Abstract
This paper examines issues relating to the perceptions and adoption of open access (OA) and institutional repositories. Using a survey research design, we collected data from academics and other researchers in the humanities, arts and social sciences (HASS) at a university in Australia. We looked at factors influencing choice of publishers and journal outlets, as well as the use of social media and nontraditional channels for scholarly communication. We used an online questionnaire to collect data and used descriptive statistics to analyse the data. Our findings suggest that researchers are highly influenced by traditional measures of quality, such as journal impact factor, and are less concerned with making their work more findable and promoting it through social media. This highlights a disconnect between researchers’ desired outcomes and the efforts that they put in toward the same. Our findings also suggest that institutional policies have the potential to increase OA awareness and adoption. This study contributes to the growing literature on scholarly communication by offering evidence from the HASS field, where limited studies have been conducted. Based on the findings, we recommend that academic librarians engage with faculty through outreach and workshops to change perceptions of OA and the institutional repository.
References
Association of College & Research Libraries (2003). Principles and Strategies for the Reform of Scholarly Communication 1. Retrieved from http://www.ala.org/acrl/publications/whitepapers/principlesstrategies (Archived by WebCite® at http://www.webcitation.org/6nr5uq4V3)Search in Google Scholar
Al-Aufi, A., Fulton, C. (2015). Impact of social networking tools on scholarly communication: A cross-institutional study. The Electronic Library, 33(2), 224-241.10.1108/EL-05-2013-0093Search in Google Scholar
Armstrong, M. (2014). Institutional repository management models that support faculty research dissemination. OCLC Systems & Services, 30(1), 43-51.10.1108/OCLC-07-2013-0028Search in Google Scholar
Atiso, K., Adkins, D., Borteye Mensah, E. (2017). Knowledge of Open Access Journals Among Research Scientists in Ghana. The Serials Librarian, 73(3-4), 327-337.10.1080/0361526X.2017.1376730Search in Google Scholar
Bell, S., Fried Foster, N., Gibbons, S. (2005). Reference librarians and the success of institutional repositories. Reference Services Review, 33(3), 283-290.10.1108/00907320510611311Search in Google Scholar
Bongiovani, P. C., Guarnieri, G., Babini, D., Lopez, F. A. (2014). Acceso abierto en la Universidad Nacional de Rosario necesidades y practicas de los docentes/ investigadores. Informacion, Cultura y Sociedad, 30, 13-34.Search in Google Scholar
Butterwick, S., Dawson, J. (2005,). Undone business: Examining the production of academic labour. Women’s Studies International Forum, 28(1), 51-65.10.1016/j.wsif.2005.02.004Search in Google Scholar
Creaser, C., Fry, J., Greenwood, H., Oppenheim, C., Probets, S., Spezi, V., White, S. (2010). Authors’ awareness and attitudes toward open access repositories. New Review of Academic Librarianship, 16(S1), 145-161.10.1080/13614533.2010.518851Search in Google Scholar
Crow, R. (2002). The Case for Institutional Repositories: A SPARC Position Paper. Association of Research Libraries, no. 223 (August 2002): 1-4. http://www.sparc.arl.org/resources/papers-guides/the-case-for-institutional-repositories (Archived by WebCite® at http://www.webcitation.org/6xGcL6307)Search in Google Scholar
Cullen, R., Chawner, B. (2011). Institutional repositories, open access, and scholarly communication: a study of conflicting paradigms. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 37(6), 460-470.10.1016/j.acalib.2011.07.002Search in Google Scholar
Donelan, H. (2016). Social media for professional development and networking opportunities in academia. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 40(5), 706-729.10.1080/0309877X.2015.1014321Search in Google Scholar
Dulle, F. W., M. K. Minishi-Majanja, L. M. Cloete, (2011). The Adoption of Open Access Scholarly Communication in Tanzanian Public Universities: Some Influencing Factors. Mousaion 29(1), 112-135.Search in Google Scholar
Elsayed, A. M. (2016). The use of academic social networks among Arab researchers: A survey. Social Science Computer Review, 34(3), 378-391.10.1177/0894439315589146Search in Google Scholar
Fruin, C., Sutton, S. (2016). Strategies for success: open access policies at North American educational institutions. College & Research Libraries, 77(4), 469-499.10.5860/crl.77.4.469Search in Google Scholar
Goodfellow, R. (2013). Scholarly, digital, open: an impossible triangle?. Research in Learning Technology, 21, 1-15.Search in Google Scholar
Greenhow, C., Gleason, B. (2014). Social scholarship: Reconsidering scholarly practices in the age of social media. British Journal of Educational Technology, 45(3), 392-402.10.1111/bjet.12150Search in Google Scholar
Gruzd, A., Goertzen, M. (2013). Wired academia: Why social science scholars are using social media. In: Proceedings of the 46th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS) (pp. 3332-3341). Piscataway, NJ: IEEE.Search in Google Scholar
Jain, P., Bentley, G. Oladiran, M.T. (2009). The role of institutional repository in digital scholarly communications”. In: African Digital Scholarship and Curation Conference (pp. 12-14).Search in Google Scholar
Jamali, H. R., Nicholas, D., Herman, E. (2016). Scholarly reputation in the digital age and the role of emerging platforms and mechanisms. Research Evaluation, 25(1), 37-49.10.1093/reseval/rvv032Search in Google Scholar
Johnson, R. (2002). Institutional repositories: partnering with faculty to enhance scholarly communication. D-Lib Magazine, 8(11), http://www.dlib.org/dlib/november02/johnson/11johnson.htmlSearch in Google Scholar
Kennan, M. A. (2008). Reassembling scholarly publishing: open access, institutional repositories and the process of change (PhD thesis). Sydney: The University of New South Wales. Retrieved from http://handle.unsw.edu.au/1959.4/10148Search in Google Scholar
Kim, J. (2007). Motivating and impeding factors affecting faculty contribution to institutional repositories. Journal of Digital Information, 8(2), https://journals.tel.org/jodi/index.php/ jodi/article/ view/193/177Search in Google Scholar
Kim, J. (2011). Motivations of faculty self-archiving in institutional repositories. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 37(3), 246-254.10.1016/j.acalib.2011.02.017Search in Google Scholar
Luca, E., Narayan, B. (2016). Redesigning the open-access institutional repository: A user experience approach. In A. Morishima, A. Rauber, & C. li Liew (Eds.), Lecture Notes in Computer Science (pp. 275-281). Berlin: Springer Verlag.Search in Google Scholar
Lwoga, E. T., Questier, F. (2015). Open access behaviours and perceptions of health sciences faculty and roles of information professionals. Health Information & Libraries Journal, 32(1), 37-49.10.1111/hir.12094Search in Google Scholar
Manca, S., Ranieri, M. (2017). Exploring Digital Scholarship. A Study on Use of Social Media for Scholarly Communication among Italian Academics. In Esposito A. (Ed.), Research 2.0 and the Impact of Digital Technologies on Scholarly Inquiry (pp. 116-141). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.Search in Google Scholar
Marsh, R. M. (2015). The role of institutional repositories in developing the communication of scholarly research. OCLC Systems & Services: International digital library perspectives, 31(4), 163-195.10.1108/OCLC-04-2014-0022Search in Google Scholar
Mercer, H. (2011). Almost halfway there: An analysis of the open access behaviors of academic librarians. College & Research Libraries, 72(5), 443-453.10.5860/crl-167Search in Google Scholar
Narayan, B., Luca, E. (2017). Issues and challenges in researchers’ adoption of open access and institutional repositories: a contextual study of an institutional repository. Information Research: An International Electronic Journal, 22(4). Retrieved from http://www.informationr.net/ir/22-4/rails/rails1608.htmlSearch in Google Scholar
National Science Foundation (2014). Reducing investigators’ administrative workload for federally funded research. Report by the National Science Board. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation.Search in Google Scholar
Nentwich, M., König, R. (2014). Academia goes Facebook? The potential of social network sites in the scholarly realm. In Opening science (pp. 107-124). Springer International Publishing.10.1007/978-3-319-00026-8_7Search in Google Scholar
Niyazov, Y., Vogel, C., Price, R., Lund, B., Judd, D., Akil, A., Mortonson, M., Schwartzman, J., Shron, M. (2016). Open access meets discoverability: Citations to articles posted to Academia.edu. PloS one, 11(2), 1-23.10.1371/journal.pone.0148257Search in Google Scholar
Odell, J., Coates, H., Palmer, K. (2016). Rewarding open access scholarship in promotion and tenure: Driving institutional change. College & Research Libraries News, 77(7), 322-325.10.5860/crln.77.7.9518Search in Google Scholar
Ortega, J. L. (2015). Disciplinary differences in the use of academic social networking sites. Online Information Review, 39(4), 520-536.10.1108/OIR-03-2015-0093Search in Google Scholar
Peekhaus, W., Proferes, N. (2015). How library and information science faculty perceive and engage with open access. Journal of Information Science, 41(5), 640-661.10.1177/0165551515587855Search in Google Scholar
Ren, X. (2015). The quandary between communication and certification: Individual academics’ views on Open Access and open scholarship. Online Information Review, 39(5), 682-697.10.1108/OIR-04-2015-0129Search in Google Scholar
Rodriguez, J. E. (2014). Awareness and attitudes about open access publishing: A glance at generational differences. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 40(6), 604-610.10.1016/j.acalib.2014.07.013Search in Google Scholar
Serrano-Vicente, R., Melero, R., Abadal, E. (2016). Open Access Awareness and Perceptions in an Institutional Landscape. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 42(5), 595-603.10.1016/j.acalib.2016.07.002Search in Google Scholar
Singson, M., Joy, M. G., Thiyagarajan, S., Dkhar, V. (2015). Perceptions of open access publishing by Faculty at Pondicherry University: A survey. International Information & Library Review, 47(1-2), 1-10.10.1080/10572317.2015.1021625Search in Google Scholar
Stewart, B. E. (2015). In abundance: Networked participatory practices as scholarship. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 16(3), 318-340.10.19173/irrodl.v16i3.2158Search in Google Scholar
Stokker, J. (2011). Open access: a widening agenda - an Australian perspective. Paper presented at the IATUL 2011 Conference, Warsaw, Poland. Retrieved from http://docs.lib.purdue.edu/iatul/2011/papers/14/ (Archived by WebCite® at http://www.webcitation.org/6xGdDJzwH)Search in Google Scholar
Suber, P. (2017). Why Is Open Access Moving So Slowly In The Humanities? Retrieved September 27, 2017, from https://blogapaonline.org/2017/06/08/open-access-in-the-humanities-part-2/ (Archived by WebCite® at http://www.webcitation.org/6xGcXh34v)Search in Google Scholar
Sugimoto, C. R., Work, S., Larivière, V., Haustein, S. (2017). Scholarly use of social media and altmetrics: A review of the literature. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 68(9), 2037-2062.10.1002/asi.23833Search in Google Scholar
Tenopir, C., Levine, K., Allard, S., Christian, L., Volentine, R., Boehm, R., Nichols, F., Nicholas, D., Jamali, H. R., Herman, E., Watkinson. A. (2016). Trustworthiness and Authority of Scholarly Information in a Digital Age: Results of an International Questionnaire. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 67(10), 2344-2361.10.1002/asi.23598Search in Google Scholar
Tomaszewski, R., Poulin, S., MacDonald, K. I. (2013). Publishing in discipline-specific open access journals: opportunities and outreach for librarians. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 39(1), 61-66.10.1016/j.acalib.2012.11.008Search in Google Scholar
University of Technology Sydney (UTS). (2013). Open Access Policy. Retrieved 21 January, 2017, from: http://www.gsu.uts.edu.au/policies/open-access.html (Archived by WebCite® at http://www.webcitation.org/6xGcr9Ns0)Search in Google Scholar
Veletsianos, G. (2016). Social media in academia: Networked scholars. New York, NY: Routledge.10.4324/9781315742298Search in Google Scholar
Van de Velde, E. (2016). Let IR RIP. Retrieved 30 January, 2017, from: http://scitechsociety.blogspot.com.au/2016/07/let-ir-rip.html (Archived by WebCite® at http://www.webcitation.org/6xGd3de8X)Search in Google Scholar
Xia, J. (2007). Assessment of self-archiving in institutional repositories: Across disciplines. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 33(6), 647-654.10.1016/j.acalib.2007.09.020Search in Google Scholar
Zhong, J., Jiang, S. (2016). Institutional repositories in Chinese open access development: Status, progress, and challenges. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 42(6), 739-744.10.1016/j.acalib.2016.06.015Search in Google Scholar
© by Bhuva Narayan, et al., published by De Gruyter
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.
