Skip to content
BY-NC-ND 4.0 license Open Access Published by De Gruyter Open Access December 13, 2018

Scholarly Communication Practices in Humanities and Social Sciences: A Study of Researchers’ Attitudes and Awareness of Open Access

  • Bhuva Narayan EMAIL logo , Edward J. Luca , Belinda Tiffen , Ashley England , Mal Booth and Henry Boateng
From the journal Open Information Science


This paper examines issues relating to the perceptions and adoption of open access (OA) and institutional repositories. Using a survey research design, we collected data from academics and other researchers in the humanities, arts and social sciences (HASS) at a university in Australia. We looked at factors influencing choice of publishers and journal outlets, as well as the use of social media and nontraditional channels for scholarly communication. We used an online questionnaire to collect data and used descriptive statistics to analyse the data. Our findings suggest that researchers are highly influenced by traditional measures of quality, such as journal impact factor, and are less concerned with making their work more findable and promoting it through social media. This highlights a disconnect between researchers’ desired outcomes and the efforts that they put in toward the same. Our findings also suggest that institutional policies have the potential to increase OA awareness and adoption. This study contributes to the growing literature on scholarly communication by offering evidence from the HASS field, where limited studies have been conducted. Based on the findings, we recommend that academic librarians engage with faculty through outreach and workshops to change perceptions of OA and the institutional repository.


Association of College & Research Libraries (2003). Principles and Strategies for the Reform of Scholarly Communication 1. Retrieved from (Archived by WebCite® at in Google Scholar

Al-Aufi, A., Fulton, C. (2015). Impact of social networking tools on scholarly communication: A cross-institutional study. The Electronic Library, 33(2), 224-241.10.1108/EL-05-2013-0093Search in Google Scholar

Armstrong, M. (2014). Institutional repository management models that support faculty research dissemination. OCLC Systems & Services, 30(1), 43-51.10.1108/OCLC-07-2013-0028Search in Google Scholar

Atiso, K., Adkins, D., Borteye Mensah, E. (2017). Knowledge of Open Access Journals Among Research Scientists in Ghana. The Serials Librarian, 73(3-4), 327-337.10.1080/0361526X.2017.1376730Search in Google Scholar

Bell, S., Fried Foster, N., Gibbons, S. (2005). Reference librarians and the success of institutional repositories. Reference Services Review, 33(3), 283-290.10.1108/00907320510611311Search in Google Scholar

Bongiovani, P. C., Guarnieri, G., Babini, D., Lopez, F. A. (2014). Acceso abierto en la Universidad Nacional de Rosario necesidades y practicas de los docentes/ investigadores. Informacion, Cultura y Sociedad, 30, 13-34.Search in Google Scholar

Butterwick, S., Dawson, J. (2005,). Undone business: Examining the production of academic labour. Women’s Studies International Forum, 28(1), 51-65.10.1016/j.wsif.2005.02.004Search in Google Scholar

Creaser, C., Fry, J., Greenwood, H., Oppenheim, C., Probets, S., Spezi, V., White, S. (2010). Authors’ awareness and attitudes toward open access repositories. New Review of Academic Librarianship, 16(S1), 145-161.10.1080/13614533.2010.518851Search in Google Scholar

Crow, R. (2002). The Case for Institutional Repositories: A SPARC Position Paper. Association of Research Libraries, no. 223 (August 2002): 1-4. (Archived by WebCite® at in Google Scholar

Cullen, R., Chawner, B. (2011). Institutional repositories, open access, and scholarly communication: a study of conflicting paradigms. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 37(6), 460-470.10.1016/j.acalib.2011.07.002Search in Google Scholar

Donelan, H. (2016). Social media for professional development and networking opportunities in academia. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 40(5), 706-729.10.1080/0309877X.2015.1014321Search in Google Scholar

Dulle, F. W., M. K. Minishi-Majanja, L. M. Cloete, (2011). The Adoption of Open Access Scholarly Communication in Tanzanian Public Universities: Some Influencing Factors. Mousaion 29(1), 112-135.Search in Google Scholar

Elsayed, A. M. (2016). The use of academic social networks among Arab researchers: A survey. Social Science Computer Review, 34(3), 378-391.10.1177/0894439315589146Search in Google Scholar

Fruin, C., Sutton, S. (2016). Strategies for success: open access policies at North American educational institutions. College & Research Libraries, 77(4), 469-499.10.5860/crl.77.4.469Search in Google Scholar

Goodfellow, R. (2013). Scholarly, digital, open: an impossible triangle?. Research in Learning Technology, 21, 1-15.Search in Google Scholar

Greenhow, C., Gleason, B. (2014). Social scholarship: Reconsidering scholarly practices in the age of social media. British Journal of Educational Technology, 45(3), 392-402.10.1111/bjet.12150Search in Google Scholar

Gruzd, A., Goertzen, M. (2013). Wired academia: Why social science scholars are using social media. In: Proceedings of the 46th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS) (pp. 3332-3341). Piscataway, NJ: IEEE.Search in Google Scholar

Jain, P., Bentley, G. Oladiran, M.T. (2009). The role of institutional repository in digital scholarly communications”. In: African Digital Scholarship and Curation Conference (pp. 12-14).Search in Google Scholar

Jamali, H. R., Nicholas, D., Herman, E. (2016). Scholarly reputation in the digital age and the role of emerging platforms and mechanisms. Research Evaluation, 25(1), 37-49.10.1093/reseval/rvv032Search in Google Scholar

Johnson, R. (2002). Institutional repositories: partnering with faculty to enhance scholarly communication. D-Lib Magazine, 8(11), in Google Scholar

Kennan, M. A. (2008). Reassembling scholarly publishing: open access, institutional repositories and the process of change (PhD thesis). Sydney: The University of New South Wales. Retrieved from in Google Scholar

Kim, J. (2007). Motivating and impeding factors affecting faculty contribution to institutional repositories. Journal of Digital Information, 8(2), jodi/article/ view/193/177Search in Google Scholar

Kim, J. (2011). Motivations of faculty self-archiving in institutional repositories. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 37(3), 246-254.10.1016/j.acalib.2011.02.017Search in Google Scholar

Luca, E., Narayan, B. (2016). Redesigning the open-access institutional repository: A user experience approach. In A. Morishima, A. Rauber, & C. li Liew (Eds.), Lecture Notes in Computer Science (pp. 275-281). Berlin: Springer Verlag.Search in Google Scholar

Lwoga, E. T., Questier, F. (2015). Open access behaviours and perceptions of health sciences faculty and roles of information professionals. Health Information & Libraries Journal, 32(1), 37-49.10.1111/hir.12094Search in Google Scholar

Manca, S., Ranieri, M. (2017). Exploring Digital Scholarship. A Study on Use of Social Media for Scholarly Communication among Italian Academics. In Esposito A. (Ed.), Research 2.0 and the Impact of Digital Technologies on Scholarly Inquiry (pp. 116-141). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.Search in Google Scholar

Marsh, R. M. (2015). The role of institutional repositories in developing the communication of scholarly research. OCLC Systems & Services: International digital library perspectives, 31(4), 163-195.10.1108/OCLC-04-2014-0022Search in Google Scholar

Mercer, H. (2011). Almost halfway there: An analysis of the open access behaviors of academic librarians. College & Research Libraries, 72(5), 443-453.10.5860/crl-167Search in Google Scholar

Narayan, B., Luca, E. (2017). Issues and challenges in researchers’ adoption of open access and institutional repositories: a contextual study of an institutional repository. Information Research: An International Electronic Journal, 22(4). Retrieved from in Google Scholar

National Science Foundation (2014). Reducing investigators’ administrative workload for federally funded research. Report by the National Science Board. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation.Search in Google Scholar

Nentwich, M., König, R. (2014). Academia goes Facebook? The potential of social network sites in the scholarly realm. In Opening science (pp. 107-124). Springer International Publishing.10.1007/978-3-319-00026-8_7Search in Google Scholar

Niyazov, Y., Vogel, C., Price, R., Lund, B., Judd, D., Akil, A., Mortonson, M., Schwartzman, J., Shron, M. (2016). Open access meets discoverability: Citations to articles posted to PloS one, 11(2), 1-23.10.1371/journal.pone.0148257Search in Google Scholar

Odell, J., Coates, H., Palmer, K. (2016). Rewarding open access scholarship in promotion and tenure: Driving institutional change. College & Research Libraries News, 77(7), 322-325.10.5860/crln.77.7.9518Search in Google Scholar

Ortega, J. L. (2015). Disciplinary differences in the use of academic social networking sites. Online Information Review, 39(4), 520-536.10.1108/OIR-03-2015-0093Search in Google Scholar

Peekhaus, W., Proferes, N. (2015). How library and information science faculty perceive and engage with open access. Journal of Information Science, 41(5), 640-661.10.1177/0165551515587855Search in Google Scholar

Ren, X. (2015). The quandary between communication and certification: Individual academics’ views on Open Access and open scholarship. Online Information Review, 39(5), 682-697.10.1108/OIR-04-2015-0129Search in Google Scholar

Rodriguez, J. E. (2014). Awareness and attitudes about open access publishing: A glance at generational differences. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 40(6), 604-610.10.1016/j.acalib.2014.07.013Search in Google Scholar

Serrano-Vicente, R., Melero, R., Abadal, E. (2016). Open Access Awareness and Perceptions in an Institutional Landscape. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 42(5), 595-603.10.1016/j.acalib.2016.07.002Search in Google Scholar

Singson, M., Joy, M. G., Thiyagarajan, S., Dkhar, V. (2015). Perceptions of open access publishing by Faculty at Pondicherry University: A survey. International Information & Library Review, 47(1-2), 1-10.10.1080/10572317.2015.1021625Search in Google Scholar

Stewart, B. E. (2015). In abundance: Networked participatory practices as scholarship. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 16(3), 318-340.10.19173/irrodl.v16i3.2158Search in Google Scholar

Stokker, J. (2011). Open access: a widening agenda - an Australian perspective. Paper presented at the IATUL 2011 Conference, Warsaw, Poland. Retrieved from (Archived by WebCite® at in Google Scholar

Suber, P. (2017). Why Is Open Access Moving So Slowly In The Humanities? Retrieved September 27, 2017, from (Archived by WebCite® at in Google Scholar

Sugimoto, C. R., Work, S., Larivière, V., Haustein, S. (2017). Scholarly use of social media and altmetrics: A review of the literature. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 68(9), 2037-2062.10.1002/asi.23833Search in Google Scholar

Tenopir, C., Levine, K., Allard, S., Christian, L., Volentine, R., Boehm, R., Nichols, F., Nicholas, D., Jamali, H. R., Herman, E., Watkinson. A. (2016). Trustworthiness and Authority of Scholarly Information in a Digital Age: Results of an International Questionnaire. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 67(10), 2344-2361.10.1002/asi.23598Search in Google Scholar

Tomaszewski, R., Poulin, S., MacDonald, K. I. (2013). Publishing in discipline-specific open access journals: opportunities and outreach for librarians. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 39(1), 61-66.10.1016/j.acalib.2012.11.008Search in Google Scholar

University of Technology Sydney (UTS). (2013). Open Access Policy. Retrieved 21 January, 2017, from: (Archived by WebCite® at in Google Scholar

Veletsianos, G. (2016). Social media in academia: Networked scholars. New York, NY: Routledge.10.4324/9781315742298Search in Google Scholar

Van de Velde, E. (2016). Let IR RIP. Retrieved 30 January, 2017, from: (Archived by WebCite® at in Google Scholar

Xia, J. (2007). Assessment of self-archiving in institutional repositories: Across disciplines. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 33(6), 647-654.10.1016/j.acalib.2007.09.020Search in Google Scholar

Zhong, J., Jiang, S. (2016). Institutional repositories in Chinese open access development: Status, progress, and challenges. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 42(6), 739-744.10.1016/j.acalib.2016.06.015Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2018-02-16
Accepted: 2018-11-01
Published Online: 2018-12-13
Published in Print: 2018-12-01

© by Bhuva Narayan, et al., published by De Gruyter

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.

Downloaded on 30.11.2023 from
Scroll to top button