Skip to content
BY-NC-ND 4.0 license Open Access Published by De Gruyter Open Access September 15, 2018

Transdisciplinarity across the Qualitative and Quantitative Science through C.S. Peirce’s Semiotic Concept of Habit

  • Søren Brier EMAIL logo
From the journal Open Information Science


This paper investigates how Peirce manages to establish a transdisciplinary fallibilist view of the sciences that is not hostile to religious spirituality viewed as a complementary fallibilist knowledge type. I focus on Peirce’s attempt to construct an alternative to classical mechanical ontology with its reversible time concept and the ontological view of absolute transcendental laws of nature. His triadic semiotic pragmaticism has empiricism in common with the logical positivists, but it shares the fallibilist critical stance with Popper, with whose critical rationalism Peirce also shares a thorough-going evolutionary approach. With Hegel and Schelling, Peirce shares a kind of evolutionary objective idealism and with Whitehead a thoroughgoing process view, and finally with Wittgenstein, he shares a pragmatic view of the meaning of words and concepts. What knits together all these apparently incompatible views is his dynamic Tychism and his Synechist field view. Together these produce a transdisciplinary irreversible view of habits as “laws” of nature, mind, and society that emerge in the development of the cosmos. Though Peirce is somehow close to Hegel’s phenomenological and dialectical view on cosmogony, a number of aspects are quite unique about his approach: the most important of these are his dynamic triadic categorically-based semiotics that makes him understand human beings as well as the universe as symbolic self-organizing developing processes. This is an interesting alternative to modern mechanical info-computationalism.

Keywords: Peirce; habits


Apel, K. O. (1981). Charles S. Peirce: from pragmatism to pragmaticism. Boston, MA: University of Massachusetts Press.Search in Google Scholar

Barad, K. (2017). Meeting the universe halfway: quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning, Durham, NC: Duke University Press. von Bertalanffy, L. (1976/68). General System Theorie. Foundations, development, applications, New York, NY: Braziller.Search in Google Scholar

Brier, S. (2013). Cybersemiotics: why information is not enough, Toronto: Toronto University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Brier, S. (2014a). Pure zero. In T. Thellefsen & B. Sørensen (Eds.), Charles Sanders Peirce in His Own Words-100 Years of Semiotics, Communication and Cognition (pp. 207-212). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9781614516415.207Search in Google Scholar

Brier, S. (2014b). The riddle of the sphinx answered: on how C.S. Peirce’s transdisciplinary semiotic philosophy of knowing links science, spirituality and knowing; death and anti-death, Ann Arbor, MI: Ria University Press; Volume 12, pp. 47-130.Search in Google Scholar

Brier, S. (2015a). Cybersemiotics and the reasoning powers of the universe: Philosophy of information in a Semiotic-Systemic Transdisciplinary Approach. Green Lett. Stud. Ecocriticism. doi:10.1080/14688417.20 15.1070684.Search in Google Scholar

Brier, S. (2015b). Can biosemiotics be a “science” if its purpose is to be a bridge between the natural, social and human sciences? Progress in Biophysics & Molecular Biology, 119, 576-587.10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2015.08.001Search in Google Scholar

Brier, S. (2017a). How to produce a transdisciplinary information concept for a universal theory of information, In: M. Burgin, W. Hofkirchner (Eds.). Information studies and the quest for transdisciplinarity: unity through diversity, World Scientific Series in Information Studies: Volume 9, Singapore: World Scientific.10.1142/9789813109001_0002Search in Google Scholar

Brier, S. (2017b). How Peircean semiotic philosophy connects Western science with Eastern emptiness ontology. Progress in Biophysics and Molecular Biology. 131, 22-107.10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2017.09.010Search in Google Scholar

Houser, N., Kloesel, C. (Eds.) (1992). The essential Peirce: selected philosophical writings, Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, Vol. 1.Search in Google Scholar

Jantsch, E. (1980). The Self-Organizing Universe; New York, NY: Pergamon Press.Search in Google Scholar

Josephson, B. D. (forthcoming 2018). Biological organization as the true foundation of reality, In: R. L. Amoroso, L. H. Kauffman, P. Rowlands (Eds.), Unified Field Mechanics II: 10th International Symposium in Honor of Mathematical Physicist Jean-Pierre Vigier, Singapore: World Scientific Publishing.10.1142/9789813232044_0049Search in Google Scholar

Mingers, J. (1995). Self-producing systems: implications and applications of autopoiesis, New York and London: Plenum Press.10.5962/bhl.title.111972Search in Google Scholar

Nicolescu, B. (2014). From modernity to cosmodernity: science, culture and spirituality, Albany, NY: State University of New York Press (S U N Y Series in Western Esoteric Traditions).Search in Google Scholar

Peirce, C. S. (1931-1958). Collected papers. C. Hartshorne, P. Weiss (Eds.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. 8 vols. [Past Masters CD-ROM version]Search in Google Scholar

Peirce, C.S. (1998). The essential Peirce: selected philosophical writings, Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, Volume 2.Search in Google Scholar

Potters, V. G. (1997). Charles S. Peirce: on norms & ideals; New York, NY: Fordham University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Prigogine, I., Stengers, I. (1984). Order Out of Chaos; New York, NY: Bantam Books.Search in Google Scholar

Ransdell, J. (2017). Is Peirce a phenomenologist?. Cybernetics & Human Knowing. 24, 69-81. (This paper appeared in print in a French translation by André Detienne (1989) as “Peirce est-il un phénoménologue?” in Ètudes Phénoménologiques, 9-10, 51-75. This English-language version is the original translated into French and has never been published in paper before 2017).Search in Google Scholar

Raposa, M. L. (1989). Peirce’s philosophy of religion; Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Romanini, V. (2014). Semiosis as a living process, In V. Romanini & E. Fernández (Eds.), Peirce and biosemiotics: a guess at the riddle of life (pp. 215-239). Dordrecht: Springer.10.1007/978-94-007-7732-3_12Search in Google Scholar

Searle, J. (1989). Minds, brains and science. London: Penguin Books.Search in Google Scholar

Smolin, L. (2013). Time Reborn, London: Alan Lane.Search in Google Scholar

Stjernfelt, F. (2014). Natural Propositions; Boston, MA: Docent Press.Search in Google Scholar

Wheeler, J. A. (1994). At home in the universe, Woodbury, NY: AIP Press.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2018-01-10
Accepted: 2018-06-05
Published Online: 2018-09-15
Published in Print: 2018-09-01

© by Søren Brier, published by De Gruyter

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.

Downloaded on 28.11.2023 from
Scroll to top button