Skip to content
BY 4.0 license Open Access Published by De Gruyter Open Access December 31, 2020

Co-Designing Visualizations for Information Seeking and Knowledge Management

  • Marian Dörk EMAIL logo , Boris Müller , Jan-Erik Stange , Johannes Herseni and Katja Dittrich
From the journal Open Information Science

Abstract

Creativity is a crucial factor in finding novel and useful visualization and interaction techniques, but its emergence is contingent on the right conditions. The focus of visualization research has traditionally been on techniques, and to a lesser degree on the process of creating them with domain experts and end users. This paper focuses on the collaborative design of visualizations for information seeking and knowledge management. The difficult, yet common challenge in any visualization project is to find meaningful visual representations and useful interaction techniques to carry out complex analysis tasks. The unique difficulty for preparing co-design activities for visualization lies in the gap between the abstract nature of data and the concrete form of visual representations. To bridge this gap, our co-design framework for visualization places particular emphasis on actors, activities, and artifacts as categories that expand the focus of visualization design beyond the traditional triad of users, tasks, and data. Drawing from general co-design principles, the framework is developed and validated during the course of two case studies in the context of information management systems and library collection databases. Based on observed patterns during the case studies, practical tactics provide advice on carrying out co-design in information visualization.

References

Al-Kodmany, K. (1999). Using visualization techniques for enhancing public participation in planning and design: Process, implementation, and evaluation. Landscape and Urban Planning, 45(1), 37–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(99)00024-910.1016/S0169-2046(99)00024-9Search in Google Scholar

Bertin, J. (1983). Semiology of Graphics: Diagrams, Networks, Maps, chapter 7: The Properties of the Graphic System, pages 40–97. University of Wisconsin Press.Search in Google Scholar

Bostock, M., Ogievetsky, V., & Heer, J. (2011). D3: Data-driven documents. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 17(12), 2301–2309. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2011.18510.1109/TVCG.2011.185Search in Google Scholar

Boy, J., Detienne, F., & Fekete, J.-D. (2015). Storytelling in information visualizations: Does it engage users to explore data? In CHI ’15: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pages 1449–1458. ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.270245210.1145/2702123.2702452Search in Google Scholar

Bødker, S. (1996). Creating conditions for participation: Conflicts and resources in systems development. Human-Computer Interaction, 11(3), 215–236. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327051hci1103_210.1207/s15327051hci1103_2Search in Google Scholar

Brehmer, M. and Munzner, T. (2013). A multi-level typology of abstract visualization tasks. Visualization and Computer Graphics, IEEE Transactions on, 19(12):2376–2385. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2013.12410.1109/TVCG.2013.124Search in Google Scholar

Brehmer, M., Ingram, S., Stray, J., & Munzner, T. (2014). Overview: The design, adoption, and analysis of a visual document mining tool for investigative journalists. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 20(12), 2271–2280. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2014.234643110.1109/TVCG.2014.2346431Search in Google Scholar

Cockburn, A., & Highsmith, J. (2001). Agile software development, the people factor. Computer, 34(11), 131–133. https://doi.org/10.1109/2.96345010.1109/2.963450Search in Google Scholar

Cross, N. (2001). Designerly ways of knowing: Design discipline versus design science. Design Issues, 17(3), 49–55. https://doi.org/10.1162/07479360175035719610.1162/074793601750357196Search in Google Scholar

De Couvreur, L., Dejonghe, W., Detand, J., & Goossens, R. (2013). The role of subjective well-being in co-designing open-design assistive devices. International Journal of Design, 7(3), 57–70.Search in Google Scholar

Dove, G., Jones, S., Dykes, J., Brown, A., & Duffy, A. (2013). Using data visualization in creativity workshops: a new tool in the designer’s kit. In Proceedings of the 9th ACM Conference on Creativity & Cognition, pages 304–307. ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/2466627.246666510.1145/2466627.2466665Search in Google Scholar

Drucker, J. (2013). Performative materiality and theoretical approaches to interface. digital humanities quarterly, 7(1).Search in Google Scholar

Fallman, D. (2003). Design-oriented human-computer interaction. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, pages 225–232. ACM.10.1145/642611.642652Search in Google Scholar

Fischer, G., & Ostwald, J. (2002). Seeding, evolutionary growth, and reseeding: Enriching participatory design with informed participation. In Participatory Design Conference 2002, pages 135–143.Search in Google Scholar

Fischer, G. (2003). Meta—design: Beyond user-centered and participatory design. Proceedings of HCI International, 4:88–92.Search in Google Scholar

Goodwin, S., Dykes, J., Jones, S., Dillingham, I., Dove, G., Duffy, A., Kachkaev, A., Slingsby, A., & Wood, J. (2013). Creative user-centered visualization design for energy analysts and modelers. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 19(12), 2516–2525. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2013.14510.1109/TVCG.2013.145Search in Google Scholar

Hartwick, J., & Barki, H. (1994). Explaining the role of user participation in information system use. Management Science, 40(4), 440–465. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.40.4.44010.1287/mnsc.40.4.440Search in Google Scholar

Herring, S. R., Chang, C.-C., Krantzler, J., & Bailey, B. P. (2009). Getting inspired! Understanding How and Why Examples are Used in Creative Design Practice. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, pages 87–96. ACM.10.1145/1518701.1518717Search in Google Scholar

Hinrichs, U., Forlini, S., & Moynihan, B. (2016). Speculative practices: Utilizing infovis to explore untapped literary collections. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 22(1), 429–438. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2015.246745210.1109/TVCG.2015.2467452Search in Google Scholar

Hullman, J., Drucker, S., Henry Riche, N., Lee, B., Fisher, D., & Adar, E. (2013). A deeper understanding of sequence in narrative visualization. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 19(12), 2406–2415. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2013.11910.1109/TVCG.2013.119Search in Google Scholar

Huron, S., Jansen, Y., & Carpendale, S. (2014). Constructing visual representations: Investigating the use of tangible tokens. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 20(12), 2102–2111. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2014.234629210.1109/TVCG.2014.2346292Search in Google Scholar

ISO 9241-210:2019 (2019). Ergonomics of human-system interaction – Part 210: Human-centred design for interactive systems. Standard, International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, CH.Search in Google Scholar

Jänicke, S., Franzini, G., Cheema, M. F., & Scheuermann, G. (2015). On close and distant reading in digital humanities: A survey and future challenges. Eurographics Conference on Visualization (EuroVis) - STARs, pages 83—103.Search in Google Scholar

Kerracher, N., Kennedy, J., & Chalmers, K. (2015). A task taxonomy for temporal graph visualisation. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 21(10), 1160–1172. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2015.242488910.1109/TVCG.2015.2424889Search in Google Scholar

Cetina, K. K. (1997). Sociality with objects: Social relations in postsocial knowledge societies. Theory, Culture & Society, 14(4), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/02632769701400400110.1177/026327697014004001Search in Google Scholar

Koch, S., John, M., Wörner, M., Müller, A., & Ertl, T. (2014). VarifocalReader—In-Depth Visual Analysis of Large Text Documents. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 20(12), 1723–1732. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2014.234667710.1109/TVCG.2014.2346677Search in Google Scholar

Lam, H., Tory, M., & Munzner, T. (2018). Bridging from goals to tasks with design study analysis reports. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 24(1), 435–445. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2017.274431910.1109/TVCG.2017.2744319Search in Google Scholar

McCurdy, N., Dykes, J., & Meyer, M. (2016). Action design research and visualization design. In Proceedings of the Sixth Workshop on Beyond Time and Errors on Novel Evaluation Methods for Visualization, BELIV ’16, pages 10–18. ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/2993901.299391610.1145/2993901.2993916Search in Google Scholar

McKenna, S., Mazur, D., Agutter, J., & Meyer, M. (2014). Design activity framework for visualization design. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 20(12), 2191–2200. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2014.234633110.1109/TVCG.2014.2346331Search in Google Scholar

Meyer, M., Munzner, T., & Pfister, H. (2009). MizBee: A multiscale synteny browser. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 15(6), 897–904. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2009.16710.1109/TVCG.2009.167Search in Google Scholar

Meyer, M., Sedlmair, M., Quinan, P. S., & Munzner, T. (2015). The nested blocks and guidelines model. Information Visualization, 14(3), 234–249. https://doi.org/10.1177/147387161351042910.1177/1473871613510429Search in Google Scholar

Muller, M. J., & Kuhn, S. (1993). Participatory design. Communications of the ACM, 36(6), 24–28. https://doi.org/10.1145/153571.25596010.1145/153571.255960Search in Google Scholar

Muller, M. J., & Druin, A. (2002). Participatory design: the third space in hci. In J. J. A. Sears (Ed.), The human-computer interaction handbook: Fundamentals, evolving technologies and emerging applications (pp. 1051–1068). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Search in Google Scholar

Munzner, T. (2009). A nested model for visualization design and validation. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 15(6), 921–928. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2009.11110.1109/TVCG.2009.111Search in Google Scholar

Nielsen, C. B., Jackman, S. D., Birol, I., & Jones, S. J. (2009). ABySS-Explorer: Visualizing genome sequence assemblies. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 15(6), 881–888. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2009.11610.1109/TVCG.2009.116Search in Google Scholar

Pirinen, A., (2016). The barriers and enablers of co-design for services. International Journal of Design, 10(3), 27–42.Search in Google Scholar

Prahalad, C. K., & Ramaswamy, V. (2004). Co-creation experiences: The next practice in value creation. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 18(3), 5–14. https://doi.org/10.1002/dir.2001510.1002/dir.20015Search in Google Scholar

Pretorius, J., Purchase, H. C., & Stasko, J. T. (2014). Tasks for multivariate network analysis. In Multivariate Network Visualization (pp. 77–95). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06793-3_510.1007/978-3-319-06793-3_5Search in Google Scholar

van Rijn, H., & Stappers, P. J. (2008). Expressions of ownership: motivating users in a co-design process. In Proceedings of the Tenth Anniversary Conference on Participatory Design 2008, pages 178–181. Indiana University.Search in Google Scholar

Rind, A., Aigner, W., Wagner, M., Miksch, S., & Lammarsch, T. (2014). User tasks for evaluation: untangling the terminology throughout visualization design and development. In Proceedings of the Fifth Workshop on Beyond Time and Errors: Novel Evaluation Methods for Visualization, pages 9–15. ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/2669557.266956810.1145/2669557.2669568Search in Google Scholar

Sanders, E. B.-N., & Stappers, P. J. (2008). Co-creation and the new landscapes of design. CoDesign, 4(1), 5–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/1571088070187506810.1080/15710880701875068Search in Google Scholar

Sanders, E. B.-N., & Stappers, P. J. (2014). Probes, toolkits and prototypes: Three approaches to making in codesigning. CoDesign, 10(1), 5–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2014.88818310.1080/15710882.2014.888183Search in Google Scholar

Saraiya, P., North, C., & Duca, K. (2005). An insight-based methodology for evaluating bioinformatics visualizations. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 11(4), 443–456. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2005.5310.1109/TVCG.2005.53Search in Google Scholar

Schulz, H.-J., Nocke, T., Heitzler, M., & Schumann, H. (2013). A design space of visualization tasks. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 19(12), 2366–2375. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2013.12010.1109/TVCG.2013.120Search in Google Scholar

Sedlmair, M., Meyer, M., & Munzner, T. (2012). Design study methodology: Reflections from the trenches and the stacks. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 18(12), 2431–2440. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2012.21310.1109/TVCG.2012.213Search in Google Scholar

Segel, E., & Heer, J. (2010). Narrative visualization: Telling stories with data. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 16(6), 1139–1148. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2010.17910.1109/TVCG.2010.179Search in Google Scholar

Steen, M., Manschot, M., & De Koning, N. (2011). Benefits of co-design in service design projects. International Journal of Design, 5(2).Search in Google Scholar

Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2004). Evolving to a new dominant logic for marketing. Journal of Marketing, 68(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.68.1.1.2403610.1509/jmkg.68.1.1.24036Search in Google Scholar

Viégas, F. B., Wattenberg, M., van Ham, F., Kriss, J., & McKeon, M. (2007). ManyEyes: A site for visualization at internet scale. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 13(6), 1121–1128. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2007.7057710.1109/TVCG.2007.70577Search in Google Scholar

Viégas, F. B., Wattenberg, M., & Feinberg, J. (2009). Participatory visualization with Wordle. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 15(6), 1137–1144. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2009.17110.1109/TVCG.2009.171Search in Google Scholar

Visser, F. S., Stappers, P. J., Van der Lugt, R., & Sanders, E. B. (2005). Contextmapping: Experiences from practice. CoDesign, 1(2), 119–149. https://doi.org/10.1080/1571088050013598710.1080/15710880500135987Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2020-04-28
Accepted: 2020-08-29
Published Online: 2020-12-31

© 2020 Marian Dörk et al., published by De Gruyter

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Downloaded on 5.3.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/opis-2020-0102/html
Scroll to top button