanban framework of lists titled to do, in progress, and done. Examining the similarities and differences in each librarian’s experience and discussing two different software programs used, we have included descriptions of our implementation, in-depth information about the origins of Kanban, and its more recent applications to technical work. We found numerous benefits-including reduced email communication and improved due date tracking-to our implementation of Kanban and no significant drawbacks. Interest in applications of Kanban in libraries is on the rise, and we found there were significant benefits of using Kanban for electronic resources teams when used in conjunction with other tools (e.g., spreadsheets, email, ERMS).

References

Ahmad, M. O., Markkula, J., & Oivo, M. (2013). Kanban in software development: A systematic literature review. Software Engineering and Advanced Applications (SEAA), 2013 39th EUROMICRO Conference on September 2013, 9-16. doi: 10.1109/SEAA.2013.28Search in Google Scholar

Bass, J. M. (2016). Improving writing processes using lean and Kanban. Learned Publishing, 29(4), 307-310. doi: 10.1002/leap.1045Search in Google Scholar

Bross, V., & Magagnosc, J. (2016). Serials spoken here: Reports of conferences, institutes, and seminars. Serials Review, 42(2), 160-171. doi: 10.1080/00987913.2016.1178835Search in Google Scholar

Collins, M., & Grogg, J. E. (2011). Building a better ERMS. Library Journal, 136(4), 22-28. Retrieved from: http://lj.libraryjournal.com/2011/03/digital-resources/building-a-better-erms/Search in Google Scholar

CORAL: An Open Source ERMS for Libraries (2017). Retrieved from: http://coral-erm.org/Search in Google Scholar

Dowdy, B., & Raeford, R. (2014). Electronic resources workflow: Design, analysis and technologies for an overdue solution. Serials Review, 40(3), 175-187. doi: 10.1080/00987913.2014.950040Search in Google Scholar

Garofalo, V. A. (2014). Doing things differently in the cloud: Streamlining library workflows to maximize efficiency. Proceedings of the Charleston Library Conference, 2014. doi: 10.5703/1288284315591Search in Google Scholar

Ikonen, M., Pirinen, E., Fagerholm, F., Kettunen, P., & Abrahamsson, P. (2011). On the impact of Kanban on software project work: An empirical case study investigation. Proceedings - 2011 16th IEEE International Conference on Engineering of Complex Computer Systems, ICECCS 2011, 305-314. doi: 10.1109/ICECCS.2011.37Search in Google Scholar

Imre, A., Oberg, S., Vieira, S., & Duggan, L. (2016). The future is flexible, extensible, and community-based: Stories of successful electronic resources management. The Serials Librarian, 70(1-4), 204-210. doi: 10.1080/0361526X.2016.1147878Search in Google Scholar

KanbanFlow. (2017). Retrieved from https://kanbanflow.comSearch in Google Scholar

Kniberg, H., & Skarin, M. (2010). Kanban and Scrum: Making the most of both. C4media. Retrieved from https://www.infoq.com/minibooks/kanban-scrum-minibookSearch in Google Scholar

Law, E. L., & Lárusdóttir, M. K. (2015). Whose experience do we care about? Analysis of the fitness of Scrum and Kanban to user experience. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 31(9), 584-602. doi: 10.1080/10447318.2015.1065693Search in Google Scholar

Lei, H., Ganjeizadeh, F., Jayachandran, P. K., & Ozcan, P. (2017). A statistical analysis of the effects of Scrum and Kanban on software development projects. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 43, 59-67. doi: 10.1016/j.rcim.2015.12.001Search in Google Scholar

Minchew, T. (2015). Who’s on first? License team workflow tracking with Trello. Serials Review, 41(3), 165-172. doi.org/10.1080/00987913.2015.106594610.1080/00987913.2015.1065946Search in Google Scholar

Minchew, T., & Slutskaya, S. (2016). The path of least resistance: Using available tools to support the e-resources lifecycle. The Serials Librarian, 70(1-4), 236-246. doi: 10.1080/0361526X.2016.1156968Search in Google Scholar

Nakazawa, S., & Tanaka, T. (2016). Development and application of Kanban tool visualizing the work in progress. Proceedings - 2016 5th IIAI International Congress on Advanced Applied Informatics, IIAI-AAI 2016, 908-913. doi: 10.1109/IIAI-AAI.2016.156Search in Google Scholar

Ostergaard, K. (2016). Applying Kanban principles to electronic resource acquisitions with Trello. Journal of Electronic Resources Librarianship, 28(1), 48-52. doi: 10.1080/1941126X.2016.1130464Search in Google Scholar

Oza, N., Fagerholm, F., & Munch, J. (2013). How does Kanban impact communication and collaboration in software engineering teams? 2013 6th International Workshop on Cooperative and Human Aspects of Software Engineering, CHASE 2013 - Proceedings, 68, 125-128. doi: 10.1109/CHASE.2013.6614747Search in Google Scholar

Pesch, O. (2008). Library standards and e-resource management: A survey of current initiatives and standards efforts. The Serials Librarian, 55(3), 481-486. doi: 10.1080/03615260802059965Search in Google Scholar

Polytechnics Canada. (2015). What is a polytechnic? Retrieved from http://www.polytechnicscanada.ca/polytechnicadvantage/what-polytechnicSearch in Google Scholar

Wilson, K. (2011). Beyond library software: New tools for electronic resources management. Serials Review, 37(4), 294-304. doi: 10.1080/00987913.2011.10765404Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2017-09-01
Accepted: 2018-01-09
Published Online: 2018-03-15

© 2018 Jaclyn McLean, Robin Canham, published by De Gruyter

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.

Downloaded on 24.9.2023 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/opis-2018-0003/html
Scroll to top button