Skip to content
BY 4.0 license Open Access Published by De Gruyter Open Access March 31, 2020

Intellectual Freedom and Social Justice: Tensions Between Core Values in American Librarianship

  • Emily J. M. Knox EMAIL logo
From the journal Open Information Science

Abstract

Over the past few years, tensions between two core values in U.S. librarianship, intellectual freedom and social justice, have roiled the profession. This conflict was most recently seen in the insertion and subsequent removal of “hate groups” to the list of entities that cannot be denied access to library meeting rooms in the American Library Association’s Meeting Rooms Interpretation of the Library Bill of Rights. This paper is intended to provide context for this conflict. It begins by situating its arguments within ethical philosophy, specifically the study of values or axiology. It then provides an overview of the theoretical foundations of the values of liberalism. Next, the paper discusses the values of truth and freedom from harm in librarianship. Finally, it suggests that a fuller understanding of the library’s place within the public sphere is a possible model for mitigating the tensions currently found in American librarianship. The paper is intended to provide a theoretical foundation for further research.

References

Allen, D. S. (2015). Reconceiving public spheres: The flow dynamics model. In Allen, Danielle S & J. S. Light (Eds.), From voice to influence: Understanding citizenship in a digital age (pp. 178–207). Chicago; London: The University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar

Anderson, E. S. (1999). What is the point of equality? Ethics, 109(2), 287–337. https://doi.org/10.1086/23389710.1086/233897Search in Google Scholar

Anderson, J. (2018). Intellectual freedom equals individual freedom. Journal of Information Ethics, 27(2), 7-12.Search in Google Scholar

Black, R. (2016, December 28). The Difference Between Liberal and Progressive. Retrieved November 2, 2019, from The 2020 Progressive website: https://the2020progressive.com/difference-liberal-progressive/Search in Google Scholar

Budd, J. (2017). Six issues facing libraries today: Critical perspectives. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Search in Google Scholar

Budd, J. M. (2006). Toward a practical and normative ethics for librarianship. The Library Quarterly, 76(3), 251–269. https://doi.org/10.1086/51114010.1086/511140Search in Google Scholar

Buschman, J. (2005). On libraries and the public sphere. Library Philosophy and Practice, 7(2).Search in Google Scholar

Critical Librarianship: An interview with Toni Samek. (2007, November 14). Retrieved November 2, 2019, from Intellectual Freedom Committee—BCALA: https://bclaifc.wordpress.com/2007/11/13/critical-librarianship-an-interview-with-toni-samek/Search in Google Scholar

Farkas, M. (2018). When Values Collide: Reconciling our commitments when hate speech is involved. American Libraries, 49(11/12), 54.Search in Google Scholar

Findlay, J. N. (1973). Axiological Ethics. London: Macmillan.Search in Google Scholar

Freeden, M. (2015). Liberalism: A Very Short Introduction. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Frické, M., Mathiesen, K., & Fallis, D. (2000). The ethical presuppositions behind the Library Bill of Rights. The Library Quarterly, 70(4), 468–491. https://doi.org/10.1086/60321810.1086/603218Search in Google Scholar

Gorman, M. (2015). Our Enduring Values Revisited: Librarianship in an Ever-changing World. Chicago, IL: American Library Association.Search in Google Scholar

Grady, C. (2017, January 3). Milo Yiannopoulos’s book deal with Simon & Schuster, explained—Vox. Retrieved from https://www.vox.com/culture/2017/1/3/14119080/milo-yiannopoulos-book-deal-simon-schuster-dangerous-boycottSearch in Google Scholar

Hart, S. L. (1971). Axiology—Theory of values. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 32(1), 29–41. https://doi.org/10.2307/210588310.2307/2105883Search in Google Scholar

Jaeger, P. T., Gorham, U., Bertot, J. C., & Sarin, L. C. (2014). Public Libraries, Public Policies, and Political Processes: Serving and Transforming Communities in Times of Economic and Political Constraint. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Search in Google Scholar

Jaeger, P. T., Shilton, K., & Koepfler, J. (2016). The rise of social justice as a guiding principle in library and information science research. The Library Quarterly, 86(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1086/68414210.1086/684142Search in Google Scholar

Jensen, R. (2004). The myth of the neutral professional. Progressive Librarian, 24, 28–34.Search in Google Scholar

Keer, G., & Bussmann, J. D. (2019). A case for a critical information ethics. Journal of Critical Library and Information Studies, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.24242/jclis.v2i1.5710.24242/jclis.v2i1.57Search in Google Scholar

Lau, A. J., Sellie, A., & Day, R. E. (2017). Why is the Journal of Critical Library and Information Studies needed today? Journal of Critical Library and Information Studies, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.24242/jclis.v1i1.4810.24242/jclis.v1i1.48Search in Google Scholar

Mill, J. S. (2011). On liberty. London: Penguin Classics. (Original work published 1859) https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO978113914978510.1017/CBO9781139149785Search in Google Scholar

Miller, D. E. (2019). Harriet Taylor Mill. In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2019). Retrieved January 11, 2020, from <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2019/entries/harriet-millSearch in Google Scholar

Nugent, W. (2010). Progressivism: A Very Short Introduction. Retrieved from http://www.myilibrary.com?id=233496Search in Google Scholar

O’Neill, J. (2016). Socialism. In Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy (1st ed.). https://doi.org/10.4324/9780415249126-S058-110.4324/9780415249126-S058-1Search in Google Scholar

Rawls, J. (2004). On justice as fairness. In M. Clayton & A. Williams (Eds.), Social Justice (pp. 49–84). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.Search in Google Scholar

Samek, T. (2001). Intellectual Freedom and Social Responsibility in American librarianship: 1967-1974. Jefferson, N.C.: McFarland.Search in Google Scholar

Shockey, K. (2016). Intellectual freedom is not social justice. Progressive Librarian, (44), 101–110.Search in Google Scholar

Smith, B., & Thomas, A. (2016). Axiology. In Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy (1st ed.). https://doi.org/10.4324/9780415249126-L120-110.4324/9780415249126-L120-1Search in Google Scholar

Snyder v. Phelps., No. 09–751 (U.S. Supreme Court March 2, 2011).Search in Google Scholar

Thomas, A. (2016). Values. In Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy (1st ed.). https://doi.org/10.4324/9780415249126-L110-110.4324/9780415249126-L110-1Search in Google Scholar

Waldron, J. (1987). Theoretical foundations of liberalism. The Philosophical Quarterly, 37(147), 127–150. https://doi.org/10.2307/222033410.2307/2220334Search in Google Scholar

Waldron, J. (1998). Liberalism. In Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy (1st ed.). https://doi.org/10.4324/9780415249126-S035-110.4324/9780415249126-S035-1Search in Google Scholar

Ward, D. V. (1990). Philosophical issues in censorship and intellectual freedom. Library Trends, 39(1/2), 83–91.Search in Google Scholar

Weindling, J. (2019, March 5). What’s the Difference Between a Liberal and a Progressive? Paste Magazine. Retrieved from https://www.pastemagazine.com/articles/2019/03/what-the-difference-between-liberals-and-progressi.htmlSearch in Google Scholar

Wilentz, S. (2018). Fighting Words. Democracy: A Journal of Ideas, 48. https://democracyjournal.org/magazine/48/fighting-words/Search in Google Scholar

Young, C. (2019, March 22). Yes, liberal democracy is struggling, and the progressive left isn’t helping. The Washington Post. Retrieved from https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2019/03/22/yes-liberal-democracy-is-struggling-progressive-left-isnt-helping/Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2019-11-03
Accepted: 2020-01-29
Published Online: 2020-03-31

© 2020 Emily J. M. Knox, published by De Gruyter

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Downloaded on 6.6.2023 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/opis-2020-0001/html
Scroll to top button