Skip to content
BY-NC-ND 4.0 license Open Access Published by De Gruyter Open Access July 26, 2018

Value Perception of Information Sources in the Context of Learning

Daphne Ruth Raban and Yonit Rusho
From the journal Open Information Science

Abstract

Information sources require consumers to use them in order to evaluate their quality, meaning that they are experience goods. The value perceived before acquisition and use may be different from the value obtained by actual use. Understanding the value perception gap is likely to inform more efficient selection of information sources. The current research studies the value gap in a learning situation. We examine information value perceptions before and after experiencing information in an experiment with 113 software engineers engaged in a problem-based learning task while using and evaluating three types of information sources: supportive, reflective and reciprocal. The results indicate that before using an information source, the subjective value for supportive information is lower than for reflective information. In addition, 55% of the participants preferred to obtain information when presented with a choice. After using an information source no correlation was observed between perceived value of information before and after the use of information source (value gap); participants assigned a higher user experience (UX) value to reflective and reciprocal information than to supportive information; positive correlation between UX value and revealed information value; positive correlation between learning achievement and revealed information value; Reciprocal information is associated with higher learning achievement than reflective and supportive; use of information led to higher learning achievement than avoidance of information. Reciprocal information supports high achievement in software engineering informal learning. Reflective information is valued higher than supportive information sources. If supportive information is essential, learning environments designers should invest heavily in interface design combining reciprocal and reflective elements, such as forums and "try it yourself", respectively

References

Ariely, D. (2000). Controlling the information flow: Effects on consumers’ decision making and preferences. Journal of consumer research, 27(2), 233-248.10.1086/314322Search in Google Scholar

Barzilai, S., & Blau, I. (2014). Scaffolding game-based learning: Impact on learning achievements, perceived learning, and game experiences. Computers & Education, 70, 65-7910.1016/j.compedu.2013.08.003Search in Google Scholar

Becker, G. M., DeGroot, M. H., & Marschak, J. (1964). Measuring utility by a single-response sequential method. Behavioral Science, 9(3), 226-232.10.1002/bs.3830090304Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Chapanis, A. (1988). Interactive human communication. Computer-Supported Cooperative Work: A Book of Readings, 125-139.Search in Google Scholar

Grinberg, N. (2018). Identifying Modes of User Engagement with Online News and Their Relationship to Information Gain in Text. In Proceedings of the 2018 World Wide Web Conference on World Wide Web (pp. 1745-1754).10.1145/3178876.3186180Search in Google Scholar

Hassenzahl, M., Burmester, M., & Koller, F. (2003). AttrakDiff: Ein Fragebogen zur Messung wahrgenommener hedonischer und pragmatischer Qualitat. In Mensch & Computer 2003 (pp. 187-196). Vieweg+ Teubner Verlag.10.1007/978-3-322-80058-9_19Search in Google Scholar

Hassenzahl, M., & Tractinsky, N. (2006). User experience-a research agenda. Behaviour & Information Technology, 25(2), 91-97.10.1080/01449290500330331Search in Google Scholar

Holton, D., & Clarke, D. (2006). Scaffolding and metacognition. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 37(2), 127-143.10.1080/00207390500285818Search in Google Scholar

Horowitz, J. K., & McConnell, K. E. (2002). A review of WTA/WTP studies. Journal of environmental economics and Management, 44(3), 426-447.10.1006/jeem.2001.1215Search in Google Scholar

Iiyoshi, T., & Kumar, M. V. (Eds.). (2008). Opening up education: The collective advancement of education through open technology, open content, and open knowledge. Mit Press, 42.Search in Google Scholar

Iqbal, A. (2013). Analyzing social behavior of software developers across different communication channels. International Conference on Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering (SEKE), Jackson, S. L., Krajcik, J., & Soloway, E. (1998). The design of guided learner-adaptable scaffolding in interactive learning environments. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 187-194.Search in Google Scholar

Klašnja-Milićević, A., Vesin, B., & Ivanović, M. (2018). Social tagging strategy for enhancing e-learning experience. Computers& Education, 118, 166-181.10.1016/j.compedu.2017.12.002Search in Google Scholar

Lin, T., Hsu, J. S., & Chen, H. (2013). Customer willingness to pay for online music: The role of free mentality. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, 14(4), 315-333.Search in Google Scholar

Linde, F., & Stock, W. G. (2011). Information markets: A strategic guideline for the I-commerce. Walter de Gruyter.Search in Google Scholar

Livingstone, D. W. (2001). Adults’ informal learning: Definitions, findings, gaps, and future research. NALL Working Paper, # 21Search in Google Scholar

Mbogo, C., Blake, E., & Suleman, H. (2013). A mobile scaffolding application to support novice learners of computer programming. Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Information and Communications Technologies and Development: Notes-Volume 2, 84-87.10.1145/2517899.2517941Search in Google Scholar

McLoughlin, C. (2002). Learner support in distance and networked learning environments: Ten dimensions for successful design. Distance Education, 23(2), 149-162.10.1080/0158791022000009178Search in Google Scholar

Moreno, R., Reisslein, M., & Ozogul, G. (2009). Optimizing Worked‐Example Instruction in Electrical Engineering: The Role of Fading and Feedback during Problem‐Solving Practice. Journal of Engineering Education, 98(1), 83-92.10.1002/j.2168-9830.2009.tb01007.xSearch in Google Scholar

Nelson, P. (1970). Information and consumer behavior. The Journal of Political Economy, 78(2), 311-329.10.1086/259630Search in Google Scholar

Norman, D. A. (1988). The psychology of everyday things Basic books.Search in Google Scholar

Norman, D. A., & Spohrer, J. C. (1996). Learner-centered education. Communications of the ACM, 39(4), 24-27.10.1145/227210.227215Search in Google Scholar

Puustinen, M., & Rouet, J. (2009). Learning with new technologies: Help seeking and information searching revisited. Computers & Education, 53(4), 1014-1019.10.1016/j.compedu.2008.07.002Search in Google Scholar

Raban, D. R. (2007). User-centered evaluation of information: A research challenge. Internet Research, 17(3), 306-322.10.1108/10662240710758948Search in Google Scholar

Repo, A. J. (1986). The dual approach to the value of information - an appraisal of use and exchange values. Information Processing & Management, 22(5), 373-383.10.1016/0306-4573(86)90072-5Search in Google Scholar

Savery, J. R. (2015). Overview of problem-based learning: Definitions and distinctions. Essential readings in problem-based learning: Exploring and extending the legacy of Howard S. Barrows, 5-15.10.2307/j.ctt6wq6fh.6Search in Google Scholar

Shapiro, C., & Varian, H. R. (1999). Information rules: A strategic guide to the network economy. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Search in Google Scholar

Van Alstyne, M. W. (1999). A proposal for valuing information and instrumental goods. Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Information Systems, Charlotte, North Carolina. 328-345.Search in Google Scholar

Wu, O., Chen, Y., Li, B., & Hu, W. (2011). Evaluating the visual quality of web pages using a computational aesthetic approach. In Proceedings of the fourth ACM international conference on Web search and data mining (pp. 337-346). ACM.10.1145/1935826.1935883Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2017-11-15
Accepted: 2018-06-08
Published Online: 2018-07-26

© 2018 Daphne Ruth Raban, Yonit Rusho, published by De Gruyter

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.

Scroll Up Arrow